Diagnostic accuracies of CTs, X-rays and Lodox to detect blunt force trauma in adults, using a pig model

Radiological detection of sharp force skeletal trauma: an evaluation of the sensitivity of Lodox in comparison to CT and X-ray

Victims of violent crime often have evidence of sharp force trauma (SFT) which needs to be examined to accurately investigate these cases. The abilities of CTs, X-rays, and Lodox to detect skeletal SFT defects and the minimum number of impacts were assessed, as were their abilities to macroscopically interpret SFT with the aim of identifying the class of weapon used. Ten pigs were, post-mortem, stabbed using a kitchen knife on one side of the body and chopped using a panga on the other side. They were then scanned and macerated. The number of SFT defects, type of SFT, and minimum number of impacts identifiable osteologically were recorded, as well as when using each imaging modality. CTs were most sensitive for detecting stab and chop defects (56.7% and 78.3%, respectively) and the minimum number of impacts (82.8%), while X-rays were least sensitive (17.2% for stab wounds, 46.5% for chop marks, and 43.5% for impacts). Lodox detected 26.8% of stab defects, 59.3% of chop marks, and 58.4% of impacts. The type of SFT for more than 70.0% of identified defects was correctly classified using all methods, while only Lodox had moderate sensitivities for stab wounds (52.4%). When radiological assessments of skeletal SFT are required, CTs should be performed, but Lodox can be used as an alternative. However, dry bone analyses still produce the best results and should be performed whenever possible. Macroscopic interpretations of skeletal SFT to broadly determine the class of weapon used is possible radiologically.