1
|
Summers MJ, Chapple LAS, Bellomo R, Chapman MJ, Ferrie S, Finnis ME, French C, Hurford S, Kakho N, Karahalios A, Maiden MJ, O'Connor SN, Peake SL, Presneill JJ, Ridley EJ, Tran-Duy A, Williams PJ, Young PJ, Zaloumis S, Deane AM. Study protocol for TARGET protein: The effect of augmented administration of enteral protein to critically ill adults on clinical outcomes: A cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, clinical trial. CRIT CARE RESUSC 2023; 25:147-154. [PMID: 37876373 PMCID: PMC10581259 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Background It is unknown whether increasing dietary protein to 1.2-2.0 g/kg/day as recommended in international guidelines compared to current practice improves outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The TARGET Protein trial will evaluate this. Objective To describe the study protocol for the TARGET Protein trial. Design setting and participants TARGET Protein is a cluster randomised, cross-sectional, double cross-over, pragmatic clinical trial undertaken in eight ICUs in Australia and New Zealand. Each ICU will be randomised to use one of two trial enteral formulae for three months before crossing over to the other formula, which is then repeated, with enrolment continuing at each ICU for 12 months. All patients aged ≥16 years in their index ICU admission commencing enteral nutrition will be eligible for inclusion. Eligible patients will receive the trial enteral formula to which their ICU is allocated. The two trial enteral formulae are isocaloric with a difference in protein dose: intervention 100g/1000 ml and comparator 63g/1000 ml. Staggered recruitment commenced in May 2022. Main outcomes measures The primary outcome is days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Secondary outcomes include days free of the index hospital at day 90 in survivors, alive at day 90, duration of invasive ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay, incidence of tracheostomy insertion, renal replacement therapy, and discharge destination. Conclusion TARGET Protein aims to determine whether augmented enteral protein delivery reduces days free of the index hospital and alive at day 90. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621001484831).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J. Summers
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lee-anne S. Chapple
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rinaldo Bellomo
- Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marianne J. Chapman
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzie Ferrie
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark E. Finnis
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Craig French
- Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sally Hurford
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nima Kakho
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Amalia Karahalios
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew J. Maiden
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephanie N. O'Connor
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sandra L. Peake
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jeffrey J. Presneill
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma J. Ridley
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Dietetics and Nutrition, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - An Tran-Duy
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Patricia J. Williams
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
| | - Paul J. Young
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
- Intensive Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Sophie Zaloumis
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Adam M. Deane
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - TARGET Protein Investigators and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Acute Care Medicine, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Centre for Research Excellence in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Critical Care, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia
- Dietetics and Nutrition, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Intensive Care Unit, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mogensen KM, Andrew BY, Corona JC, Robinson MK. Validation of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Recommendations for Caloric Provision to Critically Ill Obese Patients: A Pilot Study. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2015; 40:713-21. [PMID: 25897016 DOI: 10.1177/0148607115584001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) recommend that obese, critically ill patients receive 11-14 kcal/kg/d using actual body weight (ABW) or 22-25 kcal/kg/d using ideal body weight (IBW), because feeding these patients 50%-70% maintenance needs while administering high protein may improve outcomes. It is unknown whether these equations achieve this target when validated against indirect calorimetry, perform equally across all degrees of obesity, or compare well with other equations. METHODS Measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) was determined in obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m(2)), critically ill patients. Resting energy expenditure was predicted (PREE) using several equations: 12.5 kcal/kg ABW (ASPEN-Actual BW), 23.5 kcal/kg IBW (ASPEN-Ideal BW), Harris-Benedict (adjusted-weight and 1.5 stress-factor), and Ireton-Jones for obesity. Correlation of PREE to 65% MREE, predictive accuracy, precision, bias, and large error incidence were calculated. RESULTS All equations were significantly correlated with 65% MREE but had poor predictive accuracy, had excessive large error incidence, were imprecise, and were biased in the entire cohort (N = 31). In the obesity cohort (n = 20, BMI 30-50 kg/m(2)), ASPEN-Actual BW had acceptable predictive accuracy and large error incidence, was unbiased, and was nearly precise. In super obesity (n = 11, BMI >50 kg/m(2)), ASPEN-Ideal BW had acceptable predictive accuracy and large error incidence and was precise and unbiased. CONCLUSIONS SCCM/ASPEN-recommended body weight equations are reasonable predictors of 65% MREE depending on the equation and degree of obesity. Assuming that feeding 65% MREE is appropriate, this study suggests that patients with a BMI 30-50 kg/m(2) should receive 11-14 kcal/kg/d using ABW and those with a BMI >50 kg/m(2) should receive 22-25 kcal/kg/d using IBW.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kris M Mogensen
- Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Benjamin Y Andrew
- Department of Nutrition, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Jasmine C Corona
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Malcolm K Robinson
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|