Effect of number of replicate electrocardiograms recorded at each time point in a thorough QT study on sample size and study cost

Thorough QT/QTc Evaluation of the Cardiac Safety of Enarodustat (JTZ-951), an Oral Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent, in Healthy Adults

This study evaluated the effect of enarodustat on cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. Enarodustat (20 and 150 mg [supratherapeutic dose]), placebo, and moxifloxacin (positive control, 400 mg) were administered orally to males and females (N = 54) in a crossover fashion. Continuous 12-lead Holter electrocardiogram (ECG) data were obtained before and after dosing, and blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic assessments of enarodustat, its circulating metabolite (R)-M2, and moxifloxacin. Central tendency analysis was performed for relevant ECG parameters, the relationship between individual-corrected interval from beginning of the QRS complex to end of the T wave in the frontal plane (QTcI, the primary end point) and plasma concentrations of enarodustat and (R)-M2 were assessed, and ECG waveforms were evaluated for morphological changes. The supratherapeutic dose resulted in 7- and 9-fold higher geometric mean maximum concentrations for enarodustat and (R)-M2, respectively, than the 20 mg dose. Based on time point analysis, the upper bound of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for QTcI did not exceed 10 milliseconds at any of the time points for either dose. Based on QTcI-concentration analysis, the slopes for enarodustat and (R)-M2 were not statistically different than 0, and the upper bounds of the 2-sided 90% CI for QTcI at the geometric mean maximum concentrations for the supratherapeutic dose were 1.97 and 1.68 milliseconds for enarodustat and (R)-M2, respectively. The lower bound of the 2-sided 90% CI for moxifloxacin was ≥5 milliseconds, demonstrating assay sensitivity. The study demonstrated no clinically relevant effect of enarodustat and (R)-M2 on cardiac repolarization. There was no evidence of any clinically significant effect on the PR interval and QRS duration, and ECG waveforms showed no new clinically relevant morphological changes.

Effects of Temsavir, Active Moiety of Antiretroviral Agent Fostemsavir, on QT Interval: Results From a Phase I Study and an Exposure-Response Analysis

Fostemsavir, a prodrug of human immunodeficiency virus attachment inhibitor temsavir (TMR), is in phase III development in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug-resistant HIV-1 infection for whom it is otherwise not possible to construct a suppressive antiviral regimen due to resistance, intolerance, or safety considerations. The proarrhythmic potential of fostemsavir was studied in a thorough QT study and exposure-response modeling was performed at therapeutic and supratherapeutic concentrations of TMR. Fostemsavir 1,200 mg b.i.d. did not result in a clinically meaningful change from placebo in baseline-adjusted Fridericia-corrected QTc (ddQTcF); however, at a supratherapeutic dose of 2,400 mg b.i.d., the upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of ddQTcF was 13.2 msec, exceeding the clinically important 10 msec threshold. A linear model of ddQTcF as a function of TMR plasma concentrations described these observations. Based on simulations with this model, TMR concentrations up to 7,500 ng/mL are expected to have an upper 90% CI bound for QTcF ≤ 10 msec. This concentration is 4.2-fold higher than the geometric mean TMR peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) of 1,770 ng/mL in heavily treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients administered fostemsavir 600 mg b.i.d. in the phase III BRIGHTE study (NCT02362503).

QT Assessment in Early Drug Development: The Long and the Short of It

The QT interval occupies a pivotal role in drug development as a surface biomarker of ventricular repolarization. The electrophysiologic substrate for QT prolongation coupled with reports of non-cardiac drugs producing lethal arrhythmias captured worldwide attention from government regulators eventuating in a series of guidance documents that require virtually all new chemical compounds to undergo rigorous preclinical and clinical testing to profile their QT liability. While prolongation or shortening of the QT interval may herald the appearance of serious cardiac arrhythmias, the positive predictive value of an abnormal QT measurement for these arrhythmias is modest, especially in the absence of confounding clinical features or a congenital predisposition that increases the risk of syncope and sudden death. Consequently, there has been a paradigm shift to assess a compound's cardiac risk of arrhythmias centered on a mechanistic approach to arrhythmogenesis rather than focusing solely on the QT interval. This entails both robust preclinical and clinical assays along with the emergence of concentration QT modeling as a primary analysis tool to determine whether delayed ventricular repolarization is present. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the QT interval and highlight its central role in early drug development.

Number of ECG Replicates and QT Correction Formula Influences the Estimated QT Prolonging Effect of a Drug

INTRODUCTION

The present analysis addressed the effect of the number of ECG replicates extracted from a continuous ECG on estimated QT interval prolongation for different QT correction formulas.

METHODS

For 100 healthy volunteers, who received a compound prolonging the QT interval, 18 ECG replicates within a 3-minute window were extracted from 12-lead Holter ECGs. Ten QT correction formulas were deployed, and the QTc interval was controlled for baseline and placebo and averaged per dose level.

RESULTS

The mean prolongation difference was >4 ms for single and >2 ms for triplicate ECG measurements compared with the 18 ECG replicate mean values. The difference was <0.5 ms after 14 replicates. By contrast, concentration-effect analysis was independent of replicate count and also of the QT correction formula.

CONCLUSION

The number of ECG replicates impacted the estimated QT interval prolongation for all deployed QT correction formulas. However, concentration-effect analysis was independent of both the replicate number and correction formula.

A thorough QT study to evaluate the QTc prolongation potential of two neuropsychiatric drugs, quetiapine and escitalopram, in healthy volunteers

Prolongation of the QT interval on an ECG is a surrogate marker for predicting the proarrhythmic potential of a drug under development. The aim of this study was to evaluate the QTc prolongation potential of two neuropsychiatric drugs, quetiapine immediate release (IR) and escitalopram, in healthy individuals. This was a randomized, open-label, 4×4 Williams crossover study, with four single-dose treatments [placebo, 400 mg moxifloxacin (positive control), 20 mg escitalopram, and 100 mg quetiapine IR], conducted in 40 healthy volunteers. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetics and ECG were collected. Individually, RR-corrected QTc intervals (QTcI) and placebo-adjusted changes from baseline values of QTcI (ΔΔQTcI) were evaluated. Lower-bound values of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcI of moxifloxacin with more than 5 ms confirmed the sensitivity of the assay. The maximum upper bound 95% confidence interval for the ΔΔQTcI of quetiapine IR and escitalopram was 13.7 and 10.5 ms, with mean estimates of 10.2 and 6.9 ms, respectively. Peak effects of moxifloxacin and quetiapine IR on ΔΔQTcI were observed at approximately time to maximum concentration (Tmax), whereas that of escitalopram was observed 3 h after Tmax. The concentration-ΔΔQTcI relationships of quetiapine IR and escitalopram were relatively flat, as compared with that of moxifloxacin. The results demonstrated the validity of trial methodology and that quetiapine IR and escitalopram caused QT prolongation in healthy individuals. In addition, hysteresis of escitalopram-induced QTc prolongation. These results indicate that higher doses of these drugs could lead to greater QT prolongation in a dose-response manner.

Detecting moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation in thorough QT and early clinical phase studies using a highly automated ECG analysis approach

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Exposure-response (ER) modelling (concentration-QTc analysis) is gaining as much acceptance as the traditional by-time analysis of the placebo-adjusted change from baseline in the QTc interval (ΔΔQTcF). It has been postulated that intensive ECG analysis and ER modelling during early-phase drug development could be a cost-effective approach of estimating QT liability of a new drug, in a small number of subjects.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We used a highly automated analysis of ECGs from 46 subjects from a crossover thorough QT/QTc study to detect ΔΔQTcF with moxifloxacin. Using these data, we also simulated (bootstrapped) 1000 datasets of a parallel study with eight subjects receiving moxifloxacin and eight others receiving placebo.

KEY RESULTS

The slope from the concentration-QTc analysis for moxifloxacin in 46 subjects was 4.12 ms of ΔΔQTcF per μg(-1) mL(-1) ; at mean Cmax of 2.95 μg·mL(-1) , estimated ΔΔQTcF was 13.4 ms (90% confidence interval 11.3, 15.4 ms). In the 1000 simulated datasets, in 996 datasets, ER modelling showed that the upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for ΔΔQTcF at geometric mean Cmax exceeded 10 ms. In 895 of these 996 datasets, the slope of the ER relationship was statistically significantly positive. Thus, with a small sample size (eight subjects on active drug and eight on placebo), moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongation was demonstrated using ER analysis with statistical power of >80%.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our study adds to the growing body of data supporting intensive ECG collection and analysis in early-phase studies to estimate QT liability.

Timing of pre-dose baseline electrocardiograms in clinical trials: increased sampling over a prolonged baseline period worsens variance of QTc

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) currently recommends recording of electrocardiograms (ECGs) prior to drug administration in thorough QT studies over an hour or more time to improve reliability of baseline ECG values. However, the baseline period is usually in the morning during a period of intense trial activity and rapid circadian change in QTc. The purpose of this study was to determine if the practice of recording an extended baseline does, in fact, decrease QTc variance at baseline.

METHODS

ECG data from three thorough QT studies (TQTS) in which three ECGs (commonly referred to as triplicates) were recorded at each of three pre-specified time points during the 60 to 90 minutes before drug administration were analyzed by determining the intra-subject and inter-subject standard deviation (SD) of QTcF (Fridericia-correct QT) for each of the three pre-drug time points and for the three time points combined.

RESULTS

QTcF was relatively normally distributed in each study. Intra-subject variability of QTcF was greater for the combined triplicate recordings than for the individual triplicates at baseline treatment time points in 39 of 42 cases (93%). This was the case in 48% of the comparisons in the inter-subject analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The practice of recording three sets of triplicate ECGs over an hour or more before drug administration in a TQTS increases variability of baseline QTcF consistently in cross-over designed trials, and in roughly half of parallel comparisons. Higher variability suggests that the three-triplicate approach does not provide a more reliable baseline value. Less variability of QTcF can be obtained by simply recording one triplicate prior to drug administration. This principal may apply to other ECG and other physiological variables that have a monotonic circadian trend or that may be affected by intense trial activity during the pre-drug hour.

Drug-induced QT interval prolongation: does ethnicity of the thorough QT study population matter?

Inter-ethnic differences in drug responses have been well documented. Drug-induced QT interval prolongation is a major safety concern and therefore, regulatory authorities recommend a clinical thorough QT study (TQT) to investigate new drugs for their QT-prolonging potential. A positive study, determined by breach of a preset regulatory threshold, significantly influences late phase clinical trials by requiring intense ECG monitoring. A few studies that are currently available, although not statistically conclusive at present, question the assumption that ethnicity of the study population may not influence the outcome of a TQT study. Collective consideration of available pharmacogenetic and clinical information suggests that there may be inter-ethnic differences in QT-prolonging effects of drugs and that Caucasians may be more sensitive than other populations. The information also suggest s that (a) these differences may depend on the QT-prolonging potency of the drug and (b) exposure-response (E-R) analysis may be more sensitive than simple changes in QT(c) interval in unmasking this difference. If the QT response in Caucasians is generally found to be more intense than in non-Caucasians, there may be significant regulatory implications for domestic acceptance of data from a TQT study conducted in foreign populations. However, each drug will warrant an individual consideration when extrapolating the results of a TQT study from one ethnic population to another and the ultimate clinical relevance of any difference. Further adequately designed and powered studies, investigating the pharmacologic properties and E-R relationships of additional drugs with different potencies, are needed in Caucasians, Oriental/Asian and African populations before firm conclusions can be drawn.

The sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin does not prolong QT interval in a thorough QT (TQT) study

Background

Empagliflozin is a potent, selective sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor in development as an oral antidiabetic treatment. This QT interval study assessed potential effects of empagliflozin on ventricular repolarisation and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters.

Methods

A randomised, placebo-controlled, single-dose, double-blind, five-period crossover study incorporating a novel double-placebo period design to reduce sample size, while maintaining full statistical power. Treatments: single empagliflozin doses of 25 mg (therapeutic) and 200 mg (supratherapeutic), matching placebo and open-label moxifloxacin 400 mg (positive control). Triplicate 12-lead ECGs of 10 second duration were recorded at baseline and during the first 24 hours after dosing. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline (MCfB) in the population heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTcN) between 1–4 hours after dosing.

Results

Thirty volunteers (16 male, 14 female, mean [range] age: 34.5 [18–52] years) were randomised. The placebo-corrected MCfB in QTcN 1–4 hours after dosing was 0.6 (90% CI: -0.7, 1.9) ms and -0.2 (-1.4, 0.9) ms for empagliflozin 25 mg and 200 mg, respectively, below the ICH E14 defined threshold of regulatory concern 10 ms. Assay sensitivity was confirmed by a placebo-corrected MCfB in QTcN 2–4 hours post-dose of 12.4 (10.7, 14.1) ms with moxifloxacin 400 mg. Empagliflozin tolerability was good for all volunteers; 23.3% experienced adverse events (AEs) with empagliflozin and 27.6% with placebo. The most frequent AE was nasopharyngitis.

Conclusions/interpretation

Single doses of empagliflozin 25 mg and 200 mg were not associated with QTcN prolongation and were well tolerated in healthy volunteers.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01195675