Hepatic Epithelioid Haemangioendothelioma

Liver Transplant for Non-Hepatocellular Malignancies: A Review for Radiologists

Although traditionally only performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the last decade has seen a resurgence in the use of liver transplant (LT) for non-HCC malignancies, likely due to improvements in neoadjuvant treatment regimens as well as the establishment of well-defined eligibility criteria. Given promising survival results, patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastases, and hepatic hemangioendothelioma are eligible to receive Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception for tumors that meet well-defined criteria. Additional tumors such as colorectal cancer liver metastases, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hepatocholangiocarcinoma may undergo transplant at specialized centers with well-defined protocols, although are not yet eligible for MELD exception. Transplant eligibility criteria commonly incorporate imaging findings, yet due to the relatively novel and evolving nature of LT for non-HCC malignancies, radiologists may be unaware of relevant criteria or of the implications of their imaging interpretations. Knowledge of the allocation process, background, and liver transplant selection criteria facilitates the radiologist' active participation in multidisciplinary discussion, leading to better and more equitable care for transplant candidates with non-HCC malignancy. This review provides an overview of transplant allocation and selection criteria in patients with non-HCC malignancy, with an emphasis on imaging features and the role of the radiologist.

Historical and Contemporary Management of Infantile Hepatic Hemangioma: A 30-year Single-center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To describe outcome of infants with hemangioma(s) of the liver.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Infantile hepatic hemangiomas exhibit a diverse phenotype. We report our 30-year experience and describe optimal management based on precise radiological classification.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 124 infants (66 female) 1986-2016. Categorical analysis with Chi and nonparametric comparison. Data expressed as median (range) and P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Lesions classified as focal (n = 70, 56%); multifocal (n = 47, 38%) or diffuse (n = 7, 6%) and of these 80(65%) were symptomatic (eg, cardiac failure n = 39, 31%; thrombocytopenia n = 12, 10%).Increased hepatic artery velocity was seen in 63 (56%). Median hepatic artery velocity was greatest in diffuse lesions [245 (175-376) cm/s vs focal 120 (34-242) cm/s vs multifocal 93 (36-313) cm/s; P = 0.0001]. Expectant management alone was followed in 55 (44%). Medical therapy was utilised in 57(46%) and sufficient for symptom control in 29/57 (51%). Propranolol therapy (from 2008) was sufficient for symptom control in 22/28 (79%). Surgery (hepatic artery ligation n = 26; resection n = 13; embolization n = 1) was required in 40 (32%). Median maximal lesion diameter was 3 (0.5-17.1) cm and greater in those requiring surgery (7 cm vs 4.9 cm; P = 0.04). The proportion requiring surgery decreased markedly in the propranolol era [pre-propranolol 25/48 (52%) vs post-propranolol 16/76 (21%) (P = 0.0003)]. Systematic follow-up with ultrasound to a median of 2.6 (0.02-16) years.

CONCLUSIONS

A proportion of infantile hepatic hemangiomas remain asymptomatic permitting observation until resolution but the majority require complex multi-modal therapy. First-line pharmacotherapy with propranolol has reduced but not abolished the need for surgery.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma: A Case Series

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a rare soft-tissue tumor with unpredictable malignant potential. This type of tumor can occur in the liver but is very rare. Signs and symptoms are often nonspecific, and even if the problem is not misdiagnosed, arriving at a clear diagnosis can take some time. This article describes 3 patients who had very different signs and symptoms, all of whom were referred to a specialist center for liver transplantation in 1 year. All 3 patients proceeded to transplantation and made a good recovery. They have regular follow-up at the transplant center, and to date, no recurrence of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma has been seen in these 3 patients.

Liver transplantation for malignancies

Liver transplantation (LT) has become an acceptable and effective treatment for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with excellent outcomes. More recently, LT has been tried in different primary and secondary malignancies of the liver. The outcomes of LT for very selected group of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) have been promising. Excellent results have been reported in LT for patients with unresectable hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE). In contrast to excellent results after LT for HEHE, results of LT for angiosarcoma have been disappointing with no long-term survivors. Hepatoblastoma (HB) is the most common primary liver cancer in pediatric age group. Long-term outcomes after LT in patients with unresectable tumor and good response to chemotherapy have been promising. Indication for LT for hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is mainly for patients with unresectable tumors and for palliation of medically uncontrollable symptoms. Posttransplant survival in those patients with low tumor activity index is excellent, despite recurrence of the tumor. More recent limited outcomes data on LT for unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer have claimed some survival benefit compared to the previous reports. However, due to the high rate of tumor recurrence in a very short time after LT, especially in the era of organ shortage, this indication has not been favored by the transplant community.

Treatment sequencing strategy for hepatic epithelioid haemangioendothelioma

BACKGROUND

The biology of hepatic epithelial haemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is variable, lying intermediate to haemangioma and angiosarcoma. Treatments vary owing to the rarity of the disease and frequent misdiagnosis.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 2013, patients retrospectively identified with HEHE from a single academic cancer centre were analysed to evaluate clinicopathological factors and initial treatment regimens associated with survival.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with confirmed HEHE had a median follow-up of 51 months (range 1-322). There was no difference in 5-year survival between patients presenting with unilateral compared with bilateral hepatic disease (51.4% versus 80.7%, respectively; P = 0.1), localized compared with metastatic disease (69% versus 78.3%, respectively; P = 0.7) or an initial treatment regimen of Surgery, Chemotherapy/Embolization or Observation alone (83.3% versus 71.3% versus 72.4%, respectively; P = 0.9). However, 5-year survival for patients treated with chemotherapy at any point during their disease course was decreased compared with those who did not receive any chemotherapy (43.6% versus 82.9%, respectively; P = 0.02) and was predictive of a decreased overall survival on univariate analysis [HR 3.1 (CI 0.9-10.7), P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

HEHE frequently follows an indolent course, suggesting that immediate treatment may not be the optimal strategy. Initial observation to assess disease behaviour may better stratify treatment options, reserving surgery for those who remain resectable/transplantable. Prospective cooperative trials or registries may confirm this strategy.

Conservative management of neonatal hepatic hemangioma: a report from one institute

PURPOSE

To summarize the conservative treatment of neonatal hepatic hemangioma at one institute.

PATIENTS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen cases of neonatal hepatic hemangioma were managed in our hospital during the previous 5 years. Initial symptoms, combination symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Initial symptoms were abdominal mass, hepatomegaly, jaundice, and pneumonia. Combination symptoms were multiple skin hemangiomas, pneumonia, and cardiac insufficiency. Ultrasound and CT showed the typical characteristics of the liver hemangioma. There were three types of hepatic hemangioma: nine cases had a single focus, four cases were multiple foci, and two had diffuse changes in the liver. The diameter of a single focus in this group was about 53-99 mm. Four cases of single focus received resection and two received biopsy. Six cases received corticosteroid treatment. The other five cases were kept under observation only. Those with cardiac insufficiency and pneumonia received diuretics and antibiotic treatment. One neonate with cardiac insufficiency and pneumonia had postoperative MODS and died. One patient having multi-focus in the liver gave up the treatment after biopsy. Other patients were followed-up at 5-17 months. Two cases that received total tumor resection did not have recurrence. In those who received conservative therapy, all hemangiomas disappeared within 1 year.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma can be made from symptomology, ultrasound, and CT; pathologic samples are not necessary. Corticosteroid therapy is the widely used therapy. Proactive therapy for congestive heart failure is helpful for those endangering liver hemangioma. Surgery can increase the risk of complications and is not advised for treatment of neonatal hepatic hemangioma.

The place of liver transplantation in the treatment of hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma: report of the European liver transplant registry

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare low-grade vascular tumor. Its treatment algorithm is still unclear mainly due to a lack of larger clinical experiences with detailed long-term follow-up.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients, reported to the European Liver Transplant Registry, were analyzed to define the role of liver transplantation (LT) in the treatment of this disease. Eleven (19%) patients were asymptomatic. Eighteen (30.5%) patients had pre-LT surgical [hepatic (7 patients) and extrahepatic (3 patients)] and/or systemic or locoregional (10 patients) medical therapy. Ten (16.9%) patients had extrahepatic disease localization before or at the time of LT. Follow-up was complete for all patients with a median of 92.5 (range, 7-369) from moment of diagnosis and a median of 78.5 (range, 1-245) from the moment of LT.

RESULTS

HEHE was bilobar in 96% of patients; 86% of patients had more than 15 nodules in the liver specimen. Early (<3 months) and late (>3 months) post-LT mortality was 1.7% (1 patient) and 22% (14 patients). Fourteen (23.7%) patients developed disease recurrence after a median time of 49 months (range, 6-98). Nine (15.3%) patients died of recurrent disease and 5 are surviving with recurrent disease. One-, 5-, and 10- year patient survival rates from moment of transplantation for the whole series are 93%, 83%, 72%. Pre-LT tumor treatment (n = 18) (89%, 89%, and 68% 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates from moment of LT vs. 95%, 80%, and 73% in case of absence of pre-LT treatment), lymph node (LN) invasion (n = 18) (96%, 81%, and 71% 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates vs. 83%, 78%, and 67% in node negative patients) and extrahepatic disease localization (n = 10) (90%, 80%, and 80% 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates vs. 94%, 83%, and 70% in case of absence of extrahepatic disease) did not significantly influence patient survival whereas microvascular (n = 24) (96%, 75%, 52% 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival vs. 96%, 92%, 85% in case of absence of microvascular invasion) and combined micro- and macrovascular invasion (n = 28) (90%, 72%, and 54% 1-,5-, and 10-year survival vs. 96%, 92%, and 85% in case of absence of vascular invasion, P = 0.03) did. Disease-free survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years post-LT are 90%, 82%, and 64%. Disease-free survival is not significantly influenced by pre-LT treatment, LN status, extrahepatic disease localization, and vascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the largest reported transplant series in the treatment of HEHE are excellent. Preexisting extrahepatic disease localization as well as LN involvement are not contraindications to LT. Microvascular or combined macro-microvascular invasion significantly influence survival after LT. LT therefore should be offered as a valid therapy earlier in the disease course of these, frequently young, patients. Recurrent (allograft) disease should be treated aggressively as good long-term survivals can be obtained. Long-term prospective follow-up multicenter studies as well as the evaluation of antiangiogenic drugs are necessary to further optimize the treatment of this rare vascular hepatic disorder.

Primary malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a comprehensive review of the literature with emphasis on the surgical therapy

Malignant hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare malignant tumor of vascular origin with unknown etiology and a variable natural course. The authors present a comprehensive review of the literature on HEH with a focus on clinical outcome after different therapeutic strategies. All published series on patients with HEH (n = 434 patients) were analyzed from the first description in 1984 to the current literature. The reviewed parameters included demographic data, clinical manifestations, therapeutic modalities, and clinical outcome. The mean age of patients with HEH was 41.7 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 2:3. The most common clinical manifestations were right upper quadrant pain, hepatomegaly, and weight loss. Most patients presented with multifocal tumor that involved both lobes of the liver. Lung, peritoneum, lymph nodes, and bone were the most common sites of extrahepatic involvement at the time of diagnosis. The most common management has been liver transplantation (LTx) (44.8% of patients), followed by no treatment (24.8% of patients), chemotherapy or radiotherapy (21% of patients), and liver resection (LRx) (9.4% of patients). The 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates were 96% and 54.5%, respectively, after LTx; 39.3% and 4.5%, respectively, after no treatment, 73.3% and 30%, respectively, after chemotherapy or radiotherapy; and 100% and 75%, respectively, after LRx. LRx has been the treatment of choice in patients with resectable HEH. However, LTx has been proposed as the treatment of choice because of the hepatic multicentricity of HEH. In addition, LTx is an acceptable option for patients who have HEH with extrahepatic manifestation. Highly selected patients may be able to undergo living-donor LTx, preserving the donor pool. The role of different adjuvant therapies for patients with HEH remains to be determined.