Push-PEG or Pull-PEG: Does the Technique Matter? A Prospective Study Comparing Outcomes After Gastrostomy Placement

BACKGROUND

Push-PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) with T-fastener fixation (PEG-T) allows one-step insertion of a balloon tube or button, and avoids contamination of the stoma by oral bacteria. However, PEG-T is a technically more demanding procedure with a significant learning curve. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes after PEG-T and pull-PEG in a setting where both procedures were well established.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a prospective cohort study including all patients between 0 and 18 year undergoing PEG-T and pull-PEG between 2017 and 2020 at a combined local and tertiary referral center. Complications and parent reported outcomes were recorded during hospital stay, after 14 days and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

82 (93%) of eligible PEG-T and 37 (86%) pull-PEG patients were included. The groups were not significantly different with regard to age or weight. Malignant disorders and heart conditions were more frequent in the pull-PEG group, whilst neurodevelopmental disorders were more frequent in the PEG-T group (p < 0.001). 54% in both groups had a complication within 2 weeks. Late complications (between 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively) occurred in 63% PEG-T vs 62% pull-PEG patients (p = 0.896). More parents in the pull-PEG group (49%) reported that the gastrostomy tube restricted their child's activity, compared to PEG-T (24%) (p = 0.01). At 3 months follow-up, more pull-PEG patients (43%) reported discomfort from the gastrostomy compared to PEG-T (21%) (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Overall complication rates were approximately similar, but pull-PEG was associated with more discomfort and restriction of activity.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Treatment study level II.

Safety and efficacy of stoma site selection in CT-guided percutaneous gastrostomy: a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the safety and efficacy of CPG in the rectus abdominis and intercostal regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 226 patients who underwent CPG at a single center, with the stoma placed in the rectus abdominis or intercostal region. Surgical outcomes and complications, such as pain and infection within 6 months postoperatively, were recorded.

RESULTS

The surgical success rate was 100%, and the all-cause mortality rate within 1 month was 0%. An intercostal stoma was placed in 56 patients; a rectus abdominis stoma was placed in 170 patients. The duration of surgery was longer for intercostal stoma placement (37.66 ± 14.63 min) than for rectus abdominis stoma placement (30.26 ± 12.40 min) (P = 0.000). At 1 month postsurgery, the rate of stoma infection was greater in the intercostal group (32.1%) than in the rectus abdominis group (20.6%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.077). No significant difference was observed in the infection rate between the two groups at 3 or 6 months postsurgery (P > 0.05). Intercostal stoma patients reported higher pain scores during the perioperative period and at 1 month postsurgery (P = 0.000), but pain scores were similar between the two groups at 3 and 6 months postsurgery. The perioperative complication rates for intercostal and rectus abdominis surgery were 1.8% and 5.3%, respectively (P = 0.464), with no significant difference in the incidence of tube dislodgement (P = 0.514). Patient weight improved significantly at 3 and 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rectus abdominis and intercostal stomas have similar safety and efficacy. However, intercostal stomas may result in greater short-term patient discomfort.

Regional Comparison of Enteral Nutrition-Related Admission Policies in Skilled Nursing Facilities

BACKGROUND

Nursing home admission policies are one driver of increased and earlier gastrostomy placement, a procedure that is not always medically or ethically indicated among patients needing short-term nutrition support. This important clinical decision should be based upon patient prognosis, goals, and needs. We compared nursing home enteral nutrition-related admission policies in New York City and other regions of the United States. We also explored motivations for these policies.

METHODS

We conducted a telephone survey with skilled nursing facility administrators in New York City and a random sample of facilities throughout the United States about enteral nutrition-related admission policies. Survey data were matched with publically available data about facility characteristics from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The relationship between facility location and admission policies was described with regression models. Reasons for these policies were thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

New York City nursing homes were significantly less likely to admit patients with nasogastric feeding tubes than were nursing homes nationwide, after we controlled for facility characteristics (odds ratio = 0.111; 95% CI, 0.032-0.344). Reasons for refusing nasogastric tubes fell into 5 categories: safety, capacity, policy, perception of appropriate level of care, and patient quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that enteral nutrition-related admission policies vary greatly between nursing homes in New York City and nationwide. Many administrators cited safety and policy as factors guiding their institutional policies and practices, despite a lack of evidence. This gap in research, practice, and policy has implications for quality and cost of care, length of hospital stay, and patient morbidity and mortality.