Comparison of Prevalence, Presentation, and Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndromes in ≤35 years, 36 - 54 years, and ≥ 55 years Patients

Whether very young patients (≤35-year-old) differ in the prevalence, presentation and prognosis of ACS is not well known. Of 43,446 patients who were referred to a tertiary care cardiac catheterization laboratory between January 1, 2006 and June 30, 2017, 26,545 patients were ACS (defined as ST Elevation MI, Non-ST Elevation MI or unstable angina pectoris). Detailed chart review was performed and characteristics at baseline were compared for ages ≤35 years, ages 36 to 54 years and ages ≥55 years. A total of 291 (1.1%) were ≤35-year-old, 7,649 (28.8) were 36 to 54-year-old and 18,605 (70.1%) were ≥55-year-old. ACS patients aged ≤35-year-old, were more likely to be men, Caucasian white, smoker, obese, and have family history of coronary artery disease and less likely to have comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia compared with older patients. They were also more likely to present with elevated troponin levels than other groups. They also tended to present with late ST elevation myocardial infarction and were more likely to receive bare metal stents than older patients. The prevalence of 2- and 3-vessel disease was lower compared with older patients. They also had higher prevalence of cardiogenic shock. Compared with 36 to 54-year-old patients, ≤35-year-old were at significant higher risk of 30-day mortality in a multivariable adjusted regression model (Odds ratio 5.65, 95% confidence interval 2.49 to 12.82, p <0.001). Very young patients comprised ∼1% of all ACS cases but had much more prevalence of modifiable risk factors and significantly worse mortality. Modifying these risk factors may mitigate the risk in these patients and should be studied in the future.

Prevalence of smoking in the Kuwaiti adult population in 2014: a cross-sectional study

The study objective was to assess tobacco smoking prevalence in Kuwaiti adults in relation to sociodemographic characteristics. A cross-sectional study survey was conducted in 2014 on 3917 Kuwaiti citizens (18-69 years) following the World Health Organization (WHO) STEPwise Approach to Surveillance (STEPS) methodology. The study assessed prevalence of self-reported ever-smoking or currently smoking tobacco products and exposure to secondhand smoke in relation to demographic and smoking-related characteristics. The prevalence of "ever smoker" in men and women was 49.9% and 4.4%, respectively, whereas the prevalence of "current smoker" was 39.2% and 3.3%, respectively. Sex (adjusted OR [AOR], 19.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0-28.3], male versus female) was significantly associated with current smoking. Among daily smokers, 87.1% used manufactured cigarettes. The average daily number of manufactured cigarettes for men and women was 21.8 and 13.0, respectively. Mean age at smoking initiation was 17.5 years (95% CI 17.2-17.9). The prevalence of secondhand smoke at home and work was 38.6% and 29.9%, respectively. Half of Kuwaiti men have smoked at some point in their life with most of these being current smokers. Secondhand smoke is a common exposure at home and work, posing serious health risks to the population.

Comparison of clinical features and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction younger than 35 years with those older than 65 years

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics of patients younger than 35 years with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

A total of 117 patients younger than 35 years with AMI admitted to the hospital during the recent 10 years were chosen, and 355 patients older than 65 years with AMI served as a control group. The case history, clinical data, coronary angiography and prognosis of the patients were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

Among the younger patients with AMI, men (96.6%) and those smoking cigarettes (66.7%) account for the majority. ST-segment elevation (69.2%) and anterior wall infarction (43.6%) were more prevalent in the younger patients than in the older patients. Compared with the older patients, the younger patients had a higher level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (2.93 ± 1.48 versus 2.35 ± 1.21, P = 0.0428) and higher left ventricular ejection fraction (59.82 ± 10.86 versus 48.31 ± 12.48, P = 0.0396). Coronary angiography data showed that most of the younger patients were characteristic of having single-vessel lesion (66.7%), left anterior descending artery lesion (69.3%) and coronary artery spasm more than the older patients (6.8% versus 0.56%, P = 0.0001). In addition, the in-hospital mortality, and the prognosis after 1 and 12 months in the younger patients were comparatively better.

CONCLUSIONS

The main risk factors for young adults aged <35 years with AMI include cigarette smoking, hyperlipidemia and family history of coronary artery disease, and smoking cessation and lifestyle improvement are important considerations for the prevention of this disease in this population.

Assessment of high cardiovascular risk profiles for the clinician

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major cardiovascular (CV) risk factor. General Framingham Risk Profile (GFRP) and World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) charts were used to assess CV risk in DM in Oman. The GFRP identified more patients with medium-risk DM; GFRP and WHO/ISH identified essentially equal numbers at very high risk. These were then used to evaluate statin usage in Oman, including economics. Google lists innumerable tools from organizations, hospitals, practitioners, magazines, societies, clinics, and medical associations. The GFRP and WHO/ISH calculations provided useful DM assessment of populations in Oman. Other major risk models are Adult Treatment Panel III, based on Framingham, and Reynolds Risk Score; the latter incorporates other factors such as family history, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin A(1c) (in DM). These models are useful in assessing specific populations. Individual practitioners with limited time may just evaluate patients as low, medium, and high CV risk based on general knowledge and then treat.