Anti tumor necrosis factor induced focal myositis

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) can trigger autoantibody formation and, in a small proportion of patients, result in symptomatic autoimmune diseases, including polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Focal myositis presents with localized muscle pain and is diagnosed based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electromyography (EMG) and muscle histopathology. We report the first case of TNFi-induced focal myositis in the left thigh of a patient with ulcerative colitis on infliximab. A 30-year-old lady presented with left thigh pain with no other systemic manifestation or muscle weakness. The immunology profile showed positivity of antinuclear antibody (ANA), high titre of anti-ds-DNA, and anti-Mi-2 without any features of systemic lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Discontinuation of the TNFi and commencement of glucocorticoids resulted in the resolution of the myositis.

Bilateral Neck Pyomyositis Caused by Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus saccharolyticus in a Diabetic Adult

We report a case of pyomyositis of the paraspinal neck muscles caused by two coagulase-negative staphylococci: Staphylococcus capitis and Staphylococcus saccharolyticus. Inflammation in the spermatic cords was an additional feature of this infection. Treatment with six weeks of first-generation cephalosporin therapy resulted in complete clinical and radiological resolution.

Focal Inflammatory Myositis on 18F-FDG PET/CT

Focal myositis is a rare benign inflammatory pseudotumor that can mimic malignancy, clinically and on imaging. A 34-year-old man presented with a 3-week history of sudden-onset, nontender, left upper neck mass that was nonresolving with antibiotics. Anatomical imaging was concerning for a sarcoma of the sternocleidomastoid muscle with possible regional nodal metastases and surrounding inflammatory change. F-FDG PET/CT showed marked FDG uptake extending around the anterior border of the sternocleidomastoid muscle with no FDG-avid local nodal disease. Core biopsy of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and adjacent node revealed inflammatory changes. A diagnosis of focal inflammatory myositis was made.

Focal myositis: A review

Amongst the heterogeneous group of inflammatory myopathies, focal myositis stands as a rare and benign dysimmune disease. Although it can be associated with root and/or nerve lesions, traumatic muscle lesions and autoimmune diseases, its triggering factors remain poorly understood. Defined as an isolated inflammatory pseudotumour usually restricted to one skeletal muscle, clinical presentation of focal myositis is that of a rapidly growing solitary mass within a single muscle, usually in the lower limbs. Electromyography shows spontaneous activity associated with a myopathic pattern. MRI reveals a contrast enhanced enlarged muscle appearing hyper-intense on FAT-SAT T2 weighted images. Adjacent structures are spared and there are no calcifications. Serum creatine kinase (CK) levels are usually moderately augmented and biological markers of systemic inflammation are absent in most cases. Pathological histological features include marked variation in fibre size, inflammatory infiltrates mostly composed of T CD4+ lymphocytes and macrophages, degenerating/regenerating fibres and interstitial fibrosis. Differential diagnoses are numerous and include myositis of other origin with focal onset. Steroid treatment should be reserved for patients who present with major pain, nerve lesions, associated autoimmune disease, or elevated C reactive protein or CK.

Focal myositis of unilateral leg

Focal myositis is a rare, benign inflammatory pseudotumor of the skeletal muscle of unknown etiology. In Korea, there is no case report of focal myositis, which is not combined with connective tissue disease. We present an unusual case of focal myositis with ankle contracture, involving more than two muscles. A 26-year-old man visited our clinic complaining of right ankle contracture and leg muscle pain. Physical examination revealed no muscle weakness or any other neurological abnormality. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the right leg demonstrated diffuse high signal intensity of the right gastrocnemius, flexor digitorum longus, and tibialis anterior muscles. Needle electromyography showed profuse denervation potentials with motor unit action potentials of short duration and small amplitude from the involved muscles. All these findings suggested a diagnosis of focal inflammatory myositis and the patient was put under oral prednisolone and physical therapy.

Focal myositis: a clinicopathologic study of 115 cases of an intramuscular mass-like reactive process

BACKGROUND

Focal myositis is an uncommon inflammatory pseudotumor of skeletal muscle that can be confused with a variety of neoplastic and inflammatory diseases. It is often misunderstood because it presents as a tumor-like mass, but histologically resembles a skeletal muscle myopathy or dystrophy. We wanted to discuss the detailed morphologic and immunophenotypic features of the largest reported group of focal myositis patients.

DESIGN

Two hundred and six cases coded as "focal myositis" were culled from our files. Only 115 cases with adequate material, a solitary lesion, and correct diagnosis were included. A variety of immunohistochemical studies were performed, as were polymerase chain reaction for T cell receptor gene rearrangement and immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangement.

RESULTS

Age ranged from 7 to 94 years (mean 41, median 36 y). Most patients were otherwise healthy, and with the exception of 10 cases, lacked antecedent trauma. Masses that ranged in size from 1.0 to 20.0 cm (median 3.0 cm, mean 3.9 cm) were reported in specific muscles of the lower extremities (including vastus lateralis, adductor muscle, and groin muscles, n=39; gastrocnemius, n=22), followed by the trunk, neck (mentalis, n=8; sternocleidomastoid muscle, n=8), and upper extremity. Histologically, these were solitary intramuscular processes composed of variable myopathic (93%) and focal neurogenic (89%) changes, fibrosis, and inflammation (97%), occasionally accompanied by prominent eosinophils (n=20). By immunohistochemistry, most cases had CD163-positive macrophages that were negative for S100 protein and CD1a. Lymphocytes were mostly CD3, CD4-positive lymphocytes that were negative for cytotoxic markers, TIA-1 and granzyme-B. Polymerase chain reaction did not show B cell or T cell rearrangement. In situ studies for Epstein-Barr-encoded receptor were negative, as was ALK-1 immunohistochemistry. Major histocompatibility complex-1 and weak IgG4 were focally positive in skeletal muscle. Cases with severe inflammation had increased numbers of CD20-positive B cells and CD123-positive plasmacytic dendritic cells. S100 was strongest in skeletal muscle fibers with vacuolar change. Clinical diagnostic considerations ranged from benign entities such as rhabdomyoma, intramuscular lipoma, fibromatosis, myositis ossificans, proliferative myositis, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and inflammatory myopathy to malignant entities such as rhabdomyosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, liposarcoma, and lymphoma. Available follow-up revealed spontaneous regression.

CONCLUSIONS

Focal myositis occurs in specific muscle groups of young adults of both sexes without significant trauma. It is a largely unrecognized entity with specific histology including myopathic, focal neurogenic, fibrosis, and inflammatory features. It can be easily mistaken for an inflammatory myopathy, dystrophy, alternate reactive, or even neoplastic process. Focal myositis seems to be a macrophage and T-cell-rich lesion that changes to B cell and dendritic plasmacytoid cells when markedly inflamed, but does not seem to have a known viral or molecular etiology. IgG4 presence may be linked to the fibrosis in these lesions; a possible transient autoimmune etiology cannot be excluded. Careful attention to reproducible clinicopathologic features can aid diagnosis and spare patients from excessive surgery or adverse therapy.