Hormone Immunoassay Interference: A 2021 Update

Immunoassays are powerful qualitative and quantitative analytical techniques. Since the first description of an immunoassay method in 1959, advances have been made in assay designs and analytical characteristics, opening the door for their widespread implementation in clinical laboratories. Clinical endocrinology is closely linked to laboratory medicine because hormone quantification is important for the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of endocrine disorders. Several interferences in immunoassays have been identified through the years; although some are no longer encountered in daily practice, cross-reaction, heterophile antibodies, biotin, and anti-analyte antibodies still cause problems. Newer interferences are also emerging with the development of new therapies. The interfering substance may be exogenous (e.g., a drug or substance absorbed by the patient) or endogenous (e.g., antibodies produced by the patient), and the bias caused by interference can be positive or negative. The consequences of interference can be deleterious when clinicians consider erroneous results to establish a diagnosis, leading to unnecessary explorations or inappropriate treatments. Clinical laboratories and manufacturers continue to investigate methods for the detection, elimination, and prevention of interferences. However, no system is completely devoid of such incidents. In this review, we focus on the analytical interferences encountered in daily practice and possible solutions for their detection or elimination.

Consideration triggered by the choice of heterophilic antibody interference detection tests in measuring ACTH for a teenager boy with a rare adrenal disease

BACKGROUND

Plasma ACTH is an important marker for Cushing syndrome; inaccurate measurement of ACTH concentrations due to the serum heterophile antibody may mislead diagnosis by physicians. We describe the case of a teenage boy with a rare adrenal disease who presented falsely increased ACTH concentrations (20.3 pg/ml; Siemens Immulite).

METHODS

Low dose dexamethasone inhibition test showed no inhibition of serum cortisol. While biochemical evidence suggested ACTH-dependent Cushing, the imaging tests suggested otherwise. Hence, further tests for interference identification, including test platform replacement, sample dilution, PEG precipitation, and use of blocking antibodies, were conducted.

RESULTS

The measurements of the same patient sample on three different analytical platforms suggested ACTH concentrations below 5 pg/ml. Serial dilutions of serum samples revealed nonlinearity, PEG recovery resulted in ACTH concentrations dropping to < 5 pg/ml, and interferences in plasma were blocked by a heterophilic blocking reagent (21.2 vs < 5 pg/ml), suggesting that assay interference performed on Siemens Immulite led to false-positive ACTH. Finally, the boy was diagnosed with a rare type of ACTH-independent Cushing syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

The inaccurate evaluation of ACTH misled the physicians, increasing treatment time and diagnostic testing. Thus, an anti-interference workflow should be established between physicians and laboratories to avoid such cases in the future.

Adrenal insufficiency: Physiology, clinical presentation and diagnostic challenges

Adrenal insufficiency (AI) is a serious condition, which can arise from pathology affecting the adrenal gland itself (primary adrenal insufficiency, PAI), hypothalamic or pituitary pathology (secondary adrenal insufficiency, SAI), or as a result of suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal (HPA) axis by exogenous glucocorticoid therapy (tertiary adrenal insufficiency, TAI). AI is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality and a reduction in quality of life. In addition, the most common cause of PAI, autoimmune adrenalitis, may be associated with a variety of other autoimmune disorders. Untreated AI can present with chronic fatigue, weight loss and vulnerability to infection. The inability to cope with acute illness or infection can precipitate life-threatening adrenal crisis. It is therefore a critical diagnosis to make in a timely fashion, in order to institute appropriate management, aimed at reversing chronic ill health, preventing acute crises, and restoring quality of life. In this review, we will describe the normal physiology of the HPA axis and explain how knowledge of the physiology of this axis helps us understand the clinical presentation of AI, and forms the basis for the biochemical investigations which lead to the diagnosis of AI.

An Intact ACTH LC-MS/MS Assay as an Arbiter of Clinically Discordant Immunoassay Results

BACKGROUND

Measurement of plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) is key in the differential diagnosis of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal disorders. Two-site sandwich immunoassays dominate clinical testing of ACTH in North America; however, discordant results between manufacturers have been repeatedly reported. To resolve the discrepancy, we developed a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for the intended measurand, biologically active intact ACTH (iACTH).

METHODS

The multiple reaction monitoring LC-MS/MS assay was designed to selectively measure full-length iACTH, as well as ACTH analogs and fragments (i.e., ACTH1–24 and ACTH18–39). Epitope assignment of the Roche Elecsys antibodies was performed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. A method comparison between Roche Elecsys and Siemens Immulite ACTH immunoassays was performed and clinically concordant/discordant results identified. In a subset of these samples, the iACTH concentration was determined using the LC-MS/MS method.

RESULTS

The lower limit of the measuring interval of the iACTH LC-MS/MS assay was 9 pg/mL (2 pmol/L). The assay was linear from 9 to 1938 pg/mL (2 to 427 pmol/L). Epitope mapping revealed that the Roche capture and detection antibodies bound residues 9–12 and 36–39 of ACTH, respectively. The iACTH LC-MS/MS analysis demonstrated that for discordant results between 2 immunoassays studied, only the Roche results were highly positively correlated with the iACTH concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoprecipitation of biologically active ACTH molecules followed by LC-MS/MS analysis enabled selective detection of iACTH and relevant biologically active fragments in plasma. Applied to the investigation of clinically discrepant results, this method can act as an arbiter of the concentration of iACTH present.

Falsely elevated plasma ACTH levels measured by the Elecsys assay related to heterophilic antibody in a case of secondary adrenocortical insufficiency

A 49-year-old woman with membranous nephropathy was referred to our hospital during the tapering of oral prednisolone, because of suspicion of primary adrenal insufficiency based on a plasma ACTH level of 399.1 pg/mL in the Elecsys assay and a serum cortisol level of 3.1 μg/dL. A rapid ACTH stimulation test revealed a suboptimal response, whereas a prolonged ACTH simulation test showed a sufficient increase in her urinary free cortisol. Also, big ACTH was not detected by gel exclusion chromatography. Therefore, we speculated that ACTH levels were falsely elevated due to some interference substances. Pretreatment of her plasma with either polyethylene glycol precipitation or a heterophilic blocking tube substantially reduced her ACTH values. When either the Immulite ACTH II or the TOSOH II ACTH was tried instead of the Elecsys ACTH, her plasma ACTH values turned out to be lower and appropriate for her clinical status. These results indicated that heterophilic antibodies interfered only with the Elecsys ACTH assay presumably by bridging the capture and tracer antibodies. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which the Elecsys ACTH assay yielded falsely elevated results. Regardless of the measurement system used, if there is a discordance between assay results and clinical findings, it should be considered to adopt additional procedures and/or another assay.

Heterophile Antibody to Adrenocorticotropin Hormone Interfering with the Investigation of Cushing's Syndrome

The practice of medicine depends on the accuracy of biochemical assays. The high prevalence of incidental masses on imaging necessitates a correct biochemical diagnosis before proceeding to radiological studies. Hormonal assays, tumour markers, and markers of cardiac injury are particularly susceptible to heterophile antibody interference which may lead to inaccurate and misleading results, inappropriate investigation and/or treatment, patient concern and potential harm. A case of heterophile antibody interference in the measurement of ACTH in a patient with Cushing's syndrome resulting in unnecessary invasive investigation is presented. Close collaboration and communication between laboratory and clinical staff is essential where laboratory results and the clinical picture are not congruent.

Assay-Specific Spurious ACTH Results Lead to Misdiagnosis, Unnecessary Testing, and Surgical Misadventure-A Case Series

The proper clinical evaluation of pituitary and adrenal disorders depends on the accurate measurement of plasma ACTH. The modern two-site sandwich ACTH immunoassay is a great improvement compared with older methods but still has the potential for interferences such as heterophile antibodies and pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and ACTH fragments. We report the cases of five patients in whom the diagnosis or differential diagnosis of Cushing syndrome was confounded by erroneously elevated results from the Siemens ACTH Immulite assay [ACTH(Immulite)] that were resolved using the Roche Cobas or Tosoh AIA [ACTH(Cobas) and ACTH(AIA), respectively]. In one case, falsely elevated ACTH(Immulite) results owing to interfering antibodies resulted in several invasive differential diagnostic procedures (including inferior petrosal sinus sampling), MRI, and unnecessary pituitary surgery. ACTH(Cobas) measurements were normal, and further studies excluded the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. In three cases, either Cushing disease or occult ectopic ACTH were suspected owing to elevated ACTH(Immulite) results. However, adrenal (ACTH-independent) Cushing syndrome was established using ACTH(AIA) or ACTH(Cobas) and proved surgically. In one case, ectopic ACTH was suspected owing to elevated ACTH(Immulite) results; however, the ACTH(Cobas) findings led to the diagnosis of alcohol-induced hypercortisolism that resolved with abstinence. We have concluded that ACTH(Immulite) results can be falsely increased and alternate ACTH assays should be used in the diagnosis or differential diagnosis of clinical disorders of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

When laboratory tests can mislead even when they appear plausible

A laboratory test has three phases, pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical. The purpose of this review is to highlight an issue concerning the analytical phase of one of the most widely deployed groups of in vitro diagnostic tests using a common technology - namely immunoassay.Immunoassay entails an inherently high error rate and, therefore, has the potential for inaccurate and misleading results susceptible to misinterpretation and/or diagnostic misapplication by clinicians. An approach based on Bayesian inference (without mathematics or equations) - illustrated by examples - is presented; this may help clinicians in discerning potentially erroneous results even when they appear plausible and not unreasonable.Essentially, false positive results are most likely to occur when the disease prevalence/incidence is low. False negative results become more prominent when the prevalence/incidence of disease increases. When concern is raised, available follow-up laboratory tests should be initiated to establish with confidence the diagnostic reliability or unreliability of such results.

Interference in ACTH immunoassay negatively impacts the management of subclinical hypercortisolism

PURPOSE

Low plasma corticotropin is considered a useful parameter for the diagnosis of subclinical hypercortisolism in patients with an adrenal incidentaloma. However, immunoassays are vulnerable to interference from endogenous antibodies. In this study, subjects who underwent Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis evaluation for the assessment of subclinical hypercortisolism were evaluated. The objective of the study was to ascertain whether antibody interference in corticotropin immunoassay affected the diagnostic work-up and clinical decisions.

METHODS

The 437 consecutive patients with incidentally discovered adrenal adenomas were included in this single centre study. Patients who had a combination of a nonsuppressed corticotropin concentration (>4.4 pmol/L) and a non-suppressed cortisol concentration after 1 mg overnight dexamethasone suppression test (>50 nmol/L) were selected. Eight eligible subjects without specific features of Cushing's syndrome were identified and recruited for interference studies and follow-up. Nine controls including one patient with unilateral adrenalectomy and one patient with Cushing's disease were recruited as well.

MEASUREMENTS

Eligible subjects and controls were subjected to hormonal tests and investigations for suspected interference. Interference studies included measurement of corticotropin on a different analytical platform, serial dilutions, polyethylene glycol precipitation and heterophilic antibody analysis. Patients were followed with clinical and laboratory parameters for a median duration of 30 (12-90) months.

RESULTS

Antibody interference was identified in four patients. Rheumatoid factor was responsible for the interference in one patient. Clinical management of the patients was affected by the erroneous results. Interference tests were negative in control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Erroneous results associated with analytical interference negatively impacted on clinical decision making in this patient group. This should be considered particularly in conditions such as subclinical hypercortisolism which decisions depend on laboratory investigations mainly. Analytical interference could explain the high variability observed both in field measurements from patients who were expected to have lower corticotropin concentrations and in subclinical hypercortisolism prevalence reported by different studies. Many problems can be resolved by ensuring good communication between clinical and laboratory staff.