Management of Seizures in the Elderly: A Survey of UK Geriatricians

The risk of new-onset epilepsy and refractory epilepsy in older adult stroke survivors

Objective

Our study objectives were to identify factors associated with new-onset epilepsy and refractory epilepsy among older adult stroke survivors and to evaluate the receipt of diagnostic care and mortality for participants who developed epilepsy.

Methods

We conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study using linked, administrative health care databases. The Ontario Stroke Registry was used to identify patients 67 years and older who were hospitalized for a stroke at a designated stroke center in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2003, and March 31, 2009, and were previously free of epilepsy. Multivariable Fine–Gray hazard models were used to examine risk factors of epilepsy and refractory epilepsy, accounting for the competing risk of death.

Results

Among 19,138 older adults hospitalized for a stroke, 210 (1.1%) developed epilepsy and 27 (12.9%) became refractory to antiepileptic drugs. Within 1 year of epilepsy diagnosis, 24 (11.4%) patients were assessed with EEG and 19 (9.0%) with MRI. In multivariable analysis, younger age and thrombolysis receipt significantly increased epilepsy risk. Lesser stroke severity and anticoagulant medication receipt also significantly increased epilepsy risk; however, these effects decreased over time. Younger age and female sex were the only risk factors of refractory epilepsy. In the 5 years following epilepsy diagnosis, 97 (46.2%) participants died of any cause.

Conclusions

Older adult stroke survivors are less likely to develop epilepsy and pharmacologically refractory epilepsy. An estimated 86.6% of deaths among older adult stroke survivors with new-onset epilepsy are attributed to causes other than stroke or epilepsy.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of USL261, midazolam nasal spray: Randomized study in healthy geriatric and non-geriatric adults

AIM

Characterize pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety/tolerability of USL261 in geriatric adults to inform its potential for treating bouts of increased seizure activity.

METHODS

Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, 2-way crossover study in healthy geriatric (≥65years; n=18) and non-geriatric (18-40years; n=12) adults evaluated single USL261 doses (2.5 and 5.0mg) administered intranasally. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated for midazolam and 1-hydroxymidazolam (active metabolite), including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (C_max), time to C_max (T_max), and half-life (t_1/2). Stanford Sleepiness Scale and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation assessed sedation; Digit-Symbol Substitution Test assessed psychomotor performance.

RESULTS

Midazolam exposure and plasma concentrations were higher in geriatric versus non-geriatric adults (geometric mean AUC_0-∞ [ng*h/mL] 2.5mg: 70 vs 54, respectively; 5.0mg: 157 vs 110; C_max [ng/mL] 2.5mg: 27.1 vs 22.5; 5.0mg: 55.8 vs 46.1). USL261 was rapidly absorbed, with no differences in median T_max (14.5-17.3min); mean t_1/2 was longer in geriatric subjects. Similar age-related trends were observed for 1-hydroxymidazolam. Mean maximum observed pharmacodynamic effects were not significantly different between age groups, though were more pronounced following 5.0 versus 2.5mg (P<.05); return to baseline was generally achieved within 4h. USL261 was generally well tolerated, with similar adverse event rates between age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increased midazolam exposure in geriatric subjects, there were no differences between age groups in pharmacodynamic effects or adverse event rates. USL261 was rapidly absorbed and pharmacodynamic effects returned to baseline within ~4h, regardless of age. Dose-dependent pharmacokinetic and maximum pharmacodynamic effects were observed. Overall, pharmacokinetic findings for USL261 were similar to studies evaluating intravenous midazolam, whereas pharmacodynamic effects were less pronounced in the elderly than previously reported.

Epidemiology and drug treatment of epilepsy in elderly people

Seizures are extremely common in the elderly, with an annual incidence reaching 100 per 100000 people aged over 60 years. Most are precipitated by acute symptomatic illnesses such as stroke or systemic disease. Chronic neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease may also cause seizures. The aetiology of seizures in many patients is unknown. Seizures may be situational and subside quickly, but the prevalence of chronic seizures--epilepsy--is as high as 1% in the elderly. The majority of seizures are of partial onset, especially complex partial. Complex partial seizures at this age may be very subtle and hard to diagnose. Generalised-onset seizures also occur, perhaps as a result of diffuse changes with aging or degenerative disease or to a combination of genetic and environmental factors. The prognosis for complete seizure control in this population is relatively favourable. Physiological and disease-related changes with aging result in complex pharmacokinetics. Most changes lead to a need for gentler drug treatment with cautious initiation of drugs at lower dosages. Consideration must be given to renal and hepatic function, protein binding and drug interactions. Determinations of free (unbound) drug concentrations are helpful for highly protein bound drugs. The dosages of newer drugs excreted renally must be adjusted based on creatinine clearance. The dosage of most drugs is determined empirically by careful observation of seizure control and adverse effects. Carbamazepine, valproic acid (sodium valproate), gabapentin and lamotrigine have certain theoretical advantages, but comparative trials of anticonvulsants in the elderly are needed. The ideal drug for older patients would be effective, without neurological toxicity, with low protein binding, a nonparticipant in drug interactions and amenable to once daily administration.

Differential kinetics of phenytoin in elderly patients

The elderly have a relatively high risk of developing adverse drug reactions. Phenytoin continues to be a preferred drug for treating generalised tonic-clonic seizures in the elderly and simple partial seizures that generalise. Phenytoin is eliminated almost entirely by hepatic oxidation. The principle enzymes responsible are cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP2C19. CYP2C9 is saturated by therapeutic doses of phenytoin, and at steady state both enzymes are probably operant in most people. The nonlinear pharmacokinetics of phenytoin make it a difficult drug for which to establish safe and effective administration regimens. An important area of inquiry is whether the differential disposition kinetics of phenytoin in the elderly render its administration an even more difficult challenge. Moreover, since the elderly are generally subject to more polypharmacy than younger adults, are they, as a result, subject to either more frequent or more severe drug interactions with phenytoin than younger adults? In order to examine these issues we were interested in learning the extent to which old age might affect the plasma protein binding of phenytoin, its hepatic metabolism and, ultimately, its pharmacokinetic profile. With regard to the latter we looked carefully at the methods that have been used to characterise the disposition kinetics of phenytoin in general, and in the elderly, in particular. There are many conflicting findings with regard to the effect of age on the disposition kinetics of phenytoin. However, the strategies used for estimating kinetic parameters for phenytoin [viz the maximum rate of metabolism/elimination (Vmax) and the Michaelis-Menton constant (Km)] exhibit deficiencies that could account for some of the disparate findings. Certainly, more careful prospective studies focusing on the effects of age on phenytoin disposition kinetics are warranted. However, in light of the information currently available, no special attention need be paid to the initiation of phenytoin administration in elderly patients who are taking multiple anticonvulsants. On the other hand, for the elderly receiving phenytoin monotherapy, the initiation of phenytoin administration should occur at lower doses than would be customary for younger adults, and phenytoin blood concentrations should be appropriately monitored in order to evaluate individual Vmax and Km values for informed dosage adjustments.