Prevention of catheter-related sepsis during parenteral nutrition: effect of a new connection device

Impact of intermittent versus continuous infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in haemato-oncology patients: a quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND

Continuous fluid infusions delivered between therapies by piggy-back systems avoid disconnection and reconnection of central venous catheters (CVCs), thereby reducing opportunities for line contamination. However, the impact of continuous versus intermittent infusions on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is unknown.

AIM

To investigate the effect of temporary infusion interruption and line disconnection, with or without use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) on CLABSI rates in haematology patients.

METHODS

Quasi-experimental study in two haemato-oncology units. At baseline (P1, September 2020 to August 2021), continuous intravenous piggy-back infusions were mandatory. In a first intervention phase (P2, September 2021 to August 2022), infusion disconnections were implemented with use of a 70% isopropyl alcohol cap (IPA-C) for passive decontamination. In a second intervention phase (P3, September 2022 to August 2023), infusion disconnections continued without the use of IPA-C. Rates of CLABSI were compared across the three intervention periods using segmented Poisson regression.

FINDINGS

A total of 11,039 catheter-days across 764 CVCs and 16,226 patient-days were included. Twenty-one CLABSIs were recorded across all intervention periods. Compared with P1, incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for CLABSI did not significantly change in P2 (IRR 0.76 (95% CI 0.27-2.15)) and P3 (IRR 0.79 (95% CI 0.28-2.22)). No CVCs were removed due to occlusion during the study period. Five of 21 CLABSIs were polymicrobial, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 19/21 cases (90%).

CONCLUSION

Interruption of continuous infusions in haemato-oncology patients with a CVC was not associated with a substantial change in CLABSI rates, whether or not an IPA-C was used.

Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device–Related Infections

The “Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections” is designed to reduce the incidence of intravascular device-related infections by providing an over view of the evidence for recommendations considered prudent by consensus of Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisor y Committee (HICPAC) members. This two-part document updates and replaces the previously published Centers for Disease Control's (CDC) Guideline for Intravascular Infections (Am J Infect Control1983;11:183-199). Part I, “Intravascular Device-Related Infections: An Over view” discusses many of the issues and controversies in intravascular-device use and maintenance. These issues include definitions and diagnosis of catheter-related infection, appropriate barrier precautions during catheter insertion, inter vals for replacement of catheters, intravenous (IV) fluids and administration sets, catheter-site care, the role of specialized IV personnel, and the use of prophylactic antimi-crobials, flush solutions, and anticoagulants. Part II, “Recommendations for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections” provides consensus recommendations of the HICPAC for the prevention and control of intravascular device-related infections. A working draft of this document also was reviewed by experts in hospital infection control, internal medicine, pediatrics, and intravenous therapy. However, all recommendations contained in the guideline may not reflect the opinion of all reviewers.

Effect of Nurse Staffing and Antimicrobial-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters on the Risk for Bloodstream Infections in Intensive Care Units

Background:

Defining risk factors for central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs) is critical to establishing prevention measures, especially for factors such as nurse staffing and antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs.

Methods:

We prospectively monitored CVCs, nurse staffing, and patient-related variables for CVC-associated BSIs among adults admitted to eight ICUs during 2 years.

Results:

A total of 240 CVC-associated BSIs (2.8%) were identified among 4,535 patients, representing 8,593 CVCs. Antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs reduced the risk for CVC-associated BSI only among patients whose CVC was used to administer total parenteral nutrition (TPN, 2.6 CVC-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days vs no TPN, 7.5 CVC-associated BSIs per 1,000 CVC-days;P= .006). Among patients not receiving TPN, there was an increase in the risk of CVC-associated BSI in patients cared for by “float” nurses for more than 60% of the duration of the CVC. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for CVC-associated BSIs were the use of TPN in non-antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs (P= .0001), patient cared for by a float nurse for more than 60% of CVC-days (P= .0019), no antibiotics administered to the patient within 48 hours of insertion (P= .0001), and patient unarousable for 70% or more of the duration of the CVC (P= .0001). Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) were associated with a lower risk for CVC-associated BSI (P= .0001).

Conclusions:

Antimicrobial-impregnated CVCs reduced the risk of CVC-associated BSI by 66% in patients receiving TPN. Limiting the use of float nurses for ICU patients with CVCs and the use of PICCs may also reduce the risk of CVC-associated BSI.

Needleless closed system does not reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a retrospective study

The needleless closed system (NCS) has been disseminated in several clinical fields to prevent central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection (CVC-RBSI), in place of the conventional Luer cap system (LCS). The purpose of this study is to examine whether NCS is really superior to conventional LCS for prevention of CVC-RBSI. Between May 2002 and December 2008, 1767 patients received CVC in our department. The time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI was compared retrospectively between selected patients who were treated using the conventional LCS (group 1, n = 89, before June 2006) and the NCS (group 2, n = 406, June 2006 and after). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no significant difference in the time interval from insertion to development of CVC-RBSI between the two groups. NCS does not reduce CVC-RBSI in adult colorectal cancer patients who undergo CVC insertion.

Prevention of catheter-related infections using a closed hub system in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Most of the patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) receiving intravenous epoprostenol have experienced catheter-related infections during long-term treatment. Catheter hub was reported to be the most important source of catheter-related infections. To prevent the catheter-related infections, we have introduced a closed hub system and compared the incidence of catheter-related infections with that in patients using a non-closed hub system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated the results obtained on 24 occasions in 20 patients with PAH between June 1999 and December 2005. On 11 occasions, a non-closed hub system was used and on 13 cases a closed hub system. We classified the catheter-related infection into a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) group or a tunnel infection group based on the pathway of bacteria. The CRBSI rate was 0.89 per 1,000 catheter days in the non-closed hub system group vs 0.10 per 1,000 catheter days in the closed hub system group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the risk of CRBSI significantly decreased in the closed hub system group. None of the patients died as a direct consequence of catheter-related infection during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully prevented CRBSI by using a closed hub system.

The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the absolute and relative risks of bloodstream Infection (BSI) associated with the various types of intravascular devices (IVDs), we analyzed 200 published studies of adults In which every device in the study population was prospectively evaluated for evidence of associated infection and microbiologically based criteria were used to define IVD-related BSI.

METHODS

English-language reports of prospective studies of adults published between January 1, 1966, and July 1, 2005, were identified by MEDLINE search using the following general search strategy: bacteremla [Medical Subject Heading, MeSH] OR septicemia [MeSH] OR bloodstream Infection AND the specific type of intravascular device (e.g., central venous port). Mean rates of IVD-related BSI were calculated from pooled data for each type of device and expressed as BSIs per 100 IVDs (%) and per 1000 IVD days.

RESULTS

Point incidence rates of IVD-related BSI were lowest with peripheral Intravenous catheters (0.1%, 0.5 per 1000 IVD-days) and midline catheters (0.4%, 0.2 per 1000 catheter-days). Far higher rates were seen with short-term noncuffed and nonmedicated central venous catheters (CVCs) (4.4%, 2.7 per 1000 catheter-days). Arterial catheters used for hemodynamic monitoring (0.8%, 1.7 per 1000 catheter-days) and peripherally inserted central catheters used in hospitalized patients (2.4%, 2.1 per 1000 catheter-days) posed risks approaching those seen with short-term conventional CVCs used in the Intensive care unit. Surgically implanted long-term central venous devices--cuffed and tunneled catheters (22.5%, 1.6 per 1000 IVD-days) and central venous ports (3.6%, 0.1 per 1000 IVD-days)--appear to have high rates of Infection when risk Is expressed as BSIs per 100 IVDs but actually pose much lower risk when rates are expressed per 1000 IVD-days. The use of cuffed and tunneled dual lumen CVCs rather than noncuffed, nontunneled catheters for temporary hemodlalysis and novel preventive technologies, such as CVCs with anti-infective surfaces, was associated with considerably lower rates of catheter-related BSI.

CONCLUSIONS

Expressing risk of IVD-related BSI per 1000 IVD-days rather than BSIs per 100 IVDs allows for more meaningful estimates of risk. These data, based on prospective studies In which every IVD in the study cohort was analyzed for evidence of infection by microbiologically based criteria, show that all types of IVDs pose a risk of IVD-related BSI and can be used for benchmarking rates of infection caused by the various types of IVDs In use at the present time. Since almost all the national effort and progress to date to reduce the risk of IVD-related Infection have focused on short-term noncuffed CVCs used in Intensive care units, Infection control programs must now strive to consistently apply essential control measures and preventive technologies with all types of IVDs.

Options available for the infusion of lipid emulsion in home parenteral nutrition (HPN): a questionnaire survey for hospitals in Japan where HPN is practiced

OBJECTIVE

To understand the status of total parenteral nutritional (TPN) composition and the TPN line used for home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in Japan and to investigate how adequate nutritional support should be in HPN, we conducted a questionnaire survey.

METHODS

From February to March 2004, questionnaires were sent by mail to the members of the Japan Society for Home Therapy Research. With the content of the questionnaire, we surveyed 1) the types of medical staff who are involved in HPN, 2) the status of the preparation of TPN fluid and its place of preparation, 3) use of the TPN line and final filter, and 4) administration of lipid emulsion and All-in-One.

RESULTS

The major survey results from 66 respondents were that the 50% of the medical staff who are involved in HPN have more than 10 y of experience; however, the number of patients who used HPN and were treated by 78% of the medical staff was fewer than 50. With regard to TPN fluid, 50% was prepared in-house and 12% was prepared by home care service providers. In addition, 58% of institutions were infusing lipid emulsion from the side port of the TPN line or through a peripheral route because they used a final filter and closed system infusion line.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the final filter and closed system infusion line for HPN management is standard practice, lipid emulsion is not adequately used in Japan. Therefore, the All-in-One system including lipid emulsion is not used.

Prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients using a disinfectable, needle-free connector: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a disinfectable, needle-free connector in the prophylaxis of catheter-related bloodstream infection.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was performed in a polyvalent intensive care unit. Patients who needed multilumen central venous catheters were randomly assigned to a study or a control group. All catheters were inserted and manipulated according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Study group patients were equipped with catheters with disinfectable, needle-free connectors whereas control group patients were equipped with catheters with 3-way stopcocks. Two peripheral blood cultures and a semiquantitative culture of the catheter tip were performed on removal of the catheter.

RESULTS

The study included 243 patients, with a total of 278 central venous catheters. The catheters' mean insertion duration was 9.9 days. Both groups were comparable regarding patient and catheter characteristics. Incidence rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 0.7 per 1000 days of catheter use in the study group, compared with 5.0 per 1000 days of catheter use in the control group (P=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

To add a disinfectable, needle-free connector to the CDC recommendations reduces the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients with central venous catheters.

Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device–Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (i.e., education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

Infection rates in surgical neonates and infants receiving parenteral nutrition: a five-year prospective study

We performed a prospective, observational, cohort study on 208 surgical neonates and infants between 1992 and 1997. Surveillance cultures of the oropharynx and rectum were obtained at the start of parenteral nutrition and thereafter twice weekly. Blood cultures were taken on clinical indication only. Microbial translocation was diagnosed when the micro-organisms in the blood were not distinguishable from those carried in the oropharynx and/or rectum. Liver function was monitored weekly and when septicaemia was suspected. The incidence of septicaemia was 15%. The predominant micro-organisms (86%) were the low-level pathogens, coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci. Potential pathogens, including aerobic Gram-negative bacilli, were responsible for the remainder. Microbial translocation was responsible for 84% of septicaemic episodes in 76% of patients. The potential pathogens caused septicaemia significantly later than coagulase-negative staphylococci, at a time when liver function was significantly more impaired. In neonates and infants receiving parenteral nutrition, septicaemia is mainly a gut-derived phenomenon and requires novel strategies for prevention.

A review of risk factors for catheter-related bloodstream infection caused by percutaneously inserted, noncuffed central venous catheters: implications for preventive strategies

Strategies for preventing central venous catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection are most likely to be effective if guided by an understanding of the risk factors associated with these infections. In this critical review of published studies of risk factors for CVC-related bloodstream infection that were prospective and used multivariable techniques of data analysis or that were randomized trials of a preventive measure, a significantly increased risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection was associated with inexperience of the operator and nurse-to-patient ratio in the intensive care unit, catheter insertion with less than maximal sterile barriers, placement of a CVC in the internal jugular or femoral vein rather than subclavian vein, placement in an old site by guidewire exchange, heavy colonization of the insertion site or contamination of a catheter hub, and duration of CVC placement > 7 days. Prospective studies or randomized trials of control measures focusing on these risk factors have been shown to reduce risk significantly: formal training in CVC insertion and care, use of maximal sterile barriers at insertion, use of chlorhexidine rather than povidone-iodine for cutaneous antisepsis, applying a topical anti-infective cream or ointment or a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to the insertion site, and the use of novel catheters with an anti-infective surface or a contamination resistant hub. Better prospective studies of sufficient size to address all potential risk factors, including insertion site and hub colonization, insertion technique, and details of follow-up care, would enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of CVC-related bloodstream infection and guide efforts to develop more effective strategies for prevention.

Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S

These guidelines have been developed for practitioners who insert catheters and for persons responsible for surveillance and control of infections in hospital, outpatient, and home health-care settings. This report was prepared by a working group comprising members from professional organizations representing the disciplines of critical care medicine, infectious diseases, health-care infection control, surgery, anesthesiology, interventional radiology, pulmonary medicine, pediatric medicine, and nursing. The working group was led by the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), in collaboration with the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), Surgical Infection Society (SIS), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), American Thoracic Society (ATS), American Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists (ASCCA), Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), Infusion Nurses Society (INS), Oncology Nursing Society (ONS), Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR), American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and is intended to replace the Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular Device-Related Infections published in 1996. These guidelines are intended to provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing catheter-related infections. Major areas of emphasis include 1) educating and training health-care providers who insert and maintain catheters; 2) using maximal sterile barrier precautions during central venous catheter insertion; 3) using a 2% chlorhexidine preparation for skin antisepsis; 4) avoiding routine replacement of central venous catheters as a strategy to prevent infection; and 5) using antiseptic/antibiotic impregnated short-term central venous catheters if the rate of infection is high despite adherence to other strategies (ie, education and training, maximal sterile barrier precautions, and 2% chlorhexidine for skin antisepsis). These guidelines also identify performance indicators that can be used locally by health-care institutions or organizations to monitor their success in implementing these evidence-based recommendations.

The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices

Intravascular devices (IVDs) are widely used for vascular access but are associated with substantial risk of development of IVD-related bloodstream infection (BSI). The development of novel technologies, which are based on an understanding of pathogenesis, promises a quantum reduction in IVD-related infections in an era of growing nursing shortages. Infections of short-term IVDs (that is, those in place <10 days), including peripheral venous catheters, noncuffed and nontunneled central venous catheters (CVCs), and arterial catheters, derive mainly from microorganisms colonizing the skin around the insertion site, which most often gain access extraluminally. More-effective cutaneous antiseptics, such as chlorhexidine, a chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge dressing, CVCs with an anti-infective coating, anti-infective CVC hubs, and novel needleless connectors, have all been shown to reduce the risk of IVD-related BSI in prospective randomized trials. The challenge for the future will be to identify new preventative technologies and to begin to adapt more widely those technologies already shown to be efficacious and cost-effective.

Changing profile of parenteral nutrition in pediatric surgery: a 30-year experience at one institute

BACKGROUND

Due to technical refinements and steady advances in the development of highly sophisticated nutrient solutions consisting of optimal combinations of macronutrients and micronutrients, parenteral nutrition (PN) is now playing an important role in patient management. However, some PN-associated complications, such as catheter-related sepsis (CRS) and cholestasis, continue at high incidence, particularly in neonates. The objective of this study was to investigate the changing profiles of PN over the past 30 years in our department.

METHODS

The medical records of 893 children (225 neonates, 245 infants, 261 preschool-age children, and 162 school-age children) who were placed on PN for >7 days in our department were reviewed, and the following data were extracted: birth weight, underlying disease, indications for PN, PN delivery route, type of catheter used, duration of PN, substrate and energy intake, type of amino acid solution used, and incidence of complications including CRS and liver dysfunction. The results were analyzed by dividing the patients into 3 groups according to their basic stages in management of PN and consisted of group 1 (1970 to 1979), group 2 (1980 to 1989), and group 3 (1990 to 1999). The parameters were compared in each group.

RESULTS

The total number of patients in each group showed no significant difference; however, the percentage of low birth-weight neonates increased in group 3. In group 1, 85% of PN was administered through the peripheral vein; in group 2, 51.2%; and in group 3, 9.7%. The total calorie and nutrient intake decreased in groups 2 and 3 compared with group 1, particularly regarding fat intake. In groups 1 and 2, commercially available amino acid solution based on the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization formula was usually used as the nitrogen source, but in group 3, it was changed to an amino acid solution for children. CRS decreased significantly, particularly in neonates, and occurred at a rate of 45.4% in group 1, 10.7% in group 2, and 1.5% in group 3. The incidence of liver dysfunction also showed a decrease: 35.7% in group 1, 22.3% in group 2, and 18.0% in group 3. A multivariate analysis showed a strong relationship between PN-related liver dysfunction and the duration of PN, the presence of infection, and the type of amino acid solution used.

CONCLUSIONS

PN via central venous catheters has been regarded as safe and effective treatment in pediatric surgical patients. Over the past 30 years, the incidence of CRS has decreased. However, PN-related liver dysfunction remains a problem, particularly in patients receiving long-term PN.

Reality check: should we use vancomycin for the prophylaxis of intravascular catheter-associated infections?

The use of intravascular catheters is associated with increased risk of bloodstream infections, principally caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. This "Reality Check" session, held at the 4th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associated Infections, focused on the question of whether, and in what manner, vancomycin should be used for the prophylaxis of these infections

Prevention of infections caused by central venous catheters--established and novel measures

Intravascular catheters play an important role in infections in intensive care and hemodialysis patients. This becomes evident only if full microbiological diagnoses are made. Difficulties in the diagnosis and treatment of microbially colonized catheters make the prevention of infection particularly important. The most important preventive measures are a strict evaluation of the indications for the use of the catheter and strict hygienic precautions during insertion and maintenance of the central venous catheter. Other measures, some of which are controversial, may be considered, such as the specific decontamination of Staphylococcus carriers using mupirocin. A new approach in the prevention of catheter-related infections is the use of catheter materials impregnated with antibiotics, antiseptics or metals. Slow-delivery systems release the antimicrobially active substance from the catheter material and thus reduce the proliferation of adherent bacteria. Some of these slow-delivery systems have been used in clinical trials, with varied results. Current research is directed towards the prevention of the first stage in the pathogenesis of catheter-associated infections, namely the adherence of bacteria to the catheter polymer, e.g. by impregnation of the polymer with silver. Laboratory studies, animal experiments and initial clinical trials suggest that it will soon be possible to reduce the frequency of catheter-associated infections to below the levels attainable with current general and specific preventive measures, through the use of coated catheters.

Prevention of catheter sepsis: the hub

The prevention of catheter sepsis lies in a sound understanding of the routes through which catheters get contaminated. The catheter hub has been recognized as a portal for microorganisms causing catheter sepsis, particularly in central venous catheters inserted for > 1 wk. Bacteria and fungi may reach the internal surface of the catheter connector during manipulation by hospital staff and then colonize the entire lumen of the catheter. Endoluminal contamination has diagnostic, therapeutic, and preventive implications. Some traditional preventive approaches (site care, subcutaneous cuffs and tunnels, maximal aseptic barriers at the time of catheter insertion, and external antiseptic or antibiotic coating) may fail because they focus solely on the skin as a source of bacteria. Hub-related catheter sepsis can be prevented by aseptic hub manipulation, appropriate junction protection, and by reducing the number of catheter lumens, side ports, three-way stopcocks, and changes of the infusion sets. Needleless systems must be evaluated in terms of their safety in preventing endoluminal contamination. A new disinfecting catheter hub incorporating an antiseptic barrier has been developed and reduced hub-related catheter sepsis by more than 90%. The endoluminal route of intravascular catheter contamination must be taken into account when designing strategies for the diagnosis and prevention of catheter-related sepsis.