Abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine as a combined formulation tablet: bioequivalence compared with each component administered concurrently and the effect of food on absorption

Abacavir Drug Exposures in African Children Under 14 kg Using Pediatric Solid Fixed Dose Combinations According to World Health Organization Weight Bands

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics of abacavir (ABC) in African children living with HIV (CLHIV) weighing <14 kg and receiving pediatric fixed dose combinations (FDC) according to WHO weight bands dosing are limited. An ABC population pharmacokinetic model was developed to evaluate ABC exposure across different World Health Organization (WHO) weight bands.

METHODS

Children enrolled in the LIVING study in Kenya and Uganda receiving ABC/lamivudine (3TC) dispersible tablets (60/30 mg) according to WHO weight bands. A population approach was used to determine the pharmacokinetic parameters. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using an in silico population with demographic characteristics associated with African CLHIV. ABC exposures (AUC0-24) of 6.4-50.4 mg h/L were used as targets.

RESULTS

Plasma samples were obtained from 387 children. A 1-compartment model with allometric scaling of clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) according to body weight best characterized the pharmacokinetic data of ABC. The maturation of ABC CL/F was characterized using a sigmoidal Emax model dependent on postnatal age (50% of adult CL/F reached by 0.48 years of age). Exposures to ABC were within the target range for children weighing 6.0-24.9 kg, but children weighing 3-5.9 kg were predicted to be overexposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Lowering the ABC dosage to 30 mg twice daily or 60 mg once daily for children weighing 3-5.9 kg increased the proportion of children within the target and provided comparable exposures. Further clinical study is required to investigate clinical implications and safety of the proposed alternative ABC doses.

Effect of Food on the Pediatric Dispersible Tablet Formulations of TRIUMEQ and DOVATO in Healthy Adult Participants

This randomized food effect study in healthy adult participants examined dispersible tablet formulations of fixed-dose combinations of dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (TRIUMEQ) and dolutegravir/lamivudine (DOVATO). While adult tablet formulations of these combinations are currently approved for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus, alternate formulations for children are urgently needed to facilitate appropriate pediatric dosing for patients who may have difficulty swallowing a conventional tablet. This study compared the effect of a high-fat, high-calorie meal on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of dispersible tablet (DT) formulations of the two-drug and three-drug regimens, with administration under fasting conditions. Both the two-drug and three-drug dispersible tablet formulations, administered under fasting conditions and following a high-fat, high-calorie meal, were well tolerated in healthy participants. There were no clinically relevant differences in drug exposure for either regimen when administered with a high-fat meal as compared to under fasting conditions. Safety observations were similar for both treatments, either in the fed or fasted state. Both TRIUMEQ DT and DOVATO DT formulations can be administer with or without food.

Interactions of Antiretroviral Drugs with Food, Beverages, Dietary Supplements, and Alcohol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Multiple factors may affect combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We investigated the impact of food, beverages, dietary supplements, and alcohol on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of 33 antiretroviral drugs. Systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines was performed, with 109 reports of 120 studies included. For each drug, meta-analyses or qualitative analyses were conducted. We have found clinically significant interactions with food for more than half of antiretroviral agents. The following drugs should be taken with or immediately after the meal: tenofovir disoproxil, etravirine, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, and indinavir should be taken on an empty stomach for maximum patient benefit. Antiretroviral agents not mentioned above can be administered regardless of food. There is insufficient evidence available to make recommendations about consuming juice or alcohol with antiretroviral drugs. Resolving drug-food interactions may contribute to maximized cART effectiveness and safety.

Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of the Interactions of Antiretroviral Agents with Food and Supplements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Because pharmacokinetic changes in antiretroviral drugs (ARV), due to their concurrent administration with food or nutritional products, have become a clinical challenge, it is necessary to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of ARV in people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to clarify the pharmacokinetic outcomes of the interaction between supplements such as food, dietary supplements, and nutrients, and ARV. Twenty-four articles in both healthy subjects and PLWH were included in the qualitative analysis, of which five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Food−drug coadministration significantly increased the time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) (p < 0.00001) of ARV including abacavir, amprenavir, darunavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, zidovudine, ritonavir, and tenofovir alafenamide. In addition, the increased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of ARV, such as darunavir, under fed conditions was observed. Area under the curve and terminal half-life were not significantly affected. Evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects, it is vital to clinically investigate ARV and particular supplement interaction in PLWH. Educating patients about any potential interactions would be one of the effective recommendations during this HIV epidemic.

Crushing of dolutegravir fixed-dose combination tablets increases dolutegravir exposure

Background

If HIV patients are unconscious or cannot swallow tablets for other reasons, antiretroviral medication is crushed and dissolved prior to administration. Crushing can alter drug exposure, possibly leading to treatment failure, development of resistance or toxicity. Currently, there is no information about crushing of the branded fixed-dose combination of dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine (Triumeq®, referred to as TRI); therefore, crushing of TRI is not recommended.

Objectives

To investigate whether the TRI fixed-dose combination tablet can be crushed and combined with enteral nutrition without influencing pharmacokinetics (PK).

Methods

We carried out an open-label, three-period, randomized, single-dose, crossover trial in 22 healthy adult volunteers. Subjects randomly received whole-tablet TRI with fasting (reference), crushed and suspended TRI with fasting or crushed and suspended TRI with oral intake of enteral nutrition. Bioequivalence criteria (80%-125% acceptance range) of AUC0-∞ and Cmax were used. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02569346.

Results

Crushing TRI leads to higher dolutegravir exposure (AUC0-∞: +26% and Cmax: +30%) and, if crushed TRI is combined with enteral nutrition, to a decrease in abacavir Cmax (-17%). Lamivudine concentrations were not affected as geometric mean ratios with 90% CIs fell within the 80%-125% range.

Conclusions

Bioequivalence could not be demonstrated for a crushed and suspended tablet or a crushed and suspended tablet with oral intake of enteral nutrition compared with whole-tablet TRI with fasting. Both scenarios led to higher dolutegravir exposure, but this did not exceed exposure after intake with food or in twice-daily dosing. In our opinion, TRI can be crushed for patients with swallowing difficulties and can be simultaneously administered with enteral nutrition.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dolutegravir used as a single tablet regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection

INTRODUCTION

With the introduction of the coformulated dolutegravir, abacavir and lamivudine , a new single tablet regimen (STR) is made available for the use in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. This drug combination is the fourth STR that will be positioned next to the STRs with efavirenz, rilpivirine or elvitegravir as third agents, respectively.

AREAS COVERED

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of the combined dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine coformulation. The review will focus on dolutegravir and includes both published data as well as data presented at recent major international HIV/AIDS conferences.

EXPERT OPINION

The dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine regimen is highly effective in achieving sustained suppression of HIV-1 RNA plasma concentrations. The STR has a favorable safety profile and a low potential for drug interactions, which will contribute to a prominent role in therapy. As this STR contains abacavir as backbone component, the use requires patients to be HLA-B*5701 negative, with good hepatic function. Other first-line treatment combinations are preferred for patients with hepatitis B co-infection or with a high cardiovascular risk.

Single-dose pharmacokinetic properties, bioavailability, and tolerability of two lamivudine 100-mg tablet formulations: a randomized crossover study in healthy Chinese male subjects

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine is used in the treatment of HIV and chronic hepatitis B (HBV) infections. Since 1999, at least 2 million Chinese HBV patients have been treated with lamivudine, but there are limited studies on the pharmacokinetics and safety of the drug in Chinese populations.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed lamivudine tablet (test drug) and a branded lamivudine tablet (reference drug) in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

METHODS

A single-center, single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study was conducted in 28 healthy Chinese male volunteers. Blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the administration of oral lamivudine 100 mg in each period. Plasma lamivudine concentrations were analyzed by a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic and bioavailability parameters were calculated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean (SD) pharmacokinetic parameters between the test and reference drugs, including Cmax (1239 [328.9] ng/mL vs 1176 [341.5] ng/mL), AUC0-t (4096 [599.1] ng · h/mL vs 4064 [678.2] ng · h/mL), and AUC0-∞ (4200 [607.7] ng · h/mL vs 4162 [672.2] ng · h/mL). The geometric mean test/reference ratios (90% CI) calculated for the log-transformed parameters were Cmax, 1.06 (96.21-116.90); AUC0-t, 1.01 (96.53-105.39); and AUC0-∞, 1.01 (96.81-105.16), all of which were within the acceptance limits for bioequivalence. No serious AEs were reported, and all mild AEs were recovered quickly without treatment.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the test formulation of lamivudine 100 mg meets the FDA regulatory standards for bioequivalence with the reference formulation. Both formulations were well tolerated.

Absence of Food Effect on the Pharmacokinetics of Telbivudine Following Oral Administration in Healthy Subjects

The influence of food on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine, a candidate antiviral agent against hepatitis B virus (HBV), was investigated in healthy adult subjects following a 600-mg oral dose administered with and without a high-fat/high-calorie meal. Telbivudine was well tolerated under fasting and fed conditions. Oral absorption of telbivudine as measured by maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity)) was not altered by food intake immediately before oral dosing. Values of Cmax, Tmax, and AUC were comparable when telbivudine was administered under fed and fasting conditions. Results from this study indicated that the absorption of telbivudine was not affected by a high-fat/high-calorie meal; telbivudine can therefore be administered orally with no regard to the timing of meals.

A Combined-Formulation Tablet of Lamivudine/Nevirapine/Stavudine: Bioequivalence Compared With Concurrent Administration of Lamivudine, Nevirapine, and Stavudine in Healthy Indian Subjects

Generic fixed-dose combinations of antiretrovirals are frequently prescribed for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. A randomized, 2-way study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, Indian male subjects to assess bioequivalence between a single combination tablet containing lamivudine, stavudine, and nevirapine (treatment A) with respect to separate marketed tablets administered simultaneously (treatment B). Each subject received treatments A and B separated by 19 days of a drug-free washout period. Plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals, determined by a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay, were used to assess pharmacokinetic parameters such as maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration curve. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable for either treatment. As geometric mean ratios (% treatment A/treatment B) of log-transformed parameters of area under the plasma concentration curve and plasma concentration, as well as their resultant 90% confidence intervals, were within 80% to 125% and 75% to 133%, respectively, 2 treatments were considered bioequivalent in the extent and rate of absorption. Both treatments exhibited similar tolerability under fasting conditions.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drug varies with formulation in the target population of children with HIV-1

The bioequivalence of formulations is usually evaluated in healthy adult volunteers. In our study in 19 HIV-1-infected Ugandan children (1.8-4 years of age, weight 12 to <15 kg) receiving zidovudine, lamivudine, and abacavir solutions twice a day for ≥24 weeks, the use of scored tablets allowed comparison of plasma pharmacokinetics of oral solutions vs. tablets. Samples were collected 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h after each child's last morning dose of oral solution before changing to scored tablets of Combivir (coformulated zidovudine + lamivudine) and abacavir; this was repeated 4 weeks later. Dose-normalized area under curve (AUC)(0-12) and peak concentration (C(max)) for the tablet formulation were bioequivalent with those of the oral solution with respect to zidovudine and abacavir (e.g., dose-normalized geometric mean ratio (dnGMR) (tablet:solution) for zidovudine and abacavir AUC(0-12) were 1.01 (90% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.18) and 0.96 (0.83-1.12), respectively). However, lamivudine exposure was ~55% higher with the tablet formulation (AUC(0-12) dnGMR = 1.58 (1.37-1.81), C(max) dnGMR = 1.55 (1.33-1.81)). Although the clinical relevance of this finding is unclear, it highlights the impact of the formulation and the importance of conducting bioequivalence studies in target pediatric populations.

Abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV

In the past 15 years, improvements in the treatment of HIV infection have dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are the backbone of combination antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV. One of the recommended and commonly used therapies in this class is the once-daily fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine. Clinical studies and practice have shown these drugs to be potent, safe, and easy to use in a variety of settings; however, several recent reports have challenged the safety and efficacy claims among certain patient populations, including those at risk for cardiovascular disease and in those with high viral loads prior to treatment initiation. We reviewed abacavir/lamivudine as a treatment for HIV and discussed limitations of its use due to these controversial issues.

Steady state bioequivalence of generic and innovator formulations of stavudine, lamivudine, and nevirapine in HIV-infected Ugandan adults

Background

Generic antiretroviral therapy is the mainstay of HIV treatment in resource-limited settings, yet there is little evidence confirming the bioequivalence of generic and brand name formulations. We compared the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine, stavudine and nevirapine in HIV-infected subjects who were receiving a generic formulation (Triomune®) or the corresponding brand formulations (Epivir®, Zerit®, and Viramune®).

Methodology/Principal Findings

An open-label, randomized, crossover study was carried out in 18 HIV-infected Ugandan subjects stabilized on Triomune-40. Subjects received lamivudine (150 mg), stavudine (40 mg), and nevirapine (200 mg) in either the generic or brand formulation twice a day for 30 days, before switching to the other formulation. At the end of each treatment period, blood samples were collected over 12 h for pharmacokinetic analysis. The main outcome measures were the mean AUC_0–12h and C_max. Bioequivalence was defined as a geometric mean ratio between the generic and brand name within the 90% confidence interval of 0.8–1.25. The geometric mean ratios and the 90% confidence intervals were: stavudine C_max, 1.3 (0.99–1.71) and AUC_0–12h, 1.1 (0.87–1.38); lamivudine C_max, 0.8 (0.63–0.98) and AUC_0–12h, 0.8 (0.65–0.99); and nevirapine C_max, 1.1 (0.95–1.23) and AUC_0–12h, 1.1 (0.95–1.31). The generic formulation was not statistically bioequivalent to the brand formulations during steady state, although exposures were comparable. A mixed random effects model identified about 50% intersubject variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters.

Conclusions/Significant Findings

These findings provide support for the use of Triomune in resource-limited settings, although identification of the sources of intersubject variability in these populations is critical.

Abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine fixed combination in the treatment of HIV infection

Treatment of HIV infection has typically been carried out using two nucleoside analogs and a protease inhibitor. Such regimens can be complex and have high pill burdens. Use of alternative regimens, such as triple nucleoside-based regimens, can improve adherence and decrease toxicities associated with protease inhibitor therapy. A formulation of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine allows a dosing schedule of one pill twice daily. The components have performed favorably compared with protease inhibitor-based regimens, such as indinavir. Compared with efavirenz-based regimens, abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine has not performed as well. The combination is being studied as a cornerstone for induction maintenance strategies, in which switching a patient to abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine has been associated with similar virologic outcomes as continuing with either protease inhibitor- or efavirenz-based regimens. Administration of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine also avoids side effects of antiretroviral therapy, such as hyperlipidemia, but its use is associated with a hypersensitivity reaction in a small number of patients. The combination of abacavir sulfate/lamivudine/zidovudine is an important part of the HIV armamentarium. Its potency and ease of administration make it worth consideration in the treatment of HIV, either by itself or in combination with other agents.

Pharmacokinetic Profiling and Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Lamivudine Tablet Formulations After Single Oral Administration in Healthy Human Indian Volunteers

The present study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and single-dose tolerability of 2 marketed brands of lamivudine (3TC) 150-mg tablets, Lamivir (Cipla, Mumbai, India) and Epivir (GSK, Basingstoke, UK). The randomized, 2-treatment study was conducted in 24 fasting, healthy, Indian male subjects. Each subject received Epivir and Lamivir formulation separated by 7 days of drug-free washout period. Plasma concentrations of 3TC were used to estimate PK parameters such as maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUCinfinity). Geometric mean ratios (relative to Epivir) and resultant 90% CI of 3TC for Cmax and AUCinfinity were 1.00 (0.89-1.12) and 1.01 (0.94-1.07), respectively. As 90% CIs were entirely within 0.80-1.25 for log-transformed data, the 2 formulations were considered bioequivalent in the extent (AUCinfinity) and rate of absorption (Cmax and time to Cmax [tmax]). The means of primary PK parameters of 3TC, Cmax, and AUCinfinity in Indian subjects were comparable to those previously reported in the literature. Both formulations exhibited similar tolerability under fasting conditions.

Anti-HIV-1 activities in extracts from some medicinal plants as assessed in anin vitro biochemical HIV-1 reverse transcriptase assay

An in vitro HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) assay was used for screening of anti-HIV activity of extracts obtained from some Kenyan medicinal plants. The assay utilises [3H]-methyl thymidine triphosphate (dTTP) as the enzyme substrate and polyadenylic acid.oligodeoxythymidylic acid [poly(rA).p(dT)(12-18)] as the template-primer dimmer. This assay was optimised and standardised with respect to the various experimental parameters in a microtiter plate methodology. The assay was then applied to test for potential antiviral activities of several Kenyan medicinal plant extracts and the concentrations producing 50% inhibition (IC50) of the HIV-1 RT were determined. This assay is described in this report and results obtained with some of the extracts are presented.

Equivalent steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and lamivudine triphosphate within cells following administration of lamivudine at 300 milligrams once daily and 150 milligrams twice daily

Once-daily administration of 300 mg of lamivudine in combination with other antiretroviral agents has been proposed as a possible way to optimize anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment and to facilitate adherence. A single-center, randomized, two-way, crossover study was conducted in 60 healthy subjects to compare the steady-state pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in plasma and its putative active anabolite, lamivudine 5'-triphosphate (lamivudine-TP), in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) following 7 days of treatment with lamivudine at 300 mg once daily and 7 days of the standard regimen of 150 mg twice daily. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 h for determination of plasma lamivudine concentrations by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and intracellular lamivudine-TP concentrations in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by high-performance liquid chromatography/radioimmunoassay methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated based on lamivudine and lamivudine-TP concentration-time data. Regimens were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the ratio (once daily/twice daily) of geometric least-squares (GLS) means for lamivudine and lamivudine-TP pharmacokinetic values fell within the acceptance range of 0.8 to 1.25. Steady-state plasma lamivudine pharmacokinetics following the once- and twice-daily regimens were bioequivalent with respect to the area under the drug concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state (AUC(24,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.94; 90% CI, 0.92, 0.97) and average plasma lamivudine concentration over the dosing interval (C(ave,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.94; 90% CI, 0.92, 0.97). Steady-state intracellular lamivudine-TP pharmacokinetics after the once- and twice-daily regimens were bioequivalent with respect to AUC(24,ss) (GLS mean ratio, 0.99; 90% CI, 0.88, 1.11), C(ave,ss) (GLS mean ratio, 0.99; 90% CI, 0.88, 1.11), and maximum lamivudine concentration (C(max,ss)) (GLS mean ratio, 0.93; 90% CI, 0.81, 1.07). Lamivudine-TP trough concentrations were modestly lower (by 18 to 24%) during the once-daily regimen; the clinical importance of this is unclear, given the large intersubject variability in values that was observed (coefficient of variation, 48 to 124%). Once-daily lamivudine was as well tolerated as the twice-daily regimen. Overall, the results of this study suggest that for key AUC-related parameters, lamivudine at 300 mg once daily is pharmacokinetically equivalent to lamivudine at 150 mg twice daily.

Twice-Daily Trizivir versus Combivir-Abacavir in Antiretroviral-Experienced Adults with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection: A Formulation-Switch Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To establish the clinical equivalence (noninferiority) of one tablet containing abacavir 300 mg-lamivudine 150 mg-zidovudine 300 mg (Trizivir) versus a tablet containing lamivudine 150 mg-zidovudine 300 mg (Combivir) given with one abacavir (ABC) 300-mg tablet, administered twice/day, in antiretroviral-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-infected patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, formulation-switch study.

SETTING

Twenty seven outpatient treatment sites.

PATIENTS

Adults with HIV-1 RNA levels of 400 copies/ml or less and CD4+ cell counts above 200 cells/mm3 who had been treated for 16 weeks or more with highly active antiretroviral therapy containing Combivir-ABC.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized 1:1 to Trizivir (97 patients) or Combivir-ABC (98) for 24 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary study end point was the proportion of patients who maintained less than a 0.5-log10 increase from baseline in HIV-1 RNA (virologic success) through week 24. Clinical equivalence of the treatments was established if the 95.1% lower confidence limit (LCL) for the difference in proportion of virologic success with Trizivir minus Combivir-ABC was -0.12 or greater. Trizivir was clinically equivalent to Combivir-ABC. The intent-to-treat observed analysis at week 24 with Trizivir and Combivir-ABC showed a similar rate of virologic success (83% [80/97] and 77% [75/98], respectively, 95.1% LCL -0.026), of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of 400 or fewer copies/ml (99% [82/83] and 93% [77/83], respectively, 95.1% LCL 0.021), and of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of fewer than 50 copies/ml (89% [74/83] and 77% [64/83], respectively, 95.1% LCL 0.038). The intent-to-treat missing = failure analysis showed comparable results. Changes in CD4+ cell count from baseline, overall mean self-reported adherence (Trizivir 97%, Combivir-ABC 92%), and adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments. No ABC-related hypersensitivity reactions occurred.

CONCLUSION

Trizivir was clinically equivalent to Combivir-ABC and may be substituted for the latter to simplify treatment and reduce pill burden.

Lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir: triple combination tablet

The triple combination tablet containing lamivudine (150 mg), zidovudine (300 mg) and abacavir (300 mg, as abacavir sulfate) is a new formulation of three nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Two studies in treatment-naive patients (one double-blind, one nonblind) have reported that lamivudine/zidovudine (dual combination tablet) plus abacavir showed efficacy similar to that of lamivudine/zidovudine plus indinavir. In both studies, similar numbers of patients in each treatment group had plasma HIV RNA levels </=400 copies/mL at week 48 (51% vs 51% and 64% vs 50%). In treatment-experienced patients with baseline plasma HIV RNA levels <50 copies/mL, switching to lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir (triple combination tablet) was as effective as remaining on highly active antiretroviral treatment (mainly protease inhibitor [PI]-based). Virological failure, the primary endpoint, defined as two consecutive plasma HIV RNA values >400 copies/mL, was reported in 22% of patients in both treatment groups at week 48. Treatment-naive patients receiving lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir combination therapy experienced several adverse events, including nausea, malaise/fatigue and vomiting.

Food-drug interactions

Interactions between food and drugs may inadvertently reduce or increase the drug effect. The majority of clinically relevant food-drug interactions are caused by food-induced changes in the bioavailability of the drug. Since the bioavailability and clinical effect of most drugs are correlated, the bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic effect parameter. However, in order to evaluate the clinical relevance of a food-drug interaction, the impact of food intake on the clinical effect of the drug has to be quantified as well. As a result of quality review in healthcare systems, healthcare providers are increasingly required to develop methods for identifying and preventing adverse food-drug interactions. In this review of original literature, we have tried to provide both pharmacokinetic and clinical effect parameters of clinically relevant food-drug interactions. The most important interactions are those associated with a high risk of treatment failure arising from a significantly reduced bioavailability in the fed state. Such interactions are frequently caused by chelation with components in food (as occurs with alendronic acid, clodronic acid, didanosine, etidronic acid, penicillamine and tetracycline) or dairy products (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin), or by other direct interactions between the drug and certain food components (avitriptan, indinavir, itraconazole solution, levodopa, melphalan, mercaptopurine and perindopril). In addition, the physiological response to food intake, in particular gastric acid secretion, may reduce the bioavailability of certain drugs (ampicillin, azithromycin capsules, didanosine, erythromycin stearate or enteric coated, and isoniazid). For other drugs, concomitant food intake may result in an increase in drug bioavailability either because of a food-induced increase in drug solubility (albendazole, atovaquone, griseofulvin, isotretinoin, lovastatin, mefloquine, saquinavir and tacrolimus) or because of the secretion of gastric acid (itraconazole capsules) or bile (griseofulvin and halofantrine) in response to food intake. For most drugs, such an increase results in a desired increase in drug effect, but in others it may result in serious toxicity (halofantrine).

Trizivir

Treatment of HIV infection has typically been carried out using two nucleoside analogues and a protease inhibitor (PI). Such regimens can be complex and have high pill burdens. Use of alternative regimens, such as triple nucleoside based regimens, can improve adherence and decrease toxicities associated with PI therapy. Trizivir is a combination tablet of zidovudine, lamivudine and abacavir. This formulation allows a dosing schedule of one pill twice-daily. The components of have performed favourably compared to PI-based regimens, such as indinavir. However, in one study the individual components of Trizivir did not suppress HIV-1 viral replication as well as the PI-based regimen in a subset of patients with very high HIV-1 plasma RNA. Trizivir also avoids side effects of antiretroviral therapy, such as hyperlipidaemia, but its use is associated with a hypersensitivity reaction in a small number of patients. Trizivir is an important part of the HIV armamentarium. The potency and ease of administration of Trizivir make it worth consideration in HIV therapy, either by itself or in combination with other agents.