Patients with Polyvascular Disease: A Very High-risk Group

Polyvascular disease (PolyvascDis) with atherosclerosis occurring in >2 vascular beds (coronary, carotid, aortic, visceral and/or peripheral arteries) is encountered in 15-30% of patients who experience greater rates of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events. Every patient with multiple CV risk factors or presenting with CV disease in one arterial bed should be assessed for PolyvascDis clinically and noninvasively prior to invasive angiography. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be readily diagnosed in routine practice by measuring the ankle-brachial index. Carotid disease can be diagnosed by duplex ultrasound showing % stenosis and/or presence of plaques. Coronary artery disease (CAD) can be screened by determining coronary artery calcium score using coronary computed tomography angiography; further, non-invasive testing includes exercise stress and/or myocardial perfusion imaging or dobutamine stress test, prior to coronary angiography. Abdominal ultrasound can reveal an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Computed tomography angiography will be needed in patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia to assess the mesenteric arteries. Patients with the acute coronary syndrome and concomitant other arterial diseases have more extensive CAD and poorer CV outcomes. Similarly, PolyvascDis in patients with carotid disease and/or other PAD is independently associated with an increased risk for all-cause and CV mortality during long-term follow-up. Treatment of patients with PolyvascDis should include aggressive management of all modifiable risk factors by lifestyle changes and drug therapy, with particular attention to patients who are commonly undertreated, such as those with PAD. Revascularization should be reserved for symptomatic vascular beds, using the least aggressive strategy in a multidisciplinary vascular team approach.

Cohort Study Examining the Prevalence and Relationship with Outcome of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Peripheral Artery Occlusive and Aneurysmal Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to examine the presentation and outcome of patients with peripheral artery occlusive and aneurysmal disease (POAD) in relation to standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; i.e., hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, and smoking).

METHODS

A total of 2 129 participants with POAD were recruited from three vascular clinics in Queensland, Australia. SMuRFs were defined using established criteria. Participants were followed via outpatient appointments and linked data to record the primary outcome event of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). The association between SMuRFs and MACE was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. Subanalyses examined the association of individual SMuRFs with MACE and assessed findings separately in participants with occlusive and aneurysmal disease.

RESULTS

At recruitment 71 (3.3%), 551 (25.9%), 977 (45.9%), 471 (22.1%), and 59 (2.8%) participants had zero, one, two, three, and four SMuRFs. During a median follow up of 2.6 (interquartile range 0.4, 6.2) years, the risk of MACE was progressively higher with the increasing numbers of SMuRFs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.09, 1.29 - 12.91; 4.28, 1.37 - 13.41; 5.82, 1.84 - 18.39; and 9.42, 2.77 - 32.08; for one, two, three, or four SMuRFs, respectively) by comparison with those who were SMuRF-less at recruitment. Participants with occlusive disease were significantly more likely to have a greater number of SMuRFs than those with aneurysmal disease. In a subanalysis, there was a significantly higher risk of MACE with three or four SMuRFs in participants presenting with either occlusive or aneurysmal disease compared with those who were SMuRF-less. Hypertension, diabetes, and smoking but not hypercholesterolaemia were independently associated with increased risk of MACE.

CONCLUSION

Very few patients presenting with POAD had no SMuRFs. There was a progressive increase in the risk of MACE in relation to the number of SMuRFs identified at entry.

SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR MANAGEMENT OF EXTRACRANIAL CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE

Management of carotid bifurcation stenosis in stroke prevention has been the subject of extensive investigations, including multiple randomized controlled trials. The proper treatment of patients with carotid bifurcation disease is of major interest to vascular surgeons and other vascular specialists. In 2011, the Society for Vascular Surgery published guidelines for treatment of carotid artery disease. At the time, several randomized trials, comparing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), were published. Since that publication, several studies and a few systematic reviews comparing CEA and CAS have been published, and the role of medical management has been re-emphasized. The current publication updates and expands the 2011 guidelines with specific emphasis on five areas: is carotid endarterectomy recommended over maximal medical therapy in low risk patients; is carotid endarterectomy recommended over trans-femoral carotid artery stenting in low surgical risk patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis of >50%; timing of carotid Intervention in patients presenting with acute stroke; screening for carotid artery stenosis in asymptomatic patients; and optimal sequence for intervention in patients with combined carotid and coronary artery disease. A separate implementation document will address other important clinical issues in extracranial cerebrovascular disease. Recommendations are made using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach, as has been done with other Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines. The committee recommends CEA as the first-line treatment for symptomatic low risk surgical patients with stenosis of 50% to 99% and asymptomatic patients with stenosis of 70% to 99%. The perioperative risk of stroke and death in asymptomatic patients must be <3% to ensure benefit for the patient. In patients with recent stable stroke (modified Rankin 0-2), carotid revascularization is considered appropriate in symptomatic patients with greater than 50% stenosis and is recommended and performed as soon as the patient is neurologically stable after 48 hours but definitely before 14 days of onset of symptoms. In the general population, screening for clinically asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in patients without cerebrovascular symptoms or significant risk factors for carotid artery disease is not recommended. In selected asymptomatic patients who are at increased risk for carotid stenosis, we suggest screening for clinically asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis as long as the patients would potentially be fit for and willing to consider carotid intervention if significant stenosis is discovered. In patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis 50-99%, who require both CEA and CABG, we suggest CEA before or concomitant with CABG to potentially reduce the risk of stroke and stroke/death. The sequencing of the intervention depends on clinical presentation and institutional experience.

Health-related quality of life amongst people diagnosed with abdominal aortic aneurysm and peripheral artery disease and the effect of fenofibrate

The aims of this study were, firstly, to assess the effect of concurrent peripheral artery disease (PAD) on the health-related quality of life (QOL) of people diagnosed with a small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); and secondly, to test whether the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonist fenofibrate improved QOL of people diagnosed with a small AAA, including those diagnosed with concurrent PAD. The study included both a cross-sectional observational study and a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. 140 people diagnosed with a 35–49 mm diameter AAA, 56 (40%) of whom had concurrent PAD, and 25 healthy controls were prospectively recruited. QOL was assessed with the short form (SF) 36. Findings in participants that were diagnosed with both AAA and PAD were compared separately with those of participants that had a diagnosis of AAA alone or who had neither AAA nor PAD diagnosed (healthy controls). All participants diagnosed with an AAA were then randomly allocated to 145 mg of fenofibrate per day or identical placebo. Outcomes were assessed by changes in the domains of the SF-36 and ankle brachial pressure Index (ABPI) from randomization to 24 weeks. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney U tests. Participants diagnosed with both AAA and PAD had significantly worse QOL than participants diagnosed with AAA alone or healthy controls. Fenofibrate did not significantly alter SF-36 scores or ABPI over 24 weeks. Fenofibrate does not improve QOL of people diagnosed with small AAA, irrespective of whether they have concurrent PAD.

Trial registration: ACTN12613001039774 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Increased Risk of Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Retrospective Cohort Study (Version 5)

Studies evaluating the risk of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are limited. We used insurance claims data of Taiwan to establish a cohort of 6590 patients with AAA newly diagnosed from 2000 to 2008 and 6590 controls without AAA matched by propensity score. The subsequent incidence density rates of PAD were estimated in both cohorts by the end of 2011, and the AAA cohort to the non-AAA cohort hazard ratios (HRs) of PAD were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. The incidence density of PAD in the AAA cohort was 3.7-fold greater than that in the non-AAA cohort (14.1 vs 3.66 per 1000 person-years) with an adjusted HR of 3.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.89-4.39). For those without comorbidities, PAD in the AAA cohort was 7.4-fold greater than that in the non-AAA cohort (12.0 vs 1.61 per 1000 person-years) with an adjusted HR of 6.70 (95% CI = 4.43-10.1). The incidence of PAD in patients with ruptured AAA was lower than that in patients without rupture (6.95 vs 15.0 per 1000 person-years). This study demonstrates that patients with AAA are at increased risk of developing PAD.

Meta-analysis of the association between peripheral artery disease and growth of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background

The role of atherosclerosis in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is controversial. Atherosclerosis-associated peripheral artery disease (PAD) has been reported to be a risk factor for AAA in population screening studies; its relationship with AAA growth is controversial.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted in April 2016 and repeated in January 2017. Databases were screened for studies reporting AAA growth rates in patients with, and without PAD. The included studies underwent quality assessment and, where possible, were included in the meta-analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed, including only studies that adjusted for confounding factors.

Results

Seventeen studies, including a total of 4873 patients, met the review entry criteria. Data from 15 studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was marked heterogeneity in study design, methodology and statistical analyses used. In the main analysis, PAD was associated with reduced AAA growth (mean difference – 0·13, 95 per cent c.i. –0·27 to –0·00; P = 0·04). However, statistical significance was not maintained in sensitivity analysis. In a subanalysis that included only data adjusted for other risk factors, no significant association between PAD and AAA growth was found (mean difference –0·11, –0·23 to 0·00; P = 0·05).

Conclusion

This systematic review suggests that currently reported studies demonstrate no robust and consistent association between PAD and reduced AAA growth.