Treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome with pooled human intravenous immune globulin

IVIG and under Burn Unit Care Yield Favorable Outcomes in Pediatric Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Body reactions to drugs can manifest as Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). TEN is the most severe form of cutaneous reactions with an incidence rate of 1-2 per million cases per year. Despite TEN being a critical and life-threatening condition, there is little to no evidence of clear management protocol. We reported a 5-year-old male child who presented with lamotrigine-induced TEN and was successfully treated with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) with a burn unit care level, while TEN treatment with IVIG is an appropriate approach with predictable good outcomes, burn unit care is also effective in creating highly favorable effects. Upon reviewing the literature, several studies indicate that TEN patients treated with the combination of IVIG and burn unit care lead to decreased levels of morbidity and mortality than when treated with IVIG or burn unit care alone. Therefore, treatment involving both IVIG and burn unit care should be considered for TEN patients.

Single centre 20 year survey of antiepileptic drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease which affects about 1% of the human population. There are 50 million patients in the world suffering from this disease and 2 million new cases per year are observed. The necessary treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) increases the risk of adverse reactions. In case of 15% of people receiving AEDs, cutaneous reactions, like maculopapular or erythematous pruritic rash, may appear within four weeks of initiating therapy with AEDs.

METHODS

This study involved 300 epileptic patients in the period between September 1989 and September 2009. A cutaneous adverse reaction was defined as a diffuse rash, which had no other obvious reason than a drug effect, and resulted in contacting a physician.

RESULTS

Among 300 epileptic patients of Neurological Practice in Kielce (132 males and 168 females), a skin reaction to at least one AED was found in 30 patients. As much as 95% of the reactions occurred during therapies with carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine or oxcarbazepine. One of the patients developed Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Some hypersensitivity problems of epileptic patients were obviously related to antiepileptic treatment. Among AEDs, gabapentin, topiramate, levetiracetam, vigabatrin, and phenobarbital were not associated with skin lesions, although the number of patients in the case of the latter was small.

The use of i.v. IG therapy in dermatology

The intravenous administration of exogenous pooled human immunoglobulin (i.v. IG) was originally licensed as antibody replacement therapy in patients with primary immunodeficiencies and there are currently six FDA-approved uses for this agent. Despite a current lack of FDA approval, off-label treatment of a multitude of dermatologic disorders with i.v. IG has shown exciting potential for this unique treatment modality. The diseases successfully treated with i.v. IG include autoimmune bullous diseases, connective tissue diseases, vasculitides, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and infectious disorders (such as streptococcal toxic shock syndrome). Currently the biggest drawback in the consideration of i.v. IG therapy in dermatologic disorders is the lack of randomized controlled trials. Nevertheless, there is a significant body of evidence demonstrating the efficacy of i.v. IG in patients with dermatologic disorders that are resistant to treatment with standard agents. In summary, i.v. IG constitutes a valuable and potentially life-saving agent in managing patients with a variety of dermatologic disorders under the appropriate circumstances.

Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: Interferon and intravenous immunoglobulin (Part 1 of 2)

The introduction of a number of biologic therapies into the market has revolutionized the practice of dermatology. These therapies include interferons, intravenous immunoglobulin, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, efalizumab, alefacept, and rituximab. Most dermatologists are familiar with the Food and Drug Administration-approved indications of these medications. However, numerous off-label uses have evolved. As part 1 of a 2-part series, this article will review the literature regarding the off-label uses of the interferons and intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology.

Treatment of Severe Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions With Human Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Two Dogs

Severe adverse cutaneous reactions were documented in two dogs with acute skin lesions and systemic signs after exposure to several oral and injectable drugs. Because of the high morbidity and mortality rates of many severe cutaneous drug reactions and a poor response to supportive care, wound management, and conventional immunosuppressive therapy, human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was infused on 2 consecutive days (1 g/kg per day) after informed consent was received. Human IVIG, with supportive care, resulted in rapid resolution of dermatological and systemic signs in both dogs; this treatment may be considered in other cases of severe cutaneous drug reactions.

Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Treatment of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis

We report three female patients suffering from toxic epidermal necrolysis, with 30% to 70% epidermal detachment. Alleged causative agents were dipyrone, dibenzazepine, and allopurinol. All patients were treated by intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and survived without further complications, although poor prognostic factors such as concomitant diabetes, large areas of epidermal detachment, and pancytopenia were present. We report these cases with emphasis on the concept that prompt diagnosis, withdrawal of causative drugs, and immediate treatment are imperative for the favorable outcome of the disease. Our patients can be added to the list of those patients who were successfully treated by IVIG, as indicated in this review of the literature.

Use of intravenous immunoglobulin in children with stevens-johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: seven cases and review of the literature

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis are the most severe cutaneous reactions that occur in children. Off-label use of human intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been reported in a number of autoimmune and cell-mediated blistering disorders of the skin, including severe cutaneous drug reactions. We review 28 previous reports in which IVIG was used in pediatric patients with SJS and toxic epidermal necrolysis and discuss our experience in 7 children with SJS, in whom no new blisters developed within 24 to 48 hours after IVIG administration and rapid recovery ensued. IVIG seems to be a useful and safe therapy for children with severe cutaneous drug reactions. Well-controlled, prospective, multicenter clinical trials are needed to determine optimal dosing guidelines and to compare the efficacy and safety of IVIG with other potentially effective modalities.

Use of human immunoglobulin for treatment of severe erythema multiforme in a cat

A 5-month old female domestic shorthair cat developed lethargy and severe ulcerative skin lesions that covered more than half of its body after routine administration of rabies vaccine, anthelmintic, and ear medication. Clinical and histologic findings were consistent with a severe cutaneous drug reaction or erythema multiforme. The cat's condition continued to deteriorate despite drug withdrawal and supportive care. Administration of human intravenous immunoglobulin was well tolerated by the cat and led to rapid resolution of ulcerative cutaneous lesions, accompanied by substantial improvement in the cat's demeanor within 8 days. Human intravenous immunoglobulin appears to be a novel promising treatment for life-threatening cutaneous drug reactions.

Life-threatening adverse events of antiepileptic drugs

Treating a patient with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may give rise to unexpected life-threatening adverse events. Despite extensive experimental and clinical testing to ensure safety, most AEDs on the market have been associated with cases of severe cutaneous reactions, serious hematological disorders, or hepatic failure. Most of these disorders emerge as idiosyncratic immune-mediated disease or are related to toxic metabolic products of the AEDs. Early diagnosis is the only means of reducing the harmful, potentially fatal effects of these reactions. A high degree of suspicion, knowledge of risk factors, and close physician-patient contact increases the likelihood of early diagnosis and treatment. When diagnosed, severe reactions must be fully documented and reported to health authorities. The very rare occurrence of life threatening events should not, in general, limit treatment decision-making. Future epidemiological, chemical, and genetic research might provide methods for ascertaining which patients are at risk, so undue exposure can be avoided.

Successful treatment of antiepileptic drug hypersensitivity syndrome with intravenous immune globulin

Intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) has proved beneficial for severe immunologically related cutaneous adverse reactions. We report a child with severe antiepileptic drug hypersensitivity syndrome who was successfully treated with IVIG. IVIG should be considered in the pharmacologic armamentarium of severe antiepileptic drug hypersensitivity syndrome. antiepileptic drugs, hypersensitivity, immune globulin.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune and inflammatory dermatoses. A review of proposed mechanisms of action and therapeutic applications

Off-label use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) at high doses has resulted in numerous anecdotal reports of its effectiveness in a variety of autoimmune and inflammatory conditions. Despite its growing acceptance as a viable therapeutic option in the management of several such disorders, the poorly defined mechanism of action of IVIG has stifled its rational therapeutic application. The lack of carefully designed prospective randomized clinical trials has further fueled controversy and mitigates against optimal application of this burgeoning therapy. Nevertheless, some standardization of IVIG therapy is slowly advancing that promises to support the use of this treatment for a growing number of autoimmune and inflammatory dermatoses.

Carbamazepine-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome treated with IV steroids and IVIG

A 17-year-old female is presented who developed antiepileptic drug hypersensitivity syndrome after treatment with carbamazepine. The initial diagnoses were idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and toxic shock syndrome. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous steroids. After a severe climax on days 2-4 she recovered completely and was discharged on the eighth day of hospitalization. Although we do not have direct proof, we believe that these treatment modalities, especially the IVIG, shortened and ameliorated the clinical course of the disease.

Treatment of severe drug eruptions

Severe drug eruptions are rare, life-threatening events. The management begins with the withdrawal of the suspect drug(s). We recently confirmed that an earlier withdrawal of drugs with short elimination half-life was associated with a better survival of patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In cases of "acute skin failure" (exfoliative dermatitis, extensive SJS or TEN), management of patients must be undertaken in specialized intensive care units or in burn units. The main principles of symptomatic therapy are the same as for major burns: warming of the environment, correction of electrolyte disturbances, high caloric intake, and prevention of sepsis. The suspected immunologic orgin of drug eruptions prompted the use of corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs, and anti-cytokines. Systemic corticosteroids are useful in "hypersensitivity syndrome" when visceral lesions depend on infiltration by activated cosinophils. Systemic corticosteroids were shown to be deleterious in cases of advanced TEN. Their potential usefulness at earlier stages of SJS or TEN remains controversial. High intravenous doses of cyclophosphamide or oral cyclosporin have been administered to a few patients with TEN, most often following ineffective treatment with corticosteroids for 1 to 5 days. It remains doubtful that the progression of the lesions was shortened. A few patients appeared to benefit from treatment with pentoxifyllin, a drug suppressing the production of TNF. Thalidomide, another suppressor of TNF production, significantly increased the death rate when tested in a double-blind placebo controlled trial in patients with early TEN. High dose intravenous immunoglobulins were used in 10 patients with TEN on the basis of their ability to inhibit fas-fas ligand mediated apoptosis. The potential benefit of this treatment needs confirmation by further studies. Patients and their first degree relatives should be advised to avoid the responsible drug and chemically related compounds. Regulatory agencies should be notified of such cases.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome treated with intravenous gammaglobulin

A 31-year-old man with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome who developed toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) was successfully treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. He presented with a widespread, blistering skin rash, extensive mucosal ulceration, high-grade fever and pancytopaenia. Nevirapine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, was suspected as the culprit drug, although the patient had been taking this medication for 6 months. The patient also demonstrated an increased number of gamma/delta (gamma delta) T cells that decreased concomitantly with his clinical improvement. This correlation has not been described in TEN previously and may be of pathophysiological significance.

Acute management of hypersensitivity reactions and seizures

The most crucial step in the management of an antiepileptic drug (AED) hypersensitivity reaction is the recognition of the clinical syndrome and cessation of the presumed offending agent. The severity of the developing reaction will shape the course of treatment because multiple organ systems may become affected. Management of conjunctival involvement and treatment of skin lesions dominate care, with patients whose skin lesions are extensive benefitting from treatment in a structured burn unit. Neutropenia and sepsis are common and potentially fatal complicating factors. The use of steroids remains controversial, as is the utility of immune modulation with other agents such as cyclophosphamide and i.v. immunoglobulin. Acute treatment of seizures should be addressed with i.v. benzodiazepines, given either intermittently or by continuous infusion. Choice of long-term maintenance AEDs should take into consideration the crossreactivity among AEDs that share an arene oxide metabolite.