Endothelial Function in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Sex-Based Differences in Patients With Left Ventricular-Assisted Devices and Strokes

Background

Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes among patients with stroke related to left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are not well described.

Objectives

In this study, the authors examined differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes in men and women who had a stroke during LVAD hospitalization.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample from 2010 and 2019 was used to identify patients with stroke during LVAD hospitalization. Outcomes of interest include inpatient mortality and clinical complications among men vs women. Weighted logistic regression was used to determine the association of sex and outcomes. Adjustments were made for age and the Elixhauser comorbidity index.

Results

In total, 35,820 patients underwent LVAD implantation (77% men), and 6.12% (n = 2,192) of patients experienced stroke. Women who had stroke were younger than men who had stroke (mean age in women was 51 years vs men 59 years, P < 0.001). Men with strokes had a higher burden of comorbidities than women. While there were no differences in the odds of ischemic stroke, women had higher odds of hemorrhagic stroke compared to men (OR: 1.49 [95% CI: 1.02-2.18]). Mortality in patients with LVAD who had stroke was significantly higher than in those without stroke. Between 2010 and 2019, stroke rates significantly increased among men, while the trend remained variable among women.

Conclusions

In this national cohort, men had a higher comorbidity burden and had worsening stroke trends over the last decade compared to women. Women had fewer LVAD implants and a higher incidence of hemorrhagic stroke. Understanding the factors that contribute to sex-related outcome disparities among LVAD stroke patients is crucial in addressing these diverging trends.

Efficacy and Complication Profiles of Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Adult Heart Failure Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have marked a milestone in the evolution of treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. Their popularity and use are steadily rising. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of LVADs in improving the survival rate of patients with end-stage heart failure and to identify the complications or adverse events associated with LVAD use. Articles for this systematic review and meta-analysis were sourced from PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library databases. Only studies that met the predefined PICOS eligibility criteria were analyzed. LVADs significantly improved the 6, 12, 18, and 24-month survival rates in patients with end-stage heart failure compared to no LVAD or other therapies: OR 1.87 (95%CI [1.27-2.76]), OR 2.29 (95%CI [1.61-3.26]), OR 2.07 (95%CI [0.61-6.61]), and OR 1.73 (95%CI [0.88-3.41]) for 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the LVAD group than in the non-LVAD treatments: bleeding OR 12.53 (95%CI [2.60-60.41]), infections OR 4.15 (95%CI [1.19-14.45]), stroke OR 2.58 (95%CI [1.38-4.82]), and arrhythmia OR 2.81 (95%CI [1.64-4.80]). Overall, complications were higher in the LVAD group compared to those without LVAD treatment. Hospital readmissions due to adverse events were significantly more frequent in the LVAD group, OR 2.98 (95%CI [1.38-6.43]). Despite the elevated risk of adverse events associated with LVADs, these devices have demonstrated a notable enhancement in the survival outcomes for patients with end-stage heart failure.

Depression among Patients with an Implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device: Uncovering Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Implications for Patient Care

Depression is a common and devastating mental illness associated with increased morbidity and mortality, partially due to elevated rates of suicidal attempts and death. Select patients with end-stage heart failure on a waiting-list for a donor heart undergo left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The LVAD provides a circulatory flow of oxygenated blood to the body, mimicking heart functionality by operating on a mechanical technique. LVAD improves functional capacity and survivability among patients with end-stage heart failure. However, accumulating data suggests that LVAD recipients suffer from an increased incidence of depression and suicide attempts. There is scarce knowledge regarding the pathological mechanism and appropriate treatment approach for depressed LVAD patients. This article summarizes the current evidence on the association between LVAD implantation and occurrence of depression, suggesting possible pathological mechanisms underlying the device-associated depression and reviewing the current treatment strategies. The summarized data underscores the need for a rigorous pre-(LVAD)-implantation psychiatric evaluation, continued post-implantation mental health assessment, and administration of antidepressant treatment as necessary.

Vascular Function in Continuous Flow LVADs: Implications for Clinical Practice

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure, either as a destination therapy or as a bridge to heart transplant. Continuous flow (CF) LVADs have revolutionized advanced heart failure treatment. However, significant vascular pathology and complications have been linked to their use. While the newer CF-LVAD generations have led to a reduction in some vascular complications such as stroke, no major improvement was noticed in the rate of other vascular complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive summary of the effects of CF-LVAD on vasculature, including pathophysiology, clinical implications, and future directions.

Biomarkers in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Insight on Current Evidence

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been representing a cornerstone therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure during the last decades. However, their use induces several pathophysiological modifications which are partially responsible for the complications that typically characterize these patients, such as right ventricular failure, thromboembolic events, as well as bleedings. During the last years, biomarkers involved in the pathways of neurohormonal activation, myocardial injury, adverse remodeling, oxidative stress and systemic inflammation have raised attention. The search and analysis of potential biomarkers in LVAD patients could lead to the identification of a subset of patients with an increased risk of developing these adverse events. This could then promote a closer follow-up as well as therapeutic modifications. Furthermore, it might highlight some new therapeutic pharmacological targets that could lead to improved long-term survival. The aim of this review is to provide current evidence on the role of different biomarkers in patients with LVAD, in particular highlighting their possible implications in clinical practice.

Computational Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Children Supported with Heartware VAD, HeartMate 2 and HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Heart failure is one of the principal causes of morbidity and mortality in children. Treatment techniques may not work, and heart transplantation may be required as a result. The current state of donor-organ supply means that many patients cannot undergo transplantation. In these patients, ventricular assist devices (VADs) may be used to bridge the time until the transplantation. Continuous-flow VADs are increasingly being implanted to paediatric patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate cardiac function in children supported with Heartware HVAD, HeartMate2 and HeartMate3 devices using computational simulations. A lumped-parameter model simulating cardiac function in children around 12 years of age was used to simulate dilated cardiomyopathy and heart-pump support. The operating speeds in HVAD, HeartMate2 and HeartMate3 were selected as 2600 rpm, 8700 rpm and 5200 rpm constant speed, respectively, while the Lavare cycle and artificial-pulse modes were used to generate mean pump outputs at around 4.40 L/min and mean arterial pressures at around 82 mmHg in each device. Aortic pulse pressure was 11 mmHg, 14 mmHg and 6 mmHg under HVAD, HeartMate2 and HeartMate3 support, respectively. HVAD’s Lavare cycle and HeartMate3’s artificial pulse increased aortic pulse pressure to 15 mmHg and 20 mmHg. HeartMate3 with artificial-pulse mode may be more beneficial in reducing arterial-pulsatility-associated problems.