Postoperative pain management using an intravenous combination of ibuprofen and acetaminophen compared with acetaminophen alone after thyroidectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Multiple medications are more effective than single agents for postoperative pain management. We investigated the analgesic effects of an intravenous combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen immediately after thyroidectomy.

METHODS

In this double-blind clinical trial, 62 patients who underwent thyroidectomies were randomized to either the treatment (1000 mg acetaminophen, 300 mg ibuprofen) or control (1000 mg acetaminophen) group. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) 0, 15, and 30 min after recovery room admission. Opioid rescue consumption was also recorded.

RESULTS

The VAS scores were significantly lower in the treatment than in the control group 15 [3 (2-4.3) vs. 5 (3-6); p = 0.015] and 30 [3 (2-4.3) vs. 4 (3-5); p = 0.018] min after recovery room admission, as were the opioid rescue dose requirements (p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined intravenous acetaminophen and ibuprofen may be better than acetaminophen alone for immediately acute postoperative pain after thyroidectomy.

Opioid-Sparing Protocol for Endocrine Surgery (OSPREY): A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Thyroid and parathyroid operations are among the most commonly performed surgeries in the world; however, there remains a paucity of prospective clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of opioid-sparing protocols after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This prospective nonrandomized study was performed between March and October 2021. Participants self-selected their cohort of either an opioid-sparing protocol of acetaminophen/ibuprofen or a treatment-as-usual protocol with opioids. Primary endpoints were Overall Benefit of Analgesia Scores (OBAS) and opioid use as reported in daily medication logs. Data were recorded for 7 days. Multivariable regression, pooled variance t -tests, Mann-Whitney test, and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the results.

RESULTS

A total of 87 participants were recruited; 48 participants opted for the opioid-sparing arm, and 39 participants opted for the treatment-as-usual arm. Patients in the opioid-sparing arm used significantly fewer opioids (morphine equivalents 0.77 ± 1.71 vs 3.34 ± 5.87, p = 0.042) but had no significant difference in OBAS (p = 0.37). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean OBAS between treatment arms when controlling for age, sex, and type of surgery (p = 0.88). There were no major adverse events in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

An opioid-sparing treatment algorithm based on the use of acetaminophen/ibuprofen may offer a safe and effective treatment algorithm compared to a primary opioid-focused treatment pathway. Randomized adequately powered studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Postoperative opioid use following head and neck endocrine surgery: A multi-center prospective study

Background

Opioid abuse is widespread in North America and the over-prescription of opioids are a contributing factor. The goal of this prospective study was to quantify over-prescription rates, evaluate postoperative experiences of pain, and understand the impact of peri-operative factors such as adequate pain counseling and use of non-opioid analgesia.

Methods

Consecutive recruitment of patients undergoing head and neck endocrine surgery was undertaken from January 1st 2020 to December 31st 2021 at four Canadian hospitals in Ontario and Nova Scotia. Postoperative tracking of pain levels and analgesic requirements were employed. Chart review and preoperative and postoperative surveys provided information on counseling, use of local anesthesia, and disposal plans.

Results

A total of 125 adult patients were included in the final analysis. Total thyroidectomy was the most common procedure (40.8%). Median use of opioid tablets was 2 (IQR 0-4), with 79.5% of prescribed tablets unused. Patients who reported inadequate counseling (n = 35, 28.0%) were more likely to use opioids (57.2% vs. 37.8%, p < .05) and less likely to use non-opioid analgesia in the early postoperative course (42.9% vs. 63.3%, p < .05). Patients who received local anesthesia peri-operatively (46.4%, n = 58) reported less severe pain on average [2.86 (2.13) vs. 4.86 (2.19), p < .05] and used less analgesia on postoperative day one [0 MME (IQR 0-4) vs. 4 MME (IQR 0-8), p < .05].

Conclusion

Over-prescription of opioid analgesia following head and neck endocrine surgery is common. Patient counseling, use of non-opioid analgesia, and peri-operative local anesthesia were important factors in narcotic use reduction.

Level of evidence

Level 3.

Ambulatory thyroidectomy. Recommendations of the Association francophone de chirurgie endocrinienne (AFCE), with the Société française d'endocrinologie (SFE) and the Société française de médecine nucléaire (SFMN)

Before ambulatory thyroidectomy is proposed, the patient and his family and/or friends will need to be informed by the surgeon of the specificity of this procedure, the normal postoperative effects of a thyroidectomy, and potential complications. Also known as outpatient thyroid surgery, it can only be proposed by an experienced surgeon supported by an adequately trained medical and paramedical team. The healthcare establishment must be in possession of all the resources needed in ambulatory management, with continuity of care guaranteed 24h/24 7d/7 in the event of possible emergency rehospitalization. In all cases, contact the day after the operation between the healthcare facility and the patient is imperative. Ambulatory management can be proposed for lobo-isthmectomy or isthmectomy, possibly involving lymph node dissection. It is also possible for secondary totalization of thyroidectomy (following lobectomy). On the other hand, indications for single-stage total thyroidectomy must be limited and ensure proximity between the patient's home and a healthcare structure with a platform adapted to the pathology necessitating surgical intervention (non-plunging euthyroid goiter). A precise clinical pathway must be set out, including pre-, peri- and postoperative protocols having been formalized for surgery (hemostasis procedures) and for anesthesia (prevention of pain, of vomiting and of hypertension). We recommend at least 6hours of postoperative surveillance in outpatient care. When outpatient treatment is not possible or not recommended, hospitalization stay after thyroidectomy can be limited to 24hours, except in the event of postoperative complications, or a need for effectively dosed anticoagulant treatment.

Multimodal Analgesia with Local Wound Infiltration and Intravenous Parecoxib for Thyroidectomy

Background and objective: Adequate postoperative pain control is an important component to enhance recovery. Multimodal analgesia with various pain control techniques has been widely used to alleviate postoperative pain. The use of either wound infiltration or a superficial cervical plexus block has been reported to be effective for pain management after thyroid surgery. The present study evaluated the effect of multimodal analgesia using lidocaine wound infiltration combined with intravenous parecoxib for patients monitored after thyroidectomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 101 patients with a multimodal analgesia protocol being monitored after thyroidectomy were enrolled. After the induction of anesthesia, multimodal analgesia was performed through wound infiltration of 1% lidocaine and epinephrine at a ratio of 1:200,000 (5 μg/mL) combined 40 mg intravenous parecoxib before skin excision. Patients were divided into two groups for this retrospective analysis based on the injection dose of lidocaine they received. Patients in Group I (the control, n = 52) received a 5 mL injection solution, while those in Group II (the study, n = 49) received a 10 mL dosage in a time-sequential manner, in accordance with a previous clinical trial. The primary outcome was measuring postoperative pain intensity at rest, as well as during motion and coughing, which was measured at the postoperative anesthetic care unit (PACU) and on the first day after the operation (POD 1) in the ward. Pain intensity was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcomes were postoperative adverse events including anesthetic-related side effects, as well as airway and pulmonary complications. Results: Most of the patients reported no pain or mild pain during the observation period. The patients in Group II had a lower pain intensity during motion than Group I (NRS 1.47 ± 0.89 vs. 1.85 ± 0.96, p = 0.043) when measured at the postoperative anesthetic care unit. Pain intensity during coughing was also significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (NRS 1.61 ± 0.95 vs. 1.96 ± 0.79, p = 0.049) when measured at the postoperative anesthetic care unit. There were no severe adverse events in either of the groups. Only one patient (1.9%) in Group I experienced temporary vocal palsy. Conclusions: The use of lidocaine with an equal volume of intravenous parecoxib provided comparable analgesia with minimal adverse events when monitoring thyroidectomy.

Nonopioid perioperative analgesia in head and neck cancer surgery: A systematic review

Objective

Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The objective of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for these patients.

Methods

Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all comparative studies of patients receiving MMA (nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids) for head and neck cancer surgeries. The primary outcome was additional postoperative opioid usage, and secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, complications, adverse effects, and 30‐day outcomes.

Results

A total of five studies representing 592 patients (MMA, n = 275; non‐MMA, n = 317) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used agents were gabapentin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen (n = 221), NSAIDs (n = 221), followed by corticosteroids (n = 35), dextromethorphan (n = 40), and local nerve block (n = 19). Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage with two studies reporting a significant decrease in hospital time. Subjective pain scores widely varied with two studies reporting reduced pain at postoperative day 3. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30‐day mortality and readmission rates.

Conclusion

MMA is an increasingly popular strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain. A variety of regimens and protocols are available for providers to utilize in the appropriate head and neck cancer patient.

Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesia and undesired side effects.

Five studies (n = 592 patients) reported on the use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids.

Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage though subjective pain scores widely varied.

Multimodal analgesia is a popular and effective strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.

ERAS Protocols for Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are evidenced-based multidisciplinary programs implemented in the perioperative setting to improve postoperative recovery and attenuate the surgical stress response. However, evidence on their effectiveness in thyroid and parathyroid surgery remains sparse. Therefore, our goal was to investigate the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of ERAS protocols for the perioperative management of thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy.

DATA SOURCE

A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, Embase, and gray literature was performed to identify studies of ERAS or clinical care protocols for thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy.

REVIEW METHODS

Two reviewers screened studies using predetermined inclusion criteria. Our primary outcomes included hospital length of stay and hospital costs. Readmission and postoperative complication rates composed our secondary outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed to compare outcomes for patients enrolled in the ERAS protocol versus standard of care.

RESULTS

A total of 450 articles were identified; 7 (1.6%) met inclusion criteria with a total of 3082 patients. Perioperative components in ERAS protocols varied across the studies. Nevertheless, patients enrolled in ERAS protocols had reduced hospital length of stay (mean difference, -0.64 days [95% CI, -0.92 to -0.37]) and hospital costs (in US dollars; mean difference, -307.70 [95% CI, -346.49 to -268.90]), without an increase in readmission (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.29-1.94]) or complication rates (odds ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.82-1.57]).

CONCLUSION

There is growing literature supporting the role of ERAS protocols for the perioperative management of thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. These protocols significantly reduce hospital length of stay and costs without increasing complications or readmission rates.

Perioperative pain management and opioid-reduction in head and neck endocrine surgery: An American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section consensus statement

BACKGROUND

This American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) consensus statement focuses on evidence-based comprehensive pain management practices for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Overutilization of opioids for postoperative pain management is a major contributing factor to the opioid addiction epidemic however evidence-based guidelines for pain management after routine head and neck endocrine procedures are lacking.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened from the membership of the AHNS, its Endocrine Surgical Section, and ThyCa. An extensive literature review was performed, and recommendations addressing several pain management subtopics were constructed based on best available evidence. A modified Delphi survey was then utilized to evaluate group consensus of these statements.

CONCLUSIONS

This expert consensus provides evidence-based recommendations for effective postoperative pain management following head and neck endocrine procedures with a focus on limiting unnecessary use of opioid analgesics.

High-risk surgical procedures and semi-emergent surgical procedures for ambulatory surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates more complex surgical procedures to see whether they might be suitable for ambulatory surgery. Operations that have shown an increasing daycase rate in England include thyroidectomy, joint arthroplasty, spinal surgery and hysterectomy, and these procedures are evaluated. Similarly, there have been recent developments in the management of nonelective ambulatory surgery with more timely throughput and home discharge for suitable patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Caveats on patient selection with the development of focussed educational programmes about the proposed operation have assisted with the development of shorter discharge times. Strict antiemetic guidelines, multimodal analgesic protocols and postoperative multidisciplinary follow-up are core components of the pathway for effective ambulatory management. Communication after discharge should include phone calls from the Ambulatory Unit and easy access to the medical staff who conducted their operation.

SUMMARY

There should be no reason why more complex surgical operations could not be included in a day surgery armamentarium. Similarly, the evidence for more effective use of timely emergency care with shortened length of stay is increasing.