Carotid Artery Disease in the Era of Biomarkers: A Pilot Study

The intima-media thickness (IMT) and its irregularities or ulcerations in the common carotid artery (CCA) are useful tools as sentinel biomarkers for the integrity of the cardiovascular system. Total homocysteine and lipoprotein levels are the most commonly used elements in cardiovascular risk stratification. Duplex ultrasound (DUS), associated with serum biomarkers, can be used simply to assess the degree of atherosclerotic disease and cardiovascular risk. This study highlights the role of different kinds of biomarkers, showing their usefulness and potentiality in multi-district atherosclerotic patients, especially for early diagnosis and therapy effectiveness monitoring. A retrospective analysis performed from September 2021 to August 2022, of patients with carotid artery disease, was performed. A total of 341 patients with a mean age of 53.8 years were included in the study. The outcomes showed an increased risk of stroke in patients with significative carotid artery disease, nonresponsive to therapy, monitored through a series of serum biomarkers (homocysteine, C-reactive protein, and oxidized LDL). In this reported experience, the systematic use of DUS in association with the multiple biomarkers approach was effective for the early identification of patients at higher risk of disease progression or inefficient therapy.

Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting With Double-Layer Micromesh Carotid Stent: Contemporary Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Severe carotid stenosis (CS) is a major risk factor for stroke. Carotid Endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard revascularization technique of CS while carotid artery stenting (CAS) is considered an alternative treatment option, especially in high-risk patients or those with relative contraindications to CEA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of CEA and CAS with Roadsaver® stent device.

METHODS

We made a retrospective analysis of 119 patients undergoing treatment of CS. All CS were evaluated with imaging exams. The patients were divided into CEA group and CAS group. As primary endpoints of the study overall and cardiovascular cause - related mortality, freedom from stroke, and restenosis were considered. All patients were followed up and revaluated with duplex scan over a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 36 months (follow-up mean time 22.3 ± 3.4 months).

RESULTS

In the whole cohort 86 of 119 patients underwent CEA and 33 of 119 CAS. Risk factors were superposable in both groups. During follow-up, we observed 4 deaths, 2 cardiovascular events and 12 restenosis. CEA was associated with lower death probability than CAS (P = 0.036). Probability of Restenosis and cardiovascular events did not vary between CAS and CEA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Albeit CEA remains the gold standard for the treatment of severe CS, CAS with new double layer micromesh stent can be considered a useful and safe alternative in some clinical conditions.

Transcervical approach for carotid artery stenting with transitory reversal flow: Case report

Introduction

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been indicated as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy in high risk patients. Sometimes, an aortic arch can be anatomically unfavourable for CAS. Herein we report our experience in a case of CAS with transcervical approach.

Presentation of case

A 77-year-old male was referred to our hospital for severe subtotal occlusion of the left internal carotid artery. He had a past medical history of radiation to the head and neck for laryngeal cancer. Previous CT-angiography had shown a type III aortic with bovine arch. CAS via transcervical approach was performed with transitory reversal flow during the placement of RX Spider Filter 6 Fr (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN). After release of 7 × 30 mm RX Xact carotid stent (Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL) and ballooning with a 5.5 × 30 mm Rx Submarine balloon catheter (Medtronic Minneapolis, MN), angiography check showed a good result.

Discussion

The transcervical approach is an innovative technique where usually a shunt is created, either between the common carotid artery and the internal jugular vein or between the common carotid artery and the common femoral vein. This flow reversal reduces the risk of periprocedural embolic events. In our experience a short proximal clamping with transitory reversal flow, reduces the invasiveness of procedure with good outcomes.

Conclusion

Transcervical carotid access with transitory reversal flow is a valid alternative in complicated patient with anatomy unfit for CAS.

•

Carotid stenting can be an alternative to endarterectomy in high risk patients.

•

Aortic arch can be anatomically unfavourable for Carotid artery stenting.

•

Transcervical approach is a technique suited to patients unfit for stenting.

•

Transcervical access with transitory reversal flow is useful in complicated patient.

Late spontaneous recanalization of symptomatic atheromatous internal carotid artery occlusion

INTRODUCTION

Definitive treatment of symptomatic atheromatous internal carotid artery occlusion remains controversial, as far as in rare cases, late spontaneous recanalization has been seen.

METHODS

We consecutively studied 182 patients (January 2003 to August 2012) with an ischemic stroke in the internal carotid artery territory and diagnosis of atheromatous internal carotid artery occlusion during hospitalization.

FINDINGS

Seven patients presented a late spontaneous recanalization (>3 months) of the internal carotid artery. We described therapeutic attitude according to usual care in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors attempt to highlight the unusual condition of recanalization after a symptomatic atheromatous chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. If these patients can be treated similar to patients with asymptomatic carotid pathology, then this needs to be clarified. However, due to the risk of ipsi- and contralateral ischemic strokes, revascularization techniques should be considered in certain cases. More studies are needed to establish the most appropriate therapeutical approach in order to avoid arbitrary treatment of these patients.