Laryngopharyngeal reflux: is laparoscopic fundoplication an effective treatment?

INTRODUCTION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is difficult to diagnose and treat owing to uncertainty relating to the underlying pathology. The initial management of LPR includes lifestyle modifications and oral medications. In patients who have failed to respond to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, anti-reflux surgery is considered; laparoscopic fundoplication is the surgery of choice. The primary aim of this review is to identify whether fundoplication is effective in improving signs and symptoms of LPR. The secondary aim is to identify whether patients who have had a poor response to PPIs are likely to have symptom improvement with surgery. The objective of the study is to establish the effect of laparoscopic fundoplication on the reflux symptom index score (RSI).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were used to search according to the PRISMA guidelines. Original articles assessing the efficacy of fundoplication in relieving symptoms of LPR were included. For each study, the efficacy endpoints and safety outcomes were recorded.

FINDINGS

Nine studies from 844 initial records met the inclusion criteria: one prospective case control study, one retrospective case-control study, four prospective case series and three retrospective case series involving 287 fundoplications. All nine studies found fundoplication to be effective in improving symptoms of LPR (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests laparoscopic fundoplication is an effective treatment for LPR and should be considered if medical management is unsuccessful.

Pharyngeal pH Probe Findings in Patients with Postnasal Drainage

Background

Patients commonly present with complaints of postnasal drainage (PND). This study reports the pharyngeal pH probe findings in patients without rhinitis/rhinosinusitis who present with complaints of PND.

Methods

This is a prospective study of patients presenting with PND but no historical or endoscopic evidence of rhinitis/rhinosinusitis. Twenty-four-hour pharyngeal pH probe studies were done on 32 consecutive patients and compared with historical controls.

Results

There were a total of 32 patients with PND (mean age, 54 years) and 51 controls (mean age, 49 years). The proportion of patients with positive pH probe studies was higher in PND (28.1%) versus controls (17.6%) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.27). However, when comparing the mean number of pharyngeal acid exposure events, patients with PND had significantly more events (1.6) than controls (0.3; p < 0.002). In addition, the mean acid exposure time was significantly higher in PND (0.18%) versus controls (0.01%; p < 0.004).

Conclusion

The proportion of patients with PND displaying positive pharyngeal 24 pH probe studies is not significantly greater than controls. However, patients with PND do exhibit a statistically greater degree of pharyngeal acid exposure as compared with controls. Additional research is required to delineate the role of pharyngeal reflux in patients with PND.

Association of Nasopharyngeal and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux with Postnasal Drip Symptomatology in Patients with and without Rhinosinusitis

Background

Patients often report postnasal drip (PND), but objective rhinosinusitis and allergy findings are frequently absent. In this study, we evaluate the association between PND and pharyngeal reflux.

Methods

Sixty-eight participants underwent 24-hour pH testing, including chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients persistently symptomatic after endoscopic sinus surgery, CRS patients successfully treated by endoscopic sinus surgery, and volunteers without a CRS history. The pH probes contained nasopharyngeal (NP), laryngopharyngeal (LP), and distal esophageal sensors. Participants completed the Sinonasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20) and Modified Reflux Symptom Index (MRSI) questionnaires. Survey items addressing PND symptomatology were compared with NP reflux (NPR) below pH 4 and pH 5 (defined as ≥1 event), and LP reflux (LPR; defined as ≥7 events or reflux area index <6.3).

Results

Pearson analyses revealed a positive correlation of r = 0.87 between SNOT-20 and MRSI PND items. For NPR < pH 4, no significant difference existed between participants with and without reflux on the SNOT-20 or MRSI (p < 0.05). However, for NPR < pH 5, reflux-positive participants exhibited significantly more PND symptoms on the SNOT-20 (p = 0.030) and the MRSI (p = 0.018) compared with participants without reflux. Finally, participants with LPR had significantly more PND symptomatology on the SNOT-20 (p = 0.010) versus those without LPR. A borderline significant difference existed on the MRSI PND item between participants positive and negative for LPR (p = 0.055).

Conclusion

Objective evidence of NPR and LPR exists in patients reporting PND. Reflux treatment may reduce PND complaints.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux: Current concepts in pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is the backflow of gastric contents into the pharynx and larynx. The diagnosis of LPR is primarily based on symptoms, including dysphonia, dysphagia, globus, throat-clearing, and post-nasal drip. The gold standard for diagnosis is dual-probe 24-hour pH testing with the upper probe positioned above the upper oesophageal sphincter. Treatment may require 3 months or more of twice-daily proton pump inhibitors along with lifestyle modifications. This review details the pathophysiology, symptoms, findings, treatment, and current controversies in LPR.

Nonallergic rhinitis in children

Nonallergic rhinitis in children is a medical condition that has not been well defined and the true incidence is unknown. Current treatment recommendations are based on data obtained from adult studies. The mechanisms of pediatric nonallergic rhinitis are also unclear. The concept that laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) events may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of upper airway disease is presently under investigation. Although LPR is being better delineated and appropriate methods of diagnosis and treatment are being studied, substantial evidence links LPR with several disease states including rhinitis, sinus disease, and middle ear disease. Due to the lack of information concerning the etiology of nonallergic rhinitis in children, LPR should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a child with negative skin tests and chronic rhinitis symptoms. The clinician should especially give attention to this diagnosis when a child presents with recurrent co-morbid conditions such as chronic sinusitis or persistent middle ear disease.

Office based trans nasal esophagoscopy, and its role

Trans Nasal Esophagoscopy (TME) - a new concept to visualize the esophagus in office practice has obviated the conventional rigid esophagoscope, which is a cumbersome, time consuming procedure and sometimes associated with complications like perforation. Many surgeons in the West using flexible endoscope after air insufflation have tried this procedure. We fabricated a new gadget far the purpose of air insufflation in collaboration with the department of biomedical engineering, Apollo hospitals, Chennai which substitute oxygen insufflation through central supply or through the flow meter connected to an O(2) cylinder. In this article we have discussed various uses of the procedure in diagnosis A therapeutic application in an E.N.T office practice and also the unique technique of air insufflation with the new gadget.