Otolaryngology residency program websites in a socially distanced application cycle

An Evaluation of Otolaryngology Residency Program Websites

INTRODUCTION

 Otolaryngology remains one of the most competitive specialties to match into during the residency application process. Medical students often apply to many programs to increase their chances of matching into a residency program and rely on residency websites to gather information about the programs they apply to. The purpose of this study was to determine the comprehensiveness of the information on otolaryngology residency program websites.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-two publicly available otolaryngology residency program websites were evaluated for the presence of 47 criteria. Size, geographic location, and affiliation with a Top 50 ranked hospital for ear, nose, and throat care, according to the US News and World Report, were determined for each program. Frequencies were calculated for each of the different residency website criteria and non-parametric comparisons were used to analyze the relationship between the location, size, and ranking of each program, and the comprehensiveness of the program website.

RESULTS

 An average of 19.1 items (SD: 6.6 items) out of the 47 searches were present on the otolaryngology residency program websites. More than 75% of the websites contained the following program features: facility descriptions, descriptions of didactics, and research requirements. A total of 89.3% of the websites had a current resident list, 87.7% of these websites had photos of their residents, and 86.9% had a program contact email. Otolaryngology residency programs affiliated with a Top ENT hospital had a higher average number of criteria satisfied (21.6 criteria) compared to those that were not affiliated (17.9 criteria).

CONCLUSION

 The inclusion of research selection criteria, call schedule/requirements, average Step 2 scores of matched residents, and social aspects of residency could improve otolaryngology residency applicant satisfaction with residency program websites. Updating otolaryngology residency websites will assist prospective applicants as they apply to a wide variety of residency programs.

What Prospective Applicants Look for on Otolaryngology Residency Websites

OBJECTIVE

To determine what prospective residency applicants look for on otolaryngology residency program websites.

STUDY DESIGN

Survey.

SETTING

The survey was distributed in a virtual format through Google Forms. A link to the survey was given at the University at Buffalo Otolaryngology Chautauqua, sent to Otolaryngology program directors with requests to forward to PGY1 residents and Otolaryngology interest groups, sent to medical school Otolaryngology interest group leaders, posted on Twitter through several accounts, and on otomatch.com.

METHODS

A 45 item survey was given to fourth year medical students applying to otolaryngology, re-applicants applying to otolaryngology, and first year otolaryngology residents who had recently matched. Data collected included participant's age, sex, race and ethnicity, current status in school/residency program, and their type of medical degree (MD or DO). Participants were then asked to mark the components listed that they wished to see. Components were separated into 5 categories: Application/Selection Criteria, Employment Aspects, Program Features, Social/Community, and Faculty/Contact Information. Data was analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests when appropriate. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

One hundred one surveys were collected. Sixty-four (63.4%) participants were fourth-year medical students, 32 (31.7%) were first-year residents, and 5 (5.0%) were re-applicants. Thirteen of the items on the survey were sought by 80% or more of respondents. Ninety-nine (98.0%) of the participants wanted to see a current resident list with photos and 97 (96.0%) wanted to see the intern year schedule online. Eighty-five percent agreed that salary and benefits information would be valuable on residency websites. Women expressed significantly more interest in salary (P = .034), benefits (P = .026), and parking information (P = .048).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insight on key items to include on residency program websites. Websites that contain information that applicants want to use can be helpful for application decisions in the future.

Assessment of United States Radiology Residency Program Websites in the COVID-19 Era

Objective

To provide an updated evaluation of radiology residency program websites in light of virtual interviewing during the COVID-19 pandemic and encourage programs to improve the quality of their online website presence.

Methods

We evaluated the websites of 197 US radiology residency programs between November and December 2021 for the presence or absence of 30 metrics. The metrics chosen are those considered important by applicants when choosing a program and have been used in other similar papers.

Results

Of the 197 programs, 192 (97.5%) had working websites. The average radiology residency website had 16 of 30 (54%) metrics listed on their websites. Five programs did not have accessible websites and were not included in the analysis. The most comprehensive website had 29 of 30 (97%) of metrics listed and the least comprehensive website had 2 of 30 (7%). There is a statistically significant difference in website comprehensiveness between top 20 and non–top 20 radiology program websites.

Conclusion

Although radiology residency program websites have generally become more comprehensive over time, there is still room for improvement, especially in times of virtual interviews when residency applicants are becoming more and more reliant on program websites to gain essential information about a program. Some key areas to include are diversity and inclusion initiatives, resident wellness, applicant information, program benefits, and showcase of people in the program.