Problem feet in children

Congenital curly toe of the fetus

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence, prenatal detection rate, and associated anomalies of congenital curly toe in an unselected obstetric population.

METHODS

Between September 2001 and July 2002, 1167 singleton fetuses in the second and third trimesters underwent routine prenatal ultrasound at our hospital. Congenital curly toe was diagnosed when the fourth or fifth toe was not fully delineated on the axial image with medial and plantar flexion on the coronal image. All neonates underwent a physical examination within 3 days after delivery. Radiography was performed on those infants with curly toe. We assessed the prevalence, prenatal detection rate, and associated anomalies of the condition.

RESULTS

There were 38 congenital curly toes among the 1167 neonates, yielding a total prevalence of 32.6 per 1000. In 26 of the 38 the fourth toe was curly and in 12 the fifth toe was curly. Of those in which the fourth toe was curly, 26.9% involved the right toe, 65.4% the left, and 7.7% involved both toes. For a curly fifth toe, these values were 25.0%, 16.7% and 58.3%, respectively. There was no associated structural anomaly, chromosomal abnormality, or syndrome in any case. Sixteen of the 38 curly toes were detected on prenatal ultrasound, including 13 of 26 with the fourth toe being curly and three of 12 with the fifth being curly.

CONCLUSIONS

Congenital curly toe is not an uncommon condition, and can be detected on the prenatal ultrasound. Although it usually appears as an isolated finding without clinical significance, thorough ultrasound examination of the fetus should be recommended.

Measurement of forefoot varus angle by laser technology in people with flexible flatfoot

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to measure the forefoot varus angles in subjects with and without flexible flatfoot (FF) by using laser foot-scanning technology.

DESIGN

In the rehabilitation laboratory of a tertiary medical center, 70 subjects with FF, ranging in age from 10 to 50 yr, were recruited. The control group consisted of 30 volunteers without clinical evidence of FF. A total of 100 positive casts were obtained by having their subtalar joints kept in a neutral position. The plantar surface of the positive cast was scanned by a Yeti 3D Foot Scanner. A straight line was drawn between the first and fifth metatarsophalangeal joints. The forefoot varus angle was measured from this line in relation to the line parallel to the ground.

RESULTS

The mean forefoot varus angle was calculated to be 5.01 +/- 4.51 degrees in our FF subjects, and 1.23 +/- 1.96 degrees in the control group. Significant statistical difference in forefoot varus angle was noted between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The laser foot-scanning technique offers fast and accurate measurement of the forefoot varus angles. An average forefoot varus angle of approximately 5 degrees was observed in subjects with FF, which was significantly greater than the subjects without FF. Therefore, we recommend the concept of incorporating adequate forefoot posting at the medial forefoot area of an insole in treating people with FF.

Arch height and lower limb pain: an adult civilian study

Flexible flatfeet in children are still treated with orthotics and operative procedures by some physicians who believe such treatment will prevent disability in adult life. Opponents of treatment cite military studies that show flexible flatfeet are not a source of disability in soldiers. Because no study of adult civilians relating arch configuration and pain have been reported, this study was undertaken. Ninety-nine adult male and female physically active grocery-store employees were studied. Half-weight-bearing footprints were made, and leg and foot pain questionnaires were scored for each subject. No relationship was found between arch configuration and pain scores. This study suggests that in the civilian population flexible flatfeet are not a source of disability. This study is consistent with previous studies and provides additional evidence against the practice of treating flexible flatfeet in children.