Reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy with St. Jude Medical 19 mm valve prosthesis

Mass reduction and functional improvement of the left ventricle after aortic valve replacement for degenerative aortic stenosis

Background

Left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy caused by aortic valve stenosis (AS) leads to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine whether aortic valve replacement (AVR) decreases LV mass and improves LV function.

Materials and Methods

Retrospective review for 358 consecutive patients, who underwent aortic valve replacement for degenerative AS between January 1995 and December 2008, was performed. There were 230 men and 128 women, and their age at operation was 63.2±10 years (30~85 years).

Results

There was no in-hospital mortality, and mean follow-up duration after discharge was 48.9 months (2~167 months). Immediate postoperative echocardiography revealed that LV mass index and mean gradient across the aortic valve decreased significantly (p<0.001), and LV mass continued to decrease during the follow-up period (p<0.001). LV ejection fraction (EF) temporarily decreased postoperatively (p<0.001), but LV function recovered immediately and continued to improve with a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative EF (p<0.001). There were 15 late deaths during the follow-up period, and overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 94% and 90%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, age at operation (p=0.008), concomitant coronary bypass surgery (p<0.003), lower preoperative LVEF (<40%) (p=0.0018), and higher EUROScore (>7) (p=0.045) were risk factors for late death.

Conclusion

After AVR for degenerative AS, reduction of left ventricular mass and improvement of left ventricular function continue late after operation.

Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Left Ventricular Mass Regression Following Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch is a frequent problem in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement and its main hemodynamic consequence is to generate high transvalvular gradients through normally functioning prosthetic valves. The persistence of high gradients may hinder or delay the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on the postoperative regression of left ventricular mass. Left ventricular mass was measured by Doppler echocardiography in 109 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with a single type of bioprosthesis (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount) for pure aortic stenosis. Prosthesis-patient mismatch was defined as a projected indexed effective orifice area less than 0.90 cm2/m2. On this basis, 58/109 (53.2%) patients had prosthesis-patient mismatch.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation (r = 0.61, p < 0.001) between the postoperative mean transprosthetic gradient and the projected indexed effective orifice area. The absolute and relative left ventricular mass regression was significantly (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, respectively) lower in patients with prosthesis-patient mismatch (-48 +/- 47 g, -17% +/- 16%) compared to those with no prosthesis-patient mismatch (-77 +/- 49 g, -24% +/- 14%). In multivariate analysis, a larger projected indexed effective orifice area, female gender and a higher preoperative left ventricular mass are independent predictors of greater left ventricular mass regression.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that in patients with pure aortic stenosis prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated with lesser regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. These findings may have important clinical implications given that prosthesis-patient mismatch is frequent in these patients.

Changes in left ventricular mass and function after aortic valve replacement: a comparison between stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves

The objective of this study was to compare stentless bioprostheses with stented bioprostheses with regard to the postoperative changes in left ventricular (LV) mass and function. Forty patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement with a stentless (20 patients) or a stented (20 patients) bioprosthesis were evaluated early (baseline), 1 year, and 2 years after operation. Left ventricular mass index was calculated with the corrected American Society of Echocardiography formula. The relative changes between end-diastole and end-systole in LV mid-wall radius, length, and volume (ejection fraction) were determined with a previously validated model for dynamic geometry of the left ventricle. Overall, a significant decrease was found in LV mass index (from 155 +/- 30 to 112 +/- 23 g/m(2); P <.001) and a significant increase in longitudinal shortening (from 0.12 +/- 0.11 to 0.22 +/- 0.08; P <. 001), and ejection fractions (from 0.67 +/- 0.11 to 0.71 +/- 0.10; P =.017). No significant change was found in the mid-wall radius shortening fraction. Two years after surgery, the extent of LV mass regression was greater in stentless bioprostheses (-51 +/- 18 vs -35 +/- 17 g/m(2); P =.01), though the average mass index was similar in both groups (114 +/- 26 vs 110 +/- 20 g/m(2)). Also at 2 years, the longitudinal shortening fraction was greater in patients with a stentless bioprosthesis (0.25 +/- 0.07 vs 0.18 +/- 0.08; P =.03). In conclusion, this study suggests that the superior hemodynamic performance of stentless bioprostheses may have some benefits with regard to LV mass regression and function after aortic valve replacement. The significance of these benefits in terms of prognosis remains to be determined.

Influence of aortic valve replacement, prosthesis type, and size on functional outcome and ventricular mass in patients with aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Two years after surgery for severe aortic stenosis, we prospectively evaluated the influence of aortic valve replacement, as well as valve type (mechanical or stented biologic) and size, on functional status, left ventricular function, and regression of mass.

METHODS

Patients who received either a mechanical (n = 95) or a biologic valve (n = 42) were studied by echocardiography before the operation and after 2 years.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients with severe dyspnea decreased from 53% to 13% (P =.001). The cardiac index increased from mean 2.6 L/min per square meter (95% CI: 2.48-2. 72 L/min per square meter) to 3.1 L/min per square meter (95% CI: 2. 94-3.26 L/min per square meter; P =.001). The percentage of the patients with mild-to-moderate diastolic dysfunction decreased from 43% to 18% (P =.001). The left ventricular mass index was reduced by 42.4 g (95% CI: 35-50 g; P =.001). In comparison with biologic valves of the same size, mechanical valves produced a more pronounced reduction in mass index (overall difference 21.7 g; 95% CI: 37.1-6.4 g; P =.007) and a lower mean Doppler gradient (overall difference 4 mm Hg; 95% CI: 2-6 mm Hg; P =.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement had an improvement in functional status, as well as systolic and diastolic left ventricular function, and a reduction in left ventricular mass index, irrespective of prosthesis size and type. Mechanical valves are somewhat less obstructive than stented bioprosthetic valves of the same size. They are also associated with a concomitantly more pronounced reduction of left ventricular mass.