Characterizing Cochlear Implant Magnet-Related MRI Artifact

A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the existing literature with the aim of evaluating and consolidating the present understanding of strategies for mitigating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts related to cochlear implants in adult and pediatric patients, covering both in-vivo and ex-vivo investigations.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed from inception through April 2022. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO before commencement of data collection (CRD CRD42022319651).

REVIEW METHODS

The data were screened and collected by two authors independently, and eligibility was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recommendations, whereas the quality of the articles was evaluated using the NIH Study Quality Assessment.

RESULTS

The search yielded 2,354 potentially relevant articles, of which 27 studies were included in the final review. Twelve studies looked at 1.5-T MRI, four studies looked at 3-T MRI, eight studies looked at both 1.5 and 3 T, one study looked at 0.2 and 1.5 T, and one study looked at 3- and 7.0-T MRI. Nineteen studies focused on MRI sequences as a means of artifact reduction, nine studies focused on implant magnet positioning, two studies focused on head positioning, and one study focused on both magnet and head positioning. In terms of MRI sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging produced larger artifacts compared with other sequences, whereas fast spin echo/turbo spin echo sequences and fat suppression techniques produced smaller artifacts. The position of the magnet was also found to be important, with a magnet position more than 6.5 cm posterior to the external auditory canal producing the best images with the least distortion. The angle at which the magnet is placed also affects visibility of different brain structures.

CONCLUSION

Proper head positioning, magnet placement at a distance of over 6.5 cm from the external auditory canal, use of spin echo sequences, and fat suppression techniques reduce the size and shape of MRI artifacts.

Feasibility and limitations of head MRI in patients with cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implants (CIs) were noncompatible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) initially; however, recently, implants have become available that are compatible with MRI without the need for magnet removal or bandage fixation. The images produced by MRI scans are sometimes deteriorated by artifacts and are not clinically useful. In this study, we discussed the size differences of such artifacts with respect to the imaging modality and sequences with their clinical validity.

METHODS

We performed a head MRI, using a head bandage and without magnet removal in five patients who underwent cochlear implantation at our department and analyzed the MRI findings.

RESULTS

Without magnet removal, diffusion-weighted images and T2 star-weighted images had larger artifacts and less useful images. T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images (T2WIs), T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) images, and heavy T2WIs could evaluate the unimplanted side and middle of the head but had limited applicability on the CI side.

CONCLUSION

The characteristic features of MRI scan images vary with the method used as well as with the sequence, suggesting that the choice of MRI is largely determined on the basis of clinical feasibility and the requirement. Accordingly, we need to judge well in advance of imaging whether the images would be clinically relevant.

Endolymphatic Hydrops Magnet Resonance Imaging in Ménière's Disease Patients after Cochlea Implantation

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implantation in patients with Ménière's disease (MD) is the treatment of choice in cases of functional deafness. Additional vertigo control is of central importance in this group of patients. Endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) is the pathophysiological correlate of MD and can be evaluated by magnet resonance imaging (MRI). Bilateral MD occurs in 10-33% and can be the reason for a postoperative persisting or newly occurring vertigo in this group. Recent developments in the field of implant magnets and experience in MRI sequences allow the diagnostic performance of MRI in cochlear implantees to be evaluated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of MRI as a visual diagnostic tool for endolymphatic hydrops in cochlear implantees.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study including three cochlear implantees (age: 61-76 years, one female, two male) suffering from MD who, postoperatively, had a recurrence of vertigo with Ménière's-like symptoms. An MRI was performed for the evaluation of ELH (ELH-MRI). MRI observation was performed by a 4 h iv. delayed Gad 3 D Flair sequence.

RESULTS

In all cases, the ipsilateral implant magnet artifact covered the vestibulum, the semicircular canals and the cochlea. The contralateral vestibulum, the semicircular canal and the cochlea were fully observable, and a classification of the ELH-MRI could be performed.

CONCLUSION

ELH-MRI scanning allows for the detection of contralateral labyrinthine endolymphatic hydrops and is a tool for the postoperative evaluation of vertigo in cochlear implantees.