CO2-TOLMS for laryngeal cancer in the elderly, pushing the boundaries of partial laryngectomy

INTRODUCTION

CO₂ transoral laser microsurgery (CO₂-TOLMS) has pushed the indications of partial surgery of the larynx regardless the age of the patient.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the complications and the oncologic and functional outcomes of CO₂-TOLMS in patients older and younger than 70 years.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 1244 consecutive laryngeal carcinomas treated with CO₂-TOLMS. Complications, length of hospitalization, functional and survival outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age was 64.2 ± 11.1 years (20-96). Four hundred and sixteen patients were older than 70 years and 104 older than 80 years. The main location was the glottis (912), followed by the supraglottis (332). There were no differences in pT classification between the age groups. No differences were observed in voice outcomes. A higher rate of signs of aspiration at the glottic location was observed for those older than 70 years (2.1 % vs 5 %, p = 0.027). The need for definitive gastrostomy in supraglottic tumours was higher in those older than 70 years (0 % vs 6.5 %, p: 0.001). In the glottis, no differences in tracheostomy or gastrostomy rates were observed. Five-year overall survival was lower in the older than 70 years. No differences in disease-specific survival were observed in early stages for both locations, but a lower survival was observed in stage III glottic cancer for the older than 70 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CO₂-TOLMS is a valid treatment for laryngeal carcinomas in the elderly, with a reduced number of complications and good functional and oncologic outcomes.

A model to predict postoperative complications for otorhinolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery procedures in elderly patients

PURPOSE

All kinds of ear, nose, and throat and maxillofacial surgery (ENT/MFS) procedures are being increasingly performed in the elderly although old age is a major risk factor for increased postoperative complications. With only scarce evidence on the topic, surgeons are asked to critically evaluate their procedures' indications and outcomes to balance the treatment risks and benefits. Our primary aim was to identify predictive factors for surgical outcomes in this setting and to create a predictive model for a tailored risk assessment.

METHODS

We analyzed a case series of 435 patients from an institutional clinical database at our academic tertiary care center. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify all possible covariates and nomograms using stepwise backward method were generated. The performance was assessed by calibration curves and c-index.

RESULTS

Overall complication rate was 18.3% within the first 30 days and the need for re-intervention was 5.9%. For those under general anesthesia, we identified specific risk factors and developed three risk-predicting models of overall, early, and late complications. All of the nomograms showed satisfactory accuracy with a c-index of 0.83, 0.75, 0.86, and 0.82, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using clinical preoperative variables, we constructed a model for predicting major adverse events in ENT/MFS patients. In our experience, patients over 65 showed a non-negligible risk for postoperative complications depending on several factors. Such tools might help in decision-making, by increasing the risk-awareness of clinicians, to better address peri-operative and post-operative care of these patients.

Adjuvant chemoradiation does not improve survival in elderly patients with high-risk resected head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) confers an overall survival (OS) benefit over adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) alone in patients with resected head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with adverse pathologic features (positive surgical margins [SM+] and/or extracapsular extension [ECE]). Whether this OS benefit exists in an elderly population remains unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database study.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 1,686 elderly patients (age ≥70 years) with resected HNSCC with SM+ and/or ECE, who received adjuvant CRT (491 patients, 29%) or adjuvant RT alone (1,195 patients, 71%) between 1998 and 2011. Three-year survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method both before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed using Cox regression modeling.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 23.5 and 42.8 months for all and surviving patients, respectively. Three-year OS was 50.7% and 44.4% among patients receiving adjuvant CRT and RT alone, respectively (P = .002). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant improvement in OS with adjuvant CRT relative to adjuvant RT alone (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.73-1.06). Similarly, a PSM cohort showed no significant difference in the 3-year OS for patients receiving adjuvant CRT versus adjuvant RT alone (48.8% and 50.9%, respectively; P = .839).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant RT has been proven effective in randomized trials of patients with resected HNSCC with SM+ or ECE, it may be less efficacious in an elderly patient population treated outside of a controlled trial setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2c. Laryngoscope, 128:831-840, 2018.

Curative-Intent Aggressive Treatment Improves Survival in Elderly Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and High Comorbidity Index

For locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), therapeutic decisions depend on comorbidity or age. We estimated the treatment outcomes of patients with different Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores and ages to determine whether aggressive treatment improves survival.Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance and cancer registry databases were analyzed, and we included >20-year-old patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III or IV HNSCC (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 140.0-148.9) undergoing surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), sequential CT and RT, or surgery with adjuvant treatment. The exclusion criteria were a past cancer history, distant metastasis, AJCC stage I or II, missing sex data, an age < 20 years, nasopharyngeal cancer, in situ carcinoma, sarcoma, and HNSCC recurrence. The index date was the date of first HNSCC diagnosis, and comorbidities were scored using the CCI. The enrolled patients were categorized into Group 1 (curative-intent aggressive treatments) and Group 2 (best supportive care or palliative treatments).We enrolled 21,174 stage III or IV HNSCC patients without distant metastasis (median follow-up, 3.25 years). Groups 1 and 2 comprised 18,584 and 2232 patients, respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, and clinical stage, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of overall death in Group 1 were 0.33 (0.31-0.35), 0.34 (0.31-0.36), and 0.37 (0.28-0.49), and those of all-cause death among patients undergoing curative surgical aggressive treatments were 1.13 (0.82-1.55), 0.67 (0.62-0.73), and 0.49 (0.46-0.53) for CCI scores of ≥10, 5 to 9, and <5, respectively.Aggressive treatments improve survival in elderly (≥65 years) and critically ill HNSCC patients. Curative nonsurgical aggressive treatments including definitive RT or CCRT might be suitable for HNSCC patients with CCI scores ≥10.

Algorithm to predict postoperative complications in oropharyngeal and oral cavity carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative data in patients with oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer may predict postoperative complications that may modify therapeutic choices and improve patient care.

METHOD

We reviewed 320 consecutive patients with oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer, operated on 2003 through 2006 at the European Institute of Oncology. By multivariate analysis of preoperative patient and tumor characteristics, we developed an algorithm to predict postoperative complications. We tested the algorithm on a new series of 307 patients operated on 2007 through 2010.

RESULTS

The final algorithm used to produce a nomogram was comprised of: alcohol consumption (p = .01), site of primary (p = .03), interaction of clinical T classification to sex (p = .007), and type of neck dissection (p < .0001). The algorithm had good ability to predict complications (concordance index [c-index] 0.74) in the new series.

CONCLUSION

The nomogram accurately predicts presurgical risk of postoperative local/systemic complications in patients with oral cavity/oropharyngeal cancer and can be used to adapt therapy to patient characteristics, optimize ward admissions, and improve care.

Peri-Operative Management of Older Adults with Cancer-The Roles of the Surgeon and Geriatrician

Optimal surgical management of older adults with cancer starts pre-operatively. The surgeon plays a key role in the appropriate selection of patients and procedures, optimisation of their functional status prior to surgery, and provision of more intensive care for those who are at high risk of post-operative complications. The literature, mainly based on retrospective, non-randomised studies, suggests that factors such as age, co-morbidities, pre-operative cognitive function and intensity of the surgical procedure all appear to contribute to the development of post-operative complications. Several studies have shown that a pre-operative geriatric assessment predicts post-operative mortality and morbidity as well as survival in older surgical cancer patients. Geriatricians are used to working in multidisciplinary teams that assess older patients and make individual treatment plans. However, the role of the geriatrician in the surgical oncology setting is not well established. A geriatrician could be a valuable contribution to the treatment team both in the pre-operative stage (patient assessment and pre-operative optimisation) and the post-operative stage (patient assessment and treatment of medical complications as well as discharge planning).

Treatment of older patients with head and neck cancer: a review

The incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) in the elderly is increasing. The treatment of HNC often includes multimodality therapy that can be quite morbid. Older patients (herein, defined as ≥65 years) with HNC often have significant comorbidity and impaired functional status that may hinder their ability to receive and tolerate combined modality therapy. They have often been excluded from clinical trials that have defined standards of care. Therefore, tailoring cancer therapy for older patients with HNC can be quite challenging. In this paper, we performed a comprehensive literature review to better understand and discuss issues related to therapeutic recommendations that are particular to patients 65 years and older. Evidence suggests that older patients have similar survival outcomes compared with their younger peers; however, they may experience worse toxicity, especially with treatment intensification. Similarly, older patients may require more supportive care throughout the treatment process. Future studies incorporating geriatric tools for predictive and interventional purposes will potentially allow for improved patient selection and tolerance to intensive treatment.

Principles of surgical oncology in the elderly

Elderly patients constitute the largest group in oncologic medical practice, despite the fact that in solid cancers treated operatively, many patients are denied standard therapies and where such decision making is based solely on age. The “natural” assumptions that we have are often misleading; namely, that the elderly cannot tolerate complex or difficult procedures, chemotherapy, or radiation schedules; that their overall predictable medical health determines survival (and not the malignancy); or that older patients typically have less aggressive tumors. Clearly, patient selection and a comprehensive geriatric assessment is key where well-selected cases have the same cancer-specific survival as younger cohorts in a range of tumors as outlined including upper and lower gastrointestinal malignancy, head and neck cancer, and breast cancer. The assessment of patient fitness for surgery and adjuvant therapies is therefore critical to outcomes, where studies have clearly shown that fit older patients experience the same benefits and toxicities of chemotherapy as do younger patients and that when normalized for preexisting medical conditions,that older patients tolerate major operative procedures designed with curative oncological intent. At present, our problem is the lack of true evidence-based medicine specifically designed with age in mind, which effectively limits surgical decision making in disease-based strategies. This can only be achieved by the utilization of more standardized, comprehensive geriatric assessments to identify vulnerable older patients, aggressive pre-habilitation with amelioration of vulnerability causation, improvement of patient-centered longitudinal outcomes, and an improved surgical and medical understanding of relatively subtle decreases in organ functioning, social support mechanisms and impairments of health-related quality of life as a feature specifically of advanced age.