1
|
Scott HM, Braybrook D, Harðardóttir D, Ellis-Smith C, Harding R. Implementation of child-centred outcome measures in routine paediatric healthcare practice: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2023; 21:63. [PMID: 37394520 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-023-02143-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Person-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) are commonly used in routine adult healthcare to measure and improve outcomes, but less attention has been paid to PCOMs in children's services. The aim of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise existing evidence of the determinants, strategies, and mechanisms that influence the implementation of PCOMs into paediatric healthcare practice. METHODS The review was conducted and reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databased searched included CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo. Google scholar was also searched for grey literature on 25th March 2022. Studies were included if the setting was a children's healthcare service, investigating the implementation or use of an outcome measure or screening tool in healthcare practice, and reported outcomes relating to use of a measure. Data were tabulated and thematically analysed through deductive coding to the constructs of the adapted-Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results were presented as a narrative synthesis, and a logic model developed. RESULTS We retained 69 studies, conducted across primary (n = 14), secondary (n = 13), tertiary (n = 37), and community (n = 8) healthcare settings, including both child self-report (n = 46) and parent-proxy (n = 47) measures. The most frequently reported barriers to measure implementation included staff lack of knowledge about how the measure may improve care and outcomes; the complexity of using and implementing the measure; and a lack of resources to support implementation and its continued use including funding and staff. The most frequently reported facilitators of implementation and continued use include educating and training staff and families on: how to implement and use the measure; the advantages of using PCOMs over current practice; and the benefit their use has on patient care and outcomes. The resulting logic model presents the mechanisms through which strategies can reduce the barriers to implementation and support the use of PCOMs in practice. CONCLUSIONS These findings can be used to support the development of context-specific implementation plans through a combination of existing strategies. This will enable the implementation of PCOMs into routine paediatric healthcare practice to empower settings to better identify and improve child-centred outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION Prospero CRD 42022330013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah May Scott
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK.
| | - Debbie Braybrook
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Daney Harðardóttir
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, Bessemer Rd, SE5 9RS, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cardenas A, Esser K, Wright E, Netten K, Edwards A, Rose J, Vigod S, Cohen E, Orkin J. Caring for the Caregiver (C4C): An Integrated Stepped Care Model for Caregivers of Children With Medical Complexity. Acad Pediatr 2023; 23:236-243. [PMID: 35680082 DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Children with medical complexity (CMC) are a medically fragile subset of children who rely on parental caregivers for substantial care needs. Caregivers of CMC often experience adverse health outcomes such as depression and anxiety, sleep deprivation, financial hardships, and social isolation. Caregivers of CMC are at risk of premature mortality, which is thought to be mediated by chronic and elevated stress, as well as psychiatric morbidity risk. Access to mental health care, where the needs of both the caregiver and child are considered, can enable caregivers to meet high caregiving demands and improve both child and caregiver outcomes. We describe the Caring for the Caregiver (C4C) model, a novel integrated stepped care model consisting of collaboration between a psychiatrist and a pediatric complex care program. This model provides support in 3 steps: 1) early identification of distress, 2) social work assessment, intervention and psychotherapy, and 3) psychiatric care, including diagnosis or medication initiation, for caregivers of CMC. This innovative model will be the first to embed support for the mental health needs of caregivers of CMC within a pediatric team, facilitating access to psychiatric care and serving as a foundation for future integrated stepped care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Analyssa Cardenas
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences (A Cardenas, K Esser, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kayla Esser
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences (A Cardenas, K Esser, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elisabeth Wright
- Department of Psychiatry (E Wright, S Vigod), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry (E Wright, S Vigod), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kathy Netten
- Division of Pediatric Medicine (K Netten, A Edwards, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ashley Edwards
- Division of Pediatric Medicine (K Netten, A Edwards, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, , Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Rose
- SickKids Family Advisory Network (J Rose), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simone Vigod
- Department of Psychiatry (E Wright, S Vigod), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry (E Wright, S Vigod), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences (A Cardenas, K Esser, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Pediatric Medicine (K Netten, A Edwards, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, , Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (E Cohen, J Orkin), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children (E Cohen), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Orkin
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences (A Cardenas, K Esser, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Pediatric Medicine (K Netten, A Edwards, E Cohen, and J Orkin), The Hospital for Sick Children, , Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pediatrics (E Cohen, J Orkin), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cost-effectiveness of a mental health drop-in centre for young people with long-term physical conditions. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:518. [PMID: 35440005 PMCID: PMC9016208 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07901-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paediatric patients being treated for long-term physical health conditions (LTCs) have elevated mental health needs. However, mental health services in the community are difficult to access in the usual course of care for these patients. The Lucy Project - a self-referral drop-in access point-was a program to address this gap by enrolling patients for low-intensity psychological interventions during their treatment for LTCs. In this paper, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Lucy Project. METHODS Using a pre-post design, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the intervention by calculating the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using outcomes data and expenses recorded by project staff. The target population was paediatric patients enrolled in the program with an average age of 9 years, treated over a time horizon of 6 months. Outcome data were collected via the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory, which was converted to health utility scores using an instrument found in the literature. The QALYs were estimated using these health utility scores and the length of the intervention. We calculate a second, practical-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio using streamlined costing figures with maximum capacity patient enrolment within a one-year time horizon, and capturing lessons learned post-trial. RESULTS The base-case model showed an ICER of £21,220/Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY) gained, while the practical model showed an ICER of £4,359/QALY gained. The practical model suggests the intervention garners significant gains in quality of life at an average cost of £309 per patient. Sensitivity analyses reveal use of staff time was the greatest determinant of the ICER, and the intervention is cost-effective 75% of the time in the base-case model, and 94% of the time in the practical-case model at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000/QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS We find the base-case intervention improves patient outcomes and can be considered cost-effective according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) threshold of £20,000-£30,000/QALY gained, and the practical-case intervention is roughly four times as cost-effective as the base-case. We recommend future studies incorporate a control group to corroborate the effect size of the intervention.
Collapse
|
4
|
Catanzano M, Bennett SD, Tibber MS, Coughtrey AE, Liang H, Heyman I, Shafran R. A Mental Health Drop-In Centre Offering Brief Transdiagnostic Psychological Assessment and Treatment in a Paediatric Hospital Setting: A One-Year Descriptive Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18105369. [PMID: 34069973 PMCID: PMC8157880 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study was part of a broader project to examine the acceptability, feasibility and impact of a transdiagnostic mental health drop-in centre offering brief psychological assessment and treatment for children and young people and/or their families with mental health needs in the context of long-term physical health conditions (LTCs). The aims of this investigation were to characterise: (i) the use of such a centre, (ii) the demographics and symptoms of those presenting to the centre, and (iii) the types of support that are requested and/or indicated. METHODS A mental health "booth" was located in reception of a national paediatric hospital over one year. Characteristics of young people with LTCs and their siblings/parents attending the booth were defined. Emotional/behavioural symptoms were measured using standardised questionnaires including the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Participants subsequently received one of four categories of intervention: brief transdiagnostic cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT), referral to other services, neurodevelopmental assessment or signposting to resources. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-eight participants were recruited. The mean age of young people was 9.14 years (standard deviation: 4.28); 61% identified as white and 45% were male. Over half of young people recruited scored in the clinical range with respect to the SDQ. Presenting problems included: anxiety (49%), challenging behaviour (35%), low mood (22%) and other (15%). CONCLUSIONS A considerable proportion of young people with LTC in a paediatric hospital scored in the clinical range for common mental health problems, indicating a potential for psychological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Catanzano
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)20-7405-9200
| | - Sophie D Bennett
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Marc S Tibber
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Anna E Coughtrey
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Holan Liang
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Isobel Heyman
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - The Lucy Project Team
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - Roz Shafran
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; (S.D.B.); (A.E.C.); (H.L.); (I.H.); (T.L.P.T.); (R.S.)
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
| |
Collapse
|