Clinical monitoring in osteoarthritis: Biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this overview of osteoarthritis (OA) biomarkers is to provide the non-specialist with a toolbox, based on experience acquired by biomarker researchers over many years, to understand biomarkers in general and their use in the OA field.

METHODS

We provide an update on this subject since the OARSI Primer on osteoarthritis (OA) nearly a decade ago.

RESULTS

Since the last update, the importance of molecular biomarkers has been increasingly recognized in the field, but no OA-related biomarkers have been adopted for routine use in clinical practice. The current lack of chondroprotective treatments for OA impairs the assessment, validation and qualification of the potential role of biomarkers as tools for monitoring disease status and patient responses to treatment of OA. Yet there is no lack of an evolving compendium of OA-related biomarkers, ever more fit-for-purpose, that could currently facilitate drug development for OA. We provide an abbreviated update and overview of specific soluble OA-related biomarkers for this new OARSI Primer on OA with OA-relevant examples encompassing the concepts of biomarker nomenclature, qualification, interpretation, measurement, reporting requirements, application to research, drug discovery and clinical care, and future needs for biomarker advancement.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate biomarkers should play a role at all stages of OA diagnosis, prognosis, drug development, and treatment. The future of OA biomarker research and development holds great promise as its foundation is increasingly robust.

Calcitonin (FORTICAL, MIACALCIN) for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures

Purpose of Review

Osteoporosis is a common condition affecting the musculoskeletal system. It carries with it increased risks of fracture in many areas of the body, leading to reduced quality of life, limited mobility, and other long-term implications such as chronic pain. Vertebral compression fractures are a common development in patients with osteoporosis. Current treatment options focus on reducing pain; preventative methods are somewhat limited and focus on minimizing risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. In this review, we explore the use of calcitonin (FORTICAL, MIACALCIN) to treat vertebral compression fractures (VCFs).

Recent Findings

Osteoporosis had a prevalence of more than 10% in the United States in 2010. The CDC estimates that nearly 25% of women over age 65 have findings of osteoporosis, which include low spinal bone mass. The condition is highly prevalent and, in an aging U.S. population, quite clinically relevant. Risk factors for development include advanced age, cigarette smoking, medications, reduced physical activity, and low calcium and vitamin D intake. Family history may also play a role. Diagnosis is made based on bone mineral density.Standard therapy for VCFs in osteoporosis includes analgesic medications, such as NSAIDs and biphosphonates, and surgical intervention. NSAIDs address the chronic pain that is a common long-term effect of VCFs. Biphosphonates have recently been used to attempt to halt the progression and provide prevention. Surgical interventions such as balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are typically reserved for patients who have failed other methods.Calcitonin is a peptide naturally produced by the human body, released from the parathyroid gland. It binds to osteoclasts, inhibiting them from inducing bone resorption. By relatively unknown mechanisms, it also appears to cause endorphin release and mitigate pain. Clinical data has shown safety and efficacy for exogenous calcitonin in reducing bone turnover and reducing VCF-induced pain.

Summary

Osteoporosis is a common condition that can lead to complications such as vertebral compression fractures. It can significantly impact the quality of life in many elderly Americans. There is currently no singular treatment, but calcitonin has recently been explored as a possible option for minimizing pain and reducing disease progression. Further studies are needed to understand its preventative benefits fully.

Formulation strategies to improve the efficacy of intestinal permeation enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2021;177:113925. [PMID: 34418495 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113925]

The use of chemical permeation enhancers (PEs) is the most widely tested approach to improve oral absorption of low permeability active agents, as represented by peptides. Several hundred PEs increase intestinal permeability in preclinical bioassays, yet few have progressed to clinical testing and, of those, only incremental increases in oral bioavailability (BA) have been observed. Still, average BA values of ~1% were sufficient for two recent FDA approvals of semaglutide and octreotide oral formulations. PEs are typically screened in static in vitro and ex-vivo models where co-presentation of active agent and PE in high concentrations allows the PE to alter barrier integrity with sufficient contact time to promote flux across the intestinal epithelium. The capacity to maintain high concentrations of co-presented agents at the epithelium is not reached by standard oral dosage forms in the upper GI tract in vivo due to dilution, interference from luminal components, fast intestinal transit, and possible absorption of the PE per se. The PE-based formulations that have been assessed in clinical trials in either immediate-release or enteric-coated solid dosage forms produce low and variable oral BA due to these uncontrollable physiological factors. For PEs to appreciably increase intestinal permeability from oral dosage forms in vivo, strategies must facilitate co-presentation of PE and active agent at the epithelium for a sustained period at the required concentrations. Focusing on peptides as examples of a macromolecule class, we review physiological impediments to optimal luminal presentation, discuss the efficacy of current PE-based oral dosage forms, and suggest strategies that might be used to improve them.

Transdermal Delivery of Salmon Calcitonin Using a Dissolving Microneedle Array: Characterization, Stability, and In vivo Pharmacodynamics

Salmon calcitonin (sCT) is a polypeptide drug, possessing the ability to inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Just like other bioactive macromolecules, sCT is generally administered to the patients by either injection for poor compliance or through nasal spray for low bioavailability, which limits its use as therapeutic drugs. In the present study, to overcome the limitations of the conventional routes, two new dissolving microneedle arrays (DMNAs) based on transdermal sCT delivery systems were developed, namely sCT-DMNA-1 (sCT/Dex/K90E) and sCT-DMNA-2 (sCT/Dex-Tre/K90E) with the same dimension, meeting the requirements of suitable mechanical properties. An accurate and reliable method was established to determine the needle drug loading proportion in sCT-DMNAs. The stability study exhibited that the addition of trehalose could improve the stability of sCT in DMNA under high temperature and humidity. Further, in vivo pharmacodynamic study revealed that DMNA patch could significantly enhanced relative bioavailability to approximately 70%, and the addition of trehalose was found to be beneficial for sCT transdermal delivery. Therefore, sCT-DMNA is expected to replace traditional dosage form, providing a secure, efficient, and low-pain therapeutic strategy for bone disorders.

Blood and urinary collagen markers in osteoarthritis: markers of tissue turnover and disease activity

Introduction: The need for diagnostic markers in osteoarthritis (OA) is acute and immediate, as sensitive and precise tools that monitor disease activity and treatment response are lacking. Collagens - types I, II, and III - are the skeleton of the extracellular matrix of joint tissues. Joint collagens are generally turned over at a low rate, but the balance between formation and degradation is disturbed, leading to the loss of, for example, cartilage.Areas covered: We discuss the markers reflecting collagen turnover and provide examples of how they have been applied in OA research, as well as how we believe these should be used in the future. We have searched PubMed for full-text articles written in English using different combinations of the following terms: OA, biomarker, and collagen. The result is a narrative review that gives examples from the literature.Expert opinion: Collagen markers show promise, as they are direct measures of tissue balance. Until now, collagen markers have mainly been tested in observational cohorts, which may provide insights into the association between the candidate marker and clinical variables; however, these do not advance the development of qualified markers that can be used for drug development or in clinical practice.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral salmon calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women taking calcium and vitamin D

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of oral calcitonin (SMC021) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 4665 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to receive calcium and vitamin D plus either SMC021 tablets (0.8mg/d) or placebo for 36months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a new vertebral fracture. The two groups were well balanced at baseline with regards to demographic and clinical data. No effect of SMC021 on preventing new vertebral fractures was observed, nor was any effect seen on new hip or non-vertebral fractures. Women receiving SMC021 had a mean 1.02% (±0.12%) increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) compared with a mean 0.18% (±0.12%) increase in the placebo group by the end of the study (p<0.0001). Similarly, small increases in BMD were observed at the femoral neck and hip in both groups. Levels of the biomarkers of bone turnover, urinary CTX-I and CTX-II, were 15% lower in the SMC021 group than in the placebo arm at 12 and 24months, but not at 36months. No change in quality of life between groups, assessed by the Qualeffo-14 questionnaire, was observed in either group between baseline and month 36. Pharmacokinetics analysis confirmed exposure to SMC021, but the drug levels were markedly lower than expected. Approximately 92% of subjects in each treatment group experienced an adverse event (AE), the majority of which were mild or moderate in intensity. AEs associated with SMC021 were primarily of gastrointestinal origin and included nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, as well as hot flushes which were the reason for the slightly higher drop-out rate in the active treatment arm compared to placebo. The number of severe AEs was low in both groups. Thirty-five deaths were reported but none were considered treatment-related. Due to the lack of efficacy in preventing fractures, the development of the orally formulated calcitonin was terminated despite the promising results in earlier studies.

Lessons learned from the clinical development of oral peptides

The oral delivery of peptides and proteins has been hampered by an array of obstacles. However, several promising novel oral delivery systems have been developed. This paper reviews the most advanced oral formulation technologies, and highlights key lessons and implications from studies undertaken to date with these oral formulations. Special interest is given to oral salmon calcitonin (CT), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), insulin, PYY-(3-36), recombinant human parathyroid hormone (rhPTH(1-31)-NH2) and PTH(1-34), by different technologies. The issues addressed include (i) interaction with water, (ii) interaction with food, (iii) diurnal variation, (iv) inter- and intra-subject variability, (v) correlation between efficacy and exposure and (vi) key deliverables of different technologies. These key lessons may aid research in the development of other oral formulations.

Treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis with oral salmon calcitonin: results from two phase 3 trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the structure-modifying and symptom efficacy, as well as safety and tolerability of oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) formulated with a 5-CNAC carrier (a molecule based on Eligen(®) technology), in osteoarthritis (OA) patients with moderate to severe knee pain and joint structural damage classified as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL)2-3.

METHODS AND DESIGN

This is the combined reporting of two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled trials (CSMC021C2301 and CSMC021C2302), evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral sCT in patients with painful knee OA with structural manifestations, enrolling 1176 and 1030 patients, respectively. Study subjects were randomized (1:1) to oral sCT 0.8 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO) for 24 months. The primary efficacy objectives were to examine the treatment effect compared to placebo on change over 24 months in joint space width (JSW) in the signal knee measured by X-ray, and to examine the change in pain and function using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire. Other study parameters included patient and physician global assessment, and biochemical markers of bone (CTX-I) and cartilage degradation (CTX-II).

RESULTS

At the 24 month endpoint there was no statistically significant treatment effect on joint space narrowing (JSN) in any of the two studies. In CSMC021C2301 there was a treatment effect on WOMAC (sum of pain, function, stiffness, and total scores) as well as on the biomarkers of bone and joint metabolism, but due to the hierarchical testing procedure the treatment effect was not claimed statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The present formulation of oral sCT did not provide reproducible clinical benefits in patients with symptomatic knee OA (NCT00486434, NCT00704847).

Formulation strategies to improve oral peptide delivery

Delivery of peptides by the oral route greatly appeals due to commercial, patient convenience and scientific arguments. While there are over 60 injectable peptides marketed worldwide, and many more in development, most delivery strategies do not yet adequately overcome the barriers to oral delivery. Peptides are sensitive to chemical and enzymatic degradation in the intestine, and are poorly permeable across the intestinal epithelium due to sub-optimal physicochemical properties. A successful oral peptide delivery technology should protect potent peptides from presystemic degradation and improve epithelial permeation to achieve a target oral bioavailability with acceptable intra-subject variability. This review provides a comprehensive up-to-date overview of the current status of oral peptide delivery with an emphasis on patented formulations that are yielding promising clinical data.

The pathogenesis of osteoarthritis involves bone, cartilage and synovial inflammation: may estrogen be a magic bullet?

The female predominance of polyarticular osteoarthritis (OA), and in particular the marked increase of OA in women after the menopause points to a likely involvement of female sex hormones in the maintenance of cartilage homeostasis. This perception has inspired many research groups to investigate the role of estrogens in the modulation of cartilage homeostasis with the ultimate aim to clarify whether estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) could provide benefits in preventing the rapid rise in the prevalence of OA in postmenopausal women. The effects of ERT and selective estrogen-receptor modulators on the joint in various experimental models have been investigated. Clinically, the effects of estrogens have been evaluated by post hoc analysis in clinical trials using biochemical markers of cartilage and bone degradation. Lastly, the Women's Health Initiative trial (WHI) investigated the effects of estrogens on the joint and joint replacements. Even though the exact mode of action still needs to be elucidated, the effect involves both direct and indirect mechanisms on the whole joint pathophysiology. Several animal models have demonstrated structural benefits of estrogens, as well as significant effects on joint inflammation. This is in complete alignment with clinical data using biochemical markers of joint degradation which demonstrated approximately 50% inhibition of cartilage destruction. These finding were recently validated in WHI, where women taking estrogens had significantly less joint replacement. In conclusion, the pleiotropic effect of estrogens on several different tissues may match the complicated aetiology of OA in some important aspects.

Will posttranslational modifications of brain proteins provide novel serological markers for dementias?

Drug development for dementias is significantly hampered by the lack of easily accessible biomarkers. Fluid biomarkers of dementias provide indications of disease stage, but have little prognostic value, cannot detect early pathological changes, and can only be measured in CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) which significantly limits their applicability. In contrast, imaging based biomarkers can provide indications of probability of disease progression, yet are limited in applicability due to cost, radiation and radio-tracers. These aspects highlight the need for other approaches to the development of biomarkers of dementia, which should focus on not only providing information about pathological changes, but also on being measured easily and reproducibly. For other diseases, focus on development of assays monitoring highly specific protease-generated cleavage fragments of proteins has provided assays, which in serum or plasma have the ability to predict early pathological changes. Proteolytic processing of brain proteins, such as tau, APP, and α-synuclein, is a key pathological event in dementias. Here, we speculate that aiming biomarker development for dementias at detecting small brain protein degradation fragments of generated by brain-derived proteases specifically in blood samples could lead to the development of novel markers of disease progression, stage and importantly of treatment efficacy.

Use of Bone Turnover Markers in Clinical Osteoporosis Assessment in Women: Current Issues and Future Options

Monitoring bone turnover of the adult and aging skeleton is essential for optimal treatment of bone metabolic diseases, such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. Diagnosis of osteoporosis is based solely on dual-emission x-ray absorptiometry-based measurements of bone mineral density. However, within the last 20 years, biochemical markers of bone turnover have been implemented to a larger degree, and especially within the field of drug development. Numerous clinical studies have underscored that the markers have promise in terms of predicting patients at high risk of losing bone, future fracture events and importantly also the fracture efficacy of drugs in development. Furthermore, while classical methods often require years to monitor the changes, the bone turnover markers do so within a shorter time span. The aims of this article are to provide an update on the different biochemical markers of bone turnover, and to give an overview of their applications in epidemiological and clinical research especially in women. The main emphasis will be on their utility in clinical trials testing the efficacy of drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis, and their ability to supplement bone mass measurements. Finally, recent evidence suggests that biochemical markers may provide information on bone age that may indirectly relate to bone quality, and this is discussed together with future possibilities for measuring bone quality using bone turnover markers. In summary, a more targeted use of biomarkers could assist in the identification of high-risk patients, the process of drug discovery and monitoring of the efficacy of osteoporosis treatment in clinical settings.

Oral salmon calcitonin--pharmacology in osteoporosis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Osteoporosis is a slow progressive disease with develops over decades, and where intervention is needed for an extended number of years. This highlights the need for safe intervention possibilities, which have sustained beneficial effects post-treatment.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Articles on salmon calcitonin appearing on Pubmed from 1960 until today, with focus on a newly developed oral formulation showing increased exposure and efficacy compared with nasal formulation is reviewed. The second half focuses on long-term phenomena, such as bone quality and resolution effects. The final part discusses potential additional benefits of salmon calcitonin.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insight into the clinical development of an orally formulated peptide, as well as a detailed understanding of why this approach could revive salmon calcitonin as a treatment for osteoporosis.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The oral formulation of salmon calcitonin provides additional benefits and increased efficacy on bone based on Phase I and II clinical trials data, as compared with the nasal formulation. Hence, the results on the ongoing Phase III fracture trial are awaited with great interest.

Biochemical markers identify influences on bone and cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis--the effect of sex, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score, body mass index (BMI), oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) treatment and diurnal variation

Background

Osteoarthritis (OA) involves changes in both bone and cartilage. These processes might be associated under some circumstances. This study investigated correlations between bone and cartilage degradation in patients with OA as a function of sex, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) score, Body Mass Index (BMI), oral salmon calcitonin (sCT) treatment and diurnal variation.

Methods

This study was a 2-week, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study including 37 postmenopausal women and 36 men, aged 57-75 years, with painful knee OA, and a KL-score of I - III. Subjects were allocated to one of three treatment arms: 0.6 mg or 0.8 mg oral sCT, or placebo given twice-daily for 14 days. Correlations between gender, KL score, or BMI and the bone resorption marker, serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX-I), or the cartilage degradation marker, urine C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II (CTX-II) were investigated.

Results

At baseline, biomarkers indicated women with OA experienced higher bone and cartilage degradation than men. CTX-I levels were significantly higher, and CTX-II levels only marginally higher, in women than in men (p = 0.04 and p = 0.06, respectively). Increasing KL score was not correlated with bone resorption, but was significantly associated with the cartilage degradation CTX-II marker in both men and women (p = 0.007). BMI was significantly and negatively correlated to the bone resorption marker CTX-I, r = -0.40 (p = 0.002), but showed only a borderline positive correlation to CTX-II, r = 0.25 (p = 0.12). Before morning treatments on days 1 and 14, no correlation was seen between CTX-I and CTX-II in either the sCT or placebo group. However, oral sCT and food intake induced a clear correlation between these bone and cartilage degradation markers. Four hours after the first sCT dose on treatment days 1 and 14, a significant correlation (r = 0.71, p < 0.001) between changes in both CTX-I and CTX-II was seen. In the placebo group a weakly significant correlation between changes in both markers was found on day 1 (r = 0.49, p = 0.02), but not on day 14.

Conclusion

Bone resorption was higher in females than males, while cartilage degradation was correlated with increasing KL-score and only weakly associated with BMI. Bone and cartilage degradation were not correlated in untreated individuals, but dosing with oral sCT with or without food, and a mid-day meal, decreased bone and cartilage degradation and induced a correlation between both markers. Changes in bone and cartilage markers may aid in the identification of potential new treatment opportunities for OA.

Trial Registration

Clinical trial registration number (EUDRACT2006-005532-24 & NCT00486369)

Association of the calcitonin gene (CA) polymorphism with osteoarthritis of the knee in a Mexican mestizo population

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of destructive joint disease that is characterized by the degeneration of the articular cartilage, synovial membrane, joint capsule, and subchondral bone. The knee is a joint commonly affected for OA. Calcitonin (CT) has been suggested to have chondroprotective effects; therefore, could play a role in the pathogenesis of OA of the knee. Genetic variations in or adjacent to the CT gene may be associated with primary OA development. We conducted a case-control association study in which we examined the correlation between a dinucleotide (cytosine-adenine, CA) repeat polymorphism at the CT locus and OA of the knee in 88 patients with OA and in 111 control subjects from the Mexican mestizo population. Allele A and genotype AG frequencies were significantly higher in patients with OA than in control subjects (56.3 vs. 43.2%; p<0.001 and 40.9 vs. 26.1%; p=0.027, respectively), and were associated with the presence of OA of the knee (odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.30-5.27, and OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.04-3.58, respectively) using a logistic regression model adjusted for gender, age and Body mass index (BMI). The GG genotype was associated with a lower risk of OA development of the knee; thus, it may constitute a protective factor against this disease (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.98). In summary, we conclude that the dinucleotide CA polymorphism in the CT gene may become a useful marker for genetic studies of OA of the knee in Mexican population.

The effect of oral salmon calcitonin delivered with 5-CNAC on bone and cartilage degradation in osteoarthritic patients: a 14-day randomized study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of oral salmon calcitonin (oSCT) administered over 14 days to men and women presenting with osteoarthritis (OA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was a phase-I, 2-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, gender-stratified study including 73 subjects aged 57-75 years. Patients had painful OA with a Kellgren and Lawrence index score of I-III. Treatment allocations were; 0.6 mg, 0.8 mg of oSCT, or placebo. Treatment was given twice daily for 14 days. The morning dose was administered between 07:00 and 08:00 at least 30 min before breakfast. The second dose was administered 30 min before evening dinner. On treatment day 1 and 14, the morning dose was followed by 5h of fasting, and blood samples and urine were collected immediately prior to dosing and according to the protocol. Study parameters were: plasma sCT levels, bone resorption by CTX-I (serum C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I), bone formation by osteocalcin (serum OC), and cartilage degradation by CTX-II (urine C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type II) (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00486369).

RESULTS

Doses of 0.8 mg compared with 0.6 mg produced significantly higher C(max) and AUC(0-4 hrs), of calcitonin, P=0.03. This resulted in significant reductions in CTX-I and CTX-II, [P<0.0001; P=0.007]. No differences were observed between baseline and follow-up at day 14 in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. Gender had no observable influence on results.

CONCLUSIONS

oSCT given twice daily with a pre-dinner and morning fasting dosing resulted in reductions in markers of bone resorption and cartilage degradation.