Bowron A, Moorghen M, Morgan JE, Osborne JR, Stansbie D, Stone JE. Cost-effective strategy for the serological investigation of coeliac disease.
Ann Clin Biochem 2000;
37 ( Pt 4):467-70. [PMID:
10902862 DOI:
10.1177/000456320003700406]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Increased numbers of requests for serological investigation of coeliac disease, and a local trend to request both anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) and anti-endomysium antibodies (AEA) simultaneously, resulted in cost pressures that prompted a review of our practice. Serology results from all patients (771 children, 511 adults) investigated for coeliac disease over a 3-year period were compared with small intestine histology where available. IgG AGA and IgA AGA were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (in-house), IgA AEA by immunofluorescence (send-away contract). Overall diagnostic performance was as follows: AGA sensitivity 84%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value (PPV) 24%, negative predictive value (NPV) 99%; AEA sensitivity 88%, specificity 97%, PPV 65%, NPV 99%. Results showed AGA, with its high NPV, to be a suitable first-line test to exclude coeliac disease. The high specificity of AEA makes it a suitable confirmatory test when AGA is positive. Introduction of this step-wise approach to coeliac disease investigation resulted in cost savings of at least Pound Sterling 5000 per year without detriment to the clinical service.
Collapse