Parenteral drug products containing aluminum as an ingredient or a contaminant: response to Food and Drug Administration notice of intent and request for information. ASCN/A.S.P.E.N. Working Group on Standards for Aluminum Content of Parenteral Nutrition Solutions

Comparing Aluminum Concentrations in Adult and Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition Solutions: Multichamber-Bag versus Compounded Parenteral Nutrition

Aluminum contamination in parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions can lead to neurotoxicity, reduced bone mass, and liver toxicity, especially in pediatric patients. Ingredients commonly used in PN compounding, such as vitamins, trace elements, calcium, and phosphate salts, contain significant amounts of aluminum. This study aimed to compare aluminum concentrations in multichamber-bag (MCB) and compounded PN for adults and pediatrics. A prospective study assessed aluminum concentrations in various types of MCB and compared them with compounded PN formulations with similar compositions. The types of MCB included Lipoflex® (without electrolytes), Omegaflex®, Finomel®, Smofkabiven® (with and without electrolytes), Olimel®, Clinimix®, and Numeta®. Overall, 80 aluminum determinations were included: 36 for MCBs and 44 for compounded PN. MCBs showed significantly lower aluminum concentrations than compounded PN: 11.37 (SD 6.16) vs. 21.45 (8.08) µg/L, respectively. Similar results were observed for adult (n = 40) and pediatric (n = 40) PN formulations (12.97 (7.74) vs. 20.78 (10.28) µg/L, and 9.38 (2.23) vs. 22.01 (5.82) µg/L, respectively). Significant differences were also found between MCBs depending on the manufacturing company. These findings suggest that MCBs PN offer a safer option for reducing aluminum contamination in PN. Harmonizing regulations concerning aluminum concentrations in PN solutions could help mitigate differences between PN formulations.

Aluminum and other chemical elements in parenteral nutrition components and all-in-one admixtures

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Parenteral nutrition (PN) can lead to high or even toxic exposure to aluminum (Al). We aimed to quantify concentrations of Al and other chemical elements of all-in-one (AIO) PN admixtures for adults prepared from commercial multichamber bags (Olimel® 5.7%, Omegaflex® special, SmofKabiven®, all with and without electrolytes) and vitamin and trace element additives over a 48-h period. Secondly, we determined the level of Al contamination resulting from admixing and infusion set use.

METHODS

We used dynamic reaction cell and kinetic energy discrimination inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to quantify Al, arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), magnesium (Mg), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), nickel (Ni), antimony (Sb), selenium (Se), tin (Sn), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn) in AIO PN admixtures. We extracted samples for analysis via the bag injection ports and infusion sets over a 48-h period after admixing. We compared the measured Al concentrations of AIO PN admixtures with calculated values based on the measured concentrations of individual chamber contents and additives.

RESULTS

Mean (standard deviation) baseline Al concentrations in AIO PN admixtures ranged from 10.5 (0.5) to 59.3 (11.4) μg/L and decreased slightly over the 48 h (estimate [standard error] -0.09 [0.02] μg/L/hour, p <0.001). Thus, certain products exceeded the widely accepted limit of 25 μg/L. There was no significant difference in Al concentrations between samples extracted via the bag injection ports or infusion sets (p = 0.33), nor between measured and calculated Al concentrations of AIO PN admixtures (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Because certain commercially available PN admixtures for adults proved to contain excessively high levels of Al in our study, regulations and corresponding quality requirements at the authority level (e.g., Pharmacopoeia and regulatory authorities) are urgently required. Our results showed that the PN handling process (admixing and supplementing additives) or the materials of the infusion set did not lead to additional Al contamination to any extent. Moreover, calculated Al concentrations of AIO PN admixtures derived from individual chamber contents and additives are valid.

Determination of aluminum concentrations of parenteral nutrition solutions by HPLC

Aluminum (Al) contamination of parenteral nutrition (PN) solutions has been known for over 30 years. In particular, vascular intake of Al leads to its accumulation in tissues. In this study, 8 all-in-one PN solutions the aluminum concentration was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean Al concentration of the glucose solutions of the PN solutions combinations was 16.36 ± 8.31 µg/L, the mean Al concentration of the amino acid solutions was 4.96 ± 3.73 µg/L, and the mean Al concentration of the lipid solutions was 9.09 ± 11.23 µg/L. The Al concentration of the PN₅ glucose and PN₂ lipid solutions were above 25 µg/L, which is the limit set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). No studies in the literature have examined the Al concentrations of all-in-one PN solutions via HPLC. In two of the analyzed solutions, the Al concentration was found to be higher than the limit set by the FDA.

Systematic review of potential health risks posed by pharmaceutical, occupational and consumer exposures to metallic and nanoscale aluminum, aluminum oxides, aluminum hydroxide and its soluble salts

Abstract Aluminum (Al) is a ubiquitous substance encountered both naturally (as the third most abundant element) and intentionally (used in water, foods, pharmaceuticals, and vaccines); it is also present in ambient and occupational airborne particulates. Existing data underscore the importance of Al physical and chemical forms in relation to its uptake, accumulation, and systemic bioavailability. The present review represents a systematic examination of the peer-reviewed literature on the adverse health effects of Al materials published since a previous critical evaluation compiled by Krewski et al. (2007) . Challenges encountered in carrying out the present review reflected the experimental use of different physical and chemical Al forms, different routes of administration, and different target organs in relation to the magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure. Wide variations in diet can result in Al intakes that are often higher than the World Health Organization provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), which is based on studies with Al citrate. Comparing daily dietary Al exposures on the basis of "total Al"assumes that gastrointestinal bioavailability for all dietary Al forms is equivalent to that for Al citrate, an approach that requires validation. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for identical Al substances vary as much as 15-fold. The toxicity of different Al forms depends in large measure on their physical behavior and relative solubility in water. The toxicity of soluble Al forms depends upon the delivered dose of Al(+3) to target tissues. Trivalent Al reacts with water to produce bidentate superoxide coordination spheres [Al(O2)(H2O4)(+2) and Al(H2O)6 (+3)] that after complexation with O2(•-), generate Al superoxides [Al(O2(•))](H2O5)](+2). Semireduced AlO2(•) radicals deplete mitochondrial Fe and promote generation of H2O2, O2 (•-) and OH(•). Thus, it is the Al(+3)-induced formation of oxygen radicals that accounts for the oxidative damage that leads to intrinsic apoptosis. In contrast, the toxicity of the insoluble Al oxides depends primarily on their behavior as particulates. Aluminum has been held responsible for human morbidity and mortality, but there is no consistent and convincing evidence to associate the Al found in food and drinking water at the doses and chemical forms presently consumed by people living in North America and Western Europe with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Neither is there clear evidence to show use of Al-containing underarm antiperspirants or cosmetics increases the risk of AD or breast cancer. Metallic Al, its oxides, and common Al salts have not been shown to be either genotoxic or carcinogenic. Aluminum exposures during neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) can impair bone mineralization and delay neurological development. Adverse effects to vaccines with Al adjuvants have occurred; however, recent controlled trials found that the immunologic response to certain vaccines with Al adjuvants was no greater, and in some cases less than, that after identical vaccination without Al adjuvants. The scientific literature on the adverse health effects of Al is extensive. Health risk assessments for Al must take into account individual co-factors (e.g., age, renal function, diet, gastric pH). Conclusions from the current review point to the need for refinement of the PTWI, reduction of Al contamination in PN solutions, justification for routine addition of Al to vaccines, and harmonization of OELs for Al substances.

Reduced aluminum contamination decreases parenteral nutrition associated liver injury

PURPOSE

Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis remains a significant problem, especially for the surgical neonates. Aluminum is a toxic element known to contaminate parenteral nutrition. We hypothesize that parenterally administered aluminum causes liver injury similar to that seen in parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.

METHODS

Twenty 3- to 6-day-old domestic pigs were divided into 5 equal groups. A control group received daily intravenous 0.9% NaCl. Each subject in experimental groups received intravenous aluminum chloride at 1500 μg kg(-1) d(-1) for 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks. At the end of the study, blood was sampled for direct bilirubin and total bile acid levels. Liver, bile, and urine were sampled for aluminum content. Liver tissue was imaged by transmission electron microscopy for ultrastructural changes.

RESULTS

Transmission electron microscopy revealed marked blunting of bile canaliculi microvilli in all experimental subjects but not the controls. Serum total bile acids correlated with the duration of aluminum exposure. The hepatic aluminum concentration correlated with the duration of aluminum exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenterally infused aluminum resulted in liver injury as demonstrated by elevated bile acids and by blunting of the bile canaliculi microvilli. These findings are similar to those reported in early parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease.

Parenteral aluminum induces liver injury in a newborn piglet model

PURPOSE

Parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis remains a significant problem, especially for the surgical neonate. Aluminum is a toxic element known to contaminate parenteral nutrition. We hypothesize that parenterally administered aluminum causes liver injury similar to that seen in parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis.

METHODS

Twenty 3- to 6-day-old domestic pigs were divided into 5 equal groups. A control group received daily intravenous 0.9% sodium chloride. Each subject in experimental groups received intravenous aluminum chloride at 1500 μg/kg per day for 1, 2, 3, or 4 weeks. At the end of the study, blood was sampled for direct bilirubin and total bile acid levels. Liver, bile, and urine were sampled for aluminum content. Liver tissue was imaged by transmission electron microscopy for ultrastructural changes.

RESULTS

Transmission electron microscopy revealed marked blunting of bile canaliculi microvilli in all experimental subjects but not the controls. Serum total bile acids correlated with the duration of aluminum exposure. The hepatic aluminum concentration correlated with the duration of aluminum exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Parenterally infused aluminum resulted in liver injury as demonstrated by elevated bile acids and by blunting of the bile canaliculi microvilli. These findings are similar to those reported in early parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease.

Effect of additive selection on calculated aluminum content of parenteral nutrient solutions

PURPOSE

The quantity of aluminum in common ingredients used to compound parenteral nutrient (PN) solutions was calculated to quantify the actual aluminum content, and opportunities to modify the aluminum content by changing the manufacturer of the ingredients were explored.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of a random sample of 10 neonatal, 10 pediatric, and 10 adult patients who received PN solutions was performed to quantify the aluminum content in these solutions on the basis of the ingredients used at the authors' institution. A recalculation was performed using the lowest aluminumcontaining ingredients to determine the potential for aluminum minimization in each PN solution.

RESULTS

Various manufacturers produce each ingredient required to make PN solutions. Significant variation exists among manufacturers, vial size, and concentrations. Statistically significant differences in the mean aluminum content of PN solutions before and after aluminum minimization were found to exist within each sample of patients. Among the neonatal PN solutions, aluminum content was significantly reduced from a mean +/- S.D. of 84.16 +/- 47.61 to 33.6 +/- 16.69 mug/kg/day. The pediatric PN solutions had a significant decline in aluminum content from a mean +/- S.D. of 16.24 +/- 3.66 to 6.84 +/- 2.66 mug/kg/day. Aluminum content in the high-risk adult PN solutions significantly decreased from a mean +/- S.D. of 4.58 +/- 2.06 to 2.31 +/- 0.63 mug/kg/day.

CONCLUSION

There is wide variability in the aluminum concentration of injectable products used in the compounding of PN solutions. Selecting products with low aluminum concentration may substantially reduce the amount of the element administered to patients.

Aluminum load in ICU patients during stress ulcer prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence has linked high aluminum (Al) levels with toxicity and disease. Our objective was to evaluate the Al exposure of ICU patients receiving stress ulcer prophylaxis with sucralfate and ranitidine.

METHODS

Within a large prospective, randomized study, a subgroup of 30 critically ill, renally intact patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation who were being treated in intensive care units (ICU) of a university hospital were allocated to two prophylaxis subgroups: enteral sucralfate, 1 g six times daily by gastric tube (n=15), or intravenous ranitidine, 200 mg daily by 24-h continuous intravenous infusion (n=15). The Al content of large and small-volume parenterals was measured and Al intake calculated for each patient and day. Aluminum levels in serum and 24-h urine were monitored every 2 days during the 16-day observation period (days 0-15).

RESULTS

Mean daily parenteral Al exposure ranged from 101.3 to 158.7 mug/day for sucralfate and ranitidine patients, respectively. In both groups, Al serum levels increased from baseline on days 1-13 and on days 3-7 in the sucralfate and ranitidine groups, respectively. From days 3-13, Al serum levels were significantly higher with sucralfate than with ranitidine (P<0.05). On days 7-13, 24-h urinary Al excretion was also significantly higher in the sucralfate than in the ranitidine group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In ICU patients, only approximately 50% of parenterally administered Al is eliminated renally. Sucralfate additionally increases patients exposure to Al. In ICU patients, the mean absorption of enteral Al from sucralfate is only 0.019%.

Recent developments in aluminium contamination of products used in parenteral nutrition

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates recent developments concerning aluminium contamination of products used in the preparation of parenteral nutrition solutions and the failure of the pharmaceutical industry to respond to these concerns. The difficulty in meeting the intent of the recent US Food and Drug Administration mandate to reduce aluminium exposure with currently available parenteral nutrition additives is addressed. This review also summarizes the issues associated with aluminium toxicity, the patient populations at risk, treatment options, and compounding considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unfortunately, the published literature detailing the toxicities seen from aluminium exposure in the parenteral nutrition patient are primarily limited to those published in the 1980s and 1990s. Recent publications refer back to these classic papers and discuss the challenges that practitioners face when trying to apply the recommendations of the recently implemented Food and Drug Administration mandate with outdated literature. Few studies have been published to validate those earlier findings.

SUMMARY

The issues surrounding aluminium toxicity are real and must be addressed. In order to make meaningful changes in clinical practice, low aluminium parenteral nutrition additives are needed and studies must be conducted using currently available products. It remains a challenge to optimize nutritional intake from parenteral nutrition and at the same time reduce aluminium exposure.

Metabolic and catheter complications of parenteral nutrition

Since its introduction in the 1960s, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) has played a vital role in improving clinical outcomes for patients with acute and chronic illnesses. The evolution of TPN solutions and vascular access techniques, combined with an increased awareness and better understanding of the physiology of TPN, have improved the safety of this therapy. Nevertheless, complications are not uncommon and can be life threatening. This article provides an updated review on the metabolic and catheter complications associated with TPN.

Aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition and aluminum loading in children on long-term parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Children who are receiving parenteral nutrition are at risk of aluminum overload, which may contribute to such side effects as osteopenic bone disease. The aim of the present study is to determine the aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition solutions and their components, and to assess the aluminum status of children on long-term parenteral nutrition.

METHODS

Aluminum concentrations were determined by graphite furnace absorption spectroscopy in components and in final parenteral nutrition solutions. The urinary aluminum excretion and plasma aluminum concentration were determined in 10 children on long-term parenteral nutrition.

RESULTS

The mean aluminum concentration in the administered parenteral nutrition solutions was 1.6 +/- 0.9 micromol x l(-1)(mean +/- standard deviation (SD)). The resulting mean aluminum daily intake of the 10 patients was 0.08 +/- 0.03 micromol x kg(-1) x day(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to two previous studies performed in 1990 and in 1995 in our hospital, the aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition solutions and the daily aluminum intake of the children seemed to decrease. However, the plasma aluminum concentration and daily urinary aluminum excretion of the children still remain above normal standards. The children had no clinical symptoms of bone disease but aluminum accumulation in tissue can not be excluded. To prevent this iatrogenic toxicity, the aluminum contamination of parenteral nutrition should be assessed regularly.

Parenteral nutrition and immature neonates. Comparative study of neonates weighing under 1000 and 1000-1250 g at birth

We studied the nutritional requirements of 53 neonates with a birth-weight of 1250 g or less and analysed the parenteral and enteral nutrition provided, the weight-gain curves, the incidence of prior pathology and complications. We compared those weighing under 1000 g at birth (n=25) with those weighing 1001-1250 g (n=28). All neonates received central parenteral nutrition at an average age of 42.3 h. The liquid requirements of the lower birth-weight group were significantly greater. No differences were found in the supply of glucose, proteins, lipids and calories until after the first 15 days of life, when the <1000 g group required a greater liquid and caloric intake. Parenteral nutrition was suspended earlier for the >1000 g group (32.6 vs. 48.1 days). Maximum weight loss (12.56%) for the two groups occurred at 5.23 days. No differences in weight gain (g/kg/day) between the groups were observed. The >1000 g group began enteral nutrition significantly earlier and presented greater tolerance. The incidence of complications (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, enterocolitis, nosocomial sepsis, Candidas A sepsis, osteopenia) was greater in the lower birth-weight group, as was that of hyaline membrane disease and mechanically assisted respiration. There were no differences in the incidence of intracraneal haemorrhage, ductus arteriosus, early sepsis, delayed intrauterine growth or hypoglucemia.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of the initial pathology and the greater incidence of complications among the lower birth-weight neonates (<1000 g) influenced both the need for parenteral nutrition and the reduced tolerance to enteral nutrition. Although the rate of weight gain was similar for the two groups, the <1000 g group required a longer period of parenteral nutrition.

Aluminum balance in intensive care patients

Aluminum (Al) is a well known contaminant of intravenous solutions. The aim of the present study was the estimation of the aluminum load in patients of an intensive care unit (ICU). 15 patients with normal renal function took part. The study period was 15 days. Al was measured in serum, 24 h-urine and 132 samples of parenterals. Daily Al doses were recorded. Al balance was calculated on the basis of the iatrogenic Al dose and renal Al excretion. Al analysis was performed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) with Zeeman background correction under careful quality control. Solutions with Al levels >100 microg/l were: calcium salts, additives for parenteral nutrition solutions, antibiotics, acetylcysteine, triflupromazine, catecholamines and colloids. The Al content of solutions for parenteral nutrition ranged from 4.3 to 69 microg/l. Al doses amounted to 46-456 (median 119) microg/d, equivalent to 0.7 to 6.5 (median 1.7) microg/kg b.w. Renal Al excretion ranged from 10.5 to 723.1 microg/d (median 53 microg/d). These amounts partly exceeded the maximal dose (2 microg/kg b.w. per day), recommended by ASPEN/ASCN. Despite of the highly elevated renal Al excretion the median serum concentration of Al was only moderately increased (6.1 microg/l; range: <1.5 to 23.6 microg/l). However, calculations on the basis of the iatrogenic Al dose and renal Al excretion resulted in a net Al uptake (median) of 61 microg/d (maximum: 291 microg/d). Al amounts of this magnitude must be considered potentially harmful in ICU patients, especially with impaired renal function. Parenteral therapy resulted in a considerable Al dose with a positive Al balance in ICU patients. Threshold values for Al contamination of parenterally administered drugs and solutions should be established.

Influence of the glass packing on the contamination of pharmaceutical products by aluminium. Part II: amino acids for parenteral nutrition

The presence of aluminium in amino acids parenteral nutrition solutions can be related to the affinity of the amino acids for aluminium present in glass containers used for storage. For this study solutions of 19 amino acids used in parenteral nutrition were stored individually in glass flasks and the aluminium measured at determined time intervals. Solutions of complexing agents for aluminium, as ethylene-diaminetetraacetic acid, nitrilotriacetic acid, citrate, oxalate and fluoride ions were also stored in the same flasks and the aluminium measured during the same time interval. The measurements were made by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. The aluminium content of the glass containers was also measured. The results showed that the glasses have from 0.6% to 0.8% Al. Only solutions of cysteine, cystine, aspartic acid and glutamic acid became contaminated by aluminium. As the same occurred with the complexing agents, aluminum can be released from glass due to an affinity of the substances for aluminium. Comparing the action of complexing agents and amino acids for which the stability constants of aluminium complex are known, it is possible to relate the magnitude of the stability constant with the aluminium leached from glass, the higher the stability constant, the higher the aluminium released. The analysis of commercial formulations with and without cysteine, cystine, glutamic acid or aspartic acid stored in glass containers confirms that the presence of these amino acids combined with the age of the soLution are, at least partially, responsible for the aluminium contamination. The resuLts demonstrated that the contamination is an ongoing process due to the presence of aluminium in glass combined with the affinity of some amino acids for this element.

Liver dysfunction and parenteral nutritional therapies

Hepatobiliary dysfunction associated with the use of total parenteral nutrition is a commonly recognized phenomenon occurring in up to 90% of patients on long-term therapy. Reasons for these abnormalities, both supported by research as well as theoretical possibilities are explored. Practical guidelines considered useful in documenting, preventing and treating serious hepatic consequences of total parenteral nutrition are discussed. The role of combined liver and small bowel transplantation as treatment for select patients is also reviewed.

Abnormal trace elements in a patient on total parenteral nutrition with normal renal function

OBJECTIVE

To describe trace metal changes in a 74-year-old male patient with mesenteric fibrosis and a small bowel fistula who was maintained on total parenteral nutrition in the hospital and at home.

METHODS

Trace elements which included chromium and selenium were monitored over a 14-month period as part of his nutrient follow-up.

RESULTS

Serum chromium reached levels > 21-fold the upper reference range, and serum selenium, in contrast, was < 0.5 the lower reference range. Plasma aluminum was also measured, and found to be nearly twice the upper reference range, although the patient had normal renal function. We measured the aluminum content of the parenteral nutrients and additives, and found that replacement of calcium gluconate by calcium chloride helped to reduce the aluminum content in the final parenteral solution by 34%. Aluminum and chromium contaminants found in parenteral solutions need to be reduced or removed to avoid toxic accumulation.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the importance of adequately adjusting essential trace elements, and monitoring contaminants in parenteral fluids in an individual on total parenteral nutrition.

Parenteral nutrition: hospital to home

Parenteral nutrition support is the provision of essential nutrients intravenously, bypassing the intestinal tract. It is used in a variety of clinical settings and medical conditions. Parenteral nutrition is a complex technology that requires the input of many professionals, including dietitians. The role of the dietitian in parenteral nutrition support involves direct patient care, consultative services, education, program development, and research. Even though this field of practice is still developing, some common practices can be described. Nutrition assessment determination of macronutrient and micronutrient requirements, and monitoring are vital aspects of the provision of parenteral nutrition support that benefit from the knowledge and experience of a dietitian. The future of parenteral nutrition includes identification of preferred fuels for specific disease states, development of new lipid emulsions, and identification of conditionally essential nutrients.