A clinical analysis of intestinal mucosal necrosis and exfoliation induced by superior mesenteric vein thrombosis: A case report

Background

Superior mesenteric vein (SMV) thrombosis is a rare intestinal ischemic disease. The clinical manifestations of patients differ, and most experience gastrointestinal symptoms.

Case summary

A 45-year-old female patient presented with persistent abdominal pain and abnormal vaginal bleeding for 7 days. A physical examination revealed significant abdominal tenderness with positive rebound tenderness. A laboratory examination revealed a white blood cell count of 27 × 10⁹/l, hemoglobin level of 52 g/L, and D-dimer of 4.54 mg/l. Enhanced computed tomography revealed a thickening and swelling of the jejunum and ileum in the left upper quadrant and portal vein. Filling defects in the main lumen and branch lumen suggested the possibility of portal vein and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. Symptoms improved after treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin. One month later, the patient developed occasional dull pain in the left lower quadrant, with long strips of discharge. An electronic colonoscopy revealed avascular necrosis and tissue exfoliation of the intestinal mucosa. After the continuation of warfarin therapy, the abdominal pain resolved. Five months later, the patient experienced recurrent abdominal pain and vomiting. A physical examination revealed a blood pressure of 75/49 mm Hg. An incomplete ileus with the portal and superior mesenteric vein thrombosis was diagnosed, partial jejunectomy and gastrointestinal bypass anastomosis were performed, and warfarin was continued postoperatively.

Conclusion

The intestinal mucosal shedding observed, in this case, was caused by SMV thrombosis, which enriched the clinical manifestations of the disease and provided a new basis for the clinical diagnosis of SMV thrombosis.

Basic demographic characteristics and prevalence of comorbidities in acute mesenteric ischemia: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine and assess the basic demographic characteristics and prevalence of comorbidities in acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and its various subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted by using the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar (to June 1, 2022). Random-effects or fixed-effects models were selected to pool means and proportions and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), based on heterogeneity between studies. The results of meta-analyses for basic demographic characteristics and prevalence (proportions) of each specific comorbidities of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) and its various subtypes were described.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, including 17,103 patients with AMI. Furthermore, 7941 patients with subclass diagnoses of AMI were identified, including 3,239 patients with arterial occlusive mesenteric ischemia (AOMI), 2,977 patients with nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI), and 1,725 patients with mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT). As a surgical emergency, AMI is associated with older patients and a high likelihood of multisystem comorbidities. Comorbidities of AMI involved multiple systemic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, endocrine and metabolic diseases, kidney diseases, digestive diseases, respiratory diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, vascular diseases, and cancer.

CONCLUSION

The basic demographic characteristics and the prevalence of comorbidities of different subtypes of AMI are different. The management of comorbidities should be an essential part of improving the prognosis of AMI patients and may contribute to precise prevention of AMI.

Incidence and outcomes of acute mesenteric ischaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI), proportions of its different forms and short-term and long-term mortality.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched until 26 July 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies reporting data on the incidence and outcomes of AMI in adult populations.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment with modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale were performed using predeveloped standard forms. The outcomes were the incidence of AMI and its different forms in the general population and in patients admitted to hospital, and the mortality of AMI in its different forms.

RESULTS

From 3064 records, 335 full texts were reviewed and 163 included in the quantitative analysis. The mean incidence of AMI was 6.2 (95% CI 1.9 to 12.9) per 100 000 person years. On average 5.0 (95% CI 3.3 to 7.1) of 10 000 hospital admissions were due to AMI. Occlusive arterial AMI was the most common form constituting 68.6% (95% CI 63.7 to 73.2) of all AMI cases, with similar proportions of embolism and thrombosis.Overall short-term mortality (in-hospital or within 30 days) of AMI was 59.6% (95% CI 55.5 to 63.6), being 68.7% (95% CI 60.8 to 74.9) in patients treated before the year 2000 and 55.0% (95% CI 45.5 to 64.1) in patients treated from 2000 onwards (p<0.05). The mid/long-term mortality of AMI was 68.2% (95% CI 60.7 to 74.9). Mortality due to mesenteric venous thrombosis was 24.6% (95% CI 17.0 to 32.9) and of non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia 58.4% (95% CI 48.6 to 67.7). The short-term mortality of revascularised occlusive arterial AMI was 33.9% (95% CI 30.7 to 37.4).

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients, AMI is a rarely diagnosed condition with high mortality, although with improvement of treatment results over the last decades. Two thirds of AMI cases are of occlusive arterial origin with potential for better survival if revascularised.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021247148.

A clinical approach to acute mesenteric ischemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize current evidence on acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) in critically ill patients, addressing pathophysiology, definition, diagnosis and management.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few recent studies showed that a multidiscipliary approach in specialized centers can improve the outcome of AMI. Such approach incorporates current knowledge in pathophysiology, early diagnosis with triphasic computed tomography (CT)-angiography, immediate endovascular or surgical restoration of mesenteric perfusion, and damage control surgery if transmural bowel infarction is present. No specific biomarkers are available to detect early mucosal injury in clinical setting. Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia presents particular challenges, as the diagnosis based on CT-findings as well as vascular management is more difficult; some recent evidence suggests a possible role of potentially treatable stenosis of superior mesenteric artery and beneficial effect of vasodilator therapy (intravenous or local intra-arterial). Medical management of AMI is supportive, including aiming of euvolemia and balanced systemic oxygen demand/delivery. Enteral nutrition should be withheld during ongoing ischemia-reperfusion injury and be started at low rate after revascularization of the (remaining) bowel is convincingly achieved.

SUMMARY

Clinical suspicion leading to tri-phasic CT-angiography is a mainstay for diagnosis. Diagnosis of nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia and early intestinal injury remains challenging. Multidisciplinary team effort may improve the outcome of AMI.

Management of Acute Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Studies

Background and Aims:

Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis accounts for up to 20% of all patients with acute mesenteric ischemia in high-income countries. Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis is nowadays relatively more often diagnosed with intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the portal phase than at explorative laparotomy No high-quality comparative studies between anticoagulation alone, endovascular therapy, or surgery exists. The aim of the present systematic review was to offer a contemporary overview on management.

Materials and Methods:

Eleven relevant published original studies with series of at least ten patients were retrieved from a Pub Med search between 2015 and 2020 using the Medical Subject Heading term “mesenteric venous thrombosis.”

Results:

When MVT is diagnosed early, immediate anticoagulation with either unfractionated heparin or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin should commence. Surgeons need to be aware of the importance to scrutinize the computed tomography images themselves for assessment of secondary intestinal abnormalities to mesenteric venous thrombosis and the risk of bowel resection and worse prognosis. Progression toward peritonitis is an indication for explorative laparotomy and assessment of bowel viability. Frank transmural small bowel necrosis should be resected and bowel anastomosis may be delayed for several days until second look. Meanwhile, intravenous full-dose unfractionated heparin should be given at the end of the first operation. Postoperative major intra-abdominal or gastrointestinal bleeding occurs rarely, but the heparin effect can instantaneously be reversed by protamine sulfate. Patients who do not improve during conservative therapy with anticoagulation alone but without developing peritonitis may be subjected to endovascular therapy in expert centers. When the patient’s intestinal function has recovered, with or without bowel resection, switch from parenteral unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin therapy to oral anticoagulation can be performed. There is a trend that direct oral anticoagulants are increasingly used instead of vitamin K antagonists. Up to now, direct oral anticoagulants have been shown to be equally effective with the same rate of bleeding complications. Patients with no strong permanent trigger factor for mesenteric venous thrombosis such as intra-abdominal cancer should undergo blood screening for inherited and acquired thrombophilia.

Conclusion:

Early diagnosis with emergency computed tomography with intravenous contrast-enhancement and imaging in the portal phase and anticoagulation therapy is necessary to be able to have a succesful non-operative succesful course.

Hybrid Therapy Consisting of Bowel Resection and Fluoroscopic-Assisted Balloon Thrombectomy for Small Bowel Infarction Caused by Acute Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of bowel resection combined with fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy for small bowel infarction caused by acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (AMVT).

METHODS

Between June 2016 and August 2017, nine patients (seven males and two females; range, 40-73 years; mean, 55.11 ± 10.08 years) with small bowel infarction caused by AMVT underwent bowel resection combined with fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy. The demographics, risk factors, therapeutic effect, complications, mortality, and follow-up of the study population were assessed.

RESULTS

The effective rate was 100% with substantial clinical improvement in symptoms. All patients underwent small bowel resection with primary anastomosis. The length of bowel resection ranged from 60 to 170 cm (108.67 ± 35.05). In none of the cases there was surgery with second look. The patients were discharged 13-42 days (20.11 ± 8.75) after admission without perioperative complication or death. The follow-up period was 8-21 months (12.89 ± 4.65), and the follow-up rate was 100%. All patients returned to normal activities, regained lost body weight, and remained asymptomatic during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy of bowel resection and fluoroscopic-assisted balloon thrombectomy is technically feasible and may be beneficial for small bowel infarction caused by AMVT in removing a thrombus efficiently, relieving symptoms rapidly, averting second-look surgery, lowering extensive surgical resections, and improving the prognosis.

Portomesenteric Vein Thrombosis After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: 3 Case Reports and a Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Porto-mesenteric venous thrombosis (PMVT) is an infrequent but severe surgical complication developing in patients who underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy). Herein, we describe the clinical presentation, management, and outcome of 3 rare cases of PMVT after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), successfully treated at our center.

CASE REPORT

All patients developed PMVT post-LSG and presented with diffused abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen confirmed the diagnosis of portal vein thrombosis. Two patients were treated conservatively with anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy and the third patient required operative intervention with bowel resection.

CONCLUSIONS

PMVT is a rare presentation after LSG, which requires early diagnosis and management. Conservative management through anticoagulants and thrombolytic therapy is quite effective and, if indicated, should always be considered as the primary treatment option.

Multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy for acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis: an intestinal stroke center experience

BACKGROUD

Acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (ASMVT) is an uncommon but catastrophic abdominal vascular emergency with high rate of intestinal failure and mortality. The retrospective pilot study was performed to assess the effect of a multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy on survival and mesenteric recanalization in an integrated intestinal stroke center (ISC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A modern management strategy performed by multidisciplinary specialists in ISC was evaluated among 43 ASMVT patients that were classified into central vs peripheral type, operative vs nonoperative, early vs late treated group from March 2009 to April 2013. Patients received specific medical therapy, endovascular treatment, damage-control surgery, selective second-look laparotomy, critical care management, and clinical nutrition support in a stepwise way. The demographics, etiology, imaging characteristics, treatment procedures, complications, clinical outcome, and 1-year follow-up data were analyzed and compared. Confounding factors of mortality were identified by univariate and ROC-curve analysis. A single-center experience of over 5years for this modern strategy was also reported.

RESULTS

The protocol of multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy was followed in all ASMVT patients successfully. The 30-day mortality and recanalization rate were 11.63% and 90.70%. Initial damage-control surgery was carried out in 46.51% patients, with selective second-look laparotomy in 23.26% patients. Endovascular thrombolysis was performed in 83.72% patients initially or postoperatively. Bowel resection was necessary in 18 patients with the length of 100.00 (47.50, 222.50) cm. The incidence of short-bowel syndrome was 13.95%. The rate and length of bowel resection, short-bowel syndrome rate were significantly lower in nonoperative and early-treated groups (P<0.05). During the follow-up survey, 1-year survival was 83.72%, with no additional death or re-thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary stepwise management strategy involving modern surgical and endovascular treatments that focus on early mesenteric recanalization and bowel viability salvage in a specialized ISC could significantly improve the clinical outcome of ASMVT patients.