The Attitudes of Progressive Neurological Disease Patients and Their Family Members to End of Life Care: A Cross-Sectional Study

Older adults' attitudes toward using Euthanasia at the end-of life: cancer vs. Parkinson's disease

Background

There is a paucity of studies that compare older adults' attitudes toward Euthanasia in two different terminal illnesses. Moreover, these studies did not relate to potentially influencing psycho-social factors. The current study aimed to examine the impact of a diverse range of variables on attitudes among older adults toward Euthanasia in two medical conditions: cancer and Parkinson's disease.

Methods

A total of 501 individuals aged 75 and above participated in the study. Attitudes toward Euthanasia were measured using vignettes which described two conditions: an 80-year-old man with metastatic cancer and another man in an advanced stage of Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire included measures of relevant experience (with a close family member or a friend dying from a terminal illness), self-efficacy, will to live, satisfaction with life, will to prolong life, fear of death and dying, social support, and psycho-social characteristics. The data were analyzed using hierarchical linear regression models.

Results

A more positive attitude toward Euthanasia was found in the case of cancer compared to Parkinson's disease. Being a woman, having more years of education, lower level of religiosity, greater fear of death and dying and higher self-efficacy contributes to more favorable attitudes toward Euthanasia in both end-of life conditions.

Conclusions

The finding that attitudes toward Euthanasia are statistically significantly more positive in the case of cancer compared to Parkinson's disease can be attributed to the greater prevalence of cancer in the population, and to the public's awareness of the suffering associated with each of these medical conditions. Beyond the important role of the socio-demographic characteristics of gender, education, and religiosity, it appears that fear of death and dying and self-efficacy are important psychological factors in explaining attitudes toward Euthanasia in both illnesses among older people. These findings shed light on older adults' attitudes toward Euthanasia in debilitating illnesses.

The Impact of Rapidly Progressing Neurodegenerative Disorders on Caregivers: An Integrative Literature Review

Neurodegenerative disorders affect over 6 million people in the United States. A subset of these patients experiences symptoms that progress rapidly, along with a 5- to 10-year life expectancy (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis). This subgroup often becomes dependent on family caregivers. Managing care demands at the end of life that are brought on by rapid disease progression has a negative impact on caregiver quality of life. The purpose of this integrative review is to highlight the gaps in the existing body of research on the effect of neuropalliative care on quality of life of this caregiver population. A total of 13 articles met inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The most frequently occurring themes and findings in the literature shed light on neuropalliative care and provided some insight into both caregivers and patients' perspective at the end of life. What sets this population apart from caregivers and patients of other terminal diseases is the nature of disease progression and the rapid life adjustments that come along with it. Integration of neuropalliative has shown to provide additional support for caregivers and patients; however, it remains underused. To promote equitable access to these services, it is necessary to address several structural barriers.

Research Roundup

Synopses of a selection of recently published research articles of relevance to palliative care.

Ethics consultations in neuro-oncology

Background

Management of patients with brain tumors can lead to ethical and decisional dilemmas. The aim of this study was to characterize ethical conflicts encountered in neuro-oncologic patients.

Methods

Retrospective review of ethics consultations performed upon patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors at a tertiary cancer center. An ethics consultation database was examined to characterize ethical conflicts, contextual factors, and interventions by the consultation team.

Results

Fifty consultations were reviewed; 28 (56%) patients were women, median age 54 (range 4-86); 27 (54%) patients had a primary central nervous system malignancy; 20 (40%) had brain metastasis. At the time of consultations, 41 (82%) patients lacked decisional capacity; 48 (96%) had a designated surrogate decision maker; 3 (6%) had an advance directive outlining wishes regarding medical treatment; 12 (24%) had a Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) order. Ethical conflicts centered upon management of end-of-life (EOL) circumstances in 37 (72%) of cases; of these, 30 did not have decisional capacity. The most common ethical issues were DNAR status, surrogate decision making, and request for nonbeneficial treatment. Consultants resolved conflicts by facilitating decision making for incapacitated patients in 30 (60%) cases, communication between conflicting parties in 10 (20%), and re-articulation of patients' previously stated wishes in 6 (12%).

Conclusions

Decisional capacity at EOL represents the primary ethical challenge in care of neuro-oncologic patients. Incomplete awareness among surrogate decision makers of patients' prognosis and preferences contributes to communication gaps and dilemmas. Early facilitation of communication between patients, caregivers, and medical providers may prevent or mitigate conflicts and allow the enactment of patients' goals and values.