24-hour recording of intragastric pH in clinical trials: preconditions, methodology, and standardization strategies

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of a novel proton pump inhibitor, YH1885, in healthy volunteers

To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of YH1885, a novel proton pump inhibitor, a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-rising, parallel-group study was conducted in 46 healthy volunteers. The volunteers were randomly allocated to single dose groups of 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg, 200 mg, and 300 mg (6 subjects per dose, including 2 placebos) or to multiple-dose groups of 150 mg and 300 mg (once-daily dosing for 7 days; 8 subjects per dose, including 2 placebos). The multiple-dose study was conducted separately after the single-dose study. YH1885 was administered orally after overnight fasting. Serial blood samples, urine samples, and pharmacodynamic measurements were taken. Drug concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS). Pharmacodynamic changes were evaluated by ambulatory intragastric pH monitoring and by serial measurements of serum gastrin concentrations. Assessments of safety and tolerability also were made. Plasma concentrations of YH1885 reached peak levels 1.3 to 2.5 hours after single-dose administration and then declined monoexponentially with a terminal half-life (t(1/2)) of 2.2 to 2.4 hours in dosage groups up to 200 mg in the single-dose study. YH1885 showed linear pharmacokinetic characteristics, and little accumulation occurred after multiple administrations. The parent drug was not detected in urine. Dose-related pharmacological effects were obvious for dose groups of 150 mg and higher in the single-dose study. The mean intragastric pH and the percentage of time at pH>4 were significantly increased. The onset of drug effect was rapid, and maximal effects were observed on the first day of administration during multiple dosing. Serum gastrin levels also showed rapid increases during dosing but with a weak dose-effect relationship. Neither serious nor dose-limiting adverse effects were observed. YH1885 was found to be safe and well tolerated and effectively inhibited acid secretion with dose-dependent increases in intragastric pH. The acid-suppressing efficacy of YH1885 needs to be further evaluated in patients with gastric acid-related diseases.

Equipotent inhibition of gastric acid secretion by equal doses of oral or intravenous pantoprazole

BACKGROUND

Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor characterized by a low potential to interact with the cytochrome P450 system, and linear pharmacokinetics. The recommended oral dose for treatment of acid-related diseases is 40 mg.

METHODS

Using a randomized, crossover study design we compared the ability of 40 mg oral and intravenous pantoprazole to elevate the intragastric pH in healthy volunteers (n = 20, 'per protocol'), during two treatment phases. The duration of each phase was 5 days. Pantoprazole 40 mg was administered once daily either as a tablet or as an intravenous injection. A 24 h pHmetry was used to record the intragastric pH on day 5 of each regimen; this was compared to the baseline curve obtained before each study period. The calculated 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) represent the mean difference in the intragastric pH, attained after intravenous or oral administration. The predefined equivalence range for the 90% CI was +/- 20% for the percentage time at which the gastric pH was at least pH 3 or 4 and +/- 1 unit for the median pH.

RESULTS

Pantoprazole was well tolerated during both treatment phases. The mean of the 24 h median pH was 3.3 and 3.1 for the intravenous and oral treatments, respectively; the corresponding differences were 0.2 (90% CI: - 0.03 to 0.44). For the mean percentage time at which the pH was 3 or above, the respective calculated values were 57% and 51%, with a difference between the two administration routes of only 5.7% (90% CI: 1.8 to 9.6). At an intragastric pH of 4 or above, the mean percentage time was 420% and 38% following intravenous and oral treatment, respectively, with a difference between the treatment routes of only 4.4% (90% CI: 0.6 to 8.3).

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that the two formulations of pantoprazole can be assumed to be equipotent. Hence, the intravenous formulation of pantoprazole could be considered as an alternative route of administration.