1
|
Lamberti MJ, Dirks A, Kikuchi N, Patel Cervantes N, Getz K. Benchmarking Site Activation and Patient Enrollment. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:696-703. [PMID: 38568347 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00638-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
Clinical trial conduct poses numerous challenges, many pertaining to patient recruitment. The primary objectives of this study were to update benchmarks on site activation and patient enrollment gathered in previous Tufts CSDD studies and examine current usage of recruitment and retention tactics. The data collection focused on site activation and patient enrollment metrics used for studies. Analyses were conducted comparing results from 2012, 2019 and 2023. The results indicate that actual enrollments exceeded planned enrollments for a majority of studies and timelines were shorter than expected. In addition, differences were found for enrollment achievement by global region and site type. Further investigation into studies conducted during a later time frame and post-pandemic could be compared with current benchmarks to examine differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Jo Lamberti
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Abigail Dirks
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | | | | | - Kenneth Getz
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennestrì F, Banfi G, Tomaiuolo R. Remote decentralized clinical trials: a new opportunity for laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 61:1388-1394. [PMID: 36597971 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The traditional venue of clinical trials has been hospitals or specialized research units, usually requiring participants to come on-site. Although their contribution to biomedical progress is beyond dispute, they are characterised by two crucial logistical and ultimately scientifical limitations: poor retention and poor generalizability of results, as patients often have problems in concluding the investigation on-site. Remote Decentralised Clinical Trials (RDCTs) take advantage of digital technologies to design trial activities closer to the home of participants, with the aims of minimizing travel to health facilities and the risk of infections, improving the quality of life of participants and caregivers, reducing work absenteeism, including broader cohorts of patients and possibly reducing costs. RDCTs represent a minority of current global research, but the Covid-19 pandemic brought them to the fore. The authors of this paper promote the spread of RDCTs, building on early recommendations from international institutions, and provide some examples of their use and potential benefits in laboratory medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giuseppe Banfi
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ritchie M, Gillen DL, Grill JD. Recruitment across two decades of NIH-funded Alzheimer's disease clinical trials. Alzheimers Res Ther 2023; 15:28. [PMID: 36732846 PMCID: PMC9893207 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-023-01177-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely accrual of a representative sample is a key factor in whether Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials successfully answer the scientific questions under study. Studies in other fields have observed that, over time, recruitment to trials has become increasingly reliant on larger numbers of sites, with declines in the average per-site recruitment rate. Here, we examined the trends in recruitment over a 20-year period of NIH-funded AD clinical trials conducted by the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study (ADCS), a temporally consistent network of sites devoted to interventional research. METHODS We performed retrospective analyses of eleven ADCS randomized clinical trials. To examine the recruitment planning, we calculated the expected number of participants to be enrolled per site for each trial. To examine the actual trial recruitment rates, we quantified the number of participants enrolled per site per month. RESULTS No effects of time were observed on recruitment planning or overall recruitment rates across trials. No trial achieved an overall recruitment rate greater than one subject per site per month. We observed the fastest recruitment rates in trials with no competition and the slowest in trials that overlapped in time. The highest recruitment rates were consistently seen early within trials and declined over the course of studies. CONCLUSIONS Trial recruitment projections should plan for fewer than one participant randomized per site per month and consider the number of other AD trials being conducted concurrently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Ritchie
- UC Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
| | - Daniel L Gillen
- UC Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| | - Joshua D Grill
- UC Irvine Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Idnay B, Dreisbach C, Weng C, Schnall R. A systematic review on natural language processing systems for eligibility prescreening in clinical research. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 29:197-206. [PMID: 34725689 PMCID: PMC8714283 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review to assess the effect of natural language processing (NLP) systems in improving the accuracy and efficiency of eligibility prescreening during the clinical research recruitment process. MATERIALS AND METHODS Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards of quality for reporting systematic reviews, a protocol for study eligibility was developed a priori and registered in the PROSPERO database. Using predetermined inclusion criteria, studies published from database inception through February 2021 were identified from 5 databases. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-experimental Studies was adapted to determine the study quality and the risk of bias of the included articles. RESULTS Eleven studies representing 8 unique NLP systems met the inclusion criteria. These studies demonstrated moderate study quality and exhibited heterogeneity in the study design, setting, and intervention type. All 11 studies evaluated the NLP system's performance for identifying eligible participants; 7 studies evaluated the system's impact on time efficiency; 4 studies evaluated the system's impact on workload; and 2 studies evaluated the system's impact on recruitment. DISCUSSION NLP systems in clinical research eligibility prescreening are an understudied but promising field that requires further research to assess its impact on real-world adoption. Future studies should be centered on continuing to develop and evaluate relevant NLP systems to improve enrollment into clinical studies. CONCLUSION Understanding the role of NLP systems in improving eligibility prescreening is critical to the advancement of clinical research recruitment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Idnay
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Caitlin Dreisbach
- Data Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca Schnall
- School of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eysenbach G, Angyan P, Le N, Buchanan TA. Using Patient-Generated Health Data From Twitter to Identify, Engage, and Recruit Cancer Survivors in Clinical Trials in Los Angeles County: Evaluation of a Feasibility Study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e29958. [PMID: 34842538 PMCID: PMC8665395 DOI: 10.2196/29958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Failure to find and attract clinical trial participants remains a persistent barrier to clinical research. Researchers increasingly complement recruitment methods with social media-based methods. We hypothesized that user-generated data from cancer survivors and their family members and friends on the social network Twitter could be used to identify, engage, and recruit cancer survivors for cancer trials. OBJECTIVE This pilot study aims to examine the feasibility of using user-reported health data from cancer survivors and family members and friends on Twitter in Los Angeles (LA) County to enhance clinical trial recruitment. We focus on 6 cancer conditions (breast cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, and prostate cancer). METHODS The social media intervention involved monitoring cancer-specific posts about the 6 cancer conditions by Twitter users in LA County to identify cancer survivors and their family members and friends and contacting eligible Twitter users with information about open cancer trials at the University of Southern California (USC) Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center. We reviewed both retrospective and prospective data published by Twitter users in LA County between July 28, 2017, and November 29, 2018. The study enrolled 124 open clinical trials at USC Norris. We used descriptive statistics to report the proportion of Twitter users who were identified, engaged, and enrolled. RESULTS We analyzed 107,424 Twitter posts in English by 25,032 unique Twitter users in LA County for the 6 cancer conditions. We identified and contacted 1.73% (434/25,032) of eligible Twitter users (127/434, 29.3% cancer survivors; 305/434, 70.3% family members and friends; and 2/434, 0.5% Twitter users were excluded). Of them, 51.4% (223/434) were female and approximately one-third were male. About one-fifth were people of color, whereas most of them were White. Approximately one-fifth (85/434, 19.6%) engaged with the outreach messages (cancer survivors: 33/85, 38% and family members and friends: 52/85, 61%). Of those who engaged with the messages, one-fourth were male, the majority were female, and approximately one-fifth were people of color, whereas the majority were White. Approximately 12% (10/85) of the contacted users requested more information and 40% (4/10) set up a prescreening. Two eligible candidates were transferred to USC Norris for further screening, but neither was enrolled. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate the potential of identifying and engaging cancer survivors and their family members and friends on Twitter. Optimization of downstream recruitment efforts such as screening for digital populations on social media may be required. Future research could test the feasibility of the approach for other diseases, locations, languages, social media platforms, and types of research involvement (eg, survey research). Computer science methods could help to scale up the analysis of larger data sets to support more rigorous testing of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03408561; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03408561.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Praveen Angyan
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - NamQuyen Le
- USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Thomas A Buchanan
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Watson JD, Perrin PB, McDonald SD, Tyler CM, Burke J, Pierce BS, Hugeback H, Mickens MN. Research Participant Recruitment Strategies Among Individuals with Acute Spinal Cord Injury and Their Caregivers: A Pre-Post Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:1111-1117. [PMID: 33710112 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Pre-post study. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficiency of a series of recruitment strategies in a longitudinal study of individuals with SCI and their informal caregivers. Primary strategies included (a) rapport building in advance, (b) warm handoffs from another healthcare provider who already had a relationship with the potential participant, (c) ensuring the potential participant had information about the study prior to the initial contact by the research coordinator (RC), (d) attempting informed consent only when both the patient and informal caregiver were present, and (e) ensuring the RC had at least 30 minutes to explain the study when attempting recruitment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA While a fairly large body of research has been conducted on general recruitment strategies for clinical trials, very little has examined the efficacy of these strategies within neurological conditions and almost none within SCI. METHODS Individuals with an acute SCI and their informal caregivers were recruited from acute spinal cord rehabilitation units with a Veteran's Affairs medical center and an academic medical center in the same urban area. Of 49 eligible dyads, 41 were approached for consent, with 27 consenting to join the study (9 from the academic medical center; 18 from the VA). RESULTS There was a significant difference in enrollment rates after implementing the recruitment strategies, χ2(1) = 7.572, P = 0.006, with the per month participant enrollment rate nearly doubling after implementation. CONCLUSION Using a multiteam and multidisciplinary approach to recruitment may increase the likelihood that individuals with an acute SCI and their caregivers enroll in research.Level of Evidence: 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack D Watson
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | - Paul B Perrin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | - Scott D McDonald
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | - Carmen M Tyler
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | - Julian Burke
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | - Bradford S Pierce
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Central Virginia Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Richmond, VA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mountain R, Sherlock C. Recruitment prediction for multicenter clinical trials based on a hierarchical Poisson-gamma model: Asymptotic analysis and improved intervals. Biometrics 2021; 78:636-648. [PMID: 33604911 DOI: 10.1111/biom.13447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We analyze predictions of future recruitment to a multicenter clinical trial based on a maximum-likelihood fitting of a commonly used hierarchical Poisson-gamma model for recruitments at individual centers. We consider the asymptotic accuracy of quantile predictions in the limit as the number of recruitment centers grows large and find that, in an important sense, the accuracy of the quantiles does not improve as the number of centers increases. When predicting the number of further recruits in an additional time period, the accuracy degrades as the ratio of the additional time to the census time increases, whereas when predicting the amount of additional time to recruit a further n • + patients, the accuracy degrades as the ratio of n • + to the number recruited up to the census period increases. Our analysis suggests an improved quantile predictor. Simulation studies verify that the predicted pattern holds for typical recruitment scenarios in clinical trials and verify the much improved coverage properties of prediction intervals obtained from our quantile predictor. In the process of extending the applicability of our methodology, we show that in terms of the accuracy of all integer moments it is always better to approximate the sum of independent gamma random variables by a single gamma random variable matched on the first two moments than by the moment-matched Gaussian available from the central limit theorem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Mountain
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Chris Sherlock
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kearney A, Rosala- Hallas A, Bacon N, Daykin A, Shaw ARG, Lane AJ, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Williamson PR, Gamble C. Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0204886. [PMID: 30379822 PMCID: PMC6209179 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recruitment and retention of patients are significant methodological challenges for trials. Whilst research has focussed on recruitment, the failure to retain recruited patients and collect outcome data can lead to additional problems and potentially biased results. Research to identify effective retention strategies has focussed on influencing patient behaviour through incentives, reminders and alleviating patient burden, but has not sought to improve patient understanding of the importance of retention. Our aim is to assess how withdrawal, retention and the value of outcome data collection is described within the Patient Information Leaflets (PIL) used during consent. METHODS Fifty adult or parent PIL from a cohort of trials starting between 2009-2012 and funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme were obtained from protocols, websites or by contacting trialists. A checklist of PIL content based on Health Research Authority (HRA) and ICH GCP Guidelines was supplemented with retention specific questions. Corresponding protocols were also evaluated to cross reference trial specific procedures with information communicated to patients. RESULTS PIL frequently reiterated the patient's right to withdraw at any time (n = 49, 98%), without having to give a reason and without penalty (n = 45, 90%). However, few informed patients they may be asked to give a withdrawal reason where willing (n = 6, 12%). Statements about the value of retention were infrequent (n = 8, 16%). Consent documents failed to include key content that might mitigate withdrawals, such as the need for treatment equipoise (n = 3, 6%). Nearly half the trials in the cohort (n = 23, 46%) wanted to continue to collect outcome data if patients withdraw. However, in 70% of PIL using prospective consent, withdrawal was described in generic terms leaving patients unaware of the difference between stopping treatment and all trial involvement. Nineteen (38%) trials offered withdrawing patients the option to delete existing data. CONCLUSIONS Withdrawal and retention is poorly described within PIL and addressing this might positively impact levels of patient attrition, reducing missing data. Consent information is unbalanced, focussing on patient's rights to withdraw without accompanying information that promotes robust consent and sustained participation. With many citing altruistic reasons for participation it is essential that PIL include more information on retention and clarify withdrawal terminology so patients are aware of how they can make a valuable contribution to clinical studies. There is a need to determine how retention can be described to patients to avoid concerns of coercion. Future research is needed to explore whether the absence of information about retention at the time of consent is impacting attrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Kearney
- North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research/ Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Anna Rosala- Hallas
- Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Bacon
- Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Anne Daykin
- ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Alison R. G. Shaw
- ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Athene J. Lane
- ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jane M. Blazeby
- ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Clarke
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Paula R. Williamson
- North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research/ Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Carrol Gamble
- North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research/ Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Levitan B, Getz K, Eisenstein EL, Goldberg M, Harker M, Hesterlee S, Patrick-Lake B, Roberts JN, DiMasi J. Assessing the Financial Value of Patient Engagement: A Quantitative Approach from CTTI's Patient Groups and Clinical Trials Project. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2018; 52:220-229. [PMID: 29714515 PMCID: PMC5933599 DOI: 10.1177/2168479017716715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While patient groups, regulators, and sponsors are increasingly considering engaging with patients in the design and conduct of clinical development programs, sponsors are often reluctant to go beyond pilot programs because of uncertainty in the return on investment. We developed an approach to estimate the financial value of patient engagement. METHODS Expected net present value (ENPV) is a common technique that integrates the key business drivers of cost, time, revenue, and risk into a summary metric for project strategy and portfolio decisions. We assessed the impact of patient engagement on ENPV for a typical oncology development program entering phase 2 or phase 3. RESULTS For a pre-phase 2 project, the cumulative impact of a patient engagement activity that avoids one protocol amendment and improves enrollment, adherence, and retention is an increase in net present value (NPV) of $62MM ($65MM for pre-phase 3) and an increase in ENPV of $35MM ($75MM for pre-phase 3). Compared with an investment of $100,000 in patient engagement, the NPV and ENPV increases can exceed 500-fold the investment. This ENPV increase is the equivalent of accelerating a pre-phase 2 product launch by 2½ years (1½ years for pre-phase 3). CONCLUSIONS Risk-adjusted financial models can assess the impact of patient engagement. A combination of empirical data and subjective parameter estimates shows that engagement activities with the potential to avoid protocol amendments and/or improve enrollment, adherence, and retention may add considerable financial value. This approach can help sponsors assess patient engagement investment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kenneth Getz
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jamie N Roberts
- Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Joseph DiMasi
- Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang GD, Bull J, Johnston McKee K, Mahon E, Harper B, Roberts JN. Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 66:74-79. [PMID: 29330082 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Patient recruitment is widely recognized as a key determinant of success for clinical trials. Yet a substantial number of trials fail to reach recruitment goals-a situation that has important scientific, financial, ethical, and policy implications. Further, there are important effects on stakeholders who directly contribute to the trial including investigators, sponsors, and study participants. Despite efforts over multiple decades to identify and address barriers, recruitment challenges persist. To advance a more comprehensive approach to trial recruitment, the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative (CTTI) convened a project team to examine the challenges and to issue actionable, evidence-based recommendations for improving recruitment planning that extend beyond common study-specific strategies. We describe our multi-stakeholder effort to develop a framework that delineates three areas essential to strategic recruitment planning efforts: (1) trial design and protocol development, (2) trial feasibility and site selection, and (3) communication. Our recommendations propose an upstream approach to recruitment planning that has the potential to produce greater impact and reduce downstream barriers. Additionally, we offer tools to help facilitate adoption of the recommendations. We hope that our framework and recommendations will serve as a guide for initial efforts in clinical trial recruitment planning irrespective of disease or intervention focus, provide a common basis for discussions in this area and generate targets for further analysis and continual improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant D Huang
- Cooperative Studies Program, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave NW, Washington, DC 20420, USA.
| | - Jonca Bull
- PPDi, 929 North Front Street, Wilmington, NC 28401, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Mahon
- Janssen Research & Development, 700 US Highway 202, Raritan, NJ 08869, USA.
| | - Beth Harper
- Association of Clinical Research Professionals, 99 Canal Center Plaza, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Getz KA. Examining and Enabling the Role of Health Care Providers as Patient Engagement Facilitators in Clinical Trials. Clin Ther 2017; 39:2203-2213. [PMID: 29079388 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2017] [Revised: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/19/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development conducted a study among practicing physicians and nurses (health care providers) across multiple specialties to assess their attitudes and experiences with referring patients into clinical trials and to supplement the body of scholarly research focused primarily on referral practices among oncology-based health care providers. METHODS A total of 755 physicians and 1255 nurses completed online surveys in late 2015 and early 2016. FINDINGS The results of the study indicate that a high percentage of multispecialty nurses and physicians is interested in referring their patients to appropriate clinical trials, are familiar with the clinical trial process, and are comfortable providing clinical trial information to, and discussing clinical trial opportunities with, their patients. Study results also indicate, however, that health care providers refer only a small number of patients each year largely because of the inability to access clinical trial information and the lack of sufficient information and time to evaluate and confidently discuss clinical trial options with their patients. IMPLICATIONS Many reasons for choosing not to refer patients appear addressable, particularly through effective but presently -underused communication leveraging social media communities and using liaisons who can act as a bridge between clinical care and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth A Getz
- Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jalgaonkar SV, Bhide SS, Tripathi RK, Shetty YC, Marathe PA, Katkar J, Thatte UM. An Audit of Protocol Deviations Submitted to an Institutional Ethics Committee of a Tertiary Care Hospital. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146334. [PMID: 26735850 PMCID: PMC4703381 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 11/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Protocol deviations (PDs) may jeopardize safety, rights, and welfare of subjects and data integrity. There is scarce literature and no guidelines for Institutional Ethics Committees (IECs) to process PD reports. The PD reports submitted to IECs from Jan 2011 to August 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Types of studies reporting PDs, category and type of PDs, PD rate per participant, time of reporting PD since its occurrence and corrective actions stated by principal investigator (PI) for major deviations were noted. Out of 447 PDs from 73/1387 total studies received during study period, 402 were from 126 pharma studies. Investigator initiated studies and dissertations reported negligible PDs. Median number of PDs was 4 per protocol. Out of 447 PDs, 304 were related to study procedure, 87, 47 and 9 were from safety, informed consent document (ICD) and eligibility category respectively. The most common reason for PDs was incomplete ICD (22/47). Maximum study procedure related PDs were due to patient visiting outside window period (126/304). Thirty five of 87 PDs were due to missed safety assessment. The overall PD reporting rate per participant was 0.08. In 90% of reports, date of occurrence of PD was not specified. The median delay for reporting PDs after occurrence was 94 days. PDs classified as Major were 73% (323/447). The most common corrective actions stated by PI were participant counseling (85/323) and caution in future (70/323). The study findings emphasize the need for GCP training at regular interval of study team members. IEC have to be vigilant and visit sites frequently, take initiative and formulate guidelines regarding PD reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharmila V. Jalgaonkar
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- * E-mail:
| | - Shruti S. Bhide
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Raakhi K. Tripathi
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Yashashri C. Shetty
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Padmaja A. Marathe
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Janhavi Katkar
- Institutional Ethics Committee, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Urmila M. Thatte
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tan MH, Thomas M, MacEachern MP. Using registries to recruit subjects for clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2014; 41:31-8. [PMID: 25545027 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2014] [Revised: 12/17/2014] [Accepted: 12/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM We studied the use of patient/disease registries to recruit potential subjects for prospective clinical trials - describing the number, types and major benefits of using this approach. METHODS In December 2013, we conducted a focused database search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies (English language only) that used registries to recruit subjects for clinical trials published in 2004-2013. Of the 233 unique citations identified, 21 used registries to recruit subjects - 10 papers and 11 abstracts. Pearling and search for subsequent full papers of the abstracts identified 4 more papers. RESULTS Our analysis, based on these 25 citations, showed that 14 are related to cancer, 3 to diabetes mellitus, 1 each to stroke, asthma, and celiac disease and 5 are disease neutral. Many types of registries (population-based cancer, quality improvement, disease-specific, web-based disease-neutral registries, local general practice registers, and national health database) are used to recruit subjects for clinical trials and uncover new knowledge. Overall, 16 registries are in the US, 4 in UK, 1 each in Canada, Spain, and Australia and 1 involved in many countries. Registries can identify very large number of subjects for screening for eligibility for clinical trials, especially in very large trials, rare disease trials, and trials involving minority patients. CONCLUSIONS Registries can retrospectively identify very large numbers of potential subjects for screening for eligibility and enrollment in prospective clinical trials. This matching can lead to more timely recruitment and help solve a major problem in conducting clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng H Tan
- Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Matthew Thomas
- College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Mark P MacEachern
- Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|