Cell Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

One-Year Analysis of Autologous Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells as Adjuvant Therapy in Treatment of Diabetic Revascularizable Patients Affected by Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Real-World Data from Italian Registry ROTARI

Wounds in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may be poorly responsive to revascularization and conventional therapies. Background/Objective: This study's objective is to analyze the results of regenerative cell therapy with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) as an adjuvant to revascularization. Methods: This study is based on 168 patients treated with endovascular revascularization below the knee plus three PBMNC implants. The follow-up included clinical outcomes at 1-2-3-6 and 12 months based on amputations, wound healing, pain, and TcPO2. Results: The results at 1 year for 122 cases showed a limb rescue rate of 94.26%, a complete wound healing in 65.59% of patients, and an improvement in the wound area, significant pain relief, and increased peripheral oxygenation. In total, 64.51% of patients completely healed at 6 months, compared to the longer wound healing time reported in the literature in the same cohort of patients, suggesting that PBMNCs have an adjuvant effect in wound healing after revascularization. Conclusions: PBMNC regenerative therapy is a safe and promising treatment for diabetic PAD. In line with previous experiences, this registry shows improved healing in diabetic patients with below-the-knee arteriopathy. The findings support the use of this cell therapy and advocate for further research.

Scaffold-based synergistic enhancement of stem cell effects for therapeutic angiogenesis in critical limb ischemia: an experimental animal study

Purpose

Stem cell-based therapies are considered an alternative approach for critical limb ischemia (CLI) patients with limited or exhausted options, yet their clinical use is limited by the lack of sustainability and unclear mechanism of action. In this study, a substance P-conjugated scaffold was injected with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into an animal model of CLI to verify whether angiogenesis could be enhanced.

Methods

A self-assembling peptide (SAP) was conjugated with substance P, known to have the ability to recruit host stem cells into the site of action. This SAP was injected with MSCs into ischemic hindlimbs of rats, and the presence of MSCs was verified by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of MSC-specific markers at days 7, 14, and 28. The degree of angiogenesis, cell apoptosis, and fibrosis was also quantified.

Results

Substance P-conjugated SAP was able to recruit intrinsic MSCs into the ischemic site of action. When injected in combination with MSCs, the presence of both injected and recruited MSCs was found in the ischemic tissues by double IHC staining. This in turn led to a higher degree of angiogenesis, less cell apoptosis, and less tissue fibrosis compared to the other groups at all time points.

Conclusion

The combination of substance P-conjugated SAP and MSCs was able to enhance angiogenesis and tissue repair, which was achieved by the additive effect from exogenously administered and intrinsically recruited MSCs. This scaffold-based intrinsic recruitment approach could be a viable option to enhance the therapeutic effects in patients with CLI.

A Severe Necrotizing Inflammatory Reaction of Leg Wounds Following Autologous Peripheral Blood Total Nucleated Cells Treatment in an Old Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis and No-Option Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Is Cell Therapy Suitable for All Patients?

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) represents an unfavorable evolution of peripheral artery disease, characterized by pain at rest, ulceration, and gangrene and also by an increased risk of cardiovascular events, amputations, and death. According to scientific literature, in almost one third of cases affected by CLTI, defined as no-option CLTI patients, revascularization strategies are not feasible. In the past decade, several studies investigated the role of therapeutic angiogenesis through cell autologous therapy, administered through intramuscular injections or multiple local intralesional and perilesional injections. In this article, we report the case of a necrotizing inflammatory reaction in a patient affected by CLTI and chronic leg wounds that occurred on the multiple injection sites after autologous peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cells (PB-TNCs) transplantation. Since the patient was affected by corticosteroid-induced skin atrophy and rheumatoid arthritis, we hypothesize that an increased skin fragility and a mechanism of immune-mediated pathergy could have been main factors leading to worsening of wounds. This case report strongly suggests the urgent need to better define the indications and contraindications of cell therapy, and further studies of adequate methodology are required to definitively assess the efficacy and safety of autologous cell therapy by local injections of PB-TNCs in patients with chronic inflammatory disorder, such as rheumatoid arthritis, especially in case of concomitant marked skin atrophy. Pending definitive evidence from literature, a strong caution is needed in patients affected by chronic systemic inflammatory diseases, since multiple injections, acting as mechanical stimulus and pathergy trigger, might exacerbate a severe and uncontrolled inflammatory response.

Advances for the treatment of lower extremity arterial disease associated with diabetes mellitus

Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a major vascular complication of diabetes. Vascular endothelial cells dysfunction can exacerbate local ischemia, leading to a significant increase in amputation, disability, and even mortality in patients with diabetes combined with LEAD. Therefore, it is of great clinical importance to explore proper and effective treatments. Conventional treatments of diabetic LEAD include lifestyle management, medication, open surgery, endovascular treatment, and amputation. As interdisciplinary research emerges, regenerative medicine strategies have provided new insights to treat chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Therapeutic angiogenesis strategies, such as delivering growth factors, stem cells, drugs to ischemic tissues, have also been proposed to treat LEAD by fundamentally stimulating multidimensional vascular regeneration. Recent years have seen the rapid growth of tissue engineering technology; tissue-engineered biomaterials have been used to study the treatment of LEAD, such as encapsulation of growth factors and drugs in hydrogel to facilitate the restoration of blood perfusion in ischemic tissues of animals. The primary purpose of this review is to introduce treatments and novel biomaterials development in LEAD. Firstly, the pathogenesis of LEAD is briefly described. Secondly, conventional therapies and therapeutic angiogenesis strategies of LEAD are discussed. Finally, recent research advances and future perspectives on biomaterials in LEAD are proposed.

PBMNCs Treatment in Critical Limb Ischemia and Candidate Biomarkers of Efficacy

When in critical limb ischemia (CLI) the healing process aborts or does not follow an orderly and timely sequence, a chronic vascular wound develops. The latter is major problem today, as their epidemiology is continuously increasing due to the aging population and a growth in the incidence of the underlying diseases. In the US, the mean annualized prevalence of necrotic wounds due to the fact of CLI is 1.33% (95% CI, 1.32–1.34%), and the cost of dressings alone has been estimated at USD 5 billion per year from healthcare budgets. A promising cell treatment in wound healing is the local injection of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs). The treatment is aimed to induce angiogenesis as well to switch inflammatory macrophages, called the M1 phenotype, into anti-inflammatory macrophages, called M2, a phenotype devoted to tissue repair. This mechanism is called polarization and is a critical step for the healing of all human tissues. Regarding the clinical efficacy of PBMNCs, the level of evidence is still low, and a considerable effort is necessary for completing the translational process toward the patient bed site. From this point of view, it is crucial to identify some candidate biomarkers to detect the switching process from M1 to M2 in response to the cell treatment.

The Immune-Centric Revolution in the Diabetic Foot: Monocytes and Lymphocytes Role in Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration-A Narrative Review

Monocytes and lymphocytes play a key role in physiologic wound healing and might be involved in the impaired mechanisms observed in diabetes. Skin wound macrophages are represented by tissue resident macrophages and infiltrating peripheral blood recruited monocytes which play a leading role during the inflammatory phase of wound repair. The impaired transition of diabetic wound macrophages from pro-inflammatory M1 phenotypes to anti-inflammatory pro-regenerative M2 phenotypes might represent a key issue for impaired diabetic wound healing. This review will focus on the role of immune system cells in normal skin and diabetic wound repair. Furthermore, it will give an insight into therapy able to immuno-modulate wound healing processes toward to a regenerative anti-inflammatory fashion. Different approaches, such as cell therapy, exosome, and dermal substitute able to promote the M1 to M2 switch and able to positively influence healing processes in chronic wounds will be discussed.

Therapeutic angiogenesis in Buerger's disease: reviewing the treatment landscape

Thromboangiitis obliterans, also known as Buerger's disease, is a rare inflammatory vasculitis that predominantly develops in smokers and characteristically affects the small- and medium-sized peripheral arteries and veins. Patients typically present with extremity claudication, but symptoms may progress to rest pain and tissue loss, especially in those unable to abstain from tobacco use. Unfortunately, traditional medical treatments are largely ineffective and due to the small caliber of affected vessels and lack of suitable distal targets or venous conduits, endovascular and open surgical approaches are often not possible. Eventually, a significant number of patients require major amputation. For these reasons, much research effort has been made in developing techniques of therapeutic angiogenesis to improve limb perfusion, both for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease and the smaller subset of patients with critical limb ischemia due to Buerger's disease. Neovascularization in response to ischemia relies on a complex interplay between the local tissue microenvironment and circulating stem and progenitor cells. To date, studies of therapeutic angiogenesis have therefore focused on exploiting known angiogenic factors and stem cells to induce neovascularization in ischemic tissues. This review summarizes the available clinical data regarding the safety and efficacy of various angiogenic therapies, notably injection of naked DNA plasmids, viral gene constructs, and cell-based preparations, and describes techniques for potentiating in vivo efficacy of gene- and cell-based therapies as well as ongoing developments in exosome-based cell-free approaches for therapeutic angiogenesis.

Plain Language Title and Summary

A review of available and emerging treatments for improving blood flow and wound healing in patients with Buerger's disease, a rare disorder of blood vessels Buerger's disease is a rare disorder of the small- and medium-sized blood vessels in the arms and legs that almost exclusively develops in young smokers. Buerger's disease causes inflammation in arteries and veins, which leads to blockage of these vessels and reduces blood flow to and from the extremities. Decreased blood flow to the arms and legs can lead to development of nonhealing wounds and infection for which some patients may eventually require amputation. Unfortunately, traditional medical and surgical treatments are not effective in Buerger's disease, so other methods for improving blood flow are needed for these patients. There are several different ways to stimulate new blood vessel formation, both in humans and animal models. The most common treatments involve injection of DNA or viruses that express genes related to blood vessel formation or, alternatively, stem cell-based treatments that help regenerate blood vessels and repair wound tissue. This review explores how safe and effective these various treatments are and describes recent research developments that may lead to better therapies for patients with Buerger's disease and other vascular disorders.

Autologous cell therapy in diabetes‑associated critical limb ischemia: From basic studies to clinical outcomes (Review)

Cell therapy is becoming an attractive alternative for the treatment of patients with no‑option critical limb ischemia (CLI). The main benefits of cell therapy are the induction of therapeutic angiogenesis and neovascularization that lead to an increase in blood flow in the ischemic limb and tissue regeneration in non‑healing cutaneous trophic lesions. In the present review, the current state of the art of strategies in the cell therapy field are summarized, focusing on intra‑operative autologous cell concentrates in diabetic patients with CLI, examining different sources of cell concentrates and their mechanisms of action. The present study underlined the detrimental effects of the diabetic condition on different sources of autologous cells used in cell therapy, and also in delaying wound healing capacity. Moreover, relevant clinical trials and critical issues arising from cell therapy trials are discussed. Finally, the new concept of cell therapy as an adjuvant therapy to increase wound healing in revascularized diabetic patients is introduced.

Autologous Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells for Limb Salvage in Diabetic Foot Patients with No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) are reported to prevent major amputation and healing in no-option critical limb ischemia (NO-CLI). The aim of this study is to evaluate PBMNC treatment in comparison to standard treatment in NO-CLI patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). The study included 76 NO-CLI patients admitted to our centers because of CLI with DFUs. All patients were treated with the same standard care (control group), but 38 patients were also treated with autologous PBMNC implants. Major amputations, overall mortality, and number of healed patients were evaluated as the primary endpoint. Only 4 out 38 amputations (10.5%) were observed in the PBMNC group, while 15 out of 38 amputations (39.5%) were recorded in the control group (p = 0.0037). The Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test results showed a significantly lower amputation rate in the PBMNCs group vs. the control group (p = 0.000). At two years follow-up, nearly 80% of the PBMNCs group was still alive vs. only 20% of the control group (p = 0.000). In the PBMNC group, 33 patients healed (86.6%) while only one patient healed in the control group (p = 0.000). PBMNCs showed a positive clinical outcome at two years follow-up in patients with DFUs and NO-CLI, significantly reducing the amputation rate and improving survival and wound healing. According to our study results, intramuscular and peri-lesional injection of autologous PBMNCs could prevent amputations in NO-CLI diabetic patients.

Autologous Bone-Marrow vs. Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Therapy for Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetic Patients

Diabetes mellitus (DM) remains one of the most important risk factors for peripheral artery disease (PAD), with approximately 20% of DM patients older than 40 years old are affected with PAD. The current standard management for severe PAD is endovascular intervention with or without surgical bypass. Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients are unable to undergo these revascularization therapies due to excessive surgical risk or adverse vascular side effects. Stem cell therapy has emerged as a novel therapeutic strategy for these ‘no-option’ patients. Several types of stem cells are utilized for PAD therapy, including bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMNC) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC). Many studies have reported the safety of BMMNC and PBMNC, as well as its efficacy in reducing ischemic pain, ulcer size, pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2). However, the capacity to establish the efficacy of reducing major amputation rates, amputation free survival, and all-cause mortality is limited, as shown by several randomized placebo-controlled trials. The present literature review will focus on comparing safety and efficacy between BMMNC and PBMNC as cell-based management in diabetic patients with PAD who are not suitable for revascularization therapy.

Current Status of Cell-Based Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia

(1) Background: The treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is focused on improving perfusion and oxygenation in the affected limb. Standard revascularization methods include bypass surgery, endovascular interventional procedures, or hybrid revascularization. Cell-based therapy can be an alternative strategy for patients with no-option critical limb ischemia who are not eligible for endovascular or surgical procedures. (2) Aims: The aim of this narrative review was to provide an up-to-date critical overview of the knowledge and evidence-based medicine data on the position of cell therapy in the treatment of PAD. The current evidence on the cell-based therapy is summarized and future perspectives outlined, emphasizing the potential of exosomal cell-free approaches in patients with critical limb ischemia. (3) Methods: Cochrane and PubMed databases were searched for keywords “critical limb ischemia and cell therapy”. In total, 589 papers were identified, 11 of which were reviews and 11 were meta-analyses. These were used as the primary source of information, using cross-referencing for identification of additional papers. (4) Results: Meta-analyses focusing on cell therapy in PAD treatment confirm significantly greater odds of limb salvage in the first year after the cell therapy administration. Reported odds ratio estimates of preventing amputation being mostly in the region 1.6–3, although with a prolonged observation period, it seems that the odds ratio can grow even further. The odds of wound healing were at least two times higher when compared with the standard conservative therapy. Secondary endpoints of the available meta-analyses are also included in this review. Improvement of perfusion and oxygenation parameters in the affected limb, pain regression, and claudication interval prolongation are discussed. (5) Conclusions: The available evidence-based medicine data show that this technique is safe, associated with minimum complications or adverse events, and effective.

Thymosin‑β 4 induces angiogenesis in critical limb ischemia mice via regulating Notch/NF‑κB pathway

Thymosin‑β 4 (Tβ4) has been reported to exert a pro‑angogenic effect on endothelial cells. However, little is known on the role and underlying mechanisms of Tβ4 on critical limb ischemia (CLI). The present study aimed therefore to investigate the mechanisms and pro‑angiogenic effects of Tβ4 in CLI mice. Tβ4 overexpression lentiviral vector was first transfected into HUVEC and CLI mice model, and inhibitors of Notch pathway (DAPT) and NF‑κB pathway (BMS) were also applied to HUVEC and CLI mice. Subsequently, MTT, tube formation and wound healing assays were used to determine the cell viability, angiogenesis and migratory ablity of HUVEC, respectively. Western blotting, reverse transcription, quantitative PCR, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry were used to detect the expression of the angiogenesis‑related factors angiopoietin‑2 (Ang2), TEK receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (tie2), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), CD31 and α‑smooth muscle actin (α‑SMA) and the Notch/NF‑κB pathways‑related factors NOTCH1 intracellular domain (N1ICD), Notch receptor 3 (Notch3), NF‑κB and p65 in HUVEC or CLI mice muscle tissues. The results demonstrated that Tβ4 not only enhanced the cell viability, angiogenesis and migratory ability of HUVEC but also promoted the expression of Ang2, tie2, VEGFA, N1ICD, Notch3, NF‑κB, and phosphorylated (p)‑p65 in HUVEC. In addition, Tβ4 promoted the expression of CD31, α‑SMA Ang2, tie2, VEGFA, N1ICD and p‑p65 in CLI mice muscle tissues. Treatment with DAPT and BMS had opposite effects of Tβ4, whereas Tβ4 reversed the effect of DAPT and BMS. The findings from the present study suggested that Tβ4 may promote angiogenesis in CLI mice via regulation of Notch/NF‑κB pathways.

In vivo efficacy of endothelial growth medium stimulated mesenchymal stem cells derived from patients with critical limb ischemia

Background

Cell therapy has been proposed for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Autologous bone marrow derived cells (BMCs) have been mostly used, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) being an alternative. The aim of this study was to characterize two types of MSCs and evaluate their efficacy.

Methods

MSCs were obtained from CLI-patients BMCs. Stimulated- (S-) MSCs were cultured in endothelial growth medium. Cells were characterized by the expression of cell surface markers, the relative expression of 6 genes, the secretion of 10 cytokines and the ability to form vessel-like structures. The cell proangiogenic properties was analysed in vivo, in a hindlimb ischemia model. Perfusion of lower limbs and functional tests were assessed for 28 days after cell infusion. Muscle histological analysis (neoangiogenesis, arteriogenesis and muscle repair) was performed.

Results

S-MSCs can be obtained from CLI-patients BMCs. They do not express endothelial specific markers but can be distinguished from MSCs by their secretome. S-MSCs have the ability to form tube-like structures and, in vivo, to induce blood flow recovery. No amputation was observed in S-MSCs treated mice. Functional tests showed improvement in treated groups with a superiority of MSCs and S-MSCs. In muscles, CD31+ and αSMA+ labelling were the highest in S-MSCs treated mice. S-MSCs induced the highest muscle repair.

Conclusions

S-MSCs exert angiogenic potential probably mediated by a paracrine mechanism. Their administration is associated with flow recovery, limb salvage and muscle repair. The secretome from S-MSCs or secretome-derived products may have a strong potential in vessel regeneration and muscle repair.

Trial registration NCT00533104

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12967-019-2003-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cell therapy of critical limb ischemia-problems and prospects

Cell therapy is proposed for indirect revascularization for the patient's incurable by endovascular or surgical revascularization. The therapy with stem cells (SCs) or progenitor cells is assumed to be more efficient as compared with protein or gene therapy not only because of their direct vasculogenic properties, but also thanks to their paracrine effect via secretion of manifold biologically active substances. This review gives an overview of the potential of SC-based therapy for critical limb ischemia (CLI), putative mechanism underlying cell therapy, and comparison of cell therapy to angiogenesis gene therapy in CLI treatment. Human trial data and meta-analysis, as well as some problems of clinical trials and considerations for future SC-based therapy in CLI are also discussed.

Autologous cells derived from different sources and administered using different regimens for 'no-option' critical lower limb ischaemia patients

BACKGROUND

Revascularisation is the gold standard therapy for patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). In over 30% of patients who are not suitable for or have failed previous revascularisation therapy (the 'no-option' CLI patients), limb amputation is eventually unavoidable. Preliminary studies have reported encouraging outcomes with autologous cell-based therapy for the treatment of CLI in these 'no-option' patients. However, studies comparing the angiogenic potency and clinical effects of autologous cells derived from different sources have yielded limited data. Data regarding cell doses and routes of administration are also limited.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and trials registries (16 May 2018). Review authors searched PubMed until February 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 'no-option' CLI patients comparing a particular source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy against another source or regimen of autologous cell-based therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed the eligibility and methodological quality of the trials. We extracted outcome data from each trial and pooled them for meta-analysis. We calculated effect estimates using a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), or a mean difference (MD) with 95% CI.

MAIN RESULTS

We included seven RCTs with a total of 359 participants. These studies compared bone marrow-mononuclear cells (BM-MNCs) versus mobilised peripheral blood stem cells (mPBSCs), BM-MNCs versus bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), high cell dose versus low cell dose, and intramuscular (IM) versus intra-arterial (IA) routes of cell implantation. We identified no other comparisons in these studies. We considered most studies to be at low risk of bias in random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data, and selective outcome reporting; at high risk of bias in blinding of patients and personnel; and at unclear risk of bias in allocation concealment and blinding of outcome assessors. The quality of evidence was most often low to very low, with risk of bias, imprecision, and indirectness of outcomes the major downgrading factors.Three RCTs (100 participants) reported a total of nine deaths during the study follow-up period. These studies did not report deaths according to treatment group.Results show no clear difference in amputation rates between IM and IA routes (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.18; three RCTs, 95 participants; low-quality evidence). Single-study data show no clear difference in amputation rates between BM-MNC- and mPBSC-treated groups (RR 1.54, 95% CI 0.45 to 5.24; 150 participants; low-quality evidence) and between high and low cell dose (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.87 to 11.90; 16 participants; very low-quality evidence). The study comparing BM-MNCs versus BM-MSCs reported no amputations.Single-study data with low-quality evidence show similar numbers of participants with healing ulcers between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.83; 49 participants) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.76; 41 participants). In contrast, more participants appeared to have healing ulcers in the BM-MSC group than in the BM-MNC group (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.92; one RCT, 22 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Researchers comparing high versus low cell doses did not report ulcer healing.Single-study data show similar numbers of participants with reduction in rest pain between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.06; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence) and between IM and IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.64; 32 participants; low-quality evidence). One study reported no clear difference in rest pain scores between BM-MNC and BM-MSC (MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.61; 37 participants; moderate-quality evidence). Trials comparing high versus low cell doses did not report rest pain.Single-study data show no clear difference in the number of participants with increased ankle-brachial index (ABI; increase of > 0.1 from pretreatment), between BM-MNCs and mPBSCs (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.40; 104 participants; moderate-quality evidence), and between IM and IA routes (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.43 to 2.00; 35 participants; very low-quality evidence). In contrast, ABI scores appeared higher in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 0.05, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09; one RCT, 37 participants; low-quality evidence). ABI was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Similar numbers of participants had improved transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcO₂) with IM versus IA routes (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.72; two RCTs, 62 participants; very low-quality evidence). Single-study data with low-quality evidence show a higher TcO₂ reading in BM-MSC versus BM-MNC groups (MD 8.00, 95% CI 3.46 to 12.54; 37 participants) and in mPBSC- versus BM-MNC-treated groups (MD 1.70, 95% CI 0.41 to 2.99; 150 participants). TcO₂ was not reported in the high versus low cell dose comparison.Study authors reported no significant short-term adverse effects attributed to autologous cell implantation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Mostly low- and very low-quality evidence suggests no clear differences between different stem cell sources and different treatment regimens of autologous cell implantation for outcomes such as all-cause mortality, amputation rate, ulcer healing, and rest pain for 'no-option' CLI patients. Pooled analyses did not show a clear difference in clinical outcomes whether cells were administered via IM or IA routes. High-quality evidence is lacking; therefore the efficacy and long-term safety of autologous cells derived from different sources, prepared using different protocols, administered at different doses, and delivered via different routes for the treatment of 'no-option' CLI patients, remain to be confirmed.Future RCTs with larger numbers of participants are needed to determine the efficacy of cell-based therapy for CLI patients, along with the optimal cell source, phenotype, dose, and route of implantation. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm the durability of angiogenic potential and the long-term safety of cell-based therapy.

Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (MSCs) are of Comparable Efficacy to Syngeneic MSCs for Therapeutic Revascularization in C57BKSdb/db Mice Despite the Induction of Alloantibody

Intramuscular administration of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represents a therapeutic option for diabetic critical limb ischemia. Autologous or allogeneic approaches may be used but disease-induced cell dysfunction may limit therapeutic efficacy in the former. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of allogeneic and autologous MSC transplantation in a model of hindlimb ischemia in diabetes mellitus and to determine whether allogeneic transplantation would result in the activation of an immune response. MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 (B6) and diabetic obese C57BKS^db/db mice. Phosphate-buffered saline (control group), and MSCs (1 × 10⁶) from B6 (allogeneic group) or C57BKS^db/db (syngeneic group) were administered intramuscularly into the ischemic thigh of C57BKS^db/db mice following the induction of hindlimb ischemia. MSCs derived from both mouse strains secrete several angiogenic factors, suggesting that the potential therapeutic effect is due to paracrine signaling. Administration of allogeneic MSCs significantly improved blood perfusion as compared with the control group on week 2 and 3, post-operatively. In comparison with the control group, syngeneic MSCs significantly improved blood perfusion at week 2 only. There was no statistical difference in blood perfusion between allogeneic and syngeneic MSC groups at any stages. There was no statistical difference in ambulatory and necrosis score among the three groups. Amputation of toes was only observed in the control group (one out of seven animals). Alloantibody was detected in three out of the eight mice that received allogeneic MSCs but was not observed in the other groups. In summary, we demonstrated comparable efficacy after transplantation of autologous and allogeneic MSCs in a diabetic animal model despite generation of an immune response.

Allogeneic transplantation of programmable cells of monocytic origin (PCMO) improves angiogenesis and tissue recovery in critical limb ischemia (CLI): a translational approach

BACKROUND

Employing growth factor-induced partial reprogramming in vitro, peripheral human blood monocytes can acquire a state of plasticity along with expression of various markers of pluripotency. These so-called programmable cells of monocytic origin (PCMO) hold great promise in regenerative therapies. The aim of this translational study was to explore and exploit the functional properties of PCMO for allogeneic cell transplantation therapy in critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

Using our previously described differentiation protocol, murine and human monocytes were differentiated into PCMO. We examined paracrine secretion of pro-angiogenic and tissue recovery-associated proteins under hypoxia and induction of angiogenesis by PCMO in vitro. Allogeneic cell transplantation of PCMO was performed in a hind limb ischemia mouse model in comparison to cell transplantation of native monocytes and a placebo group. Moreover, we analyzed retrospectively four healing attempts with PCMO in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD; Rutherford classification, stage 5 and 6). Statistical analysis was performed by using one-way ANOVA, Tukey's test or the Student's t test, p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Cell culture experiments revealed good resilience of PCMO under hypoxia, enhanced paracrine release of pro-angiogenic and tissue recovery-associated proteins and induction of angiogenesis in vitro by PCMO. Animal experiments demonstrated significantly enhanced SO₂ saturation, blood flow, neoangiogenesis and tissue recovery after treatment with PCMO compared to treatment with native monocytes and placebo. Finally, first therapeutic application of PCMO in humans demonstrated increased vascular collaterals and improved wound healing in patients with chronic CLI without exaggerated immune response, malignant processes or extended infection after 12 months. In all patients minor and/or major amputations of the lower extremity could be avoided.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, PCMO improve angiogenesis and tissue recovery in chronic ischemic muscle and first clinical results promise to provide an effective and safe treatment of CLI.

Robust Revascularization in Models of Limb Ischemia Using a Clinically Translatable Human Stem Cell-Derived Endothelial Cell Product

Pluripotent stem cell-derived differentiated endothelial cells offer high potential in regenerative medicine in the cardiovascular system. With the aim of translating the use of a human stem cell-derived endothelial cell product (hESC-ECP) for treatment of critical limb ischemia (CLI) in man, we report a good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compatible protocol and detailed cell tracking and efficacy data in multiple preclinical models. The clinical-grade cell line RC11 was used to generate hESC-ECP, which was identified as mostly endothelial (60% CD31⁺/CD144⁺), with the remainder of the subset expressing various pericyte/mesenchymal stem cell markers. Cell tracking using MRI, PET, and qPCR in a murine model of limb ischemia demonstrated that hESC-ECP was detectable up to day 7 following injection. Efficacy in several murine models of limb ischemia (immunocompromised/immunocompetent mice and mice with either type I/II diabetes mellitus) demonstrated significantly increased blood perfusion and capillary density. Overall, we demonstrate a GMP-compatible hESC-ECP that improved ischemic limb perfusion and increased local angiogenesis without engraftment, paving the way for translation of this therapy.

Therapeutic efficacy of CD34+ cell-involved mononuclear cell therapy for no-option critical limb ischemia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Early-phase clinical trials in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) have shown positive results of mononuclear cell therapy. The current meta-analysis investigated whether cluster of differentiation (CD) 34+ mononuclear cell therapy (CD34+MCT) is effective for no-option CLI. Ten randomized controlled clinical studies of CD34+MCT for no-option CLI with 479 patients were identified and analyzed for pooled results. Compared to control groups, the CD34+MCT was associated with lower total amputation (odds ratio (OR): 0.45, p=0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–0.85) and a higher complete ulcer healing rate (OR: 2.80, p=0.008; 95% CI: 1.31–6.02), but showed no advantage in major amputation (OR: 0.58, p=0.11; 95% CI: 0.29–1.14) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.82, p=0.62; 95% CI: 0.36–1.83) . Studies with a high CD34+ cell dosage showed significant results in major amputation (OR: 0.38, p=0.002; 95% CI: 0.21–0.70), total amputation (OR: 0.31, p=0.0002; 95% CI: 0.17–0.57) and complete ulcer healing (OR: 7.58, p=0.0005; 95% CI: 2.40–23.88), which were not observed in the low-dose studies. However, inclusion of placebo-controlled studies showed no improvement of the CD34+MCT in total amputation (OR: 0.67, p=0.42; 95% CI: 0.25–1.79), major amputation (OR: 1.31, p=0.43; 95% CI: 0.67–2.54) or complete ulcer healing (OR: 1.52, p=0.27; 95% CI: 0.72–3.21), which were extremely significant in non-placebo-controlled studies ( p<0.001). In conclusion, the significant results of CD34+MCT might not support its therapeutic benefit due to high placebo-effect risk and considerable heterogeneity caused by distinct cell doses. More sizable double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials with higher CD34+ cell dosage are needed in the future.

Attempt to Harvest a Sufficient Number of Mononuclear Cells in an Appropriate Blood Product Volume By Modification of the Default Apheresis Setting

To harvest for T cell therapy, a 1.6-fold higher number of CD3⁺ T cells was collected with MNC mode (N = 10) compared with Auto PBSC mode (N = 5) in COBE Spectra cell separator, but the blood product volume was increased by 3.5-fold. For therapeutic angiogenesis therapy, apheresis was initially performed using Auto PBSC mode (N = 4) to fine tune the blood product volume to omit cell concentration, but the collected number of mononuclear cells was lower than expected. However, an increase of the harvest cycle number from 3.8 ± 0.5 to 7.4 ± 2.0 cycles (N = 19) resulted in a 2.1-fold higher number of collected mononuclear cells (8.7 ± 4.1 × 10⁹ vs. 4.1 ± 1.0 × 10⁹ cells, P < 0.05). The increase in blood product volume by this modification appeared to be lower than that expected with MNC mode. These data show that optimal harvesting can be achieved by modification of default collection settings.

Midterm Outcomes From a Pilot Study of Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization for the Treatment of No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE

To report the initial clinical experience with percutaneous deep vein arterialization (PDVA) to treat critical limb ischemia (CLI) via the creation of an arteriovenous fistula.

METHODS

Seven patients (median age 85 years; 5 women) with CLI and no traditional endovascular or surgical revascularization options (no-option CLI) were recruited in a pilot study to determine the safety of PDVA. All patients were diabetic; 4 had Rutherford category 6 ischemia. Six were classified at high risk of amputation based on the Society for Vascular Surgery WIfI (wound, ischemia, and foot infection) classification. The primary safety endpoints were major adverse limb events and major adverse coronary events through 30 days and serious adverse events through 6 months. Secondary objectives included clinical efficacy based on outcome measures including thermal measurement, transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (TcPO₂), clinical improvement at 6 months, and wound healing.

RESULTS

The primary safety endpoints were achieved in 100% of patients, with no deaths, above-the-ankle amputations, or major reinterventions at 30 days. The technical success rate was 100%. Two myocardial infarctions occurred within 30 days, each with minor clinical consequences. All patients demonstrated symptomatic improvement with formation of granulation tissue, resolution of rest pain, or both. Complete wound healing was achieved in 4 of 7 patients and 5 of 7 patients at 6 and 12 months, respectively, with a median healing time of 4.6 months (95% confidence interval 84-192). Median postprocedure peak TcPO₂ was 61 mm Hg compared to a preprocedure level of 8 mm Hg (p=0.046). At the time of wound healing, 4 of 5 of patients achieved TcPO₂ levels of >40 mm Hg. There were 2 major amputations, 1 above the knee after PDVA thrombosis and 1 below the knee for infection. Three patients died of causes unrelated to the procedure or study device at 6, 7, and 8 months, respectively. Limb salvage was 71% at 12 months.

CONCLUSION

PDVA is an innovative approach for treating no-option CLI and represents an alternative option for the "desert foot," potentially avoiding major amputation. Our results demonstrate its safety and feasibility, with promising early clinical results in this small cohort.

Stromal vascular fraction cells for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cell-based therapy is being explored as an alternative treatment option for critical limb ischemia (CLI), a disease associated with high amputation and mortality rates and poor quality of life. However, therapeutic potential of uncultured adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells has not been evaluated as a possible treatment. In this pilot study, we investigated the efficacy of multiple injections of autologous uncultured adipose-derived SVF cells to treat patients with CLI.

METHODS

This study included 15 patients, from 35 to 77 years old, with rest pain and ulceration. SVF cells were injected once or twice in the ischemic limb along the arteries. Digital subtraction angiography was performed before and after cell therapy. The clinical follow up was carried out for the subsequent 12 months after the beginning of the treatment.

RESULTS

Multiple intramuscular SVF cell injections caused no complications during the follow-up period. Clinical improvement occurred in 86.7% of patients. Two patients required major amputation, and the amputation sites healed completely. The rest of patients achieved a complete ulcer healing, pain relief, improved ankle-brachial pressure index and claudication walking distance, and had ameliorated their quality of life. Digital subtraction angiography performed before and after SVF cell therapy showed formation of numerous vascular collateral networks across affected arteries.

CONCLUSION

Results of this pilot study demonstrate that the multiple intramuscular SVF cell injections stimulate regeneration of injured tissue and are effective alternative to achieve therapeutic angiogenesis in CLI patients who are not eligible for conventional treatment. Trial registration number at ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN13001382. Retrospectively registered at 26/04/2017.

Autologous Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cell Implantation and Its Impact on the Outcome of Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia - Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cell therapy is a therapeutic option for patients presenting with nonrevascularizable critical limb ischemia (CLI). However there is a lack of firm evidence on its efficacy because of the paucity of randomized controlled trials.Methods and Results:The BALI trial was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial that included 38 patients. For all of them, 500 mL of bone marrow were collected for preparation of a BM-MNC product that was implanted in patients assigned to active treatment. For the placebo group, a placebo cell-free product was implanted. Within 6 months after inclusion, major amputations had to be performed in 5 of the 19 placebo-treated patients and in 3 of the 17 BM-MNC-treated patients. According to a classical logistic regression analysis there was no significant difference. However, when using the jackknife analysis, 6 months after inclusion BM-MNC implantation was associated with a lower risk of major amputation (odds ratio (OR): 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.58; P<0.0001) and of occurrence of any event (major or minor amputation, or revascularization) (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.29-0.31; P<0.0001). The secondary endpoints (i.e., pain, ulcers, TcPO₂, and ankle-brachial index value) were not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that cell therapy reduced the risk of major amputation in patients presenting with nonrevascularizable CLI.

Autologous Cell Therapy for Peripheral Arterial Disease

Rationale:

Critical limb ischemia is a life-threatening complication of peripheral arterial disease. In patients who are ineligible for revascularization procedures, there are few therapeutic alternatives, leading to amputations and death.

Objective:

To provide a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of studies evaluating safety and efficacy of autologous cell therapy for intractable peripheral arterial disease/critical limb ischemia.

Methods and Results:

We retrieved 19 randomized controlled trials (837 patients), 7 nonrandomized trials (338 patients), and 41 noncontrolled studies (1177 patients). The primary outcome was major amputation. Heterogeneity was high, and publication bias could not be excluded. Despite these limitations, the primary analysis (all randomized controlled trials) showed that cell therapy reduced the risk of amputation by 37%, improved amputation-free survival by 18%, and improved wound healing by 59%, without affecting mortality. Cell therapy significantly increased ankle brachial index, increased transcutaneous oxygen tension, and reduced rest pain. The secondary analysis (all controlled trials; n=1175 patients) shows that there may be potential to avoid ≈1 amputation/year for every 2 patients successfully treated. The tertiary analysis (all studies; n=2332 patients) precisely estimated the changes in ankle brachial index, transcutaneous oxygen tension, rest pain, and walking capacity after cell therapy. Intramuscular implantation appeared more effective than intra-arterial infusion, and mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells may outperform bone marrow–mononuclear cells and mesenchymal stem cells. Amputation rate was improved more in trials wherein the prevalence of diabetes mellitus was high. Cell therapy was not associated with severe adverse events. Remarkably, efficacy of cell therapy on all end points was no longer significant in placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials and disappeared in randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias.

Conclusions:

Although this meta-analysis highlights the need for more high-quality placebo-controlled trials, equipoise may no longer be guaranteed because autologous cell therapy has the potential to modify the natural history of intractable critical limb ischemia.

Therapeutic strategies for cell-based neovascularization in critical limb ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) causes severe ischemic rest pain, ulcer, and gangrene in the lower limbs. In spite of angioplasty and surgery, CLI patients without suitable artery inflow or enough vascular bed in the lesions are often forced to undergo amputation of a major limb. Cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis has the potential to treat ischemic lesions by promoting the formation of collateral vessel networks and the vascular bed. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells are the most frequently employed cell types in CLI clinical trials. However, the clinical outcomes of cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis using these cells have not provided the promised benefits for CLI patients, reinforcing the need for novel cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis strategies to cure untreatable CLI patients. Recent studies have demonstrated the possible enhancement of therapeutic efficacy in ischemic diseases by preconditioned graft cells. Moreover, judging from past clinical trials, the identification of adequate transplant timing and responders to cell-based therapy is important for improving therapeutic outcomes in CLI patients in clinical settings. Thus, to establish cell-based therapeutic angiogenesis as one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for CLI patients, its advantages and limitations should be taken into account.