Intraductal Laser Fiber Tip Fracture and Retrieval During Sialendoscopic Laser-Assisted Lithotripsy

Holmium:YAG laser-assisted intraductal sialendoscopic lithotripsy under local anesthesia

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective multi-institutional chart review study aims to present results from patients treated with Holmium:YAG laser-assisted sialendoscopic intraductal lithotripsy under local anesthesia.

METHODS

Preoperative ultrasound and/or CT were used for location and measurement of the stones. Local anesthesia was applied in all patients, Marchal all-in- one 1.3 mm and Erlangen 1.6 sialendoscopes were used. The laser was used with power settings limited by discomfort or pain. Inclusion criteria were stone size (all >5 mm) and fixed stones.

RESULTS

42 patients, 48 stones were treated (30 males/12 females), 21 submandibular and 21 parotid. Ages ranged from 20 to 70 years (95 % CI: 43.37-51.58). Mean size was 6.2 mm (95 % CI: 5.71-6.72). Complete fragmentation was achieved in 66.7 % and incomplete in 33.3 %. Out of the incomplete fragmented 14 cases, seven (50 %) remained symptom free on follow-up. Maximum duration was 120 min. Minimum power settings of the laser was 4.8 Watts and maximum 18 Watts. Six patients expressed pain or discomfort that limited power increase and duration of the procedure. Total follow up time was 10 years. There were no major complications such as hemorrhage, nerve paresis or skin ulceration.

CONCLUSION

The procedure is safe under local anesthesia, well tolerated by most patients and should be used in cases of small fixed and "intermediate-sized" stones as a single modality. Discomfort may limit power settings and duration. The later is the major disadvantage of the method.

Success rate and complications of sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy in patients with parotid sialolithiasis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To assess the success rate and complications of sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy for parotid sialolithiasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 228 articles were identified by the electronic database search regarding the topics sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy. Following independent then joint review of titles and abstracts, 109 articles were selected for the full review. Thirteen of these were chosen for data extraction from which 1285 patients with parotid salivary stones were identified. Extracted data included number of patients, age, gender, location, management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

All articles combined, 1285 patients with parotid salivary stones were included with a successful treatment in 1139 patients. The success rated ranged from 71.4 to 100% with a mean of 88.7%. Both partial as complete success was achieved. Although minor complications were frequent, no major complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Sialendoscopy and sialolithotripsy are best suited as first choice treatment-if conservative therapy failed-for the management of parotid gland sialolithiasis. It is a valuable and feasible treatment option with no major complications. Selection of cases will ensure the best prognosis. Although there is no indefinite stone size, the smaller the calculus, the greater the probability of a symptom-free patient.