Will For-Profits Keep Up the Pace in the United States? The Future of the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly and Implications for Other Programs Serving Medically Vulnerable Populations

Providing Behavioral Health Care in PACE - A Review of Federal and State Manual Regulations

OBJECTIVES

Present analysis of the federal and state regulations that guide The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) operations and core clinical features for direction on behavioral health (BH).

DESIGN

Review and synthesize the federal (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) and all publicly available state manuals according to the BH-Serious Illness Care (SIC) model domains.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The 155 PACE organizations operating in 32 states and the District of Columbia.

METHODS

A multipronged search was conducted to identify official state and federal manuals guiding the implementation and functions of PACE organizations. The CMS PACE website was used to identify the federal PACE manual. State-level manuals for 32 states with PACE programs were identified through several sources, including official PACE websites, contacts through official websites, the National PACE Association (NPA), and public and academic search engines. The manuals were searched according to the BH-SIC model domains that pertain to integrating BH care with complex care individuals.

RESULTS

According to the CMS Manual, the interdisciplinary team is responsible for holistic care of PACE enrollees, but a BH specialist is not a required member. The CMS Manual includes information on BH clinical functions, BH workforce, and structures for outcome measurement, quality, and accountability. Eight of 32 PACE-participating states offer publicly available state PACE manuals; of which 3 offer information on BH clinical functions.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Regarding BH, federal and state manual regulations establish limited guidance for comprehensive care service delivery at PACE organizations. The absence of clear directives weakens BH care delivery due to a limiting the ability to develop quality measures and accountability structures. This hinders incentivization and accountability to truly all-inclusive care. Clearer guidelines and regulatory parameters regarding BH care at federal and state levels may enable more PACE organizations to meet rising BH demands of aging communities.

Enrollment And Characteristics Of Dual-Eligible Medicare And Medicaid Beneficiaries In Integrated Care Programs

Integrated care programs (ICPs) are meant to make Medicare and Medicaid coverage for dual-eligible beneficiaries work more seamlessly. Evidence is limited on ICP enrollment trends and the characteristics of dual-eligible beneficiaries who enroll in these programs-specifically, the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly, Medicare Advantage (MA) Fully Integrated Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans, and state demonstration Medicare-Medicaid plans. Using national data, we evaluated changes in ICP enrollment between 2013 and 2020 and compared the demographic characteristics of beneficiaries in these programs relative to the characteristics of beneficiaries not in them. The proportion of dual-eligible beneficiaries in ICPs increased from 2.0 percent in 2013 to 9.4 percent in 2020. However, nonintegrated or partially integrated coordination-only MA plans experienced the plurality of growth in enrollment of dual-eligible beneficiaries. Relative to non-ICP fee-for-service Medicare, beneficiaries in ICPs were more likely to be Black and Hispanic versus White and were less likely to be rural, younger, or disabled. Policy makers should diligently monitor growth in ICPs and less integrated dual-eligible plans in MA while also evaluating their impact on equity, spending, and quality of care.

Minority Older Adults' Access to and Use of Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly

Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) are an effective approach to improve care quality and delay institutional admissions especially for Black and Hispanic older adults who have seen a disproportionate rise in nursing home use. Guided by Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and employing focus groups and one-on-one interviews, we qualitatively examined factors influencing access to and use of PACE by Black and Hispanic older adults. The study sample consisted of thirty-two PACE enrollees, six marketing-team members, and four family-caregivers from three PACE sites in a northeast urban city. Informed knowledge, cultural beliefs, and attitudes toward PACE were found to affect access. Community resources, available services, and care quality facilitated enrollment/participation. Barriers identified included poor dissemination of information and inadequate emphasis on staff's sensitivity to enrollees' cultural and disability differences. Findings will help healthcare leaders capitalize on facilitators and address barriers to enhance access and use of PACE by racial and ethnic minority older adults.