Hemodynamic Changes with 1:1000 Epinephrine on Wrung-Out Pledgets Before and During Sinus Surgery

Comparison of Cardiac Indices Using Two Different Concentrations of Topical Adrenaline during Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Observational Study

Introduction  Adrenaline-soaked wicks are often employed to decongest nasal mucosa during transsphenoidal pituitary surgeries to ensure proper hemostasis and visibility of the operating field. Considerable debate exists regarding the optimum concentration of adrenaline that strikes a balance between hemostasis as well as the hemodynamic side effects of adrenaline. This study assessed cardiac indices like cardiac output and cardiac index using a FloTrac Vigileo cardiac output monitor to compare two different concentrations of adrenaline used for topical instillation. Materials and Methods  60 adult patients undergoing transsphenoidal pituitary surgery were randomly assigned to receive cotton wicks soaked in adrenaline solution (either 1:100,000 or 1:200,000) for nasal decongestion. Following a standardized anesthetic regime, a FloTrac Vigileo cardiac output monitor was attached with the invasive arterial line for precise monitoring and recording of cardiac indices (cardiac output and cardiac index). Additionally, quality of surgical field (as reported by the operating surgeon) blood loss, incidences of adverse hemodynamic events, and rescue drug usage were recorded. Results  No difference in cardiac outputs and cardiac indexes of the patients was observed during baseline to 55 minutes and at 80 minutes and onward, whereas difference rose to statistical significance at the time points of 60 minutes and 70 minutes ( p  < 0.05). Other parameters like stroke volume, stroke volume variation, and hemodynamic parameters were similar. Quality of the surgical fields (as reported by the surgeon), intraoperative bleeding, incidences of adverse effects, and frequency of rescue drugs usage were similar. Conclusion  Instillation of 1:100,000 dilution of adrenaline solution compared with 1:200,000 for nasal decongestion is associated with significant rise in cardiac output and cardiac index at 60 and 70 minutes of the surgery with similar blood loss and hemodynamic variables. Therefore, the lower concentration of adrenaline can be recommended for usage during transsphenoidal pituitary surgeries.

Effect of Nasal Submucosal Injection of Low-concentration Epinephrine on Visual Field Visualization in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: To determine whether nasal submucosal injection of low-concentration epinephrine improved the surgical field visualization and physician satisfaction compared to placebo or without intervention. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Database was conducted from inception to January 10, 2023. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan version 5.3; the Cochrane Collaboration). Quality was assessed by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. And we used funnel plots to visually assess the risk of publication bias. Results: We included a total of 11 studies with 492 patients, all of which were randomized controlled trials. Among the studies, 4 had a low risk of bias, 4 had a moderate risk of bias, and 3 had a high risk of bias. Five studies reported visual bleeding grade in the surgical field (P = 0.07) and total blood loss (P = 0.16), 8 studies reported preoperative baseline heart rate (P = 0.58) and baseline mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P = 0.78), and 9 studies reported intraoperative heart rate (P = 0.27) and MAP (P = 0.56), which showed no significant differences in these parameters between the 2 groups. None of these outcomes were statistically significant between the epinephrine group and the control group. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to support the nasal submucosal application of low-concentration epinephrine to improve surgical field dryness and reduce total surgical bleeding.

Is 1:1000 adrenaline as a topical haemostat an effective alternative to control bleeding in dentistry and oral surgery?

Minor oral surgery can give rise to bleeding intra- and post-operatively. This can be minimal in most patients; however, it can be more problematic in patients with impaired clotting disorders, liver disease, or taking any form of anticoagulation therapy. Haemostatic agents are available to overcome such bleeding risks. The topical application of 1:1000 adrenaline used in medicine can be considered for use in dentistry. Adrenaline is widely used within medicine, surgery and dentistry. Examples include its use in local anaesthetic agents, in the management of anaphylaxis and as part of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation algorithm. 1:1000 adrenaline used topically for ear, nose and throat surgeries has shown improved visual fields during surgery with better surgical outcomes. It is relatively safe, but in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities, it should be practised with caution. This has precipitated the idea for its use within oral surgical procedures, including canine exposures, third molar surgery, root displacement into the antrum and periapical surgery. The haemostatic effect of 1:1000 adrenaline as an alternative should be considered in operative dentistry and oral surgery to aid in haemostasis and improve intra-operative visualisation, reducing the risk of iatrogenic damage and bleeding, thereby improving treatment outcomes.