Intraoperative Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring During Neck Dissection Surgery as a Predictor for Shoulder Dysfunction

Shoulder dysfunction is one of the most common complications seen in patients who have undergone neck dissection surgery. The prevalence of shoulder dysfunction increases depending on the type and extent of neck dissection surgery. We aim to study the relationship between changes in intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) threshold during SAN stimulation, ultrasonographic measurement of muscle size and shear wave elastography with shoulder dysfunction. This is a prospective study. All patients who have undergone neck dissection in our centre have been recruited. Analysis of demographic data, IONM threshold during exposure and pre-closure, shoulder function score, neck disability index score (NDII) and ultrasonographic parameters pre-op and during follow up was done. The cohort was divided into patients who suffered from shoulder dysfunction post op (Group A) and patients with normal shoulder function post op (Group B). Statistical significance were seen in IONM threshold during SAN stimulation and Constant shoulder score for 6 months follow up in Group A. IONM threshold difference during exposure and pre-closure could effectively prognosticate shoulder dysfunction post op. A return of shoulder function could be seen in patients who suffered from shoulder dysfunction if early physiotherapy could be commenced.

The Role of IONM in Reducing the Occurrence of Shoulder Syndrome Following Lateral Neck Dissection for Thyroid Cancer

Lateral neck dissection (LND) leads to a significant morbidity involving accessory nerve injury. Modified radical neck dissection (MRND) aims at preservation of the accessory nerve, but patients often present with negative functional outcomes after surgery. The role of neuromonitoring (IONM) in the prevention of shoulder syndrome has not yet been defined in comparison to nerve visualization only. We retrospectively analyzed 56 thyroid cancer patients who underwent MRND over a period of six years (2015–2020) in a high-volume institution. Demographic variables, type of surgical procedure, removed lymph nodes and the metastatic node ratio, pathology, adoption of IONM and shoulder functional outcome were investigated. The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 15.61, with a metastatic node ratio of 0.2745. IONM was used in 41.07% of patients, with a prevalence of 68% in the period 2017–2020. IONM adoption showed an effect on post-operative shoulder function. There were no effects in 89.29% of cases, and temporary and permanent effects in 8.93% and 1.79%, respectively. Confidence intervals and two-sample tests for equality of proportions were used when applicable. Expertise in high-volume centres and IONM during MRND seem to be correlated with a reduced prevalence of accessory nerve lesions and limited functional impairments. These results need to be confirmed by larger prospective randomized controlled trials.

Intra-operative monitoring of the spinal accessory nerve: a systematic review

Objective:

To investigate evidence that intra-operative nerve monitoring of the spinal accessory nerve affects the prevalence of post-operative shoulder morbidity and predicts functional outcome.

Methods:

A search of the Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases from 1995 to October 2012 was undertaken, using the search terms ‘monitoring, intra-operative’ and ‘accessory nerve’. Articles were included if they pertained to intra-operative accessory nerve monitoring undertaken during neck dissection surgery and included a functional shoulder outcome measure. Further relevant articles were obtained by screening the reference lists of retrieved articles.

Results:

Only three articles met the inclusion criteria of the review. Two of these included studies suggesting that intra-operative nerve monitoring shows greater specificity than sensitivity in predicting post-operative shoulder dysfunction. Only one study, with a small sample size, assessed intra-operative nerve monitoring in neck dissection patients.

Conclusion:

It is unclear whether intra-operative nerve monitoring is a useful tool for reducing the prevalence of accessory nerve injury and predicting post-operative functional shoulder outcome in patients undergoing neck dissection. Larger, randomised studies are required to determine whether such monitoring is a valuable surgical adjunct.

Spinal Accessory Nerve Monitoring and Clinical Outcome Results of Nerve-Sparing Neck Dissections

Objective

To investigate the role of intraoperative spinal accessory nerve monitoring in predicting postoperative shoulder function in spinal accessory nerve-sparing neck dissections.

Study Design

Prospective, double-blind clinical trial.

Setting

Academic, tertiary care center.

Subjects and Methods

This study was performed on 20 neck sites of 17 consecutive patients who had neck dissections sparing the spinal accessory nerve. Threshold increment ≥0.25 mA and amplitude decrement ≥72% were classified as significant intraoperative neuromonitoring changes while lesser differences were classified as insignificant intraoperative neuromonitoring changes. All patients had intraoperative neuromonitoring recordings when the spinal accessory nerve was first identified and at the end of surgery. Postoperative shoulder function was evaluated neurophysiologically with electromyography and clinically with Constant-Murley Score; daily activity restrictions were evaluated with Activity Restriction Scale.

Results

Clinical assessment of shoulder functions at postoperative first and second months showed statistically significant deteriorations when compared with preoperative values ( P < .05). The shoulder function deterioration was statistically significantly less for patients with insignificant intraoperative neuromonitoring changes than patients with significant intraoperative neuromonitoring changes ( P < .05). Daily activity restriction deteriorations were present in both groups at first postoperative month ( P < .05). While they persisted in the group with significant intraoperative neuromonitoring changes during the second postoperative month ( P < .05), there was continuing recovery in the insignificant intraoperative neuromonitoring change group and statistical significance disappeared ( P > .05).

Conclusion

Our results support the predictive value of spinal accessory nerve intraoperative neuromonitoring for determining shoulder function deterioration and activity restriction scores.

Acupuncture for pain and dysfunction after neck dissection: results of a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine whether acupuncture reduces pain and dysfunction in patients with cancer with a history of neck dissection. The secondary objective is to determine whether acupuncture relieves dry mouth in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients at a tertiary cancer center with chronic pain or dysfunction attributed to neck dissection were randomly assigned to weekly acupuncture versus usual care (eg, physical therapy, analgesia, and/or anti-inflammatory drugs, per patient preference or physician recommendation) for 4 weeks. The Constant-Murley score, a composite measure of pain, function, and activities of daily living, was the primary outcome measure. Xerostomia, a secondary end point, was assessed using the Xerostomia Inventory.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight evaluable patients were accrued and randomly assigned from 2004 to 2007 (28 and 30 patients on acupuncture and control arms, respectively). Constant-Murley scores improved more in the acupuncture group (adjusted difference between groups = 11.2; 95% CI, 3.0 to 19.3; P = .008). Acupuncture produced greater improvement in reported xerostomia (adjusted difference in Xerostomia Inventory = -5.8; 95% CI, -0.9 to -10.7; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Significant reductions in pain, dysfunction, and xerostomia were observed in patients receiving acupuncture versus usual care. Although further study is needed, these data support the potential role of acupuncture in addressing post-neck dissection pain and dysfunction, as well as xerostomia.