Characteristics and outcomes of cases with methylphenidate abuse, dependence or withdrawal: an analysis of spontaneous reports in EudraVigilance

Methylphenidate (MPH) is a central nervous stimulant, which is mainly used in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and narcolepsy. In recent years, rising MPH prescription volumes have drawn attention to possible misuse. We analyzed data on suspected MPH abuse, dependence or withdrawal reported to the EudraVigilance database (1996-2019), comparing case characteristics (e.g. age, indications and outcome). In 1531 cases from 35 countries (median: 29 years, 57.6% male), 42.3% had been diagnosed with ADHD and 8.0% with narcolepsy. Narcolepsy cases were older than ADHD cases (mean age: 47 vs. 22 years), and used co-medications more frequently (79.4 vs. 47.8%). Intravenous MPH administration was most common among individuals not diagnosed with ADHD or narcolepsy. A history of abuse, dependence or withdrawal of any substance was more often documented in fatal than in nonfatal cases (49.0 vs. 22.5%), whereas differences regarding the route of administration were less pronounced. Minors, who presumably received MPH for ADHD treatment, presented less frequently with serious outcomes than older cases or those without an approved indication. Prescribers should exercise caution in adult MPH users and should make a thorough co-medication assessment. Finally, more research on substance abuse in narcolepsy patients is required, which should include comorbidities and co-medication.

Effort–Reward Imbalance at Work and Prescription Drug Misuse—Prospective Evidence from Germany

This study examines how work stress affects the misuse of prescription drugs to augment mental performance without medical necessity (i.e., cognitive enhancement). Based on the effort–reward imbalance model, it can be assumed that a misalignment of effort exerted and rewards received increases prescription drug misuse, especially if employees overcommit. To test these assumptions, we conducted a prospective study using a nationwide web-based sample of the working population in Germany (N = 11,197). Effort, reward, and overcommitment were measured at t₁ and the 12 month frequency of prescription drug misuse for enhancing cognitive performance was measured at a one-year follow-up (t₂). The results show that 2.6% of the respondents engaged in such drug misuse, of which 22.7% reported frequent misuse. While we found no overall association between misuse frequency and effort, reward, or their imbalance, overcommitment was significantly associated with a higher misuse frequency. Moreover, at low levels of overcommitment, more effort and an effort–reward imbalance discouraged future prescription drug misuse, while higher overcommitment, more effort, and an imbalance increased it. These findings suggest that a stressful work environment is a risk factor for health-endangering behavior, and thereby underlines the importance of identifying groups at risk of misusing drugs.

Parents’ Perceptions on the Debated Parenting Practice of Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Children and Adolescents

First evidence shows that some parents engage in the health-endangering practice of (mis-)using prescription drugs to boost their children’s school performance. But little is known about parental perspectives on this phenomenon. This study aims to better understand parents’ perspectives on the non-medical use of prescription drugs to improve healthy children’s cognitive functioning. We conducted twelve semi-structured face-to-face interviews with a diverse sample of parents in Germany, and applied qualitative content analysis to explore their perspectives on instrumentalizing prescription drugs for improving the performance of healthy children, including their underlying knowledge (gaps), moral evaluations, evaluations of accompanied risks and benefits, opinions on potential motivators, and wishes regarding policy-making. The results show that parents typically believed themselves knowledgeable about such prescription drug (mis-)use, although they were not aware of anyone in their social environment taking them for enhancement. Parents generally considered such behavior to be morally reprehensible, cheating, and similar to doping in sports, and they typically claimed that no situation or occasion could motivate them to administer prescription drugs to their healthy children. Health risks (including side effects or addiction) were a typical expectation of drug use. That doctors should give such drugs to healthy young people was seen as unjustifiable. The results suggest that morality and risk–benefit evaluations of parents play a major role in their decision-making concerning this potentially risky instrumentalization of non-medical drugs. These insights are of distinct importance, especially for future research and further discussions on this topic, such as an evidence-based public dialog and ethics debates.