Nie L, Xu P, Hu D. Multidimensional IRT for forced choice tests: A literature review.
Heliyon 2024;
10:e26884. [PMID:
38449643 PMCID:
PMC10915382 DOI:
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26884]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The Multidimensional Forced Choice (MFC) test is frequently utilized in non-cognitive evaluations because of its effectiveness in reducing response bias commonly associated with the conventional Likert scale. Nonetheless, it is critical to recognize that the MFC test generates ipsative data, a type of measurement that has been criticized due to its limited applicability for comparing individuals. Multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) models have recently sparked renewed interest among academics and professionals. This is largely due to the development of several models that make it easier to collect normative data from forced-choice tests. The paper introduces a modeling framework made up of three key components: response format, measurement model, and decision theory. Under this paradigm, four IRT models were chosen as examples. Following that, a comprehensive study is carried out to compare and characterize the parameter estimation techniques used in MFC-IRT models. This work then examines empirical research on the concept by analyzing three distinct domains: parameter invariance testing, computerized adaptive testing (CAT), and validity investigation. Finally, it is recommended that future research initiatives follow four distinct paths: modeling, parameter invariance testing, forced-choice CAT, and validity studies.
Collapse