Management of N0 neck in T1-T2 unilateral supraglottic cancer

Bilateral Neck Dissection in cN0 Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Essential or Not?

OBJECTIVE

There is controversy regarding bilateral neck dissection for cN0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. This study aimed to explore the risk factor of occult isolated contralateral/bilateral metastasis in cN0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma and help clinicians better make assessments for these patients.

METHOD

PubMed, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and CBM were systematically searched for studies on occult lymph node metastasis in cN0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma from the inception of each database to May 30, 2024. All patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma and a clinical N0 neck, who had complete records of neck lymph node metastasis, were included in the study. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed to extract data. Data were pooled using a random-effects generalized linear mixed model with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of occult isolated contralateral/bilateral metastatic lymph nodes was analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies including 1609 patients with cN0 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed. The pooled risk of occult isolated contralateral/bilateral metastasis was 7.49% (95% CI: 5.65%-9.87%; I2 = 57%). For Type A tumors, the risk was 4.14% (95% CI: 2%-64%; I2 = 81%), 6.74% for Type B (95% CI: 2.27%-18.33%, I2 = 82%), and 13.62% for Type C (95% CI: 5.82%-28.66%, I2 = 69%). For T1-T2 patients, the risk was 5.18% (95% CI: 2%-64%; I2 = 81%), and 8.73% (95% CI: 5.92%-12.69%, I2 = 0%)for T3-T4 patients. When ipsilateral pN+ was present, the risk increased to 20.97% (95% CI: 16.09%-26.85%, I2 = 29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral neck dissection is recommended for Type C patients. Pathologically ipsilateral metastasis confirmed patients should receive contralateral neck dissection, radiotherapy, or even active surveillance follow-up.

Reliability and outcomes of lymph nodes biopsy in cT1-cT2 N0 supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was described as a reliable and reproductive alternative to elective neck dissection for the staging of clinical N0 T1-T2 patients. The SNB technique in supraglottic laryngeal SCC was successfully described in small series. The aim of this study is to analyze retrospectively the results of SNB technique in supraglottic SCC in CHU Godinne, to determine if the technique is reliable and may be proposed in a future multicentral prospective trial.

METHODS

The study involved a retrospective analysis of 39 patients who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2019 at CHU Godinne. All patients presented with clinical N0 neck status. The SNB procedure included general anesthesia, 99-technetium colloid peritumoral injection, and lymphoscintigraphy. The hand-held gamma probe was utilized for SNB after tumoral resection during the same operating session. Out of 39 patients, 36 underwent SNB as the sole staging tool, while 3 patients received SNB in combination with elective neck dissection. Primary outcome was the 2-years neck recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary outcomes were the 2- and 5-years disease-specific survival (DSS). Additionally, sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the SNB technique were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sentinel nodes were successfully identified in all 39 patients. An average of 4 nodes excised per patient. Positives SN were detected in 23% (9 in 39) cases, leading to subsequent selective neck dissection. Two cases of neck recurrence were observed, both considered as false negatives, occurring after an average of 3.5 months. Th median follow-up period was 48 months with a 2-year RFS of 95%. Sensitivity and NPV of the SNB technique were found to be 82% and 94%, respectively. Two and five years DSS were 84% and 71.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that SNB in T1-T2 supraglottic SCC is a feasible and reliable technique for managing the neck in N0 early-stage patients. However, to establish its oncological equivalence with selective node dissection, further prospective and comparative studies are warranted. The findings of this study underscore the importance of ongoing research in refining and validating the role of SNB in the management of supraglottic SCC, potentially paving the way for more widespread adoption in clinical practice.

Occult lymph node metastasis in patients with laryngeal cancer and relevant predicting factors: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the incidence and predictive parameters of occult cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with cN0 laryngeal squamous cell cancer (LSCC) who underwent surgery as definitive treatment.

METHODS

Patients with cN0 laryngeal cancer who had undergone elective neck dissection together with partial or total laryngectomy between January 2006 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and histopathologic predictors of occult metastasis were also analyzed. Follow-up data were used to obtain recurrence and survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients with a mean age of 62.5 years were included in the study. Occult LNM was detected in 15 (17.4%) patients. Tumor grade, pT stage, thyroid cartilage invasion, and extralaryngeal extension were found to predict occult neck metastasis in univariate analysis. The mean follow-up time was 60.7 months and in the survival/recurrence analysis, pT stage, tumor location, tumor grade, presence of occult metastasis, pre-epiglottic space involvement. and extralaryngeal extension were found to predict poorer outcome.

CONCLUSION

Overall occult LNM is low (17.4%) in N0 laryngeal cancer, but the presence of LNM is a poor prognostic factor. Correct determination of the neck status and proper treatment is crucial. The incidence of LNM is very low in T1-T2 stages and well-differentiated tumors. The "wait and see" strategy may be applied in T1-T2 cases as well as selected T3 cases with well-differentiated tumors.

The survival benefit of lymph node dissection in resected T1-2, cN0 supraglottic cancer: A population-based propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of clinically negative cervical lymph nodes (cN0) in patients with T1-2 supraglottic cancer (SC) remains unclear. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with T1-2, cN0 SC.

METHODS

We included 1036 confirmed T1-2, cN0 SC patients with clinicopathological characteristics between 2004 and 2015, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) database. The association between LND and overall survival (OS) was investigated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Before propensity score matching (PSM), patients selected for LND had better OS, compared to patients did not receive LND (5-year OS: 62.6% vs 51.2%, respectively; p = 0.011). After PSM, the LND group also present significant improvement in prognosis (5-year OS: 64.3% vs 51.7%, respectively; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

LND was significantly associated with a more favorable prognosis compared with non-LND in patients with T1-2, cN0 SC.

Occult Metastasis in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of occult metastasis (OM) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is still widely debated. In this systematic review, we aim to determine the rate of OM in laryngeal SCC, its impact on recurrence, and the role of elective neck dissection (END) in the management of the clinically negative neck.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English-language literature in Web of Science, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases on occult metastasis in laryngeal SCC from 1977 to 2018 was conducted. Studies evaluating occult metastasis (OM) in patients with laryngeal SCC with clinically negative necks undergoing surgery were included. Studies evaluating other head and neck subsites, clinically node positive, and salvage patients were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles with a total of 5630 patients were included. The overall rate of OM was 20.5% and was 23% and 12.2% in supraglottic and glottic tumors, respectively. The OM rate in T1-T2 tumors was 13% and 25% in T3-T4 tumors. T3-T4 tumors had significantly greater odds of developing OM compared to T1-T2 tumors (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.61, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] = 1.92-3.55, P < .00001). Patients with OM were more likely to develop distant metastasis (OR = 5.65, 95% CI = 3.36-9.51, P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with advanced T-stage laryngeal SCC should undergo elective neck treatment. More aggressive treatment for patients with history of OM should be considered due to the risk of subsequent regional and distant metastasis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Incidence of Occult Lymph Node Metastasis in Primary Larynx Squamous Cell Carcinoma, by Subsite, T Classification and Neck Level: A Systematic Review

Background: Larynx cancer is a common site for tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. In cases with a clinically negative neck, the indications for an elective neck treatment are still debated. The objective is to define the prevalence of occult metastasis based on the subsite of the primary tumor, T classification and neck node levels involved. Methods: All studies included provided the rate of occult metastases in cN0 larynx squamous cell carcinoma patients. The main outcome was the incidence of occult metastasis. The pooled incidence was calculated with random effects analysis. Results: 36 studies with 3803 patients fulfilled the criteria. The incidence of lymph node metastases for supraglottic and glottic tumors was 19.9% (95% CI 16.4–23.4) and 8.0% (95% CI 2.7–13.3), respectively. The incidence of occult metastasis for level I, level IV and level V was 2.4% (95% CI 0–6.1%), 2.0% (95% CI 0.9–3.1) and 0.4% (95% CI 0–1.0%), respectively. For all tumors, the incidence for sublevel IIB was 0.5% (95% CI 0–1.3). Conclusions: The incidence of occult lymph node metastasis is higher in supraglottic and T3–4 tumors. Level I and V and sublevel IIB should not be routinely included in the elective neck treatment of cN0 laryngeal cancer and, in addition, level IV should not be routinely included in cases of supraglottic tumors.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.

Is routine inclusion of level IV necessary in neck dissection for clinically N0 supraglottic carcinoma?

Objective

Elective level II to IV dissection has become a common practice for patients with N0 neck and supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma. Several authors have questioned the necessity of dissecting level IV and the possible risk of associated morbidities such as chyle leak and phrenic nerve injury.

Study Design and Setting

We reviewed 58 patients who underwent elective functional and lateral neck dissection for supraglottic carcinoma. Node levels were delineated just after the removal of the specimens. The patients were followed at least 3 years postoperatively or until the time of death; recurrence rates and levels were evaluated.

Results

Occult lymph node metastases were determined in 14 cases. Level II was the most involved zone (7 patients). Isolated level IV lymph node metastasis was not established.

Conclusion

We think that routine level IV dissection is not necessary in the management of clinically and radiologically N0 necks in patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Is routine bilateral neck dissection absolutely necessary in the management of N0 neck in patients with supraglottic carcinoma?

The supraglottic larynx has a rich lymphatic network that places patients with supraglottic laryngeal carcinomas at high risk for early dissemination of the disease into the cervical lymphatics. Therefore, elective neck treatment of clinically N0 neck in patients with supraglottic carcinomas is widely accepted as a standard approach. However, the issue whether elective neck treatment should routinely be directed on both sides of the neck is still controversial. The present study is aimed at determining whether T2-T4 stage supraglottic carcinomas require bilateral neck dissection in the management of N0 necks. We designed a prospective study on 72 patients with N0 supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma. Patients were divided into three groups according to the site and extension of the primary tumors. Group I consisted of 21 patients with lateralized (clear lateral) lesion reaching but not crossing the midline. Group II comprised 25 patients with cancer largely involving one side and crossing to the midline. Group III included 26 patients with carcinoma equally involving both sides of the larynx or growth into the midline larynx. All patients underwent bilateral lateral neck dissection in conjunction with various types of laryngectomies selected to the status of the primary. Of the 72 patients, 16 were found to have occult regional metastases in pathologic examination (9 pN1, 4 pN2b, 3 pN2c). The prevalence of occult metastases proportionally increased with T stage from 8.3 to 22.7 and 31.2%, respectively, for T2, T3 and T4. Bilateral neck metastases were found in 2 of 26 patients (7.7%) with central lesions. There was only one patient (4%) with both ipsilateral and contralateral lymph node metastasis in group II. None of the 21 patients with lateral lesion (group I) had contralateral neck metastasis. Routine bilateral elective neck dissection may not be a part of the surgical procedure in all supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma patients. Bilateral neck dissection should be preferred for cases with central tumors and lateral tumors with positive nodes in the ipsilateral side of the neck.

Efficacy of routine bilateral neck dissection in the management of the N0 neck in T1–T2 unilateral supraglottic cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of the clinically negative (N0) neck in supraglottic laryngeal cancer continues to be an area of controversy. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term efficacy of routine bilateral neck dissection compared with ipsilateral neck dissection in T1-T2 N0 lateral supraglottic carcinomas.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 108 patients who underwent surgery for T1-T2 supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma was performed. Forty-eight had undergone ipsilateral functional neck dissection, and 60 had undergone bilateral functional neck dissections. None of these patients received adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

No significant differences (p = .78) in regional recurrence were observed between the patients treated with bilateral neck dissection (13%) and those treated with ipsilateral neck dissection (17%). The 5-year survival rates were 73% and 80% for the patients who received a bilateral and ipsilateral neck dissection, respectively (p = .51).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that routine bilateral neck dissection may not be necessary in the surgical treatment of all supraglottic cancers.

Tratamiento del cuello no en el cáncer supraglótico

INTRODUCTION

Occult regional metastases in supraglottic cancer NO are the object of classical controversies. The aim of our study is to provide our experience in order to determine how neck treatment affects on regional recurrence of NO supraglottic cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective study of 246 patients with NO supraglottic cancer treated in our service between 1977 to 1999 is presented.

RESULTS

11.4% of patients did not have any cervical treatment, with a 23% of neck recurrence amongst the evolution. 66.7% of patients were treated with a modified radical neck dissection, 24% of these presented occult metastases in the histopathological study. Global regional recurrence was 2.9% in early stages (T1/T2) and 13.1% in advanced stages (T3/T4). In pN+ patients, 85% underwent postoperative radiotherapy, with a regional recurrence of 8.8%. Postoperative clinical control without any other treatment in pN0 patients showed a neck recurrence of 6.1%. We performed a unilateral neck dissection in those patients with clear-lateral tumours. In these cases the clinical control of the contralateral neck gave a 5.5% recurrencies on that side. Patients treated with elective primary radiotherapy suffered a 5.5% of regional recurrence.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

Neck treatment of the NO supraglottic cancer is recommended. We treat neck in the same way of primary tumour (surgery or radiotherapy) with good control of regional recurrencies, less than 10%. In case of a negative pathological study of the neck careful, watching is the elective attitude. In the positive pathological study of the neck (pN+), radiotherapy is the elective treatment in those with three or more affected nodes or capsular breakdown in any of them.

The distribution of lymph node metastases in supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND

The treatment of the neck in cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract is still a matter of controversy, even though nowadays there is a trend in the literature toward elective surgery in the N0 neck when the probability of occult lymph node metastasis is greater than 20%. In the elective setup, every effort is made for preservation of uninvolved nonlymphatic structures in positive neck. The aim of this study is to analyze in a large cohort of patients treated for supraglottic carcinoma the prevalence of lymph node metastases and their distribution through various neck levels to redefine our policy of neck treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 402 consecutive patients, who underwent surgery in the Department of Otolaryngology of the University of Brescia (Italy) for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma in a 14-year period, has been performed. The prevalence of neck metastases was assessed by pT category and site (marginal vs vestibular) of the primary tumor. The side(s) of neck disease was related to the side of the primary tumor, whether lateral or central. The distribution of involved lymph nodes through the neck levels was determined.

RESULTS

Overall lymph node metastases accounted for 40%; their prevalence rate increased with pT category from 10% to 57% (p =.0001). Occult metastases were found in 26% of N0 patients from 0% in pT1 to 40% in pT4 (p =.02). There was no difference in metastases rate between marginal vs vestibular, and central vs lateral neoplasms, whereas bilateral metastases were more frequent in central tumors (20% vs 5%; p <.0001). Level IV was involved only in association with level II and/or level III. Levels I and V were rarely involved when overt metastases were present and never by occult metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective lateral neck dissection (levels II-IV) is recommended in T2-T4 N0 supraglottic cancers; clearance of both sides of the neck is indicated whenever the lesion is not strictly lateral. We still perform a selective neck dissection including levels II-V whenever there is clinical, radiologic, or intraoperative evidence of metastases at any level.