Vectocardiographic "bites" as possible early findings of cardiac involvement in diabetic patients without clinical evidence of heart disease

Increased prevalence of large bites in 12-lead vectorcardiograms of diabetic patients

The vectorcardiographic (VCG) bites in diabetic patients were compared with those in nondiabetic control subjects using automated analysis of the conventional electrocardiogram (ECG). A 12-lead ECG was recorded from each of the 154 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 128 control subjects. The orthogonal leads X, Y, and Z were derived from the 12-lead ECG, from which a so-called 12-lead VCG was calculated for each of the 282 participants. A computer-based method for the detection and quantification of bites was applied to the 12-lead VCGs. Bite amplitudes in the horizontal loop had an average of 0.062 +/- 0.089 mV in the diabetic group, and 0.039 +/- 0.045 mV in the control group (P < .01). In the sagittal plane, the mean bite amplitude was also greater in the diabetic group than in the control group: 0.095 +/- 0.084 versus 0.069 +/- 0.058 mV, respectively (P < .01). A bite greater than 0.1 mV in the horizontal or sagittal planes was found in 56 diabetic patients (36%) and 27 control subjects (21%) with (P < .05) considered significant. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that automated analysis of the 12-lead VCG can be valuable in diagnosing diabetic cardiomyopathy.

Vectorcardiographic bites. A method for detection and quantification applied on a normal material

Vectorcardiographic bites as an expression of small fibrotic or necrotic areas in the myocardium have been discussed for many years. Distinct definitions of bites and normal limits for bites have, however, not been established. Therefore, an algorithm for computer detection and quantification of bites is presented. To find a bite, sectors of the QRS loop rotating opposite the way of the main part of the loop (eg, a clockwise-rotating sector in an otherwise counterclockwise-rotated loop) are detected. The bite is then delineated, using an iterative procedure. Finally the amplitude, duration, and area of the bite are calculated. The method for detection and quantification was applied on a well-defined normal material to obtain normal limits for bites. The commonly used criterion for an abnormal bite (amplitude greater than or equal to 0.1 mV and duration greater than or equal to 10 msec in the horizontal or sagittal plane) results in a specificity of only 87%. A specificity of 95% is yielded with the criterion of bite amplitude greater than 0.15 mV in the horizontal or sagittal plane.