Role of Stereoselective Assays in Bioequivalence Studies of Racemic Drugs: Have We Reached a Consensus?

Generic pharmaceuticals, regulatory aspects, bioequivalence investigation, and perception

INTRODUCTION

The objective and significance of the topic is to draw attention toward regulatory aspects (and pharmacopoeias) for bioequivalence investigation, and perception for generic pharmaceuticals, especially their stereoselective bioequivalence evaluation for understanding the performance of the racemic generic products available in the market.

AREAS COVERED

The areas covered include bioequivalence studies (and related USP and FDA requirements) on certain generic APIs for comparison, examples of concern related to inspection of pharmaceuticals for export/import. Literature methodology includes search through USP monographs, MDPI.com, msn.com, WHO Drug Information, certain specific web links, PubMed Central®, PubMed®, NLM's advanced biomedical information services, and several pdf published in relevant journals in the field for related authentic information.

EXPERT OPINION

The USP, the USFDA, and the units alike internationally should enforce pharmaceutical companies to perform stereoselective investigations on generic APIs to show that their PK/PD parameters are (nearly) equal to the standards set by such units for allowing marketing of that API. This should be provided to professionals in the areas of patient care and every country should enforce such regulations at the time of export and import of generics.

The role of stereochemistry of antibiotic agents in the development of antibiotic resistance in the environment

Antibiotic resistance (ABR) is now recognised as a serious global health and economic threat that is most efficiently managed via a 'one health' approach incorporating environmental risk assessment. Although the environmental dimension of ABR has been largely overlooked, recent studies have underlined the importance of non-clinical settings in the emergence and spread of resistant strains. Despite this, several research gaps remain in regard to the development of a robust and fit-for-purpose environmental risk assessment for ABR drivers such as antibiotics (ABs). Here we explore the role the environment plays in the dissemination of ABR within the context of stereochemistry and its particular form, enantiomerism. Taking chloramphenicol as a proof of principle, we argue that stereoisomerism of ABs impacts on biological properties and the mechanisms of resistance and we discuss more broadly the importance of stereochemistry (enantiomerism in particular) with respect to antimicrobial potency and range of action.

Chiral toxicology: it's the same thing...only different

Chiral substances possess a unique architecture such that, despite sharing identical molecular formulas, atom-to-atom linkages, and bonding distances, they cannot be superimposed. Thus, in the environment of living systems, where specific structure-activity relationships may be required for effect (e.g., enzymes, receptors, transporters, and DNA), the physiochemical and biochemical properties of racemic mixtures and individual stereoisomers can differ significantly. In drug development, enantiomeric selection to maximize clinical effects or mitigate drug toxicity has yielded both success and failure. Further complicating genetic polymorphisms in drug disposition, stereoselective metabolism of chiral compounds can additionally influence pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity. Optically pure pharmaceuticals may undergo racemization in vivo, negating single enantiomer benefits or inducing unexpected effects. Appropriate chiral antidotes must be selected for therapeutic benefit and to minimize adverse events. Enantiomers may possess different carcinogenicity and teratogenicity. Environmental toxicology provides several examples in which compound bioaccumulation, persistence, and toxicity show chiral dependence. In forensic toxicology, chiral analysis has been applied to illicit drug preparations and biological specimens, with the potential to assist in determination of cause of death and aid in the correct interpretation of substance abuse and "doping" screens. Adrenergic agonists and antagonist, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, SSRIs, opioids, warfarin, valproate, thalidomide, retinoic acid, N-acetylcysteine, carnitine, penicillamine, leucovorin, glucarpidase, pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls, phenylethylamines, and additional compounds will be discussed to illustrate important concepts in "chiral toxicology."

Drug disposition in three dimensions: an update on stereoselectivity in pharmacokinetics

Many marketed drugs are chiral and are administered as the racemate, a 50:50 combination of two enantiomers. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers are well documented. Because of enantioselectivity in pharmacokinetics, results of in vitro pharmacodynamic studies involving enantiomers may differ from those in vivo where pharmacokinetic processes will proceed. With respect to pharmacokinetics, disparate plasma concentration vs time curves of enantiomers may result from the pharmacokinetic processes proceeding at different rates for the two enantiomers. At their foundation, pharmacokinetic processes may be enantioselective at the levels of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion. In some circumstances, one enantiomer can be chemically or biochemically inverted to its antipode in a unidirectional or bidirectional manner. Genetic consideration such as polymorphic drug metabolism and gender, and patient factors such as age, disease state and concomitant drug intake can all play a role in determining the relative plasma concentrations of the enantiomers of a racemic drug. The use of a nonstereoselective assay method for a racemic compound can lead to difficulties in interpretation of data from, for example, bioequivalence or dose/concentration vs effect assessments. In this review data from a number of representative studies involving pharmacokinetics of chiral drugs are presented and discussed.

New methylphenidate formulations for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

dl-Methylphenidate (MPH) remains the most widely used pharmacological agent in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The predominantly dopaminergic mechanism of the psychostimulant actions has become more clearly defined. Neuroimaging and genetic studies are revealing the underlying neuropathology in ADHD. Novel extended-release (ER) MPH formulations now offer drug delivery options to overcome both the short-term actions of immediate-release (IR) MPH and the acute tolerance associated with the first-generation ER-MPH products. These novel MPH products apply proprietary technologies such as OROS (Alza), Diffucaps (Eurand) and SODAS (Elan) to offer both the convenience of once-a-day administration and absorption profiles resembling, to varying degrees, the standard multiple dose schedules of IR-MPH. The pharmacodynamics of the separate MPH enantiomers is in the process of further neuropharmacological characterisation. It is well established that dl-MPH undergoes marked stereoselective metabolism. Although l-MPH exhibits only minimal oral absorption, it may preferentially penetrate the brain, and interacts with ethanol to form the metabolite ethylphenidate. The newly approved resolved enantiomer product d-MPH is now available in an IR formulation, and when administered at one-half the dose to that of the racemate, is purported to produce a longer duration of clinical effect, despite essentially identical pharmacokinetics. A long-acting formulation of d-MPH, which employs the SODAS technology, is in the advanced stages of clinical development.