Transdermal patch medication delivery systems and pediatric poisonings, 2002-2006

Cold Flow Evaluation in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems by Measuring the Width of the Oozed Adhesive

The objective of this study was to develop a simpler and more practical quantitative evaluation method of cold flow (CF) in transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDSs). CF was forcibly induced by loading a weight on a punched-out sample (bisoprolol and tulobuterol tapes). When the extent of CF was analyzed using the area of oozed adhesive as following a previously reported method, the CF profiles were looked different between the samples 12 mm in diameter subjected to a 0.5-kg weight and samples 24 mm in diameter subjected to a 2.0-kg weight despite an equal load per unit area (4.42 g/mm²). The width of oozed adhesive around the original sample was suggested to be an index that properly describes the relationship between the load per unit area and the extent of CF. Further, it was clarified that the average CF width over the entire circumference of the sample was the same whether the samples were round or square as long as the sample area and load were the same. We also observed a linear relationship between the CF width and the aspect ratio of oval and rectangular samples. These results indicated that the CF properties of typical TDDS products lacking CF-proof processing at the edges could be determined by testing samples cut from the product rather than the whole TDDS patch. The proposed width measuring method was simple and useful for optimizing the composition of the adhesive and for testing the quality of the product.

Poisoning Through Pediatric Skin: Cases from the Literature

Poisoning through pediatric skin leading to acute systemic symptoms is a relatively uncommonly reported phenomenon. Systemic toxicity through the skin typically occurs by direct contact between therapeutic or non-therapeutic topical agents and the skin. Though uncommon, poisoning through pediatric skin can have significant consequences and must be recognized so the offending agent may be discontinued and appropriate treatment initiated. We performed a literature search for all article types between 1950 and April 2016 to provide a single source of detectable cases of acute toxicity in pediatric patients due to percutaneous exposure. This literature review discusses relevant pediatric skin physiology along with reports of poisoning events that resulted in systemic signs and symptoms and even death to provide a comprehensive report on causes of pediatric poisoning through the skin.

Effective use of transdermal drug delivery in children

Transdermal administration offers a non-invasive and convenient method for paediatric drug delivery. The competent skin barrier function in term infants and older children limits both water loss and the percutaneous entry of chemicals including drugs; but the smaller doses required by children eases the attainment of therapeutic concentrations. Transdermal patches used in paediatrics include fentanyl, buprenorphine, clonidine, scopolamine, methylphenidate, oestrogens, nicotine and tulobuterol. Some patches have paediatric labelling supported by clinical trials whereas others are used unlicensed. Innovative drug delivery methods, such as microneedles and sonophoresis are being tested for their safety and efficacy; needleless injectors are primarily used to administer growth hormone; and two iontophoretic devices were approved for paediatrics. In contrast, the immature and rapidly evolving skin barrier function in premature neonates represents a significant formulation challenge. Unfortunately, this population group suffers from an absence of approved transdermal formulations, a shortcoming exacerbated by the significant risk of excessive drug exposure via the incompletely formed skin barrier.

Compounded ointment results in severe toxicity in a pediatric patient

BACKGROUND

Dermal drug delivery is becoming more common, as evidenced by the increased numbers of compounding pharmacies preparing topical products for chronic pain management. Consumers may not appreciate the potency or dangers associated with some of the drugs in these preparations. Pediatric patients are especially at risk for significant toxicity with accidental exposures. We report a case of severe toxicity in an 18-month-old boy from exposure to his father's compounded pain ointment.

CASE

An 18-month-old previously healthy child had an ointment applied topically to a diaper rash by his mother, consisting of a single pump of a prescription ointment that her husband received from a compounding pharmacy for neck pain. Approximately 20 minutes later, when the child had been put down for a nap, he had gasping respiration but was otherwise unresponsive. Emergency medical services was called, and the child was unresponsive. In the ED, vital signs were pulse of 57 beats/min, blood pressure 74/35 mm Hg, respiratory rate 21 breaths/min, and O2 saturation 98% on a nonrebreather. Fingerstick glucose was 105 mg/dL. In the ED, physical examination was significant for unresponsiveness, pinpoint pupils, and hyporeflexia. The patient's mental status continued to deteriorate with depressed respirations, and he was intubated. Laboratory results were noncontributory. Electrocardiogram revealed only sinus bradycardia. The patient was transported to a pediatric intensive care unit. He did well over the next several hours with supportive care and had return to normal vital signs over the following 12 hours. He was extubated the following morning without problems. Blood taken at the time of ED presentation had a serum clonidine level of 9.2 ng/mL (reference range, 0.5-4.5 ng/mL) and a norketamine level of 41 ng/mL (reporting limit, >20 ng/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Dermal absorption of drugs leading to significant toxicity in children is well known. Our patient had toxicity from a topical pain medication compounded with several potent drugs known to cause central nervous system depression. There has been an increase in the use of this drug delivery system for management of chronic painful conditions. The popularity and attractiveness of such preparations may be the perception that they are somehow safer and more natural than taking pills. This perception and the fact that these are not dispensed in child-proof containers and are often mailed to the patients without pharmacist counseling can lead to increased inadvertent exposures in the pediatric population.