Resting Energy Expenditure of Children and Adolescents With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Measured vs estimated resting energy expenditure in children and adolescents with obesity

Pediatric obesity requires early targeted interventions consisting mainly of a low-calorie diet prescribed based on resting energy expenditure (REE), often estimated through predictive equations. The aim of this study was to define the prevalence of "hypo-", "normo-" and "hypermetabolic" in a large cohort of children and adolescents with obesity by comparing measured and estimated REE and to evaluate the characteristics related to these metabolic statuses in both males and females. The study population was divided into the three subgroups by comparing REE measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using the Molnar equation, and subsequently analyzed. The majority of the participants (60.6%) were normometabolic, 25.5% hypermetabolic and 13.9% hypometabolic. No significant differences in age, Tanner stage, systolic blood pressure, or the presence of metabolic syndrome were found. However, the hypermetabolic subgroup was significantly lighter, shorter, with lower hip and waist circumferences, had a greater amount of fat-free mass and lower fat mass, significantly lower diastolic blood pressure, and a significantly higher frequency of non-alcoholic liver steatosis. Pediatric obesity is more associated with normal or increased REE than with a hypometabolic condition, suggesting that estimation of energy expenditure with predictive equations is still inadequate for prescribing the appropriate diet plan.

Handheld Indirect Calorimetry as a Clinical Tool for Measuring Resting Energy Expenditure in Children with and without Obesity

Background: Resting energy expenditure (REE) is a valuable measure in clinical management of obesity and other chronic illnesses. Gold standard methods for measuring REE (e.g., Douglas bags and metabolic cart) are too expensive and cumbersome for an outpatient clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of a handheld indirect calorimeter (HHIC) and prediction equations (PEs) for measurement of REE in youth with and without obesity. Methods: Fifty-three children and adolescents (12.8 ± 4.3 years, 50.9% female) had REE measured first with a MedGem™ HHIC for 10 minutes, followed by a reference indirect calorimeter system (ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400™) with hood canopy and dilution pump for 30 minutes. REE was also estimated using nine PEs as follows: Henry-1, Henry-2, Schofield, World Health Organization, Molnar, Muller, Herrmann, Schmelzle, and Harris-Benedict. Concordance correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses were used for comparisons among PEs, MedGem HHIC, and metabolic cart. Results: The observed correlation between the HHIC and the reference system was rc = 0.89 with a mean bias of 2.27 ± 3.41 kcal/(kg·d) (9.1% ± 14.7%). Regarding PE, Molnar had the highest agreement with the reference system [rc = 0.93, bias of 2.17 ± 2.04 kcal/(kg·d); 9.8% ± 8.1%], followed by Harris-Benedict (rc = 0.89; 13.8% ± 8.9%), Henry-2 (rc = 0.89; 15% ± 7.6%), and Henry-1 (rc = 0.86; 16.7% ± 7.3%). All PEs were less accurate for children with overweight/obesity. Conclusions: Compared to PE, the HHIC provided more accurate REE estimates for children across the age and BMI spectrum, although positive bias was present throughout. Difference in positive bias between the HHIC and the Molnar equation may be clinically significant for youth with overweight/obesity.