Use of a uniform treatment algorithm abolishes racial disparities in glycemic control

Impact of intravenous accessibility and prehospital epinephrine use on survival outcomes of adult nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients

BACKGROUND

This study compared out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patient outcomes based on intravenous (IV) access and prehospital epinephrine use.

METHODS

A retrospective study in Ulsan, South Korea, from January 2017 to December 2022, analyzed adult nontraumatic OHCA cases. Patients were grouped: Group 1 (no IV attempts), Group 2 (failed IV access), Group 3 (successful IV access without epinephrine), and Group 4 (successful IV access with epinephrine), with comparisons using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 2,656 patients, Group 4 had significantly lower survival to hospital discharge (adjusted OR 0.520, 95% CI 0.346-0.782, p = 0.002) and favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted OR 0.292, 95% CI 0.140-0.611, p = 0.001) than Group 1. Groups 2 and 3 showed insignificant survival to hospital discharge (adjusted OR 0.814, 95% CI 0.566-1.171, p = 0.268) and (adjusted OR 1.069, 95% CI 0.810-1.412, p = 0.636) and favorable neurological outcomes (adjusted OR 0.585, 95% CI 0.299-1.144, p = 0.117) and (adjusted OR 1.075, 95% CI 0.689-1.677, p = 0.751). In the shockable rhythm group, Group 3 had better survival to hospital discharge (adjusted OR 1.700, 95% CI 1.044-2.770, p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful IV access with epinephrine showed worse outcomes in both rhythm groups than no IV attempts. Outcomes for failed IV and successful IV access without epinephrine were inconclusive. Importantly, successful IV access without epinephrine showed favorable survival to hospital discharge in the shockable rhythm group, warranting further research into IV access for fluid resuscitation in shockable rhythm OHCA patients.

Race and Sex Differences in Management and Outcomes of Patients After ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarct: Results From the NCDR

BACKGROUND

Race and sex have been shown to affect management of myocardial infarction (MI); however, it is unclear if such disparities exist in contemporary care of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

HYPOTHESIS

Disparities in care will be less prevalent in more heavily protocol-driven management of STEMI than the less algorithmic care of NSTEMI.

METHODS

Data were collected from the ACTION Registry-GWTG database to assess care differences related to race and sex of patients presenting with NSTEMI or STEMI. For key treatments and outcomes, adjustments were made including patient demographics, baseline comorbidities, and markers of socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Key demographic variables demonstrate significant differences in baseline comorbidities; black patients had higher incidences of hypertension and diabetes, and women more frequently had diabetes. With few exceptions, rates of acute and discharge medical therapy were similar by race in any sex category in both STEMI and NSTEMI populations. Rates of catheterization were similar by race for STEMI but not for NSTEMI, where both black men and women had lower rates of invasive therapy. Rates of revascularization were significantly lower for black patients in both the STEMI and NSTEMI groups regardless of sex. Rates of adverse events differed by sex, with disparities for death and major bleeding; after adjustment, rates were similar by race within sex comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

In this contemporary cohort, although there are differences by race in presentation and management of MI, heavily protocol-driven processes seem to show fewer racial disparities.

Increased cardiovascular disease, resource use, and costs before the clinical diagnosis of diabetes in veterans in the southeastern U.S

IMPORTANCE

Screening for diabetes might be more widespread if adverse associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD), resource use, and costs were known to occur earlier than conventional clinical diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether adverse effects associated with diabetes begin prior to clinical diagnosis.

DESIGN

Veterans with diabetes were matched 1:2 with controls by follow-up, age, race/ethnicity, gender, and VA facility. CVD was obtained from ICD-9 codes, and resource use and costs from VA datasets.

SETTING

VA facilities in SC, GA, and AL.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with and without diagnosed diabetes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Diagnosed CVD, resource use, and costs.

RESULTS

In this study, the 2,062 diabetic patients and 4,124 controls were 63 years old on average, 99 % male, and 29 % black; BMI was 30.8 in diabetic patients vs. 27.8 in controls (p<0.001). CVD prevalence was higher and there were more outpatient visits in Year -4 before diagnosis through Year +4 after diagnosis among diabetic vs. control patients (all p<0.01); in Year -2, CVD prevalence was 31 % vs. 24 %, and outpatient visits were 22 vs. 19 per year, respectively. Total VA costs/year/veteran were higher in diabetic than control patients from Year -4 ($4,083 vs. $2,754) through Year +5 ($8,347 vs. $5,700) (p<0.003) for each, reflecting underlying increases in outpatient, inpatient, and pharmacy costs (p<0.05 for each). Regression analysis showed that diabetes contributed an average of $1,748/year to costs, independent of CVD (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

VA costs per veteran are higher--over $1,000/year before and $2,000/year after diagnosis of diabetes--due to underlying increases in outpatient, inpatient, and pharmacy costs, greater number of outpatient visits, and increased CVD. Moreover, adverse associations with veterans' health and the VA healthcare system occur early in the natural history of the disease, several years before diabetes is diagnosed. Since adverse associations begin before diabetes is recognized, greater consideration should be given to systematic screening in order to permit earlier detection and initiation of preventive management. Keeping frequency of CVD and marginal costs in line with those of patients before diabetes is currently diagnosed has the potential to save up to $2 billion a year.

A systematic literature review of methodologies used to assess medication adherence in patients with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Adhering to prescribed medication is often a problem for patients with diabetes yet there is no consensus on how best to measure adherence in this patient population. This systematic literature review critically reviewed and summarized the methods used to measure medication adherence in patients with diabetes (on oral hypoglycemic agents [OHAs] and/or insulin) in original research published between 2007-2013.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

METHODS

A systematic search for methods to assess medication adherence in patients with type I or type II diabetes was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo, and Cochrane databases. Two researchers independently screened abstracts for initial eligibility and then applied the inclusion/exclusion criteria to the relevant full-text articles.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine articles met the criteria for inclusion. Subjective assessment (observer-reported and patient-reported), pill counts, Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS), cell-phone real-time assessment, and logbooks were used in prospective studies. In pharmacy claims databases, medication possession ratios (MPRs), or some derivation thereof, were utilized. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, but few approaches specifically addressed issues unique to assessing insulin adherence. Three novel approaches (using cell-phone real-time assessment, computerized logbooks, and a questionnaire about different dosing irregularities) provided insight on timing and dosing issues that could be useful for highlighting interventions to improve insulin adherence.

CONCLUSION

No gold standard exists for measuring medication adherence in patients with diabetes. The plethora of adherence methods precludes the comparison of adherence rates across studies. Greater consistency is therefore needed in adherence measurement, including question content, recall period, and response options for self-report measures. Novel methods for understanding adherence to variable-dosed insulin require further research. Researchers should select a methodology that best fits their research question, study design, patient population and resources.

Sociocultural Influences on Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors in Older African Americans

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this observational study was to describe the associations between cultural beliefs that are prevalent in older African Americans and adherence to diabetes self-management (DSM) behaviors.

METHODS

In a community population of 110 older African Americans with type 2 diabetes, the investigators administered surveys that assess present time orientation (PTO), future time orientation (FTO), and religiosity, as well as exercising habits, reading food labels, and checking blood glucose.

RESULTS

Participants who reported regularly exercising had significantly lower PTO scores and higher FTO and religiosity scores than participants who did not regularly exercise. Similarly, participants who reported reading food labels had lower PTO scores and higher FTO scores but did not differ in religiosity. Participants who reported checking blood glucose levels tended to have higher FTO scores but did not differ in PTO or religiosity. Participants who engaged in all three DSM behaviors had significantly lower PTO scores and higher FTO and religiosity scores.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that cultural diversity within older African Americans may influence DSM behaviors and contribute to disparities in diabetes outcomes in this high-risk population. Efforts to prevent complications of diabetes might benefit from consideration of these cultural factors.

Special considerations of care and risk management for African American patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

It is well documented that African American populations are disproportionately affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with their white counterparts. They have a higher prevalence of diabetes, a higher rate of diabetes-related complications, greater disability from these complications, and poorer control and quality of care. In order to improve diabetes care and outcomes in African Americans (and indeed all patients with diabetes), a multifactorial approach is needed to target all risk factors-not solely hyperglycemia-simultaneously. Culturally appropriate initiatives to improve lifestyle behaviors are a first step in management. Community-based programs, including those mediated through church groups, have reported varying degrees of success in effecting such beneficial lifestyle changes. If these measures fail to achieve desirable levels of blood glucose, blood pressure, and serum lipids, pharmacologic therapy is indicated. However, few evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of some drugs in African Americans currently exist due to their underrepresentation in randomized controlled clinical trials. Other essential components of diabetes care include regular screening for diabetic nephropathy and neuropathy, and eye and foot examinations, with prompt referral to specialists when important clinical changes are detected.

Impact of race/ethnicity on the efficacy and safety of commonly used insulin regimens: a post hoc analysis of clinical trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of race/ethnicity on the efficacy and safety of commonly used insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis, pooled data from 11 multinational clinical trials involving 1455 patients with type 2 diabetes were used to compare specific insulin treatments in Latino/Hispanic, Asian, African-descent, and Caucasian patients. Insulin treatments included once daily insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (BASAL), insulin lispro mix 75/25 twice daily (LMBID), or insulin lispro mix 50/50 three times daily (LMTID).

RESULTS

Race/ethnicity was associated with significant outcome differences for each of the insulin regimens. BASAL therapy was associated with greater improvement in several measures of glycemic control among Latino/Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients (lower end point hemoglobin A1c, greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c from baseline, and a larger proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1c level <7%). In contrast, LMBID therapy was associated with higher end point hemoglobin A1c and a smaller decrease in hemoglobin A1c from baseline in Latino/Hispanic and Asian patients than in Caucasian patients. Furthermore, fewer Asian patients attained a hemoglobin A1c level <7% than did Caucasians patients. For LMTID therapy, hemoglobin A1c outcomes were comparable across patient groups. Fasting blood glucose and glycemic excursions varied among racial/ethnic groups for the 3 insulin regimens. Weight change was comparable among racial/ethnic groups in each insulin regimen. During treatment with LMTID, Asian patients experienced higher incidence and rate of severe hypoglycemia than Caucasian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Latino/Hispanic, Asian, and African-descent patients with type 2 diabetes show different metabolic responses to insulin therapy, dependent in part on insulin type and regimen intensity.

Leveraging quality improvement to achieve equity in health care

INEQUALITY IN QUALITY: Disparities in health care and quality for racial, ethnic, linguistic, and other disadvantaged groups are widespread and persistent. Health care organizations are engaged in efforts to improve quality in general but often make little attempt to address disparities.

STANDARD VERSUS CULTURALLY COMPETENT QUALITY IMPROVEMENT (QI)

Most QI interventions are broadly targeted to the general population-a "one-size-fits-all" approach. These standard QI efforts may preferentially improve quality for more advantaged patients and maintain or even worsen existing disparities. Culturally competent QI interventions place specific emphasis on addressing the unique needs of minority groups and the root causes of disparities.

HOW QI CAN REDUCE DISPARITIES

QI interventions can reduce disparities in at least three ways: (1) In some cases, standard QI interventions can improve quality more for those with the lowest quality, but this is unreliable; (2) group-targeted QI interventions can reduce disparities by preferentially targeting disparity groups; and (3) culturally competent QI interventions, by tailoring care to cultural and linguistic barriers that cause disparities, can improve care for everyone but especially for disparity groups.

GUIDELINES FOR CULTURALLY COMPETENT QI

A culturally competent approach to QI should (1) identify disparities and use disparities data to guide and monitor interventions, (2) address barriers unique to specific disparity groups, and (3) address barriers common to many disparity group.

CONCLUSIONS

To achieve equity in health care, hospitals and other health care organizations should move toward culturally competent QI and disparities-targeted QI interventions to achieve equity in health care, a key pillar of quality.

Patient characteristics correlated with quality indicator outcomes in diabetes care

BACKGROUND

Quality indicators were adopted to compare quality of care across health systems.

AIM

To evaluate whether patient characteristics influence primary care physicians' diabetes quality indicators.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Primary care setting.

METHOD

The study was conducted in the Central District of Clalit Health Service in Israel. The five measures of diabetes follow-up were: the percentage of patients with diabetes for whom glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), microalbumin, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, and blood pressure were measured at least once, and the percentage of patients who were seen by an ophthalmologist, during 2005. Three outcome measures were chosen: the percentage of patients with diabetes and HbA(1c) <7 mg%, the percentage of patients with diabetes and blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, and the percentage of patients with diabetes and LDL-cholesterol <100 mg/dl in 2005. Sociodemographic information was retrieved about all the physicians' patients with diabetes.

RESULTS

One-hundred and seventy primary care physicians took care of 18 316 patients with diabetes. The average number of patients with diabetes per physician was 107 (range 10-203). A lower quality indicator score for HbA(1c) <7 mg% was correlated with a higher percentage of patients of low socioeconomic status (P<0.001) and new immigrants (P = 0.002), and correlated with borderline significance with higher mean patients' body mass index (P = 0.024); lower quality indicator score for blood pressure <130/80 mmHg was related to higher patients' age (P = 0.006). None of the diabetes follow-up measures were related to patients' characteristics.

CONCLUSION

Achieving good glycaemic control is dependent on patient characteristics. New immigrants, patients of low socioeconomic status, and older patients need special attention to avoid disparities.

Longitudinal differences in glycemic control by race/ethnicity among veterans with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine longitudinal differences in glycemic control between non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black veterans with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

VA facility in the Southeastern United States.

PARTICIPANTS

A 3-month person-period dataset was created for 8813 veterans with type 2 diabetes between June 1997 and May 2006.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over time. Secondary outcome was the odds of poor glycemic control over time (HbA1c >8%). For the primary outcome, a linear mixed model (LMM) approach was used to model the relationship of HbA1c levels and race/ethnicity over time. For the secondary outcome, generalized LMMs were used to assess whether glycemic control changed over time and whether change in glycemic control varied by racial/ethnic group.

RESULTS

Mean age was 66.3 years, 36% were non-Hispanic black (NHB), 98% were male, 65% were married, and 50% were unemployed. Mean follow-up time was 4.4 years. Least square mean HbA1c levels from LMM adjusted for time and relevant confounders showed that NHBs had higher HbA1c values over time (mean difference of 0.54% [P < 0.001]). The final model with poor versus good glycemic control as the dependent variable, race/ethnicity as primary independent variable adjusted for time, and relevant confounders showed that NHBs were likely to have poor control compared with NHWs (OR: 1.8, 95% CI, 1.7; 2.0, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

NHB veterans were more likely to have higher mean HbA1c values and less likely to have good glycemic control over time compared with NHW veterans.

Diabetes care in black and white veterans in the southeastern U.S

OBJECTIVE

Eliminating health disparities is a national priority, but progress has been difficult because of racial/ethnic differences in insurance coverage and access to health care. We investigated whether there were differences in diabetes care in the Veterans Administration (VA), where health care access should be relatively uniform.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A1C and plasma glucose were compared before/after diagnosis of diabetes.

RESULTS

Data were available for 1,456 black and 2,624 white veterans who met criteria for consistent primary care. Over 4-5 years before and after diagnosis, blacks had similar glucose and approximately 0.2% higher A1C levels than whites, and A1C differences could be attributed to glucose-independent associations between race and A1C. Blacks and whites also had comparable intervals between diagnostic-level hyperglycemia and diagnosis and between diagnosis and drug initiation. However, A1C was higher in blacks at the time of diagnosis (7.8 vs. 7.1%) and at initiation of pharmacotherapy (8.5 vs. 7.8%) (both P < 0.001). Differences in A1C at diagnosis and drug initiation were too large to be explained by differences in age, sex, BMI, and glucose-independent associations between race and A1C.

CONCLUSIONS

In the VA, glucose levels are generally comparable in blacks and whites except at the times of diagnosis and initiation of pharmacotherapy, when glucose levels are higher in blacks. While understanding the basis for such residual disparities may be important to improve the health of racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S., a health care system with structure and organization similar to that in the VA may also contribute importantly to relieving disparities in health.