Thermal ablative therapies for treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the literature

Comparison of thermal ablative methods and myomectomy for the treatment of fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness and safety of thermal ablative methods and myomectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases through April 2021. Clinical trials comparing the thermal ablative methods and myomectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies including 4205 patients were eligible. The thermal ablative treatment group was associated with less major adverse events (only ultrasound guided high-intensity focused ultrasound) (RR, 0.111 [95% CI, 0.070-0.175], p=.0), shorter duration of hospital stays in observational studies (-0.1497 day, [95% CI, -1.593 to -0.321], p=.0) and in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (-0.844 day, [95% CI, -0.1.142 to -0.546], p=.0), higher uterine fibroid symptom (UFS) score after operation (0.252 [95% CI, 0.165-0.339]; p=.0), transformed symptom severity (tSS) score after operation (0.515 [95% CI, 0.355-0.674]; p=.0) and quality of life (QoL) score after operation (0.188 [95% CI, 0.093-0.283]; p=.0) in comparison with myomectomy group. No statistically significant difference was found between the thermal ablative treatment group and myomectomy group with respect to reintervention rate and pregnancy rate.

CONCLUSION

The current data available demonstrate that thermal ablative methods were not inferior to myomectomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids. The findings in this study need to be further confirmed by large RCTs.

Comparison among cryoablation, radiofrequency ablation, and partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinomas sized smaller than 2 cm or sized 2-4 cm: A population-based study

This study aimed to compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CRA), and partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) sized ≤2 cm or 2 to 4 cm.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify 17,234 patients diagnosed with T1aN0M0 RCC from 2004 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared among patients who were treated using PN, CRA, or RFA. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine prognostic factors for survival.In patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm, better OS and CSS were observed with PN than with CRA or RFA. On multivariable analysis, compared to PN, CRA and RFA were independently associated with poor OS and CSS in patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm. In patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm, better OS was observed with PN than with CRA or RFA; however, CSS was similar. On multivariable analysis, compared to PN, RFA was independently associated with poor OS in patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm.CRA or RFA should not be recommended for patients with RCCs sized 2 to 4 cm; PN is an effective treatment modality in these patients. For patients with RCCs sized ≤2 cm, CRA can be an equally effective alternative to PN.