Off-Label Use of Ciprofloxacin/Dexamethasone Drops in the Pediatric Upper Airway: Case Presentation and Review of Adverse Effects

Safety of Nebulized Ciprodex for Postoperative Management of Tracheal Resection

OBJECTIVE

Anastomotic complications after tracheal resection/cricotracheal resection (TR/CTR), such as granulation tissue formation, can lead to severe morbidity. The off-label use of nebulized ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone (Ciprodex) for granulation tissue prophylaxis has anecdotally been used after TR/CTR, especially in pediatric patients. However, its use in the adult population, and its safety and side effect profile post-TR/CTR has not been reported. This study aims to characterize the incidence of adverse side effects associated with nebulized Ciprodex in post-TR/CTR patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent TR/CTR from June 2015 to July 2023 was performed. The use of nebulized Ciprodex (1 mL ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone 0.3%-0.1% otic suspension in 4 mL normal saline) while inpatient was evaluated. Potential side effects were defined as oral thrush, ageusia, arthralgia, and allergic reaction, and were recorded for all patients.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients underwent TR/CTR from June 2015 to July 2023. Of these, 53 (72.6%) had documented Ciprodex administration during their postoperative course. One (1.9%) patient reported at least one side effect, including one instance of skin rash (1.9%) and one instance of allergic reaction (1.9%). There were no other side effects attributed to Ciprodex use.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of side effects related to the use of nebulized Ciprodex is felt to be minimal in post-TR/CTR. Although Ciprodex may have the potential to treat granulation tissue in the airway, further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:3695-3697, 2024.

Assessing National Trends and Perceived Safety of Off-Label Ciprofloxacin-Dexamethasone Use by Pediatric Otolaryngologists

OBJECTIVES

Off-label use of Ciprodex® (ciprofloxacin-dexamethasone: CPD), an antibiotic-steroid combination solution, in the airway has been reported by pediatric otolaryngologists with anecdotal success. We examined national trends regarding off-label CPD use including prevalence, common indications, prescriber patterns, adverse events, and accessibility.

METHODS

15-item cross-sectional survey was distributed to American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology members from January-April 2022. Univariate analyses were performed to compare responses for users of off-label CPD versus non-users. Ease of access was compared across geographies and practice types using multivariate logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Of the 163 complete responses (26.6% response rate), 156 (95.7%) reported using off-label CPD. Most common indications for off-label CPD were tracheal granulation (87.8%, n = 137) and choanal atresia (82.1%, n = 128). Ease of access was significantly increased in the Midwest (OR:18.79, 95%CI:3.63-1.24, p = 0.001) and West (OR:29.92, 95%CI:3.55-682.00, p = 0.006). Ease of access was significantly lower at tertiary referral centers (OR:0.11, 95%CI:0.01-0.64, p = 0.041) and private practices (OR:0.04, 95%CI:0.002-0.33, p = 0.009) compared to academic free-standing children's hospitals. Two-thirds of respondents reported feeling "Very Comfortable" with the safety profile of off-label CPD; 99.4% (n = 156) felt that the benefits outweighed the risks of off-label use. Seven respondents (4.5%) reported adverse events (e.g., local allergic reaction, cushingoid symptoms) from off-label use.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings (26.6% response rate) suggest that off-label CPD is commonly used by pediatric otolaryngologists, many of whom reported feeling that the benefits of off-label CPD outweigh the risks. Our results establish a baseline for future efforts to assess the efficacy and safety of off-label CPD and to improve its accessibility.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V Laryngoscope, 134:2922-2930, 2024.

Impact of inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids on glucose metabolism and diabetes mellitus: A mini review

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal corticosteroids (INS) are the mainstays of treatment for chronic respiratory diseases like asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and allergic rhinosinusitis. In addition, these localized forms of steroid therapy are generally considered to have fewer systemic side effects compared to long-term oral corticosteroids. However, concern and controversy remain over the impact of ICS and INS on the incidence and control of diabetes mellitus (DM). Given the widespread use of ICS and INS, even small individual effects on DM could lead to large consequences for the global popu-lation. Multiple large observational studies suggest that high dose ICS is associated with increased incident DM and worsened DM control, though the contribution of other risk factors is less certain. In addition, only two studies were done to investigate the association of INS and DM, with both studies demon-strating a short-term association of INS use with hyperglycemia. While more research evaluating the risk of ICS/INS for DM-related adverse events is needed, high doses of ICS/INS should be avoided when possible. The following strategies for ICS/INS dose minimization can be considered: Use of non-pharmacological measures (trigger avoidance, smoking cessation, vaccination to avoid infection), control of comorbid conditions, use of non-ICS-containing medications, inter-mittent rather than regular ICS dosing, and appropriate de-escalation of high ICS doses.