Menstrual health management: Practices, challenges and human rights violations

Exploring Menstrual Hygiene Practices and Awareness of Menstrual Cups Among Nursing Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Survey

BACKGROUND

Menstrual hygiene management poses significant challenges globally, with widespread reliance on disposable sanitary pads contributing to health risks and environmental degradation. Sustainable alternatives like menstrual cups offer promising solutions but face barriers to adoption, including myths and misconceptions. Educational interventions are crucial in promoting eco-friendly menstrual hygiene practices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur (Central India) among nursing officers from January to February 2022. A structured questionnaire assessed the demographic characteristics, menstrual hygiene practices, knowledge of menstrual cups, and attitude toward their use.

RESULTS

Of the 101 participants, the majority were between the age group of 25 and 40 years (71, 70.3%) and were educated up to a Bachelor of Science degree in nursing (79, 78.21%). Overwhelmingly, 97 (96.03%) of the nursing officers used non-biodegradable sanitary pads. Frequent need to change and staining were cited as common difficulties. Although 97 (96.04%) of the participants had heard of menstrual cups, knowledge gaps existed regarding suitability for nulliparous women, material composition, cost, and lifespan. Despite expressing a desire for better alternatives by 56 (55.4%) participants, only one (0.99%) reported current menstrual cup usage, with 60 (59.4%) participants indicating future readiness to use.

CONCLUSION

Discovering nurses' menstrual hygiene habits, this study sheds light on their reliance on disposable pads over menstrual cups. Improving the acceptability of menstrual cups hinges on addressing current knowledge gaps such as their feasibility for use by nulliparous women, ease of insertion, cost, and environmental sustainability. Despite hurdles like misinformation, participants show openness to embracing new options with the right guidance and education.

Utilization of modern menstrual methods and related unmet needs among college going women in Coimbatore district: a descriptive cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The primary objectives were to determine the proportion of modern menstrual method (MMM) users among college going women in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu; and to estimate the unmet needs associated with use of MMMs in comparison with other menstrual hygiene methods (MHMs). We also assessed the factors that determine MMM use among college going women.

METHODS

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among college going women in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India between October 2022 and January 2023 using a purpose predesigned, pretested, semi-structured proforma that included validated Menstrual Practice Needs Scale (MPNS-36).

RESULTS

Only 1.4% of the study participants used MMMs - menstrual cups (1.3%) and tampons (0.1%). Sanitary pads were the most common MHM of choice (96.3%); of which majority (98.6%) used disposable pads and more than half (50.4%) used non-biodegradable pads. Importantly, one in six (16.5%) were not aware of nature of sanitary pads (biodegradable or nonbiodegradable) used. The unmet needs associated with MMMs (menstrual cups and tampons) were significantly lower than that for other MHMs (including sanitary pads), in particular, the unmet material and home environment needs, unmet material reliability concerns, unmet reuse needs and unmet reuse insecurity. However, we found no significant difference between MMMs, sanitary pads and other MHMs in terms of unmet transport, college environment, change and disposal insecurity needs. The significant predictors of use of MMMs were age (more than 21 years of age), residence (urban), type of stay (off campus including home), socioeconomic status (upper), fathers' and mothers' education (high school and above), and presence of personal income. Discussions with friends (or peers) both before and after menarche regarding menstruation resulted in higher adoption of modern menstrual methods.

CONCLUSION

MMMs provided comparative advantage with lesser unmet needs for material reliability and reuse insecurity concerns, particularly in home environment. However, none of the MHMs fulfilled the user expectations for transport and disposal insecurity concerns, particularly outdoors.