Thromboembolic trapping and anticoagulation dilemma in a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in sinus rhythm: A case report

Severe left ventricular dysfunction and ventricular wall motion abnormalities predispose individuals to thrombosis and thromboembolism. Thromboembolism is one of the main causes of increased mortality in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, regarding thromboembolism due to HFrEF in sinus rhythm, most cases to date have reported ischemic strokes, and repeated embolization of peripheral arteries has been reported not uncommon. Herein, we report the case of a 48-year-old man with a definite diagnosis of sinus rhythm HFrEF and recurrent peripheral arterial embolization within a short period. The condition is caused by severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and abnormal left ventricular wall motion, resulting in blood stasis and abnormal blood composition, with or without left ventricular thrombosis, and can lead to thromboembolism. Current guidelines state that patients with heart failure and clear indication(s) for anticoagulation (e.g., atrial fibrillation, heart valve replacement) should be administered appropriate anticoagulation therapy. However, controversy persists regarding whether patients with HFrEF in sinus rhythm can benefit from anticoagulation therapy. This case highlights the utility and necessity of anticoagulation for the prevention of intracardiac thrombosis and the treatment of peripheral arterial embolism in patients with HFrEF in sinus rhythm.

Anticoagulation in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Sinus Rhythm

Left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and chronic systolic heart failure (HF) predispose to intraventricular thrombus formation and embolization resulting in stroke. Current guideline recommends the use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and history of previous thromboembolism. However, anticoagulant treatment in patients with LV systolic dysfunction with sinus rhythm and without history of previous thromboembolism is still on debate. Recent epidemiologic date has reported increased stroke rate in patients with systolic HF shortly after diagnosis. This review focuses on the possible causes of increased stroke rate shortly after the diagnosis of HF and subsequently suggests a rationale for the use of oral anticoagulant in these patient groups.