Comparison of the performance of Anyplex II HPV HR, the Cobas 4800 human papillomavirus test and Hybrid Capture 2

Update on Effects of the Prophylactic HPV Vaccines on HPV Type Prevalence and Cervical Pathology

Most national prophylactic HPV vaccination programs started in approximately 2008, with either the bivalent Cervarix HPV16/18 or quadrivalent Gardasil (HPV6/11/16/18) vaccines, which were then followed by introduction of the nonavalent Gardasil 9 (HPV6/11/16/18/ 31/33/45/52/58) vaccine from 2015. Since that time, these products have demonstrated their ability to prevent infection with vaccine-covered HPV types and subsequent development of HPV-related cervical and genital pathologies. The data indicate that vaccination of young girls prior to sexual debut is more effective than vaccination of older HPV+ve women. Although some studies have shown a decline in the prevalence of vaccine-covered HPV types, there are national and regional differences in overall vaccine efficacy. Furthermore, several recently published studies show an increase in the prevalence of non-vaccine-covered HPV types in vaccinated populations, which is indicative of HPV type-replacement. It is also notable that vaccine-related changes in HPV type prevalence spread between vaccinated and unvaccinated women at the same geographical location-presumably via sexual transmission. In conclusion, it is not yet clear what effect dissemination of vaccine-associated changes in HPV type prevalence will have on vaccine efficacy and cervical pathology, particularly in mixed populations of vaccinated and unvaccinated women. However, it is very clear these observations do underscore the need for long-term continuation of cervical screening combined with regular reassessment of testing practices.

Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is closely associated with HPV status and uterine position

Although cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions are considered to be not randomly distributed across the cervix, but predominantly in the anterior wall, the clinicopathological etiology remains unknown. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between quantitatively measured area of CIN2/3 and cervical cancer associated factors by retrospective cohort study. We analyzed 235 consecutive therapeutic conization specimens dissected as a single intact section to determine CIN2/3 area and its correlation with both clinical risk factors including human papillomavirus (HPV) status (single or multiple infection) and uterine position defined by transvaginal ultrasound. Cervical wall was classified into three groups: anterior: (11, 12, 1, and 2 o'clock), posterior (5, 6, 7, and 8 o'clock) and lateral (3, 4, 9, and 10 o'clock). Multiple regression revealed that younger age and HPV16 status were significantly correlated with CIN2/3 area (p = 0.0224 and p = 0.0075, respectively). The Jonckheere-Terpstra test showed a significant trend: CIN2/3 area was highest in the single HPV16 group, followed by the multiple HPV16 group and the non-HPV16 group (p < 0.0001). CIN2/3 area in the anterior wall was statistically significantly larger than the posterior and lateral wall (p = 0.0059 and p = 0.0107, respectively). CIN2/3 area in the anterior wall was significantly greater with anteversion-anteflexion than retroversion-retroflexion (p = 0.0485), whereas CIN2/3 area in the posterior wall was significantly larger with retroversion-retroflexion than anteversion-anteflexion (p = 0.0394). In conclusion, the topographical distribution of CIN2/3 area is closely associated with patient age, high-risk HPV status, especially single HPV16 infection and uterine position.

Strategic Significance of Low Viral Load of Human Papillomavirus in Uterine Cervical Cytology Specimens

Infection with high-risk (HR) Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with the development of precancerous lesions or invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Thus, the high viral load (VL) of HR-HPV DNA currently serves as a representative quantitative marker for cervical cancer. However, the clinical significance of low HPV DNA VL remains undetermined. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical association between the low HPV DNA VL and cytology/histologic diagnosis of cervical samples. We searched the electronic medical databases for the resultant analyses of HPV genotyping among patients who underwent treatment for any cervical lesion or who had undergone gynecological examinations with any positive HPV results according to the national cancer screening service between 2015 and 2016. HPV testing with genotyping and semi-quantitative VL measurement was conducted using an Anyplex^TM II H28 Detection assay (H28 assay, Seegene, Seoul, Republic of Korea). The H28 assay is a multiplex semi-quantitative real-time PCR test using the tagging of oligonucleotide cleavage and extension (TOCE) technology. The VL was semi-quantified as high (3+; positive signal before 31 PCR cycles), intermediate (2+; positive between 31 and 39 PCR cycles), or low (1+; positive after 40 PCR cycles). Out of 5940 HPV VL analyses, 356 assays (5.99%) were reported as low VL (1+) of HPV DNA. Matched cytology diagnoses were mostly negative findings (n = 347, 97.5%), except for seven cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (1.9%) and two cases of atypical glandular cells (0.6%). During the follow-up periods, abnormal cytologic diagnoses were identified, including one case of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and two low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs). The matched, confirmative histologic diagnosis of HSIL cytology was compatible with chronic inflammation, wherein the two LSILs had regular check-ups. None revealed clinically concerned outcomes associated with HPV-related squamous lesions. The cytology was most likely negative for malignancy when the VL of HPV DNA was low (1+). Additional strategic monitoring and management may thus be unnecessary.

Concordance of Anyplex™ II HPV HR assays with reference HPV assays in cervical cancer screening: Systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Genital infection with certain types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is a major cause of premalignant dysplasia and cervical cancer globally. Identification of 14 high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPV) is immensely important in elucidating molecular epidemiology, patient monitoring, and evidence-based treatment. HPVs testing has become an essential part of current clinical practice in the management of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions. Thus, HPV assays are increasingly used for primary cervical screening and HPV genotyping, for monitoring vaccination-effect and determining changes in the epidemiology of viral genotypes across the globe. Testing for high-risk HPV is more effective in primary cervical cancer screening than in the cytological examination of a Pap smear. Separate genotyping may be useful for triage in both HPV-based and cytology-based screening. It should be used only for clinically validated tests.

AIMS

To evaluate the concordance of Anyplex™ II HPV HR with other HPV assays in cervical cancer screening.

METHODS

Validation studies of Anyplex™ II HPV HR assay from PubMed, google scholar, google database and Scopus were used to search articles. Articles published in English from 2013 onwards were systematically searched using keywords. Besides, other databases like Google Scholar and the Google database were searched manually for grey literature. The last search was done in December 2020. Then study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias were assessed. Due to the great clinical heterogeneity of the included articles, the diagnostic performance of the anyplex II ™ HR HPV test was unlikely to be pooled. Rather, I did a descriptive presentation of the test performance to gather the best synthesis of evidence for the anyplex II ™ HR HPV test for the detection of CIN2+. Studies that evaluate the performance of the assay in terms of its sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and positive and negative predictive values to comparator assays and/or histology were included in this review.

RESULTS

Anyplex™ Ⅱ HPV HR showed consistently high absolute clinical sensitivity for CIN2+ and CIN3+, as well as comparative clinical sensitivity relative to the currently most widely used HPV test. Because of the significantly diff ;erent composition of the referral populations, Anyplex™ Ⅱ HPV HR absolute clinical specificity for CIN2+ and CIN3+ varied across studies but was comparable relative to reference assays.

CONCLUSION

Five validation studies of Anyplex™ Ⅱ HPV HR performance in cervical cancer screening settings showed its consistently high absolute clinical sensitivity for both CIN2+ and CIN3+, still comparative clinical sensitivity and specificity relative to HC2 and GP5+/6 + PCR. Anyplex™ Ⅱ has evaluated HPV HR in several settings and population groups. It is considered clinically validated for primary cervical cancer screening and triage in referral population settings.

A comparison of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA detection between urine and cervical sample testing in women with abnormal Pap smears

AIMS

To compare the clinical performance of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA detection between urine and cervical samples collected from the same patient for the detection of CIN2+ lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or cervical cancer lesions). The secondary objectives were to evaluate agreement among hrHPV genotypes and to compare patient satisfaction between urine and cervical sample collection.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study enrolled 96 women with abnormal cervical cytology who attended the colposcopy clinic at Siriraj Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) between July 2016 and January 2017. Self-collected random-voiding and first stream urine samples were collected into a universal sterile urine container and immediately mixing with preservative before the pelvic examination. Cervical tissue sampling was performed according to standard treatment guidelines. Both specimens were sent for extraction and detection of hrHPV by Anyplex II HPV high-risk testing. Study patients were surveyed to compare patient satisfaction between urine and cervical sample collection.

RESULTS

Carcinogenic hrHPV positive rate was 73% in urine samples and 81% in cervical samples. The sensitivity for HPV in the detection CIN2+ was high in both the urine and cervical groups at 86.2% and 94.8%, respectively. Agreement between the urine and cervical groups for HPV 16 or 18 detection was high, with kappa values of 0.86 for subtypes 16/18. Urine specimen collection had significantly higher satisfaction and acceptability than cervical specimen collection.

CONCLUSION

Urine hrHPV testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction demonstrated high sensitivity and accuracy for the detection of CIN2+ lesions, with very good agreement when compared with cervical sample testing.

Discrepancy between Cytology and Histology in Cervical Cancer Screening: a Multicenter Retrospective Study (KGOG 1040)

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is the fourth common cancer in women worldwide. The Papanicolau test is the primary screening procedure to detect abnormal cervical cells. Colposcopy is the main procedure for discriminating high-grade cervical lesions. The study aimed at clarifying the discrepancy between cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy histology as well as confounding factors.

METHODS

Eligible patients visited thirteen tertiary hospitals for colposcopic biopsy following cervical cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes between January and December 2018. Baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and parity were collected.

RESULTS

In our study, 3,798 eligible patients were included. Mean age of patients was 42.7 (19-88) years and mean BMI was 22.5 (16.9-34.1) kg/m². The referred cervical cytologic findings consisted of 495 normal, 1,390 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, 380 atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 792 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 593 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, 79 atypical glandular cells, 46 squamous cell carcinoma, and 23 adenocarcinoma. HPV-positive findings were found in 3,008 (79.2%) patients and were not detected in 914 (24.1%) cases. The risk of unexpected low-grade lesions from histology was higher in patients > 45 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.137; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], 1.475-3.096). In contrast, the risk of unexpected high-grade lesions from colposcopic biopsy was lower in patients ≥ 45 years (OR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.367-0.747) and HPV 16/18 infection was higher than other HPV (OR, 1.848; 95% CI, 1.385-2.469).

CONCLUSION

Age and HPV genotypes were responsible for the discrepancies between cytology and histology. Precautions should be taken for women over the age of 45 in triage for colposcopy in order to avoid unnecessary testing.

Human papillomavirus genotyping as a tool for cervical cancer prevention: from commercially available human papillomavirus DNA test to next-generation sequencing

The biological importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the field of medicine – related to cervical carcinogenesis – has been extensively reported in the last decades. For the first time, a direct correlation between cause and effect to explain a cancer development was completely achieved in medical research. Consequently, the Nobel Prize was awarded to HZ Hausen in 2008 for his efforts to understand the effects of persistent infection of oncogenic types of HPV and malignancy transformation. The aim of the present review was to summarize the principal elements of HPV characteristics and their importance in oncology.

It is established that HPV is the main etiologic agent for the development of cervical cancer. With the evolution of diagnosis and molecular biology, many tools have become essential for an early diagnosis and thereby, considerably reducing mortality. Molecular biology continues to advance and provide new perspectives with the use of reverse-transcription PCR in automation and genotyping through next-generation sequencing. This article aims to provide an overview of what is currently used in HPV diagnostic and research and future perspectives with the help of technologies such as next-generation sequencing for screening and vaccination.

Clinical performance of Anyplex II HPV28 by human papillomavirus type and viral load in a referral population

Anyplex II HPV28 (`Anyplex`) is a semi-quantitative DNA PCR assay divided into set A, comprising 14 high risk (hr)HPV types; and set B, comprising 5 possibly hrHPV types and 9 low risk (lr)HPV types. We compared the ability of Anyplex to that of Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) and PreTect HPV-Proofer (`Proofer`) to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade two or worse (CIN2+) by HPV types and viral load. This cross-sectional study included 296 women referred to colposcopy with abnormal cervical cytology and/or persistent HPV infection. CIN2+ was identified in 175/296 women. Liquid based cytology samples were used to perform HPV testing. The sensitivity of Anyplex to detect CIN2+ was 98.9% (95% CI 95.9–99.9) and specificity 43.0% (95% CI 34.0–52.3). Restricting to medium and high viral loads in Anyplex set A, sensitivity and specificity were 97.1% (95% CI 93.5–99.1) and 59.5% (95% CI 50.2–68.3) with positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) 77.6% and 93.5%, respectively, comparable to HC2. Restricting Anyplex to the hrHPV types in Proofer, HPV16, 18, 31, 33 and 45, sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ were 85.1% (95% CI 79.0–90.1) and 71.1% (95% CI 62.1–79.0), comparable to Proofer`s. When adding HPV52 and 58, the sensitivity for CIN2+ was 92.6% (95% CI 87.6–96.0) and CIN3+ 96.5% (95% CI 92.0–98.8). No value of Anyplex set B was found in detecting CIN2+. In conclusion, the clinical performance of medium and high viral loads in Anyplex set A was comparable to HC2. Restricting the test to the 7 hrHPV types included in the 9-valent HPV-vaccine, HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58, satisfies the international criteria for cervical cancer screening with relative sensitivity compared to HC2 for CIN2+ and CIN3+ of 0.98 and 1.01, respectively. Detecting all 28 Anyplex HPV types adds no benefit in a referral population.

Clinical and Analytical Evaluation of the Anyplex II HPV HR Detection Assay within the VALGENT-3 Framework

In 2012, VALidation of human papillomavirus (HPV) GENotyping Tests (VALGENT) was initiated to provide a formalized and uniform study framework for comparison and validation of HPV assays with genotyping capability. In VALGENT-3, the clinical and analytical performance of Anyplex II HPV HR detection (Anyplex) was compared to that of the Hybrid Capture 2 HPV DNA test (hc2) and the cobas 4800 HPV test (cobas). The panel comprises 1,300 stored samples that were obtained from women 25 to 64 years old who participated in the Slovenian cancer screening program, enriched with 300 samples from women with abnormal cervical cytology. The sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex were noninferior to those of hc2, with a relative sensitivity of 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.04) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.06) for CIN3+ and relative specificity of 1.02 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03) for a CIN grade of ≤1. The clinical sensitivity of Anyplex for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was comparable to that of hc2 (P values for McNemar test [p _McN] of 0.655 and 0.564, respectively), but its specificity was significantly higher (p _McN = 0.008). The sensitivity and specificity of Anyplex were also noninferior to those of cobas, with relative sensitivity of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.04) for CIN2+ and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.04) for CIN3+ and relative specificity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99 to 1.01) (p _McN value of >0.05 in all cases). Regardless of the clinical outcome (CIN2+ or CIN3+), age restriction (women ≥30 years old), or comparator test used, Anyplex consistently showed excellent clinical performance and can be considered validated for primary cervical cancer screening.

Interest of cytology combined with Xpert® HPV and Anyplex® II HPV28 Detection human papillomavirus (HPV) typing: differential profiles of anal and cervical HPV lesions in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the interest to combine cytological examination and human papillomavirus (HPV) typing of anal and cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smears of HIV-infected patients on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), to evaluate whether differences in prevalence exist between anal and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in patients with high-risk oncogenic HPV infection.

METHODS

Anal and/or cervical Pap smears were obtained by anoscopy and/or colposcopy in 238 subjects recruited consecutively in 2015: anal smears were obtained from 48 male and female patients [42 men; 35 men who have sex with men (MSM)] and cervical smears from 190 female patients. Cytological Bethesda classification was coupled with HPV typing. HPV typing was performed, on the same smears, using the Xpert^® HPV Assay, which detects only high-risk HPV (hrHPV), and the Anyplex^® II HPV28 Detection assay, which detects hrHPV and low-risk (lr) HPV.

RESULTS

Our data showed clear-cut differences between the anal and cervical samples. Compared with the cervical samples, the anal samples exhibited (1) more numerous cytological lesions, which were histologically proven; (2) a higher hrHPV infection prevalence; (3) a higher prevalence of multiple hrHPV coinfections whatever HPV typing kit was used; (4) a predominance of HPV16 and HPV18/45 types. Overall, there was an almost perfect agreement between the two HPV typing assays (absolute agreement = 90.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-testing consisting of cytology and HPV typing is a useful screening tool in the HIV-infected population on cART. It allows detection of prevalence differences between anal and cervical HPV-related lesions. As recently recommended, anal examination should be regularly performed especially in HIV-infected MSM but also in HIV-infected women with genital hrHPV lesions.

Evaluation of the cobas Cdiff Test for Detection of Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Stool Samples

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are reliable tools for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from unformed (liquid or soft) stool samples. The objective of this study was to evaluate performance of the cobas Cdiff test on the cobas 4800 system using prospectively collected stool specimens from patients suspected of having C. difficile infection (CDI). The performance of the cobas Cdiff test was compared to the results of combined direct and broth-enriched toxigenic culture methods in a large, multicenter clinical trial. Additional discrepancy analysis was performed by using the Xpert C. difficile Epi test. Sample storage was evaluated by using contrived and fresh samples before and after storage at -20°C. Testing was performed on samples from 683 subjects (306 males and 377 females); 113 (16.5%) of 683 subjects were positive for toxigenic C. difficile by direct toxigenic culture, and 141 of 682 subjects were positive by using the combined direct and enriched toxigenic culture method (reference method), for a prevalence rate of 20.7%. The sensitivity and specificity of the cobas Cdiff test compared to the combined direct and enriched culture method were 92.9% (131/141; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4% to 96.1%) and 98.7% (534/541; 95% CI, 97.4% to 99.4%), respectively. Discrepancy analysis using results for retested samples from a second NAAT (Xpert C. difficile/Epi test; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) found no false-negative and 4 false-positive cobas Cdiff test results. There was no difference in positive and negative results in comparisons of fresh and stored samples. These results support the use of the cobas Cdiff test as a robust aid in the diagnosis of CDI.

TLR9 gene polymorphism -1486T/C (rs187084) is associated with uterine cervical neoplasm in Mexican female population

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in TLR9 (-1486 T/C [rs187084], -1237T/C [rs5743836] and G2848A [rs352140]) with HPV infection, squamous intraepithelial lesions, and uterine cervical neoplasm in a Mexican population. Additionally, the peripheral expression of TLR9 was evaluated to evaluate the differences in the TLR9 expression associated with every genotype in the locus -1486 of the TLR9 gene. The serum concentration of TLR9 was evaluated in a randomly selected subsample.

METHODS

Genotyping was performed using predesigned 5' endonuc lease assays and the association of the polymorphisms with the diagnosis groups were assessed by performing multinomial regression models. The relative expression of TLR9 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated by real-time polymerase chain reaction and the association of the level of TLR9 expression with the diagnosis was evaluated by performing multinomial regression models. The serum concentration of TLR9 was evaluated in a subsample of patients diagnosed with uterine cervical neoplasm by ELISA.

RESULTS

The results showed that genotype TT in the -1486 locus of TLR9 was significantly associated with HPV infection (OR = 3.25, 95% CI 1.12-9.46), squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion (OR = 3.76, 95% CI 1.36-10.41), and uterine cervical neoplasm (OR = 5.30, 95% CI 1.81-15.55). Moreover, the highest level of TLR9 expression was significantly associated with a greater risk for developing squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion and uterine cervical neoplasm. The serum TLR9 concentration was higher in patients with uterine cervical cancer than in controls.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that genotype TT in the -1486 locus of the TLR9 gene could comprise a risk genotype for HPV infection, squamous intraepithelial cervical lesion, and uterine cervical neoplasm in Mexican female population. Further studies with larger samples are needed to evaluate if the peripheral expression of TLR9 could be used as a biomarker of uterine cervical neoplasm progression.

Comparison of Cobas® HPV and Anyplex™ II HPV28 assays for detecting and genotyping human papillomavirus

Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV-HR) is a recognized cause of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to compare analytical and clinical performances of the Cobas® HPV and Anyplex™ II HPV28 assays for HPV detection and genotyping. A total of 94 cervical samples were tested. For HPV-HR, the results agreed very well (94.68%), with 100% agreement when detecting CIN2+. The Anyplex™ II HPV28 assay detected more genotypes than the Cobas® HPV Test, but their clinical performances were similar.

Cervical Microbiome and Cytokine Profile at Various Stages of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study

Cervical cancer (CC) is caused by high-risk human papillomavirus persistence due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment mediated by cytokines. Vaginal microbiota determines the presence of certain cytokines locally. We assessed the association between cervical microbiota diversity and the histopathological diagnosis of each stage of CC, and we evaluated mRNA cervical expression levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β1, TNF-α and IFN-γ across the histopathological diagnosis and specific bacterial clusters. We determined the cervical microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons and classified it in community state types (CST). Mean difference analyses between alpha-diversity and histopathological diagnosis were carried out, as well as a β-diversity analysis within the histological diagnosis. Cervical cytokine mRNA expression was analyzed across the CSTs and the histopathological diagnoses. We found a significant difference in microbiota's diversity in NCL-HPV negative women vs those with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and CC(p = 0.006, p = 0.036).When β-diversity was evaluated, the CC samples showed the highest variation within groups (p<0.0006) and the largest distance compared to NCL-HPV negative ones (p<0.00001). The predominant bacteria in women with normal cytology were L. crispatus and L. iners, whereas for SIL, it was Sneathia spp. and for CC, Fusobacterium spp. We found higher median cervical levels of IL-4 and TGF-β1 mRNA in the CST dominated by Fusobacterium spp. These results suggest that the cervical microbiota may be implicated in cervical cancer pathology. Further cohort studies are needed to validate these findings.