A National Survey of Robotic Surgery Training Among Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Residents

The Chief Residency in U.S. and Canadian Graduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review

PHENOMENON

Despite the nearly universal presence of chief residents within U.S. and Canadian residency programs and their critical importance in graduate medical education, to our knowledge, a comprehensive synthesis of publications about chief residency does not exist. An understanding of the current state of the literature can be helpful to program leadership to make evidence-based improvements to the chief residency and for medical education researchers to recognize and fill gaps in the literature.

APPROACH

We performed a scoping review of the literature about chief residency. We searched OVID Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science databases through January 2023 for publications about chief residency. We included publications addressing chief residency in ACGME specialties in the U.S. and Canada and only those using the term "chief resident" to refer to additional responsibilities beyond the typical residency training. We excluded publications using chief residents as a convenience sample. We performed a topic analysis to identify common topics among studies.

FINDINGS

We identified 2,064 publications. We performed title and abstract screening on 1,306 and full text review on 208, resulting in 146 included studies. Roughly half of the publications represented the specialties of Internal Medicine (n = 37, 25.3%) and Psychiatry (n = 30, 20.5%). Topic analysis revealed six major topics: (1) selection of chief residents (2) qualities of chief residents (3) training of chief residents (4) roles of chief residents (5) benefits/challenges of chief residency (6) outcomes after chief residency.

INSIGHTS

After reviewing our topic analysis, we identified three key areas warranting increased attention with opportunity for future study: (1) addressing equity and bias in chief resident selection (2) establishment of structured expectations, mentorship, and training of chief residents and (3) increased attention to chief resident experience and career development, including potential downsides of the role.

Otolaryngology resident familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup: A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to determine otolaryngology (ORL) residents' ability to prepare the operating room independently for ORL surgical cases and their familiarity with ORL surgical instruments and related equipment.

METHODS

A 24-question, one-time, anonymous survey was distributed to otolaryngology-head and neck surgery program directors for distribution among their residents in the United States in November 2022. Residents in every post-graduate year were surveyed. Spearman's ranked correlation and Mann-Whitney U test were used.

RESULTS

The response rate among program directors was 9.5 % (11/116 programs), while the response rate among residents was 51.5 % (88/171 residents). A total of 88 survey responses were completed. 61 % of ORL residents who responded were able to name most instruments used in surgical cases. The most recognized surgical instruments by ORL residents were microdebrider (99 %) and alligator forceps (98 %); the least recognized were bellucci micro scissors (72 %) and pituitary forceps (52 %); and all instruments except the microdebrider showed significantly increased recognition with increasing post graduate training year (PGY), p ≤ 0.05. ORL residents were most able to set up independently the electrocautery (77 %) and laryngoscope suspension (73 %), while they were least able to set up the robot laser (6.8 %) and coblator (26 %) independently. All instruments showed significant positive correlations with increasing PGY; the strongest correlation was found in laryngoscope suspension, r = 0.74. 48 % of ORL residents reported that there were times when surgical techs and nurses were not available. Only 54 % of ORL residents reported being able to set up instruments when alone in the operating room, including 77.8 % of PGY-5 residents. Only 8 % of residents reported receiving education related to surgical instruments from their residency program, while 85 % thought that ORL residencies should have courses or educational materials about surgical instruments.

CONCLUSION

ORL residents' familiarity with surgical instruments and preoperative setup improved throughout their training. However, specific instruments had much lower recognition than others and a lower ability for independent setup. Nearly half of ORL residents reported being unable to set up surgical instruments in the absence of surgical staff. Implementation of surgical instrument education may improve these deficiencies.