Socioeconomic inequalities in the utilization of dental services among adults in Saudi Arabia

Background

This study used the Anderson Behavioral Model to assess the socioeconomic inequalities in dental services utilization among adults in Saudi Arabia, along with other predictors of utilization, to inform future planning of dental care services.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was a secondary analysis using national data from the 2019 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia World Health Survey (KSAWHS). The survey consisted of two interviewer-administered questionnaires: one household and one individual interview. The questions covered predisposing factors (age, gender, marital status, nationality, education, employment), enabling factors (income, household wealth, area-based socioeconomic class, health insurance, eligibility for free governmental health care, transportation and region of residence) and self-reported need for dental treatment. The main outcome was dental utilization in the past year; predisposing, enabling and need factors were independent variables. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses identified significant predictors of dental utilization, applying survey weights to adjust for the complex survey design. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and p values were reported in the final model.

Results

The final dataset included 8535 adults (response rate = 95.4%). Twenty percent of adults had visited the dentist at least once in the past year (95% CI 18–21%). There were socioeconomic inequalities in dental utilization. High household income (OR 1.43, p = 0.043), second and middle household wealth status (OR 1.51, p = 0.003 and OR 1.57, p = 0.006) and access to free governmental health care (OR 2.05, p = 0.004) were significant predictors in the final regression model along with perceived need for dental treatment (OR 52.09, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Socioeconomic inequalities in the utilization of dental services exist in Saudi Arabia. The need for treatment was the strongest predictor suggesting predominantly symptomatic attendance. Increasing awareness about the importance of preventive dental visits rather than symptomatic attendance could be an important policy implication to improve oral health and optimize dental care expenditure. Further research should explore the drivers for adults to seek preventive care in the absence of any recognized dental problems.

Population-based surveillance of medical tourism among US residents from 11 states and territories: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

OBJECTIVE

To describe medical tourism among a subset of US residents; identify possible indicators for medical tourism.

METHODS

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention collaborated with 11 states and territories to ask 6 questions about medical tourism, using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Data collected from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, included whether respondents traveled internationally for preplanned care, travel reasons and destinations, procedures received, and occurrence and treatment of complications. A descriptive analysis of demographics, socioeconomic status and health access variables was performed, and a regression model with a log-link function and Poisson distribution was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) for medical tourism.

RESULTS

Of 93,492 respondents, 517 (0.55%) traveled internationally during the previous year for care. Mexico was the most common destination (41% of trips). Dentistry accounted for 55% of treatments. Complications from care received abroad were reported by 5% of medical tourists; 67% sought care upon returning to the United States. The prevalence of medical tourism was 1.32% (95% CI, 1.00-1.64). The prevalence of medical tourism was higher in Hispanics and non-whites (PR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.48-6.32) and higher among those without current health insurance (PR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.69-4.34).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest collection of population-based surveillance data describing medical tourism among US residents from multiple states and territories. Understanding the demographic and socioeconomic factors associated with medical tourism can inform evidence-based recommendations for travelers and clinicians who may advise or care for these individuals before, during, or after travel.

Health Care Disparities in Race-Ethnic Minority Communities and Populations: Does the Availability of Health Care Providers Play a Role?

OBJECTIVES

To examine disparities in use and access to different health care providers by community and individual race-ethnicity and to test provider supply as a potential mediator.

DATA SOURCES

National secondary data from 2014 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 5-year estimates (2010-2014) from American Community Survey, and 2014 InfoUSA.

STUDY DESIGN

Multiple logistic regression models examined the association of community and individual race-ethnicity with reported health care visits and access. Mediation analyses tested the role of provider supply.

DATA EXTRACTION METHODS

Individual-level survey data were linked to race-ethnic composition and health business counts of the respondent's primary care service area (PCSA).

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Minority PCSAs are significantly and independently associated with lower odds of having a visit to a physician assistant/nurse practitioner, dentist, or other health professionals and having a usual care provider (all p < 0.05). Few significant associations were observed for integrated PCSAs or for health provider supply. A modest mediation effect for provider supply was observed for travel time to usual care provider and visit to other health professionals.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a range of health services is lower in minority communities and individuals. However, provider supply was not an important explanatory factor of these disparities.